5
CaptainQirk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Huma was the handler for the various Hillary actors.

Now, we know these people don't traditionally "date" like we do. Their unions are built on power.

Huma + Weiner, power Huma + Soros = power

The question is, since there's a long-standing theory that Alex Soros is literally just a clone of George, is Huma functioning as HIS handler in the same way she did for the Hillaries?

Is her skillset handling manufactured clones and doubles?

1
CaptainQirk 1 point ago +1 / -0

The note that Biden's team weren't aware of Lloyd Austin's cancer intrigues me, especially since it looks like they already replaced Austin with a body double.

Looking at the Fetterman situation, where he was obviously replaced by a body double, the question has arisen about just who was responsible for the replacement.

White hats are just as capable of this as black hats.

So, could the Lloyd Austin replacement have been a White Hat move?

5
CaptainQirk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why are we meant to give a shit?

Given that even Trump talked about them, it makes me think that there's something here we're all missing.

The only good thing that has come of all this, is people figuring out in increasing intensity and frequency that the Bread and Circuses are all rigged and that the Subpar Owl is a Satanic ritual.

But regardless, people are still drawn into the Satanic media bullshit.

4
CaptainQirk 4 points ago +4 / -0

All these people are spooks. But sometimes the spooks are on our side. I feel like we get confirmation from Watters of this fact. He gives hat tips to anons, I recall one segment where he specifically referred to the "Side of Beef" moment and used that phrase.

The thing I hate about an Infowar though, is that whether I agree with you, disagree with you, was ahead of the story, or am catching up on the story... we're still just caught in this fucking matrix of Intelligence assets pulling the strings.

It's frankly exhausting.

2
CaptainQirk 2 points ago +2 / -0

This isn't the Hillary who debated Trump on stage. However this DOES look like the more timid one that got scared at protesters and needed the now dead Nigerian handler to tell her to keep talking.

Hillary is a character portrayed by many people.

7
CaptainQirk 7 points ago +7 / -0

Also saw a Politico article today which mentioned Trump having a 17 point lead on Haley

31
CaptainQirk 31 points ago +31 / -0

A traitor to what though? A traitor to the US? For a conversation? No.

A traitor to Britain? He's not British.

The only thing this retarded Muppet could mean is that someone formerly under the control of the Deep State has betrayed the Deep State.

11
CaptainQirk 11 points ago +12 / -1

The closer we get to them realising they've lost the war, the more these establishment talking heads start flipping into Trump Assassination comms.

Alex Jones the glowie pied piper wants Trump dead. Ann Coulter wants Trump dead. Nikki Haley wants Trump dead.

They're trying their hardest with all their assets, to trigger a sleeper agent into taking the shot.

1
CaptainQirk 1 point ago +2 / -1

I know it's mathematics. But the occult will use it in a such a way where it's like mass sacrifices on certain dates, as if each of these events is a little targeted "code injection" at specific points.

Thus, who's to say that white hats aren't "injecting code" too? The repetition of 17 seemed like more than just saying "hi Q folks".

Of course we can influence our world. Are you saying there's no such thing as free will? That literally everything happens because God wants it to happen? That's a pretty bleak outlook considering we're fighting a Cabal of multigenerational child rapists. So God wants that to happen? If that's the case, then we wouldn't want God to "win".

But we do. So God must mean something higher than that.

And according to the Bible one can even bargain with God, in the case of Sodom and Gomorrah.

4
CaptainQirk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Saturday Night Live isn't comedy. It's propaganda. They don't even pretend otherwise anymore.

How pathetic do you have to be as a Presidential candidate, how desperate for relevance do you have to be, that you think it's a smart idea to get up there and do such a thing?

At what point of the genius brainstorming session of the government thinktanks did they think this would "show Trump" or sway the people?

They're basically scraping the bottom of the barrel for ammunition and assets, and are finding dust and dumbassery.

I feel like it's one of those situations where they (the Deep State) know they've lost the war... but you can't just quit a war. You just gotta keep fighting and using everything you have. You know you've lost the war but you gotta try cause as much damage and chaos and confusion as possible before you die.

I mean, I know we're watching a movie. There are many levels of kayfabe and illusion.

But amongst all the noise, the signal is that the Deep State Assets from all over the spectrum in whatever profession or guise they adopt, find themselves circling the wagons in increasingly tighter circles, desperate to protect "The System of Systems".

The irony is, because the desire to protect the system outweighs the desire to be consistent in their belief or ideology, we can all see them doing it, we can all see the alliances they make.

In their desire to circle the wagons, they've just backed themselves into one spot. Circling the wagons doesn't work when you can strike the wagons from above.

8
CaptainQirk 8 points ago +8 / -0

They activated all assets. Anyone they "own" will be pressed into service to defend the regime, the system of systems.

People don't care about this stuff anymore. When people see these celebrated idiots all line up and endorse anyone, it sends a massive signal to avoid those people like the plague.

Remember when Madonna was offering blowjobs to anyone who would vote Hillary?

by Cuzzo
2
CaptainQirk 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "coincidence" between the Kennedy Assassination and Doctor Who's first episode has been a pretty well known bit of Trivia in the Who fandom for a long time.

Looking back though, is it saying "ha ha, look, we referenced the thing", or is it saying "ha ha, we killed your guy and decades later our cult still flaunts it".

Did you ever notice that the "British Invasion" happened directly after, essentially with "culture bombs" instead of weapons?

by Cuzzo
2
CaptainQirk 2 points ago +2 / -0

In fairness, they hadn't really established The Doctor (or Dr. Who) as being a guy who intervenes and saves people at that point. The episode from that exact era called "The Aztecs" even had The Doctor chastising Barbara for trying to bring modern attitudes to the past; "You cannot rewrite history, not one line!"

As a second, out-of-universe point, you couldn't really have a TV show that premiered the day of the Assassination and have your main character go back and save the guy that just got assassinated. That would be in poor taste whether you were for or against Kennedy.

This was current events. The show was more focused on being educational, which is why the first two companions were schoolteachers.

You get your history lessons in "the past", exciting scientific concepts for "the future", and current events were basically restricted to advertising The Beatles and the mod scene.

What The Doctor started as, and what he became, are quite different.

by Cuzzo
3
CaptainQirk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course, what you'll find is that the people running Doctor Who especially from 2005 onwards, are crazy woke Communists indoctrinated into a cult, and that they absolutely agree with assassinating Kennedy.

Try not to become too attached as I did, since eventually you hit that same woke point that every media franchise has succumbed to.

It's good for cultural insight, but from someone who watched, absorbed, became invested in this show since I was a teenager, there's zero point in caring about what happens to these characters.

You know what though? I could never see myself saying this. Back in the day I would have been so excited to talk about Doctor Who with someone, anyone.

These days, all I see is a smouldering wreck of a fun scifi show, but because it's dead and expired, it makes it far easier to see behind the curtain of "the entertainment industry" and figure out what's been going on.

We all take gradual steps in our path for knowledge. I hope you continue yours. By all means, watch whatever you want whenever you want, just remember to keep that critical observing eye.

by Cuzzo
6
CaptainQirk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Saving this post, because I am an ex Doctor Who fan with a fairly large knowledge of the show. I have opinions about all of this, including how it ties to the British Intelligence agencies, the communist manufactured psyop called The Beatles, the Freemasons, and how it pretty much becomes inextricably linked to the Jimmy Savile side of the BBC.

I have my normie brain, which can enjoy things at face value, and then the conspiracy research brain that ties it all together.

I say I'm saving this post because I fully intend to return to it with discussion. I'm just unable to cogently and cohesively organize a million strands of information right now, but can recognise I'm probably someone with the largest knowledge on the board when it comes to Doctor Who through both the normie lens and a conspiracy lens.

How deep do you want the rabbithole to go though? It goes pretty far.

The Kennedy Assassination though, that was the public beginning of a decades long psyop and reframing of society and culture. You need a big mass trauma event to prime or shock the brain into rewiring.

This is the trouble with diving into rabbitholes though, it all starts to get very complex and overwhelming. It's hard to be concise. How do you successfully convey decades of research without an unreadable convoluted text dump that is as exhausting to write as it is to read?

15
CaptainQirk 15 points ago +15 / -0

Their goal is to rewrite history.

18
CaptainQirk 18 points ago +18 / -0

HURR HURR, GET VACCINATED MATE

real bright spark there

You travel all that way, buy tickets, just to yell at sports stars to conform to medical experimentation.

8
CaptainQirk 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is what they've come to.

Boris, once foisted upon the British people because of his messy hair (essentially to make a fake Trump comparison) so he could stop Brexit while appearing to support it, is now repurposed.

I wonder, is it just a case of death by association now? That is, now that Boris was used for his main task, now they wheel him out to hurt Trump.

Nobody ever loved Boris like people love Trump, so I guess the idea is to try tarnish Trump by further equating him and Boris?

7
CaptainQirk 7 points ago +7 / -0

Step 1. Have a statement of truth. Step 2. Deliver truthful statement humorously. Step 3. Share with friends and laugh.

You can see how all three of these things are stumbling blocks for the left.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›