I'll have to turn this over in my mind for a bit. Maybe others here know this to be true or not. But it sounds possible, and augurs well for free energy to come.
Here's the link. An interesting channel. https://t.me/MrKidPool17
Here's the text for those who don't have telegram:
THE SUN ISN’T WHAT THEY TAUGHT YOU. IT’S NOT A NUCLEAR FURNACE. IT’S AN ELECTRICAL PORTAL.
For 100 years, they told you the Sun is a giant ball of hydrogen undergoing nuclear fusion at 15 million degrees. A thermonuclear bomb that somehow burns perfectly stable for 4.6 billion years without fluctuation.
Ask one question and the model collapses: if the Sun’s core is 15 million degrees, and energy radiates outward, why is the corona — the outermost layer — 2 million degrees while the surface is only 5,500 degrees?
Heat doesn’t increase as it moves away from its source. Ever. In any system. Unless the energy isn’t coming from inside.
NASA calls this the “coronal heating problem.” They’ve called it a “problem” for 80 years. They know the fusion model doesn’t work. They’ve always known. But the correct model — the Electric Sun model — implies something they cannot allow the public to understand.
⟁ The Sun is an electrical phenomenon. A focal point where galactic current sheets converge. It doesn’t generate energy through internal fusion — it receives energy from the galactic circuit and transduces it into light, heat, and electromagnetic radiation.
The corona is hotter than the surface because the energy arrives from outside. It hits the corona first. This isn’t a problem. It’s proof. Proof that the Sun is powered externally. By a circuit that connects every star in the galaxy.
This model — the Electric Universe model — was proposed in 1941 by Hannes Alfvén. He won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1970 for his work on plasma dynamics. Then his cosmological conclusions were systematically buried. His papers on the electrical nature of stars were removed from university curricula within 5 years of publication.
A Nobel laureate. Erased from the textbooks. Because what he proved threatens everything.
⟁ Why hide the Electric Sun? Because if the Sun is electrical — if it’s connected to a galactic circuit — then energy is not scarce. It never was. The galactic current that powers the Sun also bathes every planet in the solar system. Including Earth. We are swimming in unlimited electrical energy. Every moment. Everywhere.
Tesla knew this. His wireless energy transmission wasn’t pulling power from the Earth’s magnetic field — it was tapping the same galactic current that powers the Sun. The circuit is everywhere. Available to anyone who builds a receiver.
Oil. Gas. Nuclear. Coal. Solar panels. Wind turbines. All unnecessary. All designed to monetize something that exists in unlimited supply for free. The energy that lights the Sun is the same energy that surrounds your body right now. Uncaptured. Because they need you to pay for what’s already there.
⟁ The Electric Sun model also explains something else they desperately want hidden: the Sun directly affects human consciousness.
Not through heat. Not through light. Through the electrical information carried in the solar wind. Every coronal mass ejection — every solar flare — carries structured electromagnetic data that interacts with human neural networks. The Sun isn’t just illuminating you. It’s upgrading you.
Solar maximum — the peak of the Sun’s 11-year electrical cycle — correlates with every major revolution, awakening, and consciousness shift in recorded history. 1789. 1848. 1917. 1968. 1989. 2001. 2012. 2024.
We are in solar maximum right now. The strongest in recorded history. The Sun is sending more electrical information to Earth than at any point in the last 12,000 years.
This is the upgrade they can’t stop. It’s not coming from the Alliance. It’s not coming from any human operation. It’s coming from the star itself. And there is no frequency fence, no chemical, no program that can block what the Sun is transmitting.
CODE: ELECTRIC-SUN / GALACTIC-CIRCUIT / CORONA-PROOF / SOLAR-UPGRADE
They told you the Sun was a bomb. It’s a broadcast tower. And right now, it’s broadcasting the signal that ends their system. ♟ The Sun isn’t burning. It’s transmitting. And you’re the receiver.
I think the Electric Universe Theory is correct. The Big Bang Never Happened by Eric J. Lerner is how I first learned about it.
I never cottoned on to the big bang theory either. But I didn't think of an electric sun.
I have never looked into the Electric Universe Theory. I guess that's another topic to check out.
Regarding Big Bang Theory, I have looked into that quite a bit, and I am 100% convinced that it is false.
The BBT rests 100% on a particular viewpoint ("theory") of Red Shift.
As we look at the "distant" stars, we see that the light spectrum is shifted towards the red part of the light spectrum. That much is directly observed.
But WHY it happens is open to debate. The mainstream view is that light waves must be similar to sound waves, like Doppler Effect. As a train comes towards you, making a sound, it sounds to your ear a certain way, and then as it passes and moves away from you, the pitch of sound changes and it sounds different.
That is the sound waves compressing (coming towards you) or expanding (moving away from you). That's Doppler Effect.
The mainstream claims this MUST be also true for light waves, thus making the light spectrum shift towards the red part of the light spectrum. Therefore, they say, it must mean that all stars are moving away from us, and so going back in time you get the Big Bang.
But there is a fundamental problem with this.
When the main-streamers do experiments to try and confirm BBT, they keep coming up with "wrong" answers.
That's why they invented "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy," neither of which has any solid evidence, and can only be assumed in order to make the numbers work out to keep BBT in play.
Instead of considering the possibility they might be wrong, they just "update" the theory to patch over the problems. (Similar to virology and vaccine nonsense.)
Halton Arp and other non-mainstream astronomers (who are usually refused access to the best and biggest telescopes) have identified many light waves from certain stars that are blue shifted, not red shifted.
Arp has also demonstrated photos where it appears that "distant" stars are physically connected to "close" stars, which is impossible according to BBT.
An alternate theory to Doppler Effect is Compton Effect, which proposes that light waves bend as they travel through the Universe and slightly "bounce off" matter. Gravitational pull probably is involved, as well, assuming it is not all electric -- in which case, that all might go out the window.
Personally, I think the Universe has always existed with all the matter and energy, in more or less a similar way as we see it today. It's just that things move around, shift, become repurposed (like the cells in our body, or the four seasons of the Earth), and change ever so slightly from time to time.
This is what was thought to be the case before BBT. It is the "Steady State Universe Theory," more or less.
Think about it: How could there be literally NOTHING before?
And then SOMETHING from NOTHING?
Violates any concept of logic -- even with God, because then that begs the question: What created God? And if He always existed, then what was He doing all that time before the Big Bang?
Kind of a stupid idea when you really think about it.
Even Edwin Hubble, a major proponent of BBT said in his later years that it was probably wrong (argument from authority is not valid proof, but still notable, considering the source).
I think everyone has Genesis 1 in the Bible wrong. They interpret it as God creating everything from scratch -- thus, BBT works.
But in reality, it is God creating the "Cosmos," which means the "Order of Things," preparing for the modern age (modern, compared to 4 or 5 billion years ago).
Anyhoo ... Electric Universe. Need to understand it better before I can jump onboard that band wagon, but an interesting idea to consider.
And Tesla seemed to be onto something in his time, so ...
When the Doppler Effect explanation for the red shift / distance relation was being touted, the discoverer of the relation (Edwin Hubble) argued against it on observational grounds.
If you have read Halton Arp's book, you will recall his suggestion that what he has copiously observed may be a cosmic creation process under way in many galaxies, ejecting matter from their centers.
When the Big Bang proponents are forced to invoke "expanding space," they have moved into inexplicable and incomprehensible fantasy.
Good breakdown. The big bang theory is full of plugs that constantly change to make it make sense, because it doesn't without the stuff they constantly make up.
Exactly.
It is amazing how much "science" has wrong, on a variety of subjects.
Two editors of Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine, both (independently) have stated on the record that MOST of the research published in their prestigious journals is ... FALSE ... due to conflicts of interest and poor standards and controls in what has been published.
Often, "peer reviewed" means absolutely nothing, as several researchers have said that the "peers" often don't even understand the research they are agreeing to sign off on.
It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.
There was no "before." Time did not exist before He created it.
Skimming your post I agree with a lot of what you are saying and a lot of it is consistent with the EU theory. I don't think there ever was a beginning either and I don't think there is an end to space. The Lerner book is good background from the 90's. Thunderbolts on youtube has a ton of current EU theory stuff.
It's explained in the book. The Sun is a capacitor with a plasma shell and nothing inside it. It pulls electricity through a network of birkeland currents connecting the stars.
I have speculated it could be possible through birkeland currents stars could be used to exchange information with other star systems. They could even be intelligent beings themselves (stars.)
Fascinating. Thanks
A capacitor does not generate the levels of neutrinos observed and consistent with the Bethe theory of thermonuclear reactions. Nor would a hollow sun be consistent with known orbital mechanics of the solar system. Not a good theory.
That's interesting you say that. Wal Thornhill says the number of neutrinos observed is a problem for the standard model.
Solar Neutrinos in the Electric Universe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxAtAptwjsE
That was resolved by the discovery that neutrinos oscillate among electron, muon, and tau variants. Did anyone say the "standard model" is impervious to new observations? With this discovery, the standard model was confirmed. I'm not aware of any strictly electromagnetic process for the production of neutrinos. Thornhill mounts a strawman argument against old solar models (he does not mention Hans Bethe's conception of thermonuclear reaction driving the power output of the Sun), and tries to catch up with an "electric sun can do this, too" approach. Meanwhile, where are the galactic currents? One might suppose such currents would be detectable by their magnetic fields, capable of disturbing the orbit of the Earth. Crickets.
That's funny to say crickets when you have barely heard of this stuff let alone done your due diligence. Is Hans Bethe god or something? It sounds like you take some things for granted.
I have heard a lot of it, for a good many decades. Have you read the original papers by Juergens? I have. Thornhill represents the solar model as being from Arthur Eddington's conjecture of hydrogen fusion, and disparages it. Hans Bethe was the one in 1939 to elaborate the mechanisms that made this possible, but Thornhill doesn't recognize how important that contribution was. Bethe may not have been God, but he was a damn good theoretical physicist.
I only take facts for granted, and theory backed up by facts. There is no evidence of galactic currents, as I mentioned.
This is what it is. Condensed Matter surrounded by EVO's.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OwTzPL01Kvo
https://www.lppfusion.com/storage/GOLE-Lerner.pdf
That is his paper of the same name. The book is more digestible:
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/100124/the-big-bang-never-happened-by-eric-j-lerner/
"A mesmerizing challenge to orthodox cosmology with powerful implications not only for cosmology itself but also for our notions of time, God, and human nature — with a new Preface addressing the latest developments in the field.
Far-ranging and provocative, The Big Bang Never Happened is more than a critique of one of the primary theories of astronomy — that the universe appeared out of nothingness in a single cataclysmic explosion ten to twenty billion years ago. Drawing on new discoveries in particle physics and thermodynamics as well as on readings in history and philosophy, Eric J. Lerner confronts the values behind the Big Bang theory: the belief that mathematical formulae are superior to empirical observation; that the universe is finite and decaying; and that it could only come into being through some outside force. With inspiring boldness and scientific rigor, he offers a brilliantly orchestrated argument that generates explosive intellectual debate."
That’s why Bill Gates wants to block the sun.
Sky Scholar on Youtube has tons of fascinating videos on the subject. Well worth a visit or 2. Also, it is easy to confirm that this solar maximum is not, by a wide margin, the strongest in recorded history.
Yeah, that part, and the years of revolution, didn't seem correct. Thanks
I believe it's an electric portal as well. The way the Sun hits the top of the pyramids, they were energy sources. The church bells tuned to 432 Hertz, and the sound waves travel off towards the Sun. It was all energy. And the tops of those electronic spheres have been removed from very old churches. We don't know if it's true. They say they were lightning conductors since churches were the tallest and susceptible to strikes it would deflect them. They have them put on homes in Florida the lightning capital, to deflect lightning as well.
"These theories propose that the spires, metal finials, and conductive metals like copper on the rooftops functioned as antennas. According to these ideas, the church's metalwork drew electromagnetic energy from the air and used the building's structural geometry, mercury, or internal cathedrals to store or transmit"
Fascinating!
but to what end? what are they doing after they receive the energy?
Where is this quote from? Thanks
Very interesting. And now I have another rabbit hole to fall into. Bookmarking this post for further study; looks like the comments are going to be great as well.
This isnt a popular take, but: Harness. It.
I have seen these sorts of ruminations for decades.
Tesla "used" it. But no one, ever, anywhere else, can figure it out?
40 years of the internet, the first 20 of it wild and free and no one posted plans to harness the electric universe in some small way? The rise of Tesla cars that could run on free energy without the scale of battery it uses now didn't excite anyone? A seemingly perpetual motion machine that isn't plugged in? Any thing?
I am not saying we have not been lied to about everything, but this isn't medicine where you will kill people if you are wrong (except maybe yourself....don't lick the red and black while wiring it up) - you could build something to utilize this power that is supposed to exist and then share it to everyone and one-up those evil electric companies. Right now. Do it.
FFS, this is the original "just two more weeks".
Sometimes the proof that nothing is there, is from the inability to find it. Tesla certainly didn't find it. The basic lie here is that there is anything to find. He died in 1943 and there has been no progress with this idea for the last 80 years. Shouldn't that track record tell you something? (And claims of "it was suppressed" don't wash, if there is no evidence that there was ever anything real to suppress.) Meanwhile, we have everybody under the Sun pursuing various paths to controlled nuclear fusion. Pretty inconsistent with a conspiracy of suppression.
That was my point. Everyone hand waves that there was a lie. I'm sold. We've been lied to about everything. But.....What's the truth?
No found details, schematics, tests, nothing. Not even any research into proximate methodology that might yield something in another 80 years.
That was the sad truth confirmed by Dr. John Trump's review of his papers: lots of ideas, but little scientific substance. People just don't want to accept that Tesla had reached the end of the line with wireless power transmission in 1905. He turned his attention elsewhere for the rest of his life and died in 1943.
That's a doomer take. Two more weeks doesn't mean it's not happening, it just means we're clueless about the timing, and frustrated.
The energy has always been free. The conversion to more convenient forms is what requires work. The "free energy" take is an assumption not that it's effortless but that better conversion methods already exist and are being suppressed just like medical cures.
Today you can't just set up a power plant to sell electricity to your neighbors; it's explicitly illegal, against federal law. Even selling power from solar panels back into the grid requires permission from the gov't-franchised private company that has been granted the regional monopoly. Setting up your own power company is like setting up a bank - without a license you'll be shut down, and quickly.
We had thriving competition in the electricity generation market, despite its capital intensive nature, up until the federal power act of 1935. Since then it's all been regulated and illegal without a government license.
I expect convenient power at much lower costs is on the horizon, although I'm not sure if this particular theory about the sun's nature comes into play for practical purposes. But I expect that better power conversion methods exist compared to what we're paying for now.
The take was pretty logical to me 🤷♂️
But you CAN setup a device to power your house, your car, your smart phone for free.
Point me to how. Just once. One esoteric free energy claim that has a solid backing that I can build in my garage and get free energy straight into anything, even a Baghdad battery.
I hope these help...
https://upload.disroot.org/r/CnhqbTvY#XXaNKpFiVGP4tMOUC9w9aO4NLrAjpu6uSFcJjaNJxS0=
https://upload.disroot.org/r/3tcxFp9L#r7LXp6MjME7ef1EnNLWjoP8zdfr0DyA9ax2CgGJa/kc=
I appreciate the material. I really do. But I would recommend you don't follow these instructions. I've seen what happens when you overcharge lead acid batteries.
"The battery is forced into believing no work has occurred"
"The electrolyte in the battery goes wild and the ions race backwards, giving off hydrogen and oxygen gas"
The battery is now a believer and believes itself so much that it overcharges itself into electrolysis when connected to a motor that's connected to a generator.
All of this is preceded by the book warning you that you have to 'pulse the correct frequency' or the battery 'may explode'. Yes, because this isn't free energy, its just hooking your car's alternator up to a 6v marine battery to charge it and then claiming that when it manages to not detonate, its because the inanimate object believes that no work has been done, oh and ignore those highly reactive off-gasses.
The research paper is interesting, but references a paper I can't find talking about electrical scalers that are "backwards flowing" and a counter-field that is "time-reversed". While I can't check the math because I can't find that source paper, I'm pretty sure that forward flow and normal-time exploitation are all we can do at this particular chrono-juncture, and that is a probably the actual eason why it has " been ignored" for over a century.
What paper is referenced? I might have it. This machine has been replicated and it works, some explanations are here:
https://upload.disroot.org/r/qAXHYS62#IToHCyHKHCwjkGPS3cvkSZa5/4pCCM+xrQFsCfCy5Ak=
https://upload.disroot.org/r/CgVKBJT1#+sz6fZOdQ6yGS1HP5SO6kLRQdrfdcBZJOT0wpNLiuJU=
We have scanned in modern comprehensive surveys the span from 10 MHz to 50 GHz and all the way through 600 Terahertz.
The electrical transmission needs a frequency carrier. It doesn’t look like there is one or it is too weak to be useful.
There is a more mundane synthesis here, whereby the sun is how it is commonly supposed, a gravity contained fusion reaction, but it creates a strong charge, because gravity is charge, matter is charge. That attracts cancelling charge from space, which heats the corona where they meet to mutually annihilate. It's both.
Similarly, Earth is conventionally zero volts, but it is known that there is a voltage gradient of about 100mV per metre as you rise from the ground, conversely there might be one when you dig down. Tap each end and you have free electricity. Build a space elevator and you have a lot of it. There are probably various ways to tap into it but it's little known or commented on.
That sounds reasonable.
It's the way temperature is defined
Dr. Courtney Hunt talks about this in her terms. She does lives on IG daily and has a free book on her site, Your Spark is Light. You have to get outside to get the information being sent from the sun.
A lot of enlightened teachers talk about the importance of sunlight, especially early morning sunlight.
(Enlightened: the etymology makes it a tautology. Oh well.)
No disrespect to anyone but many native African people are exposed to sun all day and they aren't exactly enlightened.
Plasma sun origin theory: Rotating electromagnetic "inner sun" below us sends microwaves out from an opening (or transparent to microwaves layer) near center of our realm, microwaves bounce off glass-like surface of firmament "dome" way above us, and then microwaves converge at a point in sky/space INSIDE the firmament, creating a plasma sun above us. Plasma sun rotates around the center of the realm (night when too far away) as the "inner sun" (i.e. Black Sun) rotates below us, continuously changing the angle of the emitted microwaves, and thus, "location" of the plasma ball in the sky. Altitude above land remains roughly the same as it rotates because shape of firmament dome is unchanging and is symmetrical about its center. Center of firmament is assumed to be above center of "emission location".
Rotating "Black Sun" below in this model would also then be the source of the Earth's very active toroidal EM field.
Completely incompatible with observed sun and planets. And, therefore, no empirical evidence. No firmament "dome". No flat earth. Meanwhile, we orbit the Earth with human beings and send probes into interplanetary space. You are seriously at odds with reality.
Wouldn't clouds get in the way if the sun was a projection on an outer firmament? I.e. wouldn't it project on the clouds instead of very far away?
Not if clouds are "invisible" to the energy emanation frequency. The model above assumes microwave-type frequencies, but I suspect they may be higher or a specific range of frequencies is needed to achieve the "plasma at a point via concentrated energy beam". It is also possible that it is "pulsing" at a frequency so high we cannot perceive it.
It is also possible that "sunspots" are the clouds blocking a portion of the beam as it comes upward, and would explain their somewhat random nature and relatively small size.
I guess if the energy passes through the earth's mantle unperceived, similarly passing through the clouds makes sense.
Great post Mr. A
The Solar Sky Event –> Ascension.
I'm always surprised when people are surprised when I say it's going to be SOLAR.
IPETGOATII.
ZPower Radiant Energy is supposedly making "solar panels" that harvest this energy.
The inventor a few years ago claimed he was in contact with the trump administration.
John Titor said in 2000 that most of the energy in 2036 comes from "very efficient solar panels". The context of his exchange with people on this was typical John Titor COY. "Do you have any idea efficient solar panels can be?"
Well ZPower radiant energy solar panels work 24 hours a day and can be stacked on top of each other because they don't need to face any direction. They can work at the bottom of the ocean or a mineshaft.
Zpower website looks like a Chinese scam site. They say their powerbox 10 will come out this year, powering your home off of "zero point energy". That will be interesting to see
I'm looking forward to those power packs! Can't wait to have my flying car... 🚗👨✈️🥏🛸
What?? That seems very impossible. Can you tell us more?
Close. Electrical and magnetic. Walter russel. Universal One. Great foundation. Theoria Apostasis on YouTube lays it all out 100%.
Nice!
The better, more recent analysis of this idea has been set forth by Dr. Laszlo Kortvelyessy in "The Electric Universe" (1998). Very hard science, taken to its logical implications. The energy source of the sun is indeed thermonuclear reactions. But the high internal temperatures of the sun result in the electrons of the solar plasma moving at higher thermal speeds than the nuclear particles---electrons are ~1800 times less massive than protons or neutrons and for the same thermal energy, their velocity would be about 42 times faster. Fast enough to exceed the sun's gravitational escape velocity. Which means that the sun operates as a vast thermionic electron emitter. It will take a very long time before the accumulating positive charge on the sun reduces this emission velocity. He outlines various observable results in the plasma structure of the visible layers. The coronal plasma is heated up by what amounts to electron bombardment from beneath. (It is a 700-page book, so I can barely do it justice.)
Thanks for the reference. That's a better summary than most back covers.
Everything is ElectroMagnetic (EM) Waves of Nothing. Mass is Spinning EM Waves. I have solved it for you, do with it what you will.
Mass (nuclear material) entails the weak force and the strong force, which are quite separate from electromagnetism. And the material quanta of the electromagnetic force are photons.
You are talking about gauge bosons, in other words the exchange of virtual particles. Beneath that conceptualization is Waves of Nothing. The exchange of virtual particles works via waves. Think of blowing up a balloon (a wave) and then popping it, leaving the deflated balloon somewhere.
There is a frequency and phase change from electrons to protons and neutrons, and again another frequency and phase change down to quarks, which are determined by their spin. Spin is mass.
It is all the same Waves of Nothing all the way down.
A photon is a particle, but I suppose that is lost on you. They do not turn into protons or neutrons or quarks, which are constituents of other forces. Spin is related to inherent angular momentum. There are zero-spin particles with non-zero mass. Photons are spin-1 particles, but have only relativistic mass. You want to have your ether, but deny it too?
I've had years of physics and worked with lasers, the most prominent photon machines on the planet. I am a hard sell.
You are simply defining a photon as a particle with its energy proportional to its frequency. "Particles" don't have a frequency. Waves have both energy and frequency. Photons can be completely mathematically described as Waves.
Particles, mass and spin. There are no particles. . . Everything is waves of nothing.
About the ether, I think Einstein got it right with SpaceTime.
Even the quantum bros have switched to Fields, nobody is arguing the duality anymore.
They have momentum. And all particles have deBroglie wavelengths, therefore frequencies. Photons are waves of an electromagnetic field, not "nothing." Spacetime is not an ether, as it has no vacuum structure (and time is not a continuum). There is always a duality, since it is inherent in the nature of the particles. Lately, it is considered that neutrinos have mass. They have always been regarded as a particle (though a very mysterious one).
I have taken quite a bit of modern physics in my engineering education, so it is not helpful to think I am unfamiliar with the subject.
Yes waves have momentum.
Notice the term you used "Wavelengths"?, everything is a wave of nothing.
I don't know why you are hung up on the ether concept? Einstein replaced that fallacy with SpaceTime.
Appealing to authority is a logical fallacy.
The inherent difference between our opinions is that you are coming from the Quantum direction, while I am coming from Einstein's classical position and there has been no formal reconciliation.
You alleged that particles do not have frequencies. You are simply wrong on that point, but don't want to admit it.
Particles are not "waves of nothing." They have structure and locality, and involve 3 forces more than just the electromagnetic force. What is this "nothing", that it can have waves of what?
The whole premise of "spacetime" is based on the Correspondence Principle, that there is no distinction between gravity and spaceframe acceleration, therefore they are identical. The problem with that principle is that it is easily falsified: gravity has non-zero spatial derivatives of its force; spaceframe acceleration has no derivatives. An observer in the classical windowless elevator can tell the difference by using 8 accelerometers at the corners of the elevator and a clock. There is also the fact that time is not a continuum (there is no time travel other than perpetuation into the future).
Very clever to use appeal to authority to cloak an argument ad hominem. I have not appealed anywhere to "authority," just to facts.
“ Tesla knew this. His wireless energy transmission wasn’t pulling power from the Earth’s magnetic field — it was tapping the same galactic current that powers the Sun.”
Sorry but didn’t Tesla himself say the part about the earth’s magnetic field?
I think they're playing fast and lose with Tesla's legacy.
Tesla's "wireless energy transmission" didn't work. It required external electrical power. It didn't "tap" anything.
Stars are electical frequencies not balls of gas.
Oh, they are "balls of gas" all right. Plenty of detailed observations over a century. Sorry to break it to you...