2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

The SS is just as compromised as the FBI, NSA, CIA, ATF, IRS, and every other federal agency. They did not secure the venue, they allowed multiple shots to be fired at Trump before returning fire, and took way too long to move Trump out of the kill zone.  This was another inside job. President Trump, please rely ONLY on your own personal security team going forward.

34
427windsorman 34 points ago +34 / -0

The SS is just as compromised as the FBI, NSA, CIA, ATF, IRS, and every other federal agency. They did not secure the venue, they allowed multiple shots to be fired at Trump before returning fire, and took way too long to move Trump out of the kill zone.  This was another inside job. President Trump, please rely ONLY on your own personal security team going forward.

12
427windsorman 12 points ago +13 / -1

Facts:

  1. This was not a staged assassination attempt. It was the real deal. It was a real shooting and a real attempt to kill our legitimate President.
  2. The area was not secured properly, nor was protocol followed in securing the venue. The SS was slow to react to the threat. They took an extremely long time in moving him to safety. Both are in opposition to the extensive and precise training the SS receive to be on a security detail of this nature.

Speculation:

  1. The SS is as compromised as the FBI, CIA, ATF, IRS, and every other federal agency.
  2. The hoped for outcome was not achieved forcing the SS to jump into protection mode and move Trump out of the area. There is no way 3+ shots could have been taken by the assassin before a SS sniper could get off a shot.
  3. I predict Trump will keep his personal security team close around him going forward. Between him and the SS.

To me, this has a lot of red flags indicating it was a possible set up. There is no way they could have predicted only 1 of the shots fired would hit Trump, and it only be a grazing wound.

9
427windsorman 9 points ago +9 / -0

If you do not believe the SS is as compromised as the other federal agencies, then you are truly gullible. President Trump needs to keep his personal security team around him at all times.

There is no way this was an "oversight". This is all the SS protection detail do for a living.

6
427windsorman 6 points ago +6 / -0

What is happening today, under Biden, is an invasion. So-called Sanctuary States, Counties, and Cities are aiding and abetting this invasion, which is a threat to national security. So, yes, in this case, Federal law is proper jurisdiction.

The same could be said for illegal immigration at any time, not just under an illegitimate "President" intentionally destroying our Republic. illegal immigration has always ben a threat to national sovereignty and security.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Constitution Party comes to mind.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another crime by government against individuals. The Constitution FORBIDS government from taking individual private property.

They do the same thing to people arrested for gun possession, even when released and charges being dropped. It takes years, if ever, you get your guns back.

3
427windsorman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, if a few hundred of us were to send in individual FOIA's for each of the issues posted by TaQo that would keep them busy in Greenwich for quite some time.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not going to trust here. Just listen to President Trumps "Snake" story.

Ben Carson is the best pick for VP, IMHO. He has a long track record of goodness.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what happens when our people are not instructed in the principles of liberty as our founding fathers warned us about. This was common knowledge back in their day, yet seems foreign to most people in America today:

No Branch of our Federal Government has any legitimate power to grant any person or entity full immunity for any act that violates the individual natural rights of Americans. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why would it need to be repealed? No Branch of our Federal Government has any legitimate power to grant any person or entity full immunity for any act that violates the individual natural rights of Americans. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute.

by sol7
3
427windsorman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jill Biden goes on campaign trip without Joe. One would almost think she believes she is running.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one should ever be allowed to run for any office without passing a Constitutional Republic knowledge test, and swearing to honor, follow, uphold, and defend the Constitution above all other ideologies or agenda's. If you do not believe in it, you do not get to serve under it.

3
427windsorman 3 points ago +3 / -0

This isn't surprising. Biden and Obama have labelled veterans who support the Constitution as domestic terrorists since Obama's first illegitimate term of office.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do not agree. We used to be a society that took care of our own elderly relatives. Since we moved away from that, our country has deteriorated from being the greatest nation to being where we find ourselves today.

I do not think age should have any bearing on free will and the liberty to choose how you live your life.

9
427windsorman 9 points ago +9 / -0

Investigate, indicted, impeached (where required), prosecuted, and, if found guilty, should be a Capital Offense, in my opinion. Not incarceration.

6
427windsorman 6 points ago +6 / -0

I understood that, but drew a parallel closer to home. Regardless, I am sure their constitution is just as much the contract for their government, as our is for our own.

Canadian people need to stand up and hold those that represent them accountable. All men have the same right to reform their own governments, as do we. This is a right given all people by our Creator to hold the governments of man they live under accountable for their conduct.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am opposed to #13 and #14.

For #13, I am 100% opposed to continuing use of the FRN as the U.S. Dollar. I fully support abolishing the FRN, the Federal Reserve, and returning to the real U.S. Dollar in the form of Silver and Gold Eagles, as established and intended by our Founding Fathers.

For #14, Both programs (along with many others) are purely socialistic and not authorized by the Constitution. I would much rather see a program to eliminate these programs and giving the people back their money to use as they choose.

I love our Country, but as a fully functioning Constitutional Republic operating 100% on the principles upon which it was originally established.

6
427windsorman 6 points ago +6 / -0

No Branch of our Federal Government has any legitimate power to grant any person or entity full immunity for any act that violates the individual natural rights of Americans. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›