🟨(OZ = Ounces of Gold. The Yellow Brick Road = The Gold Standard.)
They told us it was a children’s story.
It was actually a warning about bankers, courts, corporations, and the legal fiction system.
Here’s the truth:
🧠 THE STRAW MAN
Not a real man, a legal creation.
He receives a certificate instead of a brain…
just like we receive a Birth Certificate that creates the ALL-CAPS legal PERSON.
🛠 THE TIN MAN (TIN = Taxpayer Identification Number)
A soulless machine that works until it freezes and collapses.
The symbol of the worker who becomes “rusted out” by nonstop taxation and labour.
🦁 THE COWARDLY LION
Loud roar, no courage.
Just like politicians, judges and officials with titles but no true authority.
🔥 THE WIZARD
Smoke, fire, and a giant hologram head…
but behind the curtain is just a scared little man.
A perfect metaphor for modern government:
Illusion of authority
Backed by fear
No real power once the curtain is pulled back
🧹 THE WICKED WITCH (BAR & Policy Enforcers)
Controls the flying monkeys, the police.
Intimidation, threats, fear.
She melts when exposed to truth and lawful jurisdiction.
🌺 THE POPPY FIELD
Dorothy collapses — drugged.
The others don’t — because they’re not real humans.
A warning about Rockefeller medicine and mass sedation.
🐶 TOTO (Truth, Totality)
Toto = “in toto” = “the whole truth.”
Small, unnoticed, but fearless.
Toto pulls the curtain and exposes the illusion.
That’s why the Witch wanted him —
not Dorothy.
Truth is the biggest threat to the system.
⚡ THE VEIL IS FALLING
The Wizard of Oz wasn’t fantasy.
It was a coded message:
• The banking system is an illusion
• Corporate government is a façade
• Courts are theatres
• The ALL-CAPS NAME is not you
• The real power was always yours
Ah it was actually Arthur Freed that flashed Shirley and a couple of years later, but at the same time however Mayer was propositioning her mother. However MGM and the Temples wanted her for Wizard Of Oz big time, but Fox flat refused. Makes you wonder if they knew what sort of thing was going on with the men over at MGM.
It WAS fantasy. The Wizard of Oz was one of Rockefellers greatest post "1929 Crash" creations. It was designed to put the truth in FANTASY FORM as a form of programming AKA mind control.
It was a coded message:
It was a coded message. A subliminal message. One you are strongly encouraged to relegate as fantasy.
Using fantasy to tell the truth is incredibly powerful. Rockefeller (et al) had been doing that for years. The movie industry (completely created and controlled by Rockefeller) was designed to do exactly that, to control the Minds of Men. That was it's ENTIRE PURPOSE.
By encoding the truth in fantasy form you believe in the fake world that is presented to you from the "trusted sources;" the media ("that is the safeguard against the evil oligarchs and would never lie to you"), the 9 to 5 job that is your most important "reality," etc.. The entertainment industry (bread and circuses) is designed to distract you from the "real world;" to help you go back to the reality that sucks (that they created). Encoding the truth in fantasy form dissociates the message from the truth of it and reenforces what you have to deal with in your shitty "real world."
If it is "fantasy," then it can't be reality.
The Wizard of Oz was created by the same people who created the OSS and then the CIA and then MKUltra, etc. They create inversions of reality: Truth is fantasy, Lies are the truth. ALL SIDES of information are inversions, all sides are controlled opposition. All sides are missing the most important pieces of information:
The Primary Teaching (which has been hidden from the world for a very, VERY long time).
People are programmed to believe in the "reality" they are presented with. Those who dig deeper find that the truth has been hidden. Most will go back into the program (especially prior to 2020). The Program is a much safer world. Those who see it is false are vilified, but that vilification is just another "box" created by the same entity, a controlled opposition. Thanks to Q, MANY more people appreciate that our vision has been veiled, and we are no longer vilified for challenging the Main Narrative.
While many have seen that now, there are still so many that think that because the first level of the Matrix has been shown to them that they now know the truth. But that's just the first level; what we call "the Matrix" that we are "breaking free from" is itself controlled opposition.
There is another veil. Through time the Primary Teaching keeps getting pushed into the zeitgeist by "enlightened masters," but the PTB keep it hidden right after they die (or are killed). The last unveiling and subsequent hiding (in the "western world") occurred about two thousand years ago.
So many insist that the veil created for them in the second to fourth centuries is that Primary Teaching. It is not. It is in there; it is ALWAYS (and always has been) in there (because it resonates with both Us and Truth, and thus can't be completely eliminated); but it is intentionally obfuscated, hidden by the PTB through controlled opposition.
It's going to take a bit to untangle the next veil because "We already know the truth, and anyone who challenges that truth is a 'crazy conspiracy theorist'" (or more appropriately, a "heretic").
Q helped us untangle the "conspiracy theorist" veil. The next revelation is untangling the "heretic" veil.
The Primary Teaching is in there, but you can't untangle the veil until you realize that it exists, that your "absolute truth and trust" is the opposite of the Truth.
The Wizard of Oz was one of Rockefellers greatest post "1929 Crash" creations. It was designed to put the truth in FANTASY FORM as a form of programming AKA mind control.
"The first edition had a printing of 10,000 copies and was sold in advance of the publication date of September 1, 1900." Enjoy your movie FANTASY though
I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to help create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.
In it's book form, in 1900, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper quartile (at best) of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.
In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time (or even heard of by the vast majority of the planet) until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation and the PTB didn't care. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie formbecause it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.
It sold out first printing of 10,000 in the first month. And in 1900 everyone could and did read, unlike today. The even understood metaphors like this story.
"The ground-breaking success of both the original 1900 novel and the 1902 musical prompted Baum to write thirteen additional Oz books, which serve as official sequels to the first story. Over a century later, the book is one of the best-known stories in American literature, and the Library of Congress has declared the work to be "America's greatest and best-loved homegrown fairytale".
I can show, beyond any reasonable doubt (if you bother to read my book), that all information has been completely controlled pretty much for forever (since the Roman Empire at least). All publishers have been completely controlled (see Jakob Fugger and his creation of what we call "media" and his domination of the printing press and printers guild). This control has existed completely the whole time, and anyone who investigates it finds exactly that: a Banker Cabal controls everything using control of information and controlled opposition (both "for" and "against" paid for by the same Banker Cabal once you dig into the money trail). We try so hard to believe that things are organic because it's an easier pill to swallow than the alternative. Investigation proves otherwise.
In the case of books, if any publication (which is completely controlled by the media) was pushed to the public (a "book review" e.g.) it was done by the media which was also completely controlled. Every newspaper was controlled. Every "book review" was controlled. Whether it was organic or intentional, it was allowed by the Control System.
If something happens that is not allowed (the The Protocols of the Elders of Zion e.g.), it is stamped down into oblivion. The person who stamped down the Protocols e.g. was a person called Allen Dulles (in 1921). Allen Dulles (at the time) was a top level Rockefeller lawyer (who helped him take over South America). He, along with Rockefeller (and others) cocreated the CFR (at the same time), then the OSS, and eventually the CIA. As an agent of Rockefeller, in a NYT 1921 (iirc) paper (also owned by Rockefeller and Morgan) he stamped down The Protocols definitively by "debunking" it. His "authoritative report", stopped all people from allowing themselves to read it or talk about it in fear of being called an "anti-semite" (a phrase created by Rothschild to ensure a specific narrative which led to and guided WWI, WWII, the state of Isreal, the UN, the Cold War and eventually "The Matrix").
The only reason anyone even read it widespread to begin with was because it was pushed by a controlled opposition publisher. Did it start as a true opposition? Possibly. Probably imo. But it became widespread once it became big enough to matter. It became an effort of controlled opposition as soon as it had any meaningful readership. Then by pushing it bigger, they had a big enough audience to stamp it down into oblivion.
That is how controlled opposition works. That is shown, in gory detail, time and time again once you follow the money and the Board of Directors (the men behind the curtain).
The way to read history is to understand what actually happened (e.g. the Protocols were shut down by contrivance by an "authority" but ultimately controlled by both sides). Learn how to ignore "who was doing what for the obvious reasons." The money and the financial and family ties prove it's all controlled opposition. The House always wins because they control everything as soon as it matters to become meaningful.
The only reason anyone even read it wi despread to begin with was because it was pushed by a controlled opposition publisher.
You do realize like movies of today it was a kids book? And opposition , controlled or otherwise , must use truth to slip their lies in and some can distinguish between the two.
The House always wins because they control everything... until they don't and is why progress comes in fits and starts
But this sort of Hubris has always been the failing of those who would Gods.
And in 1900 everyone could and did read, unlike today.
You really need to learn about the history of education. Yes, many people could read by that time, but the average person didn't have any leisure time to read at all. And no one had a "high school education." In 1900 there was less than 5% of the US with a high school education, and all high schools were controlled by Rockefeller by that time (by 1890 it was less than 1%. He had started his "reeducation program" by 1880). Every persons high school level was related to their family income (there was no such thing as "public high school" yet, not until Rockefeller created it over 30 years later).
NO ONE WAS READING FANTASY BOOKS. By "no one" I don't mean "zero people." Don't make a categorical error to push a false argument. It was very few people, and it was related to income, and most importantly, it was all controlled on every single level, by the same entity. So if it happened, it was intentional.
Well, I encountered the Oz books in grade school when I was less than 10 years old and I enjoyed reading them. They were in the school library. Other children read them. Why do you go on about a "high school education" when it was a children's story?
Are you aware that most children's stories are fantasy? Did you never read "The Wind in the Willows" (1908) as a child? Or Peter Pan (1911)? Or "Treasure Island" (1883)? I'm sorry to tell you that none of this was high school material.
I encountered the Oz books in grade school when I was less than 10 years old and I enjoyed reading them.
Were you 10 in 1900? Or even 1939? What is the context of what I was exposing? Can you transfer your context to a context decades earlier and assume they have the same meaning in a broader conversation? Are you aware of how much changed in the decades in between. all the social engineering, the population demographics, the education demographics, and who paid for it and controlled it and how?
Why do you go on about a "high school education" when it was a children's story?
By itself not a lot. In the entire context of my exposition and argument a great deal. I was talking about how information is controlled, and how using the MOVIE, The Wizard of Oz, hid the truth through pushing that truth through fiction, a deliberate program of mind control. Those programs were controlled by the exact same people who created the movie (at the exact same time) as similar mind control programs. The same people that controlled the systems and the narratives related to the 1930s (and 1920s, and 1910s, etc., etc.) Banker Cabal systems (including the Versailles treaty, the German banking systems failure and rebuild, the Bank of International Settlements), the WWII narrative and the world wide Eugenics programs (and who really paid for the Nazis and their programs), not to mention "anti" Jewish narratives (lost to time, but are very meaningful if you dig).
Are you aware that most children's stories are fantasy?
I feel like you probably didn't actually listen to what I was saying. Your response is purely a strawman and says pretty much nothing about anything relevant (that I was talking about) at all.
Your point was focused on this being high-school reading matter. My point is that it was grade-school reading matter. Books were books. The story predates the Federal Reserve, and L. Frank Baum was not interested in polemics.
The movie followed the plot of the book, so nothing new emerges from the movie. If it did for you, you are the only one. I guess it was so obvious, no one else saw it.
Because the deep state even then had to tell what they were doing, because they believe that if they do then they escape some cosmic payback because they "let us know" what was going on and we willingly let it happen.
They also claimed that anyone calling them out was a conspiracy theorist.
Remember the photo of Rockefeller in front of the Twin towers with his watch saying 9/11. We like to blame Bush but he was a pawn.
The "world leaders" that we know about are ALL pawns, every single one. From my investigation, I can't find a single truly independent agent (not counting ones that work from the shadows) since the Greeks controlled a good portion of the western world. Every single one (every single Cesar e.g., every pope, every king, every president, etc.) is a "front man." Every single one (and all that that implies).
Follow the money, follow the families, follow the control of the media (on every level of that meaning), and you find a completely different world of true control.
That includes Trump btw, though in this case it is well known that Trump is a front man for Q. Who exactly Q is, is a different question. I am pretty certain I know, but I'm not quite ready for the exposure of that investigation. It get's very... thorny, because it requires showing the next Veil, and that one will be a difficult pill to swallow for many.
Regardless, by all appearances Trump seems to have some level of input in operations, though front men often do (at various degrees). It's kinda a requirement just to be able to do their job effectively (in most cases, though not all (see Biden)). In all cases, for thousands of years, it seems the Front Men always work for a larger group's intentions from the shadows (the ties are easily found through indebtedness (a devil's bargain), through the marriages, through political favors, through who pay taxes to whom, etc.).
Those "shadows" are the same group (at various levels of association) for millennia.
I've always known Trump is a frontman for Q they even said they asked him to run, I'm glad you think you know who Q is, I don't and I'm not going to pretend I do.
The only thing I know is that it's group of patriots working to bring the deep state down and that's enough for me.
It's less a "know who" and more of a "what faction of what larger group the Q team must be associated with;" which pretty much shows everything.
Or perhaps better said; when you are able to appreciate what that subgroup really said (throughout time), and how their message was obfuscated and by whom, everything else seems to trivially and automatically fall into place, though there is a HUGE hurdle that makes that revelation extremely difficult for almost everyone.
Having said that, Q might be a different, albeit associated faction, using subversion, pretending to be that other, but actually working towards the Cabal End Game. That conclusion also fits all of the evidence except one:
As far as I have been able to tease out, there is no reason to show the details of Epstein to the whole world. (The depth of the control system, who they really are, what they really do (child sacrifice e.g.),what they really believe, who the Jews (a small portion of them) really are, what the phrase "God's chosen people" really means, and what Judaism really is.)
Of course that disclosure hasn't really happened yet, but the "prep work" is over obvious, and the attempts at obfuscation are also over obvious, and there is no reason for the specifics to be pushed, even demanded on "both sides" at all, as far as I can reason.
I've been reading the discussion, and I find some points of agreement and points of disagreement.
I can't find a single truly independent agent (not counting ones that work from the shadows) since the Greeks controlled a good portion of the western world. Every single one (every single Cesar e.g., every pope, every king, every president, etc.) is a "front man."
Q: If all these figures are 'front men', does God have any front men in the game?
On one level, it is not difficult to conceive of multiple factions vying for control, and yet, on another, personally, I think the distinction between good and evil is critical.
I think perhaps a more important concept than 'who is in control' (front men included) is what is the nature of conflict? Why do conflicts arise? Who are the conflicts between?
My birth certificate does not have my name appearing in all CAPS. My name on my Social Security card is (first issued to me in 1973), but not my birth certificate.
Unknown if directly relevant, but most states now have 2nd level "birth certificate reference number" or some such layer to hide the actual number that matches the CUSIP bond number on all issued "original, notarized birth certificates". Reason claimed is for security, but likely reason is too many people finding Social Security "Trust Fund" Bond with CUSIP bond number and making a claim of ownership on the $100M bond (typical).
I am preparing a claim after making my LLC owner of my birth certificate (title) to my asset (SSN). All bonds proceeds issued using my SSN as collateral are now lawful LLC property.
Birth certificate is your title (owned by your birth state CORP, post 15OCT1933). It appears to be allodial, but must be reclaimed by a "natural living man or woman" and taken from the state via a process involving Municipal Service CORP Secretary of State of birth state and US CORP Secretary of State. Title to what? Your SSN asset.
Social Security Number (SSN, TIN) is your asset, and title to asset gives you (natural living man or woman or your LLC) rights to bonds issued (proceeds) using the asset as collateral. (Bonds have been issued without your knowledge or consent, but bond proceeds belong to you if you claim them).
Think about this one: The Wizard of Oz (ounces) is not a typical Hero's Journey. Dorothy didn't need to earn the power. In the end, Dorothy always had the "power." she didn't need to earn it through the adventure, she always had it. We have the power, and we always had it. We don't need to defeat all the enemies everywhere. We don't need to earn the power, we just need to use it!
The journey, the process, is the path of discovering what our power is and how to use it.
If the 'power' is potential, the path, the journey, unlocks that potential and makes it real and tangible (substantial).
We need both, the latent and potential power, and the ability to unlock it, tap into it, and utilize it. One without the other does not result in 'effect'.
did they have Doomers around 1900? Published in 1900, “00” years are often big years for doomers. I do not see any doomers amongst the main characters, it’s a story of optimism by following the correct path, kind of an economic “Pilgrim’s Progress”
🟨(OZ = Ounces of Gold. The Yellow Brick Road = The Gold Standard.)
They told us it was a children’s story.
It was actually a warning about bankers, courts, corporations, and the legal fiction system.
Here’s the truth:
🧠 THE STRAW MAN
Not a real man, a legal creation. He receives a certificate instead of a brain… just like we receive a Birth Certificate that creates the ALL-CAPS legal PERSON.
🛠 THE TIN MAN (TIN = Taxpayer Identification Number)
A soulless machine that works until it freezes and collapses. The symbol of the worker who becomes “rusted out” by nonstop taxation and labour.
🦁 THE COWARDLY LION
Loud roar, no courage. Just like politicians, judges and officials with titles but no true authority.
🔥 THE WIZARD
Smoke, fire, and a giant hologram head… but behind the curtain is just a scared little man.
A perfect metaphor for modern government:
Illusion of authority Backed by fear No real power once the curtain is pulled back
🧹 THE WICKED WITCH (BAR & Policy Enforcers)
Controls the flying monkeys, the police. Intimidation, threats, fear. She melts when exposed to truth and lawful jurisdiction.
🌺 THE POPPY FIELD
Dorothy collapses — drugged. The others don’t — because they’re not real humans. A warning about Rockefeller medicine and mass sedation.
🐶 TOTO (Truth, Totality)
Toto = “in toto” = “the whole truth.” Small, unnoticed, but fearless. Toto pulls the curtain and exposes the illusion.
That’s why the Witch wanted him — not Dorothy. Truth is the biggest threat to the system.
⚡ THE VEIL IS FALLING
The Wizard of Oz wasn’t fantasy. It was a coded message: • The banking system is an illusion • Corporate government is a façade • Courts are theatres • The ALL-CAPS NAME is not you • The real power was always yours
One small truth collapses the whole illusion.
Nitter: https://nitter.net/DutchForce17/status/2058308566952337890#m
Thank you OP. This makes a lot of sense. Two things came to mind immediately.
Follow the yellow brick road = Follow the money.
The water destroying the witch. Water, being an analogy for free flowing information/exposure/purification.
Water. Banks contain water/ rivers streams.
" 'The Wizard of Oz' and its relevance to this spiritual fight concisely explained with 7 key points that illustrate the intentional suppression of the Constitution and Natural Law.": https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9gzRW76/the-wizard-of-oz-and-its-relevan/
Original 1900 print (of book), color scanned: https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTLr03DF/anon-library-the-wonderful-wizar/c/
Got Silver ?
Totoo in Tagalog also means "True" or "Truth"
Pronounced Toto - Oh
Don't forget the ruby slippers... that were originally silver...
The Pedostas love those
There's also Judy Garland MK Ultra'd or 1930s equivalent
Shirley Temple wanted it but she burned her bridges with MGM by laughing at Mayer when he flashed his junk at her
Sauce?
Ah it was actually Arthur Freed that flashed Shirley and a couple of years later, but at the same time however Mayer was propositioning her mother. However MGM and the Temples wanted her for Wizard Of Oz big time, but Fox flat refused. Makes you wonder if they knew what sort of thing was going on with the men over at MGM.
https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/02/shirley-temple-hollywood-pedophilia-larry-king/
It WAS fantasy. The Wizard of Oz was one of Rockefellers greatest post "1929 Crash" creations. It was designed to put the truth in FANTASY FORM as a form of programming AKA mind control.
It was a coded message. A subliminal message. One you are strongly encouraged to relegate as fantasy.
Using fantasy to tell the truth is incredibly powerful. Rockefeller (et al) had been doing that for years. The movie industry (completely created and controlled by Rockefeller) was designed to do exactly that, to control the Minds of Men. That was it's ENTIRE PURPOSE.
By encoding the truth in fantasy form you believe in the fake world that is presented to you from the "trusted sources;" the media ("that is the safeguard against the evil oligarchs and would never lie to you"), the 9 to 5 job that is your most important "reality," etc.. The entertainment industry (bread and circuses) is designed to distract you from the "real world;" to help you go back to the reality that sucks (that they created). Encoding the truth in fantasy form dissociates the message from the truth of it and reenforces what you have to deal with in your shitty "real world."
If it is "fantasy," then it can't be reality.
The Wizard of Oz was created by the same people who created the OSS and then the CIA and then MKUltra, etc. They create inversions of reality: Truth is fantasy, Lies are the truth. ALL SIDES of information are inversions, all sides are controlled opposition. All sides are missing the most important pieces of information:
The Primary Teaching (which has been hidden from the world for a very, VERY long time).
People are programmed to believe in the "reality" they are presented with. Those who dig deeper find that the truth has been hidden. Most will go back into the program (especially prior to 2020). The Program is a much safer world. Those who see it is false are vilified, but that vilification is just another "box" created by the same entity, a controlled opposition. Thanks to Q, MANY more people appreciate that our vision has been veiled, and we are no longer vilified for challenging the Main Narrative.
While many have seen that now, there are still so many that think that because the first level of the Matrix has been shown to them that they now know the truth. But that's just the first level; what we call "the Matrix" that we are "breaking free from" is itself controlled opposition.
There is another veil. Through time the Primary Teaching keeps getting pushed into the zeitgeist by "enlightened masters," but the PTB keep it hidden right after they die (or are killed). The last unveiling and subsequent hiding (in the "western world") occurred about two thousand years ago.
So many insist that the veil created for them in the second to fourth centuries is that Primary Teaching. It is not. It is in there; it is ALWAYS (and always has been) in there (because it resonates with both Us and Truth, and thus can't be completely eliminated); but it is intentionally obfuscated, hidden by the PTB through controlled opposition.
It's going to take a bit to untangle the next veil because "We already know the truth, and anyone who challenges that truth is a 'crazy conspiracy theorist'" (or more appropriately, a "heretic").
Q helped us untangle the "conspiracy theorist" veil. The next revelation is untangling the "heretic" veil.
The Primary Teaching is in there, but you can't untangle the veil until you realize that it exists, that your "absolute truth and trust" is the opposite of the Truth.
"The first edition had a printing of 10,000 copies and was sold in advance of the publication date of September 1, 1900." Enjoy your movie FANTASY though
I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to help create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.
In it's book form, in 1900, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper quartile (at best) of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.
In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time (or even heard of by the vast majority of the planet) until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation and the PTB didn't care. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.
Reading is hard. Thinking & remembering harder.
It sold out first printing of 10,000 in the first month. And in 1900 everyone could and did read, unlike today. The even understood metaphors like this story.
"The ground-breaking success of both the original 1900 novel and the 1902 musical prompted Baum to write thirteen additional Oz books, which serve as official sequels to the first story. Over a century later, the book is one of the best-known stories in American literature, and the Library of Congress has declared the work to be "America's greatest and best-loved homegrown fairytale".
You completely missed my point.
I can show, beyond any reasonable doubt (if you bother to read my book), that all information has been completely controlled pretty much for forever (since the Roman Empire at least). All publishers have been completely controlled (see Jakob Fugger and his creation of what we call "media" and his domination of the printing press and printers guild). This control has existed completely the whole time, and anyone who investigates it finds exactly that: a Banker Cabal controls everything using control of information and controlled opposition (both "for" and "against" paid for by the same Banker Cabal once you dig into the money trail). We try so hard to believe that things are organic because it's an easier pill to swallow than the alternative. Investigation proves otherwise.
In the case of books, if any publication (which is completely controlled by the media) was pushed to the public (a "book review" e.g.) it was done by the media which was also completely controlled. Every newspaper was controlled. Every "book review" was controlled. Whether it was organic or intentional, it was allowed by the Control System.
If something happens that is not allowed (the The Protocols of the Elders of Zion e.g.), it is stamped down into oblivion. The person who stamped down the Protocols e.g. was a person called Allen Dulles (in 1921). Allen Dulles (at the time) was a top level Rockefeller lawyer (who helped him take over South America). He, along with Rockefeller (and others) cocreated the CFR (at the same time), then the OSS, and eventually the CIA. As an agent of Rockefeller, in a NYT 1921 (iirc) paper (also owned by Rockefeller and Morgan) he stamped down The Protocols definitively by "debunking" it. His "authoritative report", stopped all people from allowing themselves to read it or talk about it in fear of being called an "anti-semite" (a phrase created by Rothschild to ensure a specific narrative which led to and guided WWI, WWII, the state of Isreal, the UN, the Cold War and eventually "The Matrix").
The only reason anyone even read it widespread to begin with was because it was pushed by a controlled opposition publisher. Did it start as a true opposition? Possibly. Probably imo. But it became widespread once it became big enough to matter. It became an effort of controlled opposition as soon as it had any meaningful readership. Then by pushing it bigger, they had a big enough audience to stamp it down into oblivion.
That is how controlled opposition works. That is shown, in gory detail, time and time again once you follow the money and the Board of Directors (the men behind the curtain).
The way to read history is to understand what actually happened (e.g. the Protocols were shut down by contrivance by an "authority" but ultimately controlled by both sides). Learn how to ignore "who was doing what for the obvious reasons." The money and the financial and family ties prove it's all controlled opposition. The House always wins because they control everything as soon as it matters to become meaningful.
I didn't miss your point /paranoia.
You do realize like movies of today it was a kids book? And opposition , controlled or otherwise , must use truth to slip their lies in and some can distinguish between the two.
But this sort of Hubris has always been the failing of those who would Gods.
You really need to learn about the history of education. Yes, many people could read by that time, but the average person didn't have any leisure time to read at all. And no one had a "high school education." In 1900 there was less than 5% of the US with a high school education, and all high schools were controlled by Rockefeller by that time (by 1890 it was less than 1%. He had started his "reeducation program" by 1880). Every persons high school level was related to their family income (there was no such thing as "public high school" yet, not until Rockefeller created it over 30 years later).
NO ONE WAS READING FANTASY BOOKS. By "no one" I don't mean "zero people." Don't make a categorical error to push a false argument. It was very few people, and it was related to income, and most importantly, it was all controlled on every single level, by the same entity. So if it happened, it was intentional.
Well, I encountered the Oz books in grade school when I was less than 10 years old and I enjoyed reading them. They were in the school library. Other children read them. Why do you go on about a "high school education" when it was a children's story?
Are you aware that most children's stories are fantasy? Did you never read "The Wind in the Willows" (1908) as a child? Or Peter Pan (1911)? Or "Treasure Island" (1883)? I'm sorry to tell you that none of this was high school material.
Were you 10 in 1900? Or even 1939? What is the context of what I was exposing? Can you transfer your context to a context decades earlier and assume they have the same meaning in a broader conversation? Are you aware of how much changed in the decades in between. all the social engineering, the population demographics, the education demographics, and who paid for it and controlled it and how?
By itself not a lot. In the entire context of my exposition and argument a great deal. I was talking about how information is controlled, and how using the MOVIE, The Wizard of Oz, hid the truth through pushing that truth through fiction, a deliberate program of mind control. Those programs were controlled by the exact same people who created the movie (at the exact same time) as similar mind control programs. The same people that controlled the systems and the narratives related to the 1930s (and 1920s, and 1910s, etc., etc.) Banker Cabal systems (including the Versailles treaty, the German banking systems failure and rebuild, the Bank of International Settlements), the WWII narrative and the world wide Eugenics programs (and who really paid for the Nazis and their programs), not to mention "anti" Jewish narratives (lost to time, but are very meaningful if you dig).
I feel like you probably didn't actually listen to what I was saying. Your response is purely a strawman and says pretty much nothing about anything relevant (that I was talking about) at all.
Your point was focused on this being high-school reading matter. My point is that it was grade-school reading matter. Books were books. The story predates the Federal Reserve, and L. Frank Baum was not interested in polemics.
The movie followed the plot of the book, so nothing new emerges from the movie. If it did for you, you are the only one. I guess it was so obvious, no one else saw it.
Because the deep state even then had to tell what they were doing, because they believe that if they do then they escape some cosmic payback because they "let us know" what was going on and we willingly let it happen. They also claimed that anyone calling them out was a conspiracy theorist. Remember the photo of Rockefeller in front of the Twin towers with his watch saying 9/11. We like to blame Bush but he was a pawn.
The "world leaders" that we know about are ALL pawns, every single one. From my investigation, I can't find a single truly independent agent (not counting ones that work from the shadows) since the Greeks controlled a good portion of the western world. Every single one (every single Cesar e.g., every pope, every king, every president, etc.) is a "front man." Every single one (and all that that implies).
Follow the money, follow the families, follow the control of the media (on every level of that meaning), and you find a completely different world of true control.
That includes Trump btw, though in this case it is well known that Trump is a front man for Q. Who exactly Q is, is a different question. I am pretty certain I know, but I'm not quite ready for the exposure of that investigation. It get's very... thorny, because it requires showing the next Veil, and that one will be a difficult pill to swallow for many.
Regardless, by all appearances Trump seems to have some level of input in operations, though front men often do (at various degrees). It's kinda a requirement just to be able to do their job effectively (in most cases, though not all (see Biden)). In all cases, for thousands of years, it seems the Front Men always work for a larger group's intentions from the shadows (the ties are easily found through indebtedness (a devil's bargain), through the marriages, through political favors, through who pay taxes to whom, etc.).
Those "shadows" are the same group (at various levels of association) for millennia.
I've always known Trump is a frontman for Q they even said they asked him to run, I'm glad you think you know who Q is, I don't and I'm not going to pretend I do. The only thing I know is that it's group of patriots working to bring the deep state down and that's enough for me.
It's less a "know who" and more of a "what faction of what larger group the Q team must be associated with;" which pretty much shows everything.
Or perhaps better said; when you are able to appreciate what that subgroup really said (throughout time), and how their message was obfuscated and by whom, everything else seems to trivially and automatically fall into place, though there is a HUGE hurdle that makes that revelation extremely difficult for almost everyone.
Having said that, Q might be a different, albeit associated faction, using subversion, pretending to be that other, but actually working towards the Cabal End Game. That conclusion also fits all of the evidence except one:
As far as I have been able to tease out, there is no reason to show the details of Epstein to the whole world. (The depth of the control system, who they really are, what they really do (child sacrifice e.g.),what they really believe, who the Jews (a small portion of them) really are, what the phrase "God's chosen people" really means, and what Judaism really is.)
Of course that disclosure hasn't really happened yet, but the "prep work" is over obvious, and the attempts at obfuscation are also over obvious, and there is no reason for the specifics to be pushed, even demanded on "both sides" at all, as far as I can reason.
I've been reading the discussion, and I find some points of agreement and points of disagreement.
Q: If all these figures are 'front men', does God have any front men in the game?
On one level, it is not difficult to conceive of multiple factions vying for control, and yet, on another, personally, I think the distinction between good and evil is critical.
I think perhaps a more important concept than 'who is in control' (front men included) is what is the nature of conflict? Why do conflicts arise? Who are the conflicts between?
The story line was published in 1900. There are no time machines.
My birth certificate does not have my name appearing in all CAPS. My name on my Social Security card is (first issued to me in 1973), but not my birth certificate.
Unknown if directly relevant, but most states now have 2nd level "birth certificate reference number" or some such layer to hide the actual number that matches the CUSIP bond number on all issued "original, notarized birth certificates". Reason claimed is for security, but likely reason is too many people finding Social Security "Trust Fund" Bond with CUSIP bond number and making a claim of ownership on the $100M bond (typical).
I am preparing a claim after making my LLC owner of my birth certificate (title) to my asset (SSN). All bonds proceeds issued using my SSN as collateral are now lawful LLC property.
Keep us updated.
ditto
When did your birth county/city first become incorporated ?
1833
So that wasn't it. Unless it was not actually incorporated but rather founded ?
"In the post-Revolutionary era, the first industrial corporation was the Boston Manufacturing Company, chartered in 1813,"
Ann Arbor, MI, incorporated in 1833
What about non city or county locations? Those outside this system?
Either we change "this system" now or our grandchildren's grandchildren for at least the next 1000 years will be slaves at best.
Noted, thank you.
Birth certificate is your title (owned by your birth state CORP, post 15OCT1933). It appears to be allodial, but must be reclaimed by a "natural living man or woman" and taken from the state via a process involving Municipal Service CORP Secretary of State of birth state and US CORP Secretary of State. Title to what? Your SSN asset.
Social Security Number (SSN, TIN) is your asset, and title to asset gives you (natural living man or woman or your LLC) rights to bonds issued (proceeds) using the asset as collateral. (Bonds have been issued without your knowledge or consent, but bond proceeds belong to you if you claim them).
Please show how to start this process. Also, are you in danger of being offed if you attempt this?
u/#howl
...i cherish the moment when Dorothy steps out of her home into OZ....
Think about this one: The Wizard of Oz (ounces) is not a typical Hero's Journey. Dorothy didn't need to earn the power. In the end, Dorothy always had the "power." she didn't need to earn it through the adventure, she always had it. We have the power, and we always had it. We don't need to defeat all the enemies everywhere. We don't need to earn the power, we just need to use it!
The journey, the process, is the path of discovering what our power is and how to use it.
If the 'power' is potential, the path, the journey, unlocks that potential and makes it real and tangible (substantial).
We need both, the latent and potential power, and the ability to unlock it, tap into it, and utilize it. One without the other does not result in 'effect'.
The author also created a two-letter land called Ix. So what?
What about the munchkins?
“The actors who played the munchkins, who were open about the mistreatment they (and the rest of the cast) received on set….”
Sounds like us frogs are the munchkins😂
Nice to see this being brought to the forefront again.
nice post!
did they have Doomers around 1900? Published in 1900, “00” years are often big years for doomers. I do not see any doomers amongst the main characters, it’s a story of optimism by following the correct path, kind of an economic “Pilgrim’s Progress”