Nancy Mace tried to force Congress to release its own sexual misconduct records today.
357 members voted to stop her.
(twitter.com)
🏛️ PANIC IN DC 🏛️
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Great. We know of 357 confirmed pedophiles now. Thanks for playing the game, but the ride ends here!
Make sure you vote for Nancy. She would not do that if she has shit in her background. The fake news have been trying hard to destroy her.
I would if I lived in her state lol. I'll do my part, though, and invest in woodchippers and millstones.
Since when has being in another state... errr being from another country...errr being an illegal alien ever stop someone from voting😀
Pfff... RIGHT?! I can't believe I follow the rule of law around here!
Howls.
It was a smart move. I'm guessing there's a few old-fashioned cheats in the mix that didn't want to have to go home to an angry spouse / family, so not all pedos.
That's not to say they should be excused - if they can't keep their own house clean, why should we trust them with ours?
why should we pay their legal bills
We shouldn't. Personal problems should be a personal expense. Same for corporations.
Madison Cawthorn Reveals WILD Details Of Politicians Partying?!
Just to call it out, this is about sexual misconduct, not always pedophilia. Like the congressional staffer who was having sex in the Capitol Building with another man. (congressman?)
Things like this, affairs, anything sexual that can be settled for money to make it go away.
Can't wait until those "men" GET THEIR COMUPPANCE AND GET MARCHED OUT OF THE CAPITAL IN CUFFS!!!!!!!
You do realize both men and women voted to stop her, right?
Anons shouldn't forget that we still have the Brunson Brothers case on the back burner.
It is the 'nuclear' option with regards to removing the Deep State assets in Congress. It effectively nullifies their office, as they have all violated their oaths of office.
Everyone crying "no arrests" need to understand. It isn't one of them. It isn't a few of them. It isn't even some of them. It is the vast majority of them. As Q told us; it had to be this way.
I believe the Save Act and the Mid Terms are the last effort of the White Hats to remove the Deep State through Civilian Law. After that, if the Deep State still wants to play ball, it will be Military Law they will have to content with should they try to disrupt or tamper with the elections this time.
Everything takes forever and I know.
Can you update on the status of the Brunson case? I thought SCOTUS denied cert and it was dead in the water.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Z9v9MYatJDe The Brunson Brothers case has ALREADY been the voted on by SCOTUS AND WON (a 5 to 4 vote)
chatGPT:
No — the claim that the “Brunson Brothers case has already been voted on by SCOTUS and won 5-to-4” is not true.
What’s documented in actual court records and credible reporting is this:
The lawsuit known as Brunson v. Adams et al. (filed by Raland J. Brunson and others) sought to challenge the 2020 presidential election results and remove President Biden and other federal officials from office based on allegations of oath-of-office violations. That case and related petitions were denied by the U.S. Supreme Court — meaning the Court refused to hear it rather than ruling on the merits. The denials were documented by multiple sources reporting on the Supreme Court’s orders declining to grant review. 
The Supreme Court did not conduct a full hearing, did not issue a 5–4 decision in favor of the Brunson brothers, and did not reinstate Donald Trump as president based on any such vote. The justices simply declined to grant certiorari (i.e., they chose not to review the case). 
Versions of the claim that SCOTUS “voted 5–4 and won” appear to come from unofficial forums, rumors, or fringe discussions — not from official Supreme Court records or reliable news reporting. 
If you want, I can point you to the official Supreme Court docket entries and explain how to interpret them.
Can you provide any source for that other than a bitchute video? When I look at the SCOTUS docket all I can see is that the SCOTUS declined to hear both of the Brunson cases on Feb 21, 2023 and July 22. 2024, respectively.
As I have been telling you before I go to schools as a guest teacher, the education system is so bad that I believe the teacher I was substituting yesterday has not been for a week, he is gone and he is new. The students are practically Latinos and black few white ones, six and seven periods were behaving bad and they feel they are entitled that we owe something to them, they are illegals, but the students knew I didn’t care so they stopped the crap and starting their own thing. That’s why we have pedophiles in the schools like in one of the posts was talking we are paying a lot of those settlements because the education administrators are not removing them. They need teachers so these psychopaths administrators help their own. I believe the system needs to begin closing and start a new one. God bless USA.
I wouldn't send my dogs to school.
Oh no, they can’t talk plus they will be raped 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Can you believe?
I agree...time to take apart an education system that can't teach. My grandchildren need to not be taught by the current system. I am fortunate that they have parents who see the problems and are looking at solutions like Homeschooling. Only a small part of a big problem in our country right now....but at least I feel some control over this piece.
💯 with you. I am glad your grandchildren are homeschool, what I have seen in those schools are bunch of illegals that don’t care about the education that had been given to them (free) from us the taxpayers, but soon they will find out what is FAFO
That just shows you how widespread it is.
She said she saw the names in Epstein file. It will put most to the hospital or something similar to what Q said.
Great idea.
Just vote for the right people and take down the Federal Reserve.
I wish many of us (the ones not compromised) would step up and help. Many of the ones on the list are those that Trump did not endorsed.
3/4 out of a state.
I'm in
It is abhorrent to me we must pay for their criminal peccadillos!
I want my money back.
Me too!
357 just raised their hand and said "I am guilty of being a piece of shit criminal thug"
How you can tell, maybe?
Could a citizen pursue freedom of information act since American taxpayers dollars are involved?
Wondering about that.
MY GUT, has always been that we need a complete NEW system of Governance WW. I dont know what it will look like BUT this is UNACCEPTIBLE.!!
Scottish comedian, Billy Connolly, used to say that if anyone ever wanted to become a politician that should automatically bar them from ever becoming one!
That's beautiful
Have a bonus video of him saying it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58OBTi18bsY&t=41s
Noice!
Thanks fren
I agree. It’s a problem in the entire world, where we have modelled our governments on the Anglo system.
It’s just a facade of participation by the citizens, the public servants control everything and are completely unaccountable.
We are, tax cattle. Mere serfs to do their bidding.
Among other things, I’d expect it needs to:
Just some thoughts.
We escaped royalty to install it again.
Animal Farm
I think we should at least know the ones who were paid off with the sexual abuse hush funds . I don’t need to know the ugly details of them all. I am willing to listen to anyone who claims false allegations were made. After all, our President was framed by malicious persecution for alleged sexual misconduct. These bums are either compromised or otherwise unworthy of their positions.
You know, anyone that you did not see Trump endorsed, you can pretty much be sure it's on that list.
Isnt it illegal to knowingly support any type of fraud/sexual harassment? So if I pay my taxes am I participating in that fraud.........
Of course.
Didn't she also wanted to fine employers who hire illegals.
https://www.wsav.com/news/your-local-election-hq/rep-nancy-mace-proposes-1000-per-day-fine-for-knowingly-hiring-undocumented-immigrants-in-south-carolina/
Ok - here's a way better list. I asked Grok to make a list of the yeas and nays, add in their whole names, genders, political parties, and the states they represent.
You can open this in Excel or OpenOffice Calc or just open it in a text editor. It is just a csv file (will import into Excel) so it is all text.
I tried pasting the text here but the list is way too long - it truncated in the "Ls".
https://files.catbox.moe/l0qj5d.csv
Thank you so much.
No problem. Everyone should look at it and see where their reps stand.
I already did. 3/4 corrupt.
Over one half of the entire House is gained by that ...think about that
Think Federal Reserve or Epstein file.
Any sexual misconduct should be grounds for IMMEDIATE expulsion from political office because any such person is compromised and subject to blackmail. Thats why the deep state only wants creeps in office.
I agree.
Some former Navy Seals are on this list: Zinke, Lutrell and Van Orden (this guy was a leader!) These men not agreeing to reveal criminal activity and subsequent taxpayer-funded payouts to victims SHOCKS ME. Sorry, it does - although my naivety has matured a lot since Crenshaw revealed his depravity.
thank you.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Z9v9MYatJDe The Bruson Brothers case was heard & voted on by SCOTUS 5 to 4
There are no active Brunson cases.
Here's Grok referencing all of the cases. It pulled all of them from the SCOTUS website. It also checked newspaper sources.
All of the Brunson cases (the election-related lawsuits filed by Raland J. Brunson and his brother Loy Arlan Brunson) that reached the U.S. Supreme Court have been completely denied.
These cases claimed that hundreds of members of Congress, President Biden, Vice President Harris, and others violated their oaths of office by certifying the 2020 election results without further investigation into alleged fraud. They sought removal of those officials from office. Lower courts dismissed them for lack of standing and other reasons, and SCOTUS never granted review on the merits in any of them.
Here are the specific petitions to SCOTUS and their outcomes (all certiorari petitions denied, with rehearings also denied where filed; no cases were heard or decided on the merits):
Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al. (Docket No. 22-380)
Petition for writ of certiorari denied January 9, 2023.
Petition for rehearing denied February 21, 2023.
Loy Arlan Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al. (Docket No. 22-1028)
Petition for writ of certiorari denied in 2023 (after docketing in April 2023).
The case was fully resolved with no SCOTUS review granted.
Raland J. Brunson v. Sonia Sotomayor, et al. (Docket No. 23-1073; this one sued the three liberal justices for their role in denying the earlier petition).
Petition for writ of certiorari denied May 28, 2024 (Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson recused themselves as named parties).
Petition for rehearing denied July 22, 2024.
No other Brunson-related petitions involving these claims have been filed at SCOTUS since, and none have been granted or remain pending as of March 2026.
A separate, unrelated Brunson case (involving a different person) appeared in a 2024 order list but was also denied/dismissed for procedural reasons and is not connected to these matters.
In short, SCOTUS has uniformly declined to take up any of these cases, consistent with its usual practice of denying the vast majority of cert petitions.
Thanks. I will go check it out.
Can’t these records be FOIA’d to see them?
Heard of stonewall?
Just leak the records like everyone else does kek
She is more decent than that.
INSANITY!!!!
In what sane, rational world is this even a thing?
How many of you have a SMR????
u/#wtf