The last I heard the Supreme Court ruled against the latest Brunson brothers challenge due to lack of standing.
Is it possible that during Trump’s upcoming trial, he submits evidence on record, that judges rejected to hear in the Brunson lawsuit?
Would that mean, win or lose for Trump, the Brunson's would instantly be able to reopen their challenge at the Supreme Court level?
Would the Supreme Court, with sufficient evidence of interference already on record, hear the case? If so, would the Republican majority of justices be enough?
Thoughts?
Now that McCarthy has been ousted as Speaker, it would be interesting if the Brunson Bros. Cases is finally heard by the Supreme Court!
OCTOBER SURPRISE?
https://ewerickson.substack.com/p/brunson-v-adams-at-the-supreme-court
Seems to have disappeared.
Wasn't SC to rule on Brunson under article 11 today ?
As some may know, the SCOTUS docketed the Brunson case on June 22nd. They began hearing the case and should have a decision by Saturday June 24th. The results would lead to annulment of the 2020 Election which would dissolve the Biden Administration and the majority of Congress for not investigating the fraud of the 2020 election.
SCOTUS could have denied it on Thursday but are continuing arguments. The case was accepted under a rule 11. A rule 11 has never been docketed in this manner by anyone outside of a federal government case that was brought in the 1970's. Rule 11 means the case is of imperative public importance (SCOTUS had to decide that and docket this in that manner).
Prayers up warriors - I know the Brunson case has received many critics but this would definitely qualify as a swamp flush.
I'm not sure how to show you other than a link to his Facebook. It's the first post. https://m.facebook.com/raland.brunson
Screencap of poast
DOCKET #22-380 In a few days our 3rd Petition to the US Supreme Court will be considered to be added to the docket of the Supreme Court and there they will determine if they will accept it for another conference.
NEW INFORMATION THAT IS BEING ADDED: We are bringing more details of the events of January 6, 2021 that we have not previous done. This petition is much more bold in pointing out that on that day, both parties were accusing each other of attempting to interfere with the election process. Interfering with the election process is considered an act of war on the United States of America because it accomplishes the same results. It puts into power it's victor. Democrats were accusing Republicans Ted Cruz and Paul Gosar of treason for their attempt to hold off on the certification until their claimed evidence could be investigated. Kelly Townsend, the chairwoman of the Arizona House Elections Committee was also being accused by the democrats for attempting to interfere with the election process, which if proven true, would be an act of treason. These accusations made by the democrats were very serious, yet the defendants of this case voted to thwart the investigation into these accusations, cheating out the democrats. Many democrats were accusing Trump with attempting to interfere with the election and to this day they are still making those claims, all because there was no investigation.
Is this case a "Put Trump back into office" case? No. Do not assume for a second I voted for Trump and this case is all about putting him back in. For all you know I wrote in my neighbor. This case has nothing to do with Trump. So you people who are about to make comments on this post about anti Trump stuff you might as well be talking about a way to lose weight, because it does not relate. But go ahead, be my guest and post whatever you want. Oh, and one last thing. The Supreme Court absolutely has the full power to remove a sitting president. It goes like this: the Supreme Court judges all laws. All of them. Every law. They have the final and ultimate say on how the Constitution of the US is to be interpreted, and there are only two powers on this earth that can stop them. 1. Congress getting together and voting them out. 2. The military generals.
Oh, and the US Supreme Court can, if they want, give me full standing in this case, because why? Because if they want, they have the power to say so, that's why. Oh, and here's a note to all of those who are accusing us of grifting: We absolutely appreciate your donations and your letters to the Supreme Court. We're actually starting to get noticed. Thank you again.