Just thinking out loud here:
Maybe it's really important to the future of humanity to somewhat reduce the human population. It's not just some green leftist bullshit that the Earth is in trouble. The oceans are way too polluted for instance and natural food chains worldwide are under severe pressure thanks to humanity.
When we manage populations of animals and don't let their numbers grow out of control, we don't do that because we want to do evil. We do that because we care about the long-term.
What's more ethical? Saving as many people in the short-term or is it more ethical to save future generations from an over-populated planet that will buckle under the pressure of too many human beings?
Just in case it's taken down:
Don't forget the Bush funeral! Same sloppy flag: https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/12/03/18/George-HW-Bush-Lies-In-State.jpg
Well she did say it goes against "the laws of the universe"...
Oprah Winfrey mourned the death of Avant on Twitter, saying “The fact that this has happened, her being shot and killed in her own home … has shaken the laws of the Universe.”
What a retarded statement by that bitch!
For when it's taken down:
For future reference:
We are going to find out I guess what the deal is with Comey and his family.
I'm still wondering about why Comey, who is supposed to be on team black hat, reopened the Hillary Clinton email case just shortly before the 2016 election.
I think he talked and that he might be in witness protection. And the picture released of Epstein Island of someone looking like Epstein seen from above (after he supposedly killed himself), might have been a message from the white hats to the deep state.
Sorry for hijacking top comment, but the following train of thought I haven't seen yet in the past year and it might be very helpful in our understanding of the situation.
I was thinking about this issue the other day and maybe this has something to do with it:
What needs saving first in order to save the human race? It's the planet that needs to be saved first. There are predictions we will have 10 billion people on the planet in 2050 and it will stay at that level, but there are others that are saying the population will continue to grow beyond 10 billion.
Eventhough it might sound evil, but for the health of the planet and therefore the future of the human race, it might be necessary to somewhat reduce the Earth's population. The white hats might have even used Project Looking Glass to see what (catastrophic?) problems overpopulation will cause down the line.
What is more ethical? Save as many humans now but have major problems down the road causing a lot of suffering for the next generations, or reduce the Earth's population now to save the future?
It's not like the white hats are doing everything to help reduce the population, they are actually helping to offer the right information about the pandemic so that people can make the choice themselves. It's not the white hats responsibility that people are not thinking for themselves and choosing possible death.
I'm finding this:
The term Generation X was coined by photographer Robert Capa in the early 1950s. He used it as a title for a photo-essay about young men and women growing up immediately after the Second World War. The 'X' refers to the unknown.
The name became popular after Douglas Coupland published his novel entitled Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture, concerning young adults during the late 1980s and their lifestyles.
After 'X', the names of Generation Y and Z (known together as Millennials) were coined sequentially. Now that we have reached the end of the alphabet, the terminology has switched to the Greek alphabet, the youngest generation (born after 2008) is called Alpha.
https://www.quora.com/What%E2%80%99s-the-origin-of-the-term-Generation-X?share=1
I think Satoshi Nakamoto, who invented Bitcoin, might have been a white hat team working for the NSA. There's a reason why the CIA wanted to talk to Gavin Andreessen who worked closely together with Satoshi. After the CIA approached Gavin, Satoshi disappeared. I think Bitcoin plays a major role in the white hat vs black hat war.
Also, Trump might just be old-fashioned and might not understand crypto that well. Trump doesn't need to be fully informed of the entire white hat game plan to perform his role. The white hat plan to save the world is larger than just Trump.