4
Evergreeniskunt 4 points ago +4 / -0

My sentiments as well. You can tell this person has experience writing research papers by their citations of their reasoning.

3
Evergreeniskunt 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's the same judge that was tackled awhile back.

3
Evergreeniskunt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting. Thanks for the response! Makes me appreciate JW and others more.

6
Evergreeniskunt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Never made a FOIA request, always thought it was free. It costs thousands?! Could you expand on the fees associated with the request a little bit?

5
Evergreeniskunt 5 points ago +5 / -0

My first thoughts as well. Tornados can impale blades of grass into wooden telephone poles.

9
Evergreeniskunt 9 points ago +9 / -0

Great post. I'd just like to point out though that Q isn't a single person but a team. Pretty sure.

(Can someone aware me on how to get the Q posts to automatically display instead of linking them? Am dumb)

u/#q42

u/#q351

u/#q412

2
Evergreeniskunt 2 points ago +4 / -2

Why watch a 2 minute video clip when I read the image above even faster than that? In today's digital information age it isn't feasible for a person to consume the absolute massive amount of information that is being produced every second of the day. How many hundreds of hours of YT vids/Podcasts/etc are being uploaded every day?

Saying that 'everyone' should watch the 45 minute video is akin to telling a person to not bother reading a cited research paper when they can just read all the books and papers that were cited in the bibliography.

Most of the 'normies' that we're trying to awaken have very time intensive lives with school/work/family/sustenance/etc with very precious little free time dedicated to staying informed. When they do have that time, we need to hook their hyper short attention spans with concise and to-the-point data that they will easily be able to digest and remember. I personally wouldn't have watched either video and moved along, but I did read the image in it's entirety.

Now, you said you've watched the video 'several' times and noticed many small details. What were they? Why have you sunk 3+ hours into a single raw data source and haven't shared your findings?

I think your reply should've looked something like this:

I've watched this video several times and here are some other things I've noticed. X... X... X...

That's how you fight in this digital information age.

5
Evergreeniskunt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can't be called a Black Swan event when it's painfully obvious that the entire system is at the precipice of its breaking point.

1
Evergreeniskunt 1 point ago +1 / -0

99 on the W4 but you best know what you're doing when you do that.

1
Evergreeniskunt 1 point ago +1 / -0

From wiki -​ Ozone is formed from dioxygen by the action of ultraviolet light and electrical discharges within the Earth's atmosphere.

8
Evergreeniskunt 8 points ago +8 / -0

Took a meteorology class in college and learned the ozone needs sunlight to activate. No sun = "hole". It's like worrying about getting sunburned at night.

12
Evergreeniskunt 12 points ago +12 / -0

I understand why this is sticked, but this isn't a crypto-centric forum and it'll need to be put into layman's terms if you want it to gain traction. Maybe I'll take a stab at it:

$8​Billion of the Paycheck Protection Program loans were given to fake people who had been "verified" (KYC = Know Your Customer)

These entities converted the fiat paper money into crypto exchanges via many ways.

After crypto washing the crypto money was then converted back to fiat money through Signature Bank

Same dirty laundry, different washing machine.

2
Evergreeniskunt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just wondering if he's subtly hinting at any island vacations he's taken in the past.

view more: Next ›