Jill Biden goes on campaign trip without Joe. One would almost think she believes she is running.
No one should ever be allowed to run for any office without passing a Constitutional Republic knowledge test, and swearing to honor, follow, uphold, and defend the Constitution above all other ideologies or agenda's. If you do not believe in it, you do not get to serve under it.
This isn't surprising. Biden and Obama have labelled veterans who support the Constitution as domestic terrorists since Obama's first illegitimate term of office.
I do not agree. We used to be a society that took care of our own elderly relatives. Since we moved away from that, our country has deteriorated from being the greatest nation to being where we find ourselves today.
I do not think age should have any bearing on free will and the liberty to choose how you live your life.
Now let's see this happen across the rest of the States.
Investigate, indicted, impeached (where required), prosecuted, and, if found guilty, should be a Capital Offense, in my opinion. Not incarceration.
I understood that, but drew a parallel closer to home. Regardless, I am sure their constitution is just as much the contract for their government, as our is for our own.
Canadian people need to stand up and hold those that represent them accountable. All men have the same right to reform their own governments, as do we. This is a right given all people by our Creator to hold the governments of man they live under accountable for their conduct.
Look how Mike Simpson limits the ability of his constituents to contact him:> https://simpson.house.gov/contact/
I am opposed to #13 and #14.
For #13, I am 100% opposed to continuing use of the FRN as the U.S. Dollar. I fully support abolishing the FRN, the Federal Reserve, and returning to the real U.S. Dollar in the form of Silver and Gold Eagles, as established and intended by our Founding Fathers.
For #14, Both programs (along with many others) are purely socialistic and not authorized by the Constitution. I would much rather see a program to eliminate these programs and giving the people back their money to use as they choose.
I love our Country, but as a fully functioning Constitutional Republic operating 100% on the principles upon which it was originally established.
No Branch of our Federal Government has any legitimate power to grant any person or entity full immunity for any act that violates the individual natural rights of Americans. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute.
In a Constitutional Republic, when the Federal Government ignores the Constitution, you have an illegitimate Government. The Constitution is quite literally they contract, or license, for Government to exist and operate.
"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)
Once President Trump is back in office he should work toward withdrawing all federal funds from any City, County, and State that is ignoring immigration law and enforcement.
And yet, over 99% of Americans pay property taxes on homes and other property. It isn't about me knowing the difference, it is about being able to argue it successfully in court when the deck is stacked against you by the corrupt system.
We all have a right to own and carry weapons yet in many places you will be arrested for doing so. That is despite the 2A telling government not to infringe.
It is the County, not the State, and yes, they will force you to go to court because they will deny your petition, and your filings. There maybe a rare few that get the easy approval, but most end up having to go to court to secure they patents. Harris County, TX was the last time I saw someone filing and ended up having to go to court.
I know, for a fact, that it will most likely go to court to enforce.
First of all, the Court didn't grant anything. The Constitution defines each Branch of government, and each role. Presidential Immunity has always been around. There are already remedies to Presidential criminal activity. It is called Impeachment. If impeached, then the President can be tried for illegal activities.
Not without a court fight. You MUST know how to fight to win, or you will lose the case. Most lawyers are going to be useless for a case like this. You need to be ready to argue your own case.
Learn about land patents and how to apply them. Here is a good place to start your research: https://teamlaw.net/land.htm
The Constitution doesn't grant them any "Emergency Powers". Only the limited powers they always have. Nothing more.
Wrong. The constitution merely protects our pre-existing rights from government infringement and overreach. We were born with the right to abolish government no longer operating under the limits of the constitution. Our Creator endowed us with all of our rights at birth.
Land patents are worth the time and effort to research, apply, and defend in court. https://teamlaw.net/land.htm is a great place to start learning and researching.
Obama was not eligible, either, but see how that turned out?
The President can't give anyone the death penalty. He can sign a bill into law, but he is not king.
They don't have to turn Idaho blue to win control. Just see what they did in Denver to win control over the entire State of Colorado.
Why would it need to be repealed? No Branch of our Federal Government has any legitimate power to grant any person or entity full immunity for any act that violates the individual natural rights of Americans. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute.