7
CacheCollector 7 points ago +7 / -0

it couldnt possibly be tomorrow. because we know q said no telegraphing. but q knows that we know q said no telegraphing so it must be tomorrow. but q knows we know that q knows that we know that q said it would not be telegraphed so it also must not be tomorrow.

3
CacheCollector 3 points ago +3 / -0

my thought is that u have non government entity dominion. you have foreign intervention, not tied to foreign government. so no one can be held accountable for criminal activity, treason, or justifying a war. there is criminal activity but they maintain plausable deniability. that would be benefit to the international element. the individuals in US comitting fraud cant be linked to widespread voterfraud, conspiracy, treason etc. While the analysis, aggregation, conspiracy can be done overseas.

2
CacheCollector 2 points ago +2 / -0

De-socialize. that is the solution. without government welfare, immigrant families would not benefit from size and they would assimilate to norms of smaller family size.

2
CacheCollector 2 points ago +2 / -0

nothing surprises me about "science". Institutions, grants, gatekeepers cause a lot of it. Following cosmology and watching them invent dark matter halos around galaxies as an adhoc fix to their theories was my redpill. i never trusted ever again. pioneers like galileo, birkeland, arp, etc. anyone who goes against consensus(current thing) is ostracized and "debunked" out of scientific community. currently some things are beyond our scientific capabilities. dna is another one. they want to create life, they cant. they splice/add/remove (gain of function type stuff) but they do not understand.

1
CacheCollector 1 point ago +1 / -0

well, if a teacher wants to commit a shooting they are just as able as students or general pop. statistically speaking teacher involved shootings are not worth thinking about ... wtf. and the ones u are worried about are libs who want no guns. this whole train of thought u all are on makes no sense to me. tranny teacher shootings are the problem now?

2
CacheCollector 2 points ago +3 / -1

Its a deterrent. just knowing any teacher could possibly be armed makes mass shooters more likely to target somewhere else. they always target gun free zones. we dont need a gun in every classroom or even every school. the possibility changes the thought process for the shooters. its not a fix all but it would help.

5
CacheCollector 5 points ago +5 / -0

it is much easier to avoid accountability and claim lack of knowledge of 3rd party google. if twitter makes its own bots it is blatant fraud. purchasing consulting or algorithm development services from google creates plausible deniability.

11
CacheCollector 11 points ago +11 / -0

special acquisition companies like dwac are used to bring private companies public. they are never used to acquire publicly traded company like twtr. and its already announced its acquisition. too many people talk about dwac not even knowing what a spac is.

1
CacheCollector 1 point ago +1 / -0

the transaction was done march 14

1
CacheCollector 1 point ago +1 / -0

correct. there is no obligation to adhere to those moralities. often a persons morality is not tested. at extremes even religous types may give in to immorality.

1
CacheCollector 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are many theories on moral philosophy. quite a few of which are of an atheistic nature ... But why would one to adhere to morality without an eternal benefit/punishment is an intresting question and yet it does exist.

9
CacheCollector 9 points ago +9 / -0

TE Connectivity has also done the same. Can we just get the OSHA recommendations for masks overturned next. Literally no evidence or study showing any benefit to the masks.

1
CacheCollector 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe there is video or photo showing rosenbaum with a heavy chain. Not a firearm, but a weapon.

8
CacheCollector 8 points ago +8 / -0

I am not on the GME bandwagon. I think it has nothing to do with Q. But ... Liquidity plays a factor in the market, especially when you are talking about margin accounts, heavily leveraged, loaning of shares, and market makers needing to maintain delta neutral positions while maniacs buy up stock and calls that they should never be buying. LMAO . Its just getting funny at this point, GME keeps bringing the financial system maintained by these market makers to the brink of destruction. And as it all happens anyone holding shorts on GME needs to have a giant pile of cash to back up their short position and try to outlast the squeeze, or be forced to take huge losses. If they are cutoff from some avenues (ie lending from the fed) I imagine this would possibly start to see wealth destruction for some of the market makers and hedge funds.

3
CacheCollector 3 points ago +4 / -1

People don't gain their wealth through naked shortselling. Short selling, at maximum profit you can double your money. Many many plays out where that have seen huge multiplicative returns. Short selling is a hedge strategy not a wealth building strategy. It is what you do after you have built wealth and have a portfolio. The hedge is a hedge on another investment, it is not the investment itself.

3
CacheCollector 3 points ago +3 / -0

But you could make the same argument for twitter. It just didn't have an option to disable replies like youtube does. Either can be used as a one-way communication tool or a forum. I think twitter may have added something to disable replies on tweets tough, not sure.

1
CacheCollector 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://youtu.be/QoKJcOx8-Os?t=70 Right around 1:10, just interesting comments you may have seen this. Strange comments just a day before the crash.

1
CacheCollector 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah it will be interesting to see how it plays out. I can't really see a scenario where this thing doesn't come falling back to the sub$40 range, plus an offering driving it back to the ground. I really wonder what this is like to watch from perspective of CEO/CFO, board members of a company when this speculation happens. I think I would be freaking out, idk. I trade, Can't imagine being responsible for a company on the verge of bankruptcy in a battle between wall street hedge funds and reddit autists.

4
CacheCollector 4 points ago +4 / -0

To short a stock, you "borrow" shares from the people who own them and pay interest on those shares, like a loan, but stock shares instead of money. You then sell those shares at the current price, and you will need to repurchase the shares later. (The assumption is, in the future stock price will be much lower, so it is worth paying interest in the meantime since you are selling at $5 but can buy the shares back later for $2 for example) The people who shorted game stop shorted so many shares that now, they have to buy back so many shares that the law of supply and demand, there is not enough supply of shares, so the price rises. Because they borrowed shares and are paying interest, they need to buy the shares NO MATTER THE PRICE. Since the risk is infinite as the price rises the brokers/creditors will force the short sellers to buy the stock no matter the price. Basically shorts getting fukt, so hard.

3
CacheCollector 3 points ago +3 / -0

Puts will have expirations, and the further into the future your put expires, the more the market will need to drop for you to make a return. They are risky and most often used as hedges or as part of a larger strategy. Shorting requires a margin account and you will need to pay interest on the shares you borrow to short. Despite some of the biggest events in history the market has continuously climbed upward, betting against it is not easy. For example Gamestop right now(GME) by all logic should be failing. Large investors have tried to short and are burning right now. “the markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” Interest rates remain extremely low, the fed has been continuing to support the market, this leaves people with little option in how to use money besides the market. Electric vehicle companies are sprouting up everywhere and receiving insane evaluations. If you see Biden ultimately not being in office, shorting or buying puts on the EV bubble could be profitable. My money has mostly been and still is in start up companies (IPO/SPAC) and tech like AMD and NVDA. These tend to move on their own and do not follow the general market as much as some bigger name companies. NPA is a IPO/SPAC company looking to provide 4g/5g service globally via satelite. You can buy stock or warrants in this company. Their selling point is they will be selling service direct to telecoms and will work 100%compatible with existing phones. All investments carry risk. Be careful, good luck.

1
CacheCollector 1 point ago +1 / -0

But you can't even make political bets in the U.S. the only way to have even bet on the election is foreign gambling sites online. There literally are no bets to pay out.