2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Vance should be able to shed light on this since he was in that position and probably had 'offers' made to him. Rubio too.

11
BadMamaJama 11 points ago +11 / -0

The whole Patriot Act while you're in there.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Not available. In a meeting at the moment."

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone please ELI5 the AI revolution and the unbelievably huge need for power to put us first in the world for national security, etc. I guess I have missed something big. My understanding is that AI is going to have an impact similar to robotics entering our manufacturing sector... it will displace workers by automation. Robots supplant the physical need for workers, AI would supplant workers by handling the 'thinking and decision making ' currently handled by existing employees. I feel I am missing a great big elephant in the room. Am I close to guessing the impact? Why the excessive need for power?

Edit to add/ask: So, if AI thinking replaces a lot of the workforce, is the return to manufacturing 'stateside' supposed to make up the difference in job loss due to AI?

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this the same event that James O;Keefe revealed on undercover video a few weeks ago? Where the directive was to just get money into outside bank accounts so it was already 'distributed' before Biden left office? There were DOGE reps saying the money in those accounts could be 'clawed back.' Or is this a new instance?

3
BadMamaJama 3 points ago +3 / -0
  1. Patel couldn't hold eye contact with the interviewer when he was talking. If you review his 'older' interviews when he was Crossfire investigator and during his confirmation hearings, he always had nearly unbroken eye contact and low blink rate with an interviewer when he was both speaking and listening.

2 Bongino looked like he was going to throw up the whole time Patel was talking. That man has a conscience, a good relationship with God (esp since his Ca scare) and was wishing he was anywhere but 'there' during that whole interview. His only statements 'it was a suicide' and 'I saw the file'.

If I were to make a wag, I'd say that both were purposely handed 'prepared versions' of the Epstein file with 'evidence' and 'facts' leading one to conclude that suicide was the only possible fit. That way, they could both reference 'his file' and make the statements they made to help them try to sound convincing in the interview. If Epstein is in witness security then, of course, there will be a 'published' file showing the 'suicide' facts, even within the FBI.

3
BadMamaJama 3 points ago +3 / -0

My first 'radar warning' was when the virus was first observed in only 'port cities' (west and east coast) and then, overnight it seemed, it spread throughout the urban and rural central US. No way was this a organic spread but, I believe, a purposeful distribution of the virus in public areas, i.e airports, large hubs, larger stores (Walmarts, maybe?) probably schools. After that, here come the jab and testing tents, the TV and movie stars in commercials, etc. Way too coordinated to not have been staged in advance. The saturation was like the 'reminders' in Demolition Man.

The info and discussions on this board confirmed suspicions and definitely confirmed no jab for me. Can't thank you folks enough for the research and review of studies, theories, etc., beyond anything I could accomplish. What baffles me, though, is that Birx and the rest kept publishing the crazy-high survival rates by age category. If they really wanted higher saturation of the jab, why wouldn't they have falsified those numbers to indicate higher morbidity?

3
BadMamaJama 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good grief - how could human beings sit around a table and make deliberate decisions like this - "you deliver the bad batches for June, July, then next company gets it for 60 days". Bunch of psychopaths.

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was really hoping YMCA would be there. Yay!!

4
BadMamaJama 4 points ago +4 / -0

Both lying. Look at Bongino's face when Patel is speaking. Looks like he's about to throw up. Also, how would both the Dir and the Dep Dir of FBI both have 'the time' and be scheduled together on Maria's program? Would make sense if this is a definite script to get a message out. Too bad the 'senders' weren't too convincing. Just like Susan Rice on 'it was a video' - people knew while she was doing the Sunday news show rounds that she was making her story up.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›