Your theory assumes that a member of Antifa was at one point employed, and in a blue collar job at that. Highly unlikely, but the rest of the theory makes sense.
And they want carbon taxes as the cherry on top.
You will own nothing and you will be happy.
Also, just because HAARP can broadcast a resonant frequency doesn’t mean that the resonance can cause an earthquake. That’s a step in OP’s logic that’s being overlooked.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the DD can predict earthquakes by a few days or weeks, which would allow them to evacuate their ambassadors. But causing earthquakes is a little too much speculation with too little evidence.
Well of course purebloods are more likely to have diabetes.
The jabbed keep dying suddenly before they can get it.
Chemicals aren’t in everything, they ARE everything. Any physical matter is a chemical. The word has just been given a negative connotation by those who don’t understand chemistry and are pushing “natural” homeopathic snake oil.
100% of people who consume dihydrogen monoxide die, yet it is present in nearly everything you eat and some of what you breathe.
Hell might actually be blue. It’s described as a place of fire and brimstone, the latter being an old word for sulphur. Sulphur gives off blue flame. Pictures are quite striking.
Unfortunately these ads are satanic too. They try to gaslight Christians into thinking that Christ was pro illegal immigration, pro lgbt, and anti white. They preach a false Jesus that coddles their sin and never commands them to repent.
Christianity, or at the very least principles derived from it, have been an integral part of Western Civilization since the fourth century AD. Western Civilization is the synthesis between Athens and Jerusalem; reason and faith. The “rational skepticism” that you laud is what led to the degradation of our moral values by undermining the very foundations those values are grounded in.
Christianity is not a religion of tolerance. It states in no uncertain terms that all are wicked and that all should repent. Do not mistake the weakness of some modern “preachers” for weakness in the religion itself.
Christianity is not a Jewish religion. Its early adherents were Israelites, but Jews as a whole rejected in, which is why the overwhelming majority of Christians today aren’t Jews. The religion of Judaism was formed by rabbis who had rejected Christ, so their Talmud/Kabbalah system has nothing to do with Christianity, in fact it outright opposes everything Christ stood for.
The Christian right is the reason work exists.
No, wokeness exists because Marxists captured our university systems back in the 60’s. They invented and propagated the ideology that today is termed “woke”.
Does Christianity telling people homosexuality is wrong cause people to become homosexual? I don’t think so.
Operation Looking Glass is probably just game theory taken to the nth degree.
Here’s the solution for sustainable energy:
Nuclear. Everything else is a complete waste of time and resources. “Renewables” are laughably inefficient.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
Jon stole Kash’s name and only changed it after Kash got wind of it. Kash himself then said that Devo was off the table, which Jon of course took as confirmation of his theory because “operators don’t divulge”. Jon also repeatedly predicted that Trump would return prior to the midterm elections, which turned out to be utterly false hopium.
If it was a seismic survey ship, then it’s perfectly reasonable that it would be around when an earthquake strikes. They are supposed to gather data from earthquakes after all. And since New Zealand is on the southern end of the Ring of Fire, there’s going to be lots of seismic activity in that area, regardless of what ships are present.
Your chart does show an increase in tropical storm activity, but that alone does not establish why this increase is occurring. Any model attempting to explain this trend must be able to provide a mechanism for why it’s happening and an objectively falsifiable prediction for future cyclonic activity. Does the “it’s secret govt tech” model provide such a mechanism or predictions?
If you cut out the vague speculation, I feel like most of the content here would get removed.
Good, that would open up more room for things that we actually have facts and evidence for, like vaccine side effects and election rigging.
some things may not be objectively true but they feel right and that’s what’s important.
False, feelings do not substantiate anything. Feelings are incredibly subjective and have no bearing on reality. This exact argument is what the Left uses to justify their nonsense: “it feels right/good, therefore it must be right/good”. Ultimately this is the same argument that Flat Earthers use as well; all their arguments boil down to “I don’t like NASA and my model feels right, regardless of what evidence opposes it”.
Intuition is not a bad tool to use, but it cannot be your only tool. If there’s no evidence to support your intuition, or available evidence contradicts it, then your intuition needs to be re-examined.
Notice how it’s suddenly getting warmer?
We just got through an ice storm here in Texas, so no, I’m not seeing the general climate getting warmer. Didn’t Trump Jr post on TS about how Mt Washington just hit record cold temps? I’ve also recently heard that the polar ice caps are growing to the utter bafflement of climate scientists.
The storms and events the Left “predicted” are all coming true.
Do you have any data to suggest that storms are getting worse or more frequent? Any data showing that said increase is man made? What are these other events you allude to?
Weather manipulation tech is not nearly as advanced as some think. At best they can make clouds drop their rain a little earlier than usual, and at best they get a 15% increase in rainfall per Scientific American. To make the leap that they can cause hurricanes and earthquakes is completely unfounded.
Turkey gets an earthquake after disagreeing with its NATO allies? That’s called correlation; it is not a valid data point. You have to prove that earthquakes are artificial. Do you even have a scientifically plausible mechanism for how earthquakes can be artificially induced? Furthermore, if the Turkey earthquakes were generated by other NATO members, then Turkey would consider that an act of war, split from NATO, and immediately side with Russia.
Vague speculation about DS capabilities, when it’s backed by conjecture and not verifiable facts, is not helpful. This kind of irrational speculation is why we keep getting inundated with Flat Earthers and NESARA scammers.
The Bible does not describe a geocentric earth. Retroactively reinterpreting the word "firmament" to fit your failed, incoherent model doesn't change that.
this is a prison planet and we are inmates until... we can make proper choices and ascend
You're almost right. Earth was created to be a perfect place where God and man could live in perfect fellowship, but mankind messed that up by choosing to reject God. So Earth can be thought of as a prison, but one of our own making. However, you can't ascend by making your own choices. No one is good enough to restore fellowship with God by their own good choices or good deeds. It is God who came down to us to make the way back to Him, and this was fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The only way back to God is by acknowledging your faults and believing that Christ has already paid to have those faults cleared from your record. Then, on top of getting to be with God in heaven, you get the Holy Spirit here on earth to help guide you into all truth.
Regarding whether Jesus changed the rules in the Old Testament, He did and He didn't. Basically this boils down to the idea of dispensations, the idea that God has slightly different expectations for different people groups across time, with the overall plan of salvation (faith in Jesus Christ) staying the same. So the Israelites were expected to follow all the OT Law, but that's not how they got saved; they were saved by having faith in the coming Messiah, just as Christians today (we just know more about Him because He's already come once). Christians are no longer under the Law, but that doesn't mean we don't have rules. Any rule that Christians are expected to follow is repeated in some form in the New Testament. In fact, all the Ten Commandments are repeated save the keeping of the Sabbath day; the book of Hebrews goes into detail about how Christ is the fulfillment of the sabbath for us. Plus Christians have the Holy Spirit, who provides guidance on how to live your life if you listen.
You're on the right track, and it's good that you're devoting so much thought into this. My advice would be to get a Bible, read the New Testament for starters, and find a good church that teaches the Bible and only the Bible. The more you study, the more answers you will find. Best of luck to you.
The heliocentric round earth model is not incompatible with young earth creationism. Not only am I myself a young earth creationist, but also this is the standard position for every major institute that promotes creation science. I find it bizarre that every FE proponent I talk to thinks they have the exclusive corner on promoting creationism.
Copernicus? Masonic priest.
And? so were all the Founding Fathers. Should we just throw their ideas out the window and go back to a monarchy? Accusations of Freemasonry is an ad hominem attack, not a valid criticism of a scientific model.
You are prohibited from traveling past the 60th parallel...You cannot demonstrate the curvature of the earth using a formula for a sphere... water seeks its own level...
I have heard every flat earther make those exact claims verbatim. For all your admonitions to think for yourself, y'all have the weird tendency to use the exact same catchphrases and arguments. Furthermore, all of these claims are patently false.
FE sounds completely bat**** crazy...
I wouldn't say that, but it's internally inconsistent, and no two flat earthers agree on what the correct model is. Every time someone tries to explain inconsistencies with the FE model, a flat earther comes along and says "that's not what real flat earthers believe", despite documented evidence that the model in question was formulated by another flat earther. Y'all need two separate models to explain the day/night cycle and the seasons cycle.
...ignoring God, His word (firmament), and making you out to be just an insignificant grain of sand in an infinite universe... and not one of God's children
I'd like to unpack this a bit since I am a Christian and creation science is one of my favorite topics. Apologies for the upcoming wall of text, but I'm extremely passionate and well read about this subject.
The Bible does use the word "firmament", but this was a translation choice from the folks who translated the Vulgate into Latin, and these people were associated with the Roman Catholic Church. So if you're concerned about associations with Freemasonry, then associations with RCC should also give you pause. The original Hebrew word is "raqia", and the meaning associated with this word is the idea of beating out a sheet of metal on an anvil. Hence why the translaters chose the Latin word "firmamentum", which is where the English firmament and firm come from. This imo doesn't mesh well with an vapor canopy, ice canopy, or whatever material the FE dome is allegedly made out of. I'll get into this later, but I think this firmament is actually the earth's crust, which used to have a layer of water trapped under it; this water was later released to cause Noah's Flood (btw, how exactly does the Flood work in a FE model?)
Next, not even the Big Bang model specifically requires an infinite universe, though it doesn't rule out that possibility. As far as causing feelings of insignificance, this is merely personal interpretation. The Psalms state that the heavens declare the glory of God, so if the universe really does have billions of galaxies and incomprehensible numbers of stars, all that does is show how powerful, intelligent, and awesome God is. The fact that He is simultaneously capable of shaping galaxy clusters and paying attention to our needs/saving us from our failures just makes me love and appreciate Him more. I don't see how a vast universe is incompatible with us being God's children. He still made us and sent His Son to save us after all.
If you want a resource that shows how the Big Bang/evolutionary model is wrong, while still showing how a heliocentric, round earth cosmology is compatible with Scripture and actually better explains the biological and geological evidence, check out the link below. It's a free online book about creation science with a unique model for Creation and the Flood. Everything is backed by science, reason, and Scripture. The book even shows how mainstream plate tectonic theory is wrong and doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Definitely worth a read.
https://hpt.rsr.org/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html
If you've made it this far, thank you. If you'd like to discuss it more I've got plenty of free time on my hands.
if flat earth positions are weak, simply argue the point
Which we have, ad nauseam. The flat earth model is incoherent, every argument against the heliocentric round earth model is ultimately based in scientific ignorance, and Q himself said the earth wasn't flat. And yet some people just won't take the hint.
I don't mind debating flat earthers, but this community is specifically for Q discussion. Debating something that is 1) already thoroughly disproven, 2) already dismissed by Q, and 3) provides more ammo to the MSM to discredit "Qanon", is simply neither useful nor constructive.
His comment wasn't even that bad. Despite the implication that he was a flat earther, I took it as a light-hearted joke. Oh well.
I saw a poll over on conspiracies for whether they should allow FE stuff too. Even they’re getting tired of it.
So he’s completely unhinged from reality. Good call then.
Must have missed all the drama. What was he posting/commenting about that got him banned?
Notice how they put flat earth and hollow earth in next to the human trafficking. We're here trying to expose satanic pedophiles in our government, something that actually has evidence to support it, and then others come in shrieking "everything you were taught in school is wrong! The earth is flat and Copernicus never existed!"
Sometimes I think it's deliberate sabotage, and other times I think it's some people becoming so open minded that their brains have fallen out.
Great, maybe in another 20 years normies might get angry enough to change their voting and spending habits. They might even write more sternly worded letters to their Congressman!