I've used a different but similar way on redacted PDF docs before. Maybe some of you have seen the feature where acrobat (or whichever PDF reader has the feature) will read the doc to you? If the author didn't do the redactions properly it will read you the same redacted text that you can copy and paste using the method 4chan is talking about.
@DemPanicAtTheDisco .. 8 hours ago +7 / -0
Today I'm thankful for Elon Musk & DOGE canceling the multiple expensive Adobe Acrobat Pro memberships which have the "redact" function... Which forced incompetent government officials running the free version of Adobe Acrobat to use Black blocks for redactions on the Epstein files which were easily bypassed by the cut n paste feature. 😂
Seriously guys, this is likely what happened.
"Redact to permanently remove sensitive visible information available on paid Acrobat Pro licenses" (not available on free version)
Not the first time they have done something like this, I forget which files they were but the redacted words could be read very well in a text editor. This was around 2018 time.
To prove this we could go to another case not related to Epstein and find something redacted and copy and paste that out—like Weiner laptop case or Hunter.
It will show the intentional or maybe over the years it was just always sitting there?
reminds me of post 749 -->That choice, to know, will be yours
Coincidence the Matrix (movie) grew people as a crop, used for energy, and controlled their mind?
Sound familiar?
Wonder where they derived that idea from.
Now comes the 'conspiracy' label.
Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes.
THE END won't be for everyone.
That choice, to know, will be yours.
Q
The redacted information mostly reveals parties other than Epstein were spreading payments around and commiting fraud. The Clinton Foundation was not mentioned by name, but I bet that's where this is going.
WOWSA! This is gonna be fun!
Exactly 💯
It had to be this way
Absolutely an intentional play. Bravo!
Yeehaw!!! Was that accidentally on purpose??
I'm having flashbacks of homobama's birth certificate with multiple layers.
Pretty sure the white hats swapped the version that was uploaded to the White House.gov site. I still have my original copy.
This wasn't an "accident". Nobody is that incompetent.
They wanted it to come out with plausible deniability so they could maintain a narrative.
Honestly can't figure out where the plot of this movie is headed.
LOL. Get in there.
Dear sweet baby Jesus, on eve of the the celebration of your birth, help us shine light on this evil. Amen.
I'm sure they will be fixing this issue pretty quickly once they're aware.
Wouldn't matter, the files were downloaded immediately. The horse is out of the barn.
From my understanding they never fixed Obama's birth certificate, it can still be downloaded from the gov website lol
Er, unless it was deliberate.
Question: When is a set of redacted files not a set of redacted files?
Answer: When you can unredact them using a pdf viewer.
AND THE EPSTEIN FILES ARE NOW "PUBLIC DOMAIN"...which means ANYONE in those files is fair game and NOT SO SECRET ANYMORE!!!!!!!
OOOOH MY...there just might be a lil' squishy drawer(s) and the gurgling of those stomach acids!!!!!!!
... and it shows how lame at journalism the Lamestream Enemedia really is.
More like Lamestream Enema-dia....
Kek
*Enema-dia
Merry Christmas! ✝️
Of course it was deliberate. Our side is smart and sending their best unlike the dummies on the other side.
Which file? Tried this on some of them, didn't work
When I tried it earlier from the DOJ site it appeared to work but after looking at downloaded Dataset 7 and 8 haven't had any joy.
72 hour rule for click pay
Same. I pulled a random PDF from dataset 8 and the redactions are not copyable. I was using Adobe Acrobat and also tried with Edge.
I saw this video of Asmongold doing it as well lol
https://youtu.be/-BLp3PiRqWg
I've used a different but similar way on redacted PDF docs before. Maybe some of you have seen the feature where acrobat (or whichever PDF reader has the feature) will read the doc to you? If the author didn't do the redactions properly it will read you the same redacted text that you can copy and paste using the method 4chan is talking about.
Now all the libtards are turning into ''anons'' scrubbing through the files to find orange man bad!
From todays general chat:
@DemPanicAtTheDisco .. 8 hours ago +7 / -0 Today I'm thankful for Elon Musk & DOGE canceling the multiple expensive Adobe Acrobat Pro memberships which have the "redact" function... Which forced incompetent government officials running the free version of Adobe Acrobat to use Black blocks for redactions on the Epstein files which were easily bypassed by the cut n paste feature. 😂
Seriously guys, this is likely what happened.
"Redact to permanently remove sensitive visible information available on paid Acrobat Pro licenses" (not available on free version)
The BHs have been hiding behind incompetence forever.
Is turnabout fair-play?
u/#pepecozy Happy Christmas to all!
Not the first time they have done something like this, I forget which files they were but the redacted words could be read very well in a text editor. This was around 2018 time.
OBAMA Birth Certificate PDF...remember? Worked the first time, second time even better 🤣👍🍿
Hurry. Pepe
Kek. https://x.com/RealFletch17/status/2003551688268152967
Oh!
It is about the Clinton (?)Foundation. Southern Trust Foundation?
Whoops!
Summary table here
https://twitter.com/JohnnyFreeze92/status/2003604454428590430
What a lovely Christmas present!
Beautiful. I want more “government incompetence favoring us plebs” events.
intentional maybe?
To prove this we could go to another case not related to Epstein and find something redacted and copy and paste that out—like Weiner laptop case or Hunter.
It will show the intentional or maybe over the years it was just always sitting there?
Goodness gracious! I didn't know Papi was starting the Easter egg hunt this early.
reminds me of post 749 -->That choice, to know, will be yours
Coincidence the Matrix (movie) grew people as a crop, used for energy, and controlled their mind? Sound familiar? Wonder where they derived that idea from. Now comes the 'conspiracy' label. Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes. THE END won't be for everyone. That choice, to know, will be yours. Q
And excerpts reveal that the redactions were merely to protect special people and not necessarily victims. We are being gaslighted as usual.
72 hours
The redacted information mostly reveals parties other than Epstein were spreading payments around and commiting fraud. The Clinton Foundation was not mentioned by name, but I bet that's where this is going.
HOLY FUCK.