I hope so because the public utilities commission in my state just wrote me that they don’t want to receive evidence of the safety problems of smart meters.
When these smart meters were foisted on California residents, we were later afforded the opportunity to have them removed by a judge. All we had to do was lodge a complaint letter to the court describing how these meters were effecting our health. Those symptoms were severe headaches, nausea, blurred vision, dizziness etc.etc. I had claimed every symptom under the sun. Needless to say it was removed. You can research the symptoms and perhaps get them removed.
Think Tesla was a persecuted genius who just wanted to give the world free energy? Matt Ehret would like a word. In Part 1 of this deep dive, he traces Tesla's closest friendship to George Sylvester Virek, Hitler's official Washington spokesman, Aleister Crowley disciple, and organizer of the 1939 Madison Square Garden Nazi rally. Along the way Ehret documents Tesla's enthusiastic support for mandatory eugenics, his belief that humans are soulless automatons with no free will, his claim to have received radio signals from Martians, and his tele-automaton demos that turned out to be a guy behind a curtain with a remote control. The Wardenclyffe Tower? Blown up by US Naval Intelligence for transmitting secrets to Germany. The beloved persecuted visionary story starts looking considerably less heroic from here.
Some eye-opening stuff, to be sure. And, well, researched.
Not casting any shade on John Trump by any means, but it certainly seems that Tesla is not everything he's been made out to be.
Guilt by association, plus the tower was powered down in 1906 and was not capable of transmitting anything. It was shut down as J.P. Morgan found out the power could not be metered, so no profits.
I am glad to see you admit it worked.
No, not at all. What posted here is simply the blurb for the issues the research raises. You know, actual research, investigation, with an unbiased mind.
It was shut down as J.P. Morgan found out the power could not be metered
OK. This is the story we are told. But is it true?
The questions are valid.
I am glad to see you admit it worked.
Well, the snarkiness at least tells me you are triggered. Take that trigger, and invest the energy into research. It's worth doing. Beliefs that cannot be defended are inherently weak.
tbh, prior to listening to this 2-part well researched (aka based on factual information, not narrative) I very much had the exact same impression of Tesla that I'm sure you share. Moreover, I had a personal connection to the Tesla legend, in that a friend/associate of mine is the person who developed and established the Tesla memorial at the New Yorker Hotel, when Tesla lived at the time of his death.
However, listening to this author's research, then cross referencing it with my own checks, leads me to believe that maybe we haven't been told the whole story, or even the real story. I'm still thinking about it, and I don't have any hard and fast conclusions.
But really, if you are willing to convict by association, that's just the inverse of being willing to exonerate by association. Or because of the story you've learned. One we've all been told.
On the other hand, if you're unwilling or unable to question that narrative, with an open mind, and learn some of the factual information, at least, to be able to base your viewpoint on facts, then yeah! Avoid the podcast!
I mean, heck. We've been lied to about everything of the last 120 years, except of course, Tesla, right!!!??
Hey, its your choice. I'm just providing to the board something I found, and sharing my experience and opinion on the research (so far). If you reject the content out of hand simply because it contradicts a firmly held set of beliefs, hey, that's your choice.
You can't always be right can you?
Um, are you trying to make this some sort of argument where one side wins (always right) and the other loses? Because frankly, I'm not interested in that. Am I interested in challenging my understand of various things? Certainly. Including Tesla.
More importantly, I don't have a firm opinion on whether the researchers conclusions are right, or accurate, or on target. Yet. But I'm not going to reject the factual information simply because it contradicts what I think I know.
Well, one of the weird things is his relationship with George Sylvester Virek. It's well documented. And, Tesla refers to him as his best friend. Who and what George Sylvester Virek also appears to be well documented. (just do a web search on this guy, or ask grok about his relationship with Tesla to get some factoids.)
I don't know that Tesla had 'genocidal intentions', but his statements on Eugenics are pretty clearly recorded, in his words and articles.
This apparently, is one of the more widely quoted statements (published in Liberty magazine (February 1935)):
“The year 2100 will see eugenics universally established. In past ages, the law governing the survival of the fittest roughly weeded out the less desirable strains. Then man’s new sense of pity began to interfere with the ruthless workings of nature. As a result, we continue to keep alive and to breed the unfit.
The only method compatible with our notions of civilization and the race is to prevent the breeding of the unfit by sterilization and the deliberate guidance of the mating instinct. Several European countries and a number of states of the American Union sterilize the criminal and the insane. This is not sufficient. The trend of opinion among eugenists is that we must make marriage more difficult. Certainly no one who is not a desirable parent should be permitted to produce progeny. A century from now it will no more occur to a normal person to mate with a person eugenically unfit than to marry a habitual criminal.”
So, I mean, I never knew this aspect of Tesla. It makes you ponder. It does appear, however, that his view was not quite as racially motivated as the Nazis, who advanced the idea of a superior race. Tesla seems to have simply been more, hey, unfit, mentally ill, criminal inclined... we should get rid of them and not allow anyone connected to them to breed....
The question is, has Tesla been made out to be some sort of humanistic savior of humanity, the inventor who wanted to make energy free to all humanity? Or was he a more complex, and also flawed person.... Hmmm...?
Didn't Nick T have a "Nazi spy" pretending to be an assistant? Almost like some of our "Vice Presidents" turning out to be Deep Staters making sure the President is "monitored" and doesn't get off course (Johnson, Ford, Bush, Pence).
I haven't watched the content yet. But the snip you posted has me calling BS. I say that because this is how we should have known him for all this time if all the information detailed in your snip is true. I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
This isn't the story any of us grew up with. Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
I say that because this is how we should have known him
Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
Because that is the response of every single person who claimed that 'if all those baseless conspiracy theories were true, we'd know it.'
Are you convinced that COVID was a verifiable pandemic, that people should have been wearing masks, that all the lockdowns were unfortunate but necessary measures, etc? And that the covid virus thing actually came from bats in a wet market?
Because until the truth emerges, that's what people believe.
Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
Well, obviously. But the argument that "if this was true, I'd know it" is a completely false logic.
What do you understand about the world that you did not understand 10 years ago? Anything? or nothing?
I think its fine to be skeptical, and calling something out as BS is a natural response to information that contradicts something we think we know, but I strongly encourage you to watch or listen to the content before passing judgment. But only if its something that interests you, or you are willing to question what you know.
For me, all this was new information, but listening to the content, well, this certainly got me thinking.
I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
I for one would like to know if this is conjecture or true. Would explain a lot. But im not sure what secrets he was sending to germany back when thos happened.
I don't know either if he was sending info. I think the facts are, tho, that this was the reason given for shutting it down.
George Sylvester Virek - his "best friend" - was almost certainly a Nazi agent. Lots of information on that. Heaps.
Also, that Aleister Crowley was a full-blown occultist, and a double agent working for both the British intel and the Germans.
The thing is, there seems to be lots of connections that when you join the dots, draw a very different picture of Tesla than the one we've been sold.
I haven't made up my mind yet, but I'm willing to think about it.
The researcher (podcaster) has a podcast focused on breaking free of psyops. That's going to challenge some ideas people think they know.
what secrets he was sending to germany
From what I can gather, Crowley was working for the British in order to draw and force Germany (Prussia) into the first world war. i.e. that Germany had no desire to got to war, but the British Cabal created the situation forcing them in.
For example, the sinking of the RMS Lusitania. According to the researcher, although ostensibly a passenger vessel, it was actually carrying munitions from the USA to the UK. This information was leaked to German intel on purpose to have them attack the ship, thus creating a propaganda victory for the Brits. "Evil Germany sinks civilian population without cause or provocation."
Don't know if this is all true, but the researcher presents an interesting case.
The underlying premise of the podcast (there are two parts, I and II) is that Tesla has been made out to be a sort of 'god-like' figure by the forces that are pursuing a technological utopia, aka the occultist transhumanists, etc.
Curious stuff.
What I do find interesting but not surprising at all is how some people just dismiss any suggestion that Tesla might not be exactly who they think he is, out of hand. The idea of sacred cow comes to mind.
I plan to listen to the series again, and then perhaps report back in a post.
Remember Trump's 2015 campaign video that would get him elected? Tall blonde guy in it 2x iirc that I thot was younger Uncle John. With all the quantum comms now, on top of the drop with POTUS/BO pic ('like you never existed') and Alice/jumproom tech confirmed along with timeline wars...mebbe a timeline convergence is coming up that is a major jump and not just a minor one. Last night POTUS even talked about how quick and easy he could get rid of the commies. Remember he cannot tell us he has to show us... Exhausted thots lol
Well, if you notice, the MSM and elite instutions will immediatly denounce anyone who evem talks about free energy without bothering to investigate if proposed ideas are accurate. Energy scarcity is how the elite cabal keeps people in chains. They know free energy exists, and they're terrified of it, which is why they work so hard to immediately suppress any inquery into it. They've done such a good job that the US Patent Office won't accept a patent for free energy. Part of fighting back against the cabal is not accepting their version of what is and is not possible. We need to ask the questions that they specifically don't want us to ask. If you think free energy is just a crackpot theory, then I'm sorry to say you have been brainwashed, but now that you're being presented with an opportunity to see that, I hope you are willing to change and challenge your own biases and false assumptions.
The "miracle cancer cures" have worked for many people. Which would you rather try, chemotherapy with horrible side effects and marginal success rates, or a 'miracle cancer cure" that has great success (although not enumerated), with minimal side effects?
You never lose energy, it is still there. The second law of thermodynamics says that energy/mass cannot be created or destroyed, though honestly I think this is a dumb law and should be changed. Regardless, the energy is still there. Sometimes it comes out as a form we don't find immediately useful, like heat, but it hasn't gone anywhere.
Sunlight is effectively free energy. Our bodies use it to convert cholesterol into vitamin D. You can focus it onto food to cook it with almost-free mirror cardboard/plastic. When it shines on your house, you get free heat. (You might not want it but it's free.) Sunlight dries hay, coffee beans, garlic bulbs, cloves, wet clothing ... all for free.
Why should we? The entitlement to think we shohld have free energy is a liberal one.
Energy is a finite resource. There's no magical free energy producer out there. Even if it was, (it's not), it would still have to have people running it, getting it to you, maintaining the system, etc. They wouldn't work for free.
So why would you expect to get it for "free"? Who do you think would cover those bills? The government? Which is why I call it a liberal mindset.
You are thinking of centralised energy production, and its not finite at all. Energy can't be destroyed, it can only be changed into another form of energy. As in electricity heating our home using infra red radiation.
But if we can stop this process and make energy into a closed loop we can harvest this energy forever. It's a scientific mindset which has nothing to do with divisive politics.
Search for Victor Schauberger, and also look at this.
Energy can't be created or destroyed, that's true. But every time you convert it (like electricity to heat), you lose some as unusable waste heat.
That's basic physics (Second Law of Thermodynamics). You can't make a perfect "closed loop" that runs forever without adding new energy.
Schauberger had cool ideas about water and vortices, but none of them created free energy that beats physics. Real progress comes from better batteries, solar, nuclear, etc, not magic loops.
If someone actually builds a working one, it'll change everything. Until then, it's just a fun idea that doesn't work in practice.
And even if they DID actually build one, it would still cost money to produce and transport it. So again, why would you expect to get it for free?
(And sorry, I'm not downloading anything from random, sketchy sites.)
We won't know until we try. Maybe the courts will try to strike it down, but even if that happens, it at least shows us which side these people are on.
Energy being finite is an artificial construct, created by the elite cabal to control us. They create scarcity, and then ration it out for enormous profits. They have so thoroughly taken over our institutions that anyone bringing up free energy is immediately dismissed and ostracised. Isn't science suppose to be about asking questions and exploring? But for some reason they won't even tolerate dicussion on this topic.
The elites control our instutions and sources of information. There isn't "credible evidence" because they have decided there shouldn't be any. We often see individuals come out with free energy ideas, only for them to quickly be silenced. They're often portrayed as shills for trying to sell their ideas, as if that isn't the basis capitalism. Its rediculous that people think these inventions should be given away for free when they wouldn't expect that anyone else. If you invent a free energy device, why shouldn't you also be able to feed your family?
Asking for evidence is playing the game by the rules of the elite. I and many others like me are taking the bold step to refuse to play by their rules. When we are attuned to truth, our gut instinct is almost always correct. This is like how we know the 2020 election was stolen. I can't prove it, there is no evidence for it, but we know it is true.
I already explained, my gut instinct. I've seen videos (before they were taken down) of people demonstrating free energy devices. Even without the evidence or so called "third party" verification, I can tell if something is genuine or if something is fake. Like with you, I can tell that you're a real person, not a bot or a skinwalker. I don't need you to prove that to me.
Sometimes I think we all need to step back and look at things from an unemotional/personal standpoint.
Some of the more unrealistic things I've seen spread have been the result of either fear or desperation, or a combination of both.
If you have an instantly deep emotional response to something, I think it's extra deserving of some dispassionate evaluation that isn't based on what we WANT to happen.
A couple of the best examples of this is anything to do with health or money.
This is why I push back so much on things like MedBeds or NESARA/GESARA here.
They have absolutely nothing to do with Q. Q "influencers" just grabbed some random Q drops and twisted them to support ideas like this. But they were never actually presented by Q as being real.
They make us look gullible to normies, and undermine our credibility severly, thus making it harder to red-pill them.
It preys on people who are truly desperate and simply WANT to believe these things are true. We can't simply wish things into reality.
President Trump posted about Medbeds. You can tell how quickly the MSM was to ridicule it that he hit on something sensative there. Medical care is one of the ways the elite control us. They suppressing healing technology and then charge us exorbitant costs for the crude tools and medications they allow us to have. Side effects aren't an accident, they're an intentional part of treatment to create the need for more treatment. The elite cabal can only get away with this if they can continue to supress the truth, which is why President Trump took the bold step of publically calling them out by posting about the medbeds.
Sometimes President Trump does delete posts. I think this is because it is sensative information and he only wants those who closely follow him to get this information, which is why I always have my notifications turned on for whenever he posts. And yes, of course. Now, we can't always take what he says at face value, but the underlying message is true, we just have to interpret it. Q has always talked about the value of comms and deception. President Trump has proved himself over and over again. I don't think it is asking much at all to trust him, even when it seems to contradict what we see in reality. If this was easy, then we would already have overthrown the elites and had the Great Awakening.
Did you see my posts earlier about how much of this type of thing is simply wish casting?
You acknowledge that there is no credible evidence to support things you have strong opinions/beliefs about and that we can just interpret anything President Trump says/does to match those wishes.
This isn't us just deciding to what is and isn't true. It is statistically impossible that some many people could reach the same conclusions about so many things. That's the evidence right there. You can see how the time stamps of posts align with the Q clock that this has to be true. For this all to be based on coincidenes or wishful thinking is so statistically unlikely that it isn't even worth considering. The elite cabal has worked hard to shape the way we think, which is why they're so heavily invested in the education system. Q is teaching us a new way to think, a new way to validate information that doesn't depend on third party data which is easily corruptable. When President Trump talks, I often have a feeling that confirms what he is saying is true. For the trickier comms, I often can come up with plausible explanations for the information he is hiding. This isn't some special ability, I just have listened to Q and been able to tune my gut instinct to correclty figure out what is true.
I get where you're coming from, and I respect the dedication to digging deep. But we have to be careful here.
Statistical alignment on timestamps and "gut feelings" confirming what we already want to believe isn't the same as solid evidence.
That's exactly how confirmation bias works, we notice the hits and downplay the misses. The elite cabal angle doesn't magically make physics optional or turn interpretation into proof.
Real red pilling has always been stronger when we stick to things we can verify and show normies without them rolling their eyes. When we lean too hard on "tuned instincts" and comms that need special decoding, it becomes harder to bring people in, not easier.
We should keep questioning everything, including our own interpretations. That's how we actually stay ahead of the narrative, not by trusting the feeling more than the observable reality. Hope isn't the problem, letting hope override scrutiny is.
Especially when it comes to things like hard science, such as the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
Confusing a scientific law with a legal law as you've done repeatedly here, and arguing with or in front of normies that we can change scientific laws with a vote from Congress absolutely undermines our credibility and severely damages our chances of red pilling them.
Nothing is ever free. Getting energy requires some sort of gadget that must be paid for. Moving the energy requires more gadgets that cost. Everything costs some labor, which isn't free.
We used to have cheap energy with no practical limits decades ago. My parents' electric bill used to be only $8 a month. Gasoline used to be less than 50 cents a gallon. As far as the limits, they were invented by the oil companies. Oil doesn't come from dead dinosaurs or ferns. That's a proven fact.
If you factor inflation, the 50-cent a gallon gas of the 60's was actually more expensive than $3/gallon gas of today. 50-cent/gallon gas in 1966 is equivalent to about $5/gallon gas today.
Inflation is a construct of the elite cabal. If you took money and went back in time, it would still be worth just as much then, proving that inflation is only true if we collectively believe it to be.
Gas was not 50 cents in the 60s. It passed 47.9 in late 1974, early 1975. I was working then. Minimum wage was $2.00. I could buy four gallons of gas for an hour's pay. Today's minimum wage can buy about two gallons of gas.
I lived back then and know. I also have photos taken at work during that period of time as proof.
It depends on how big the "gadget" has to be and who owns the "gadget." For example, hydroelectric power is free, but someone has to build the dam, the generators, and the distribution system.
Nuclear is free, if someone gave you a small, personal nuclear plant and set it up for you.
It is called a "conspiracy theory" but history would dictate otherwise. During the Tartary empire they extracted energy from the Ether. The Tartarians were a technologically advanced civilization, buried by the Mud floods. Some of their buildings are still standing. It's such an interesting topic, and a fun rabbit hole to delve into.
How much of the Tartary rabbit hole is actual fact, and how much is something that some guy just made up, or cited from someone else who just made it up?
A LOT of those “research documentaries” are REAL light on presenting their sources and verifiable evidence, though it does seem like there was not nothing there at the same time. It’s irritating.
Sources are suppressed by the elite cabal. It has been discussed here enough to know that it is accurate. If you notice, the people who are always clamoring for "facts" and verified sources of information are the same elites from educational institutions. You already have everything you need to verify facts, it is your gut instinct. The elites have control of many sources of information, and have changed the "facts" to fit their agenda. Asking for sources is playing the game by their rules and serves their purposes, which is why I refuse to play along. Like how we know the election was stolen. I can't prove that and I'm mocked by family and friends because of it. Part of the Great Awakening is that we don't need "facts" to pursue what we know as truth. For most of human history, we did fine going by our gut instinct. It is only in the modern age where we find that is no longer sufficient.
It is extremely difficult to know any sources are accurate and haven’t been tampered with
We can’t know sources haven’t been erased
Further:
Assuming Tartarian claims are correct, what direct value does it hold for any given anon?
1 Corinthians 2:2 - For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.
It’s real hard to know anything in this world.
I know a lot of accounts here have made a lot of claims about Tartaria.
I also know that:
Tartarus is both a deep abyss in Greek mythology used as a dungeon for the wicked and a primordial deity associated with this abyss. It serves as a place of punishment for souls judged after death and is also known for imprisoning the Titans.
That’s about it, really.
If you notice, the people who are always clamoring for "facts" and verified sources of information are the same elites from educational institutions.
True, but going to the opposite pole with no sources and a lot of claims doesn’t work either. If claims can’t be proven and have no obvious practical use, there isn’t much value to them, is there?
Given that uncertainty, how to move forward other than faith?
I do suspect there could easily be something to the whole Tartaria thing, you just won’t catch me running with it as if I know anything about it.
Sure, it can work. If you know your enemy is striving to convince you of something, it is obvious that they are trying to cover up the truth. This is classic Sun Tzu. Once you start asking these questions, it is easy to see what they're trying to hide.
There isn't much uncertainty. Q has proven his (or her) reputation over and over again. We see alignment with post time stamps and the Q clock that would be statistically impossible to happen by chance. Do you think Q would simply give us all these clues and truth and simply leave us to our own devices? Of course not. The white hats have been working behind the scenes to guide our discussions and point of to the truth. Ever notice how we never see anything posted by the top mod of this site? Who do you think user dropgun is?
As for Tartaria, my gut instinct tells me it is true and that there is a even more to discover. I've been honing this instinct and now it is accurate nearly all of the time. I don't have any special abilities, anyone can do this if they focus on truth and develop an awareness of the energy around them. Good energy is attracted to truth, which is why it is so hard to sleep when you have a brilliant idea.
This attempt got dumped 3x so will try again. You already have free energy ie YOU whether spiritual intellectual physical ie energy is defined as using power so if you are praying thinking jumping you are tapping into free energy. The self actualizing person spirals that energy by knowing themselves and their full potential and can spiral that energy like a rocket in their reality. This gift from your Creator is one of the biggest threats to THEM.
Tesla was able to keep his love of God in his work and saw that religion and science weren't separate but complemented each other. This allowed him to do and learn monumental things.
He was way ahead of his time, and famously posted "The present is theirs; the future, for which I REALLY worked, is MINE."
From what I've seen over the past few years, John G. Trump was able to get Tesla's notes, understand them with his electrical engineering background, and help save the world.
So many other technical people seemed to "have something bad happen to them" when they tried to introduce new technologies like over-unity power and 200mpg carburetors for example.
As for free energy just think about POTUS at the sword dance in SA and their hands on the power globe. And remember that just weeks before Nov 22 1963 there was a dustup between JFK and DC agencies re the blueprints of DC BLDGS THAT HAD AETHER INFRASTRUCTURE AND HE HAD BEEN REFUSED AND HE MADE ANOTHER DEMAND WHTH A DEADLINE. It woulda put Koon Kreekers outta business. My money sez POTUS ALREADY HAS WHAT JFK WANTED.
I hope so because the public utilities commission in my state just wrote me that they don’t want to receive evidence of the safety problems of smart meters.
Sounds like you should send some.
When these smart meters were foisted on California residents, we were later afforded the opportunity to have them removed by a judge. All we had to do was lodge a complaint letter to the court describing how these meters were effecting our health. Those symptoms were severe headaches, nausea, blurred vision, dizziness etc.etc. I had claimed every symptom under the sun. Needless to say it was removed. You can research the symptoms and perhaps get them removed.
Mine wrote me that they want me to pay them. Assholes. Why would they do that?
What happens if you wrap it in foil? Kek
DR JOHN G TRUMP - FAR MORE THAN JUST "THAT GUY WHO REVIEWED TESLA'S PAPERS" https://old.bitchute.com/video/Dk5nxXOgvybr/
Donald Trump, Nikola Tesla and Uncle John Trump bonus part 3 - Scott Hensler https://old.bitchute.com/video/vqG0xFMMjNL8/
Nikola Tesla's Missing Research Revealed | The Tesla Files (S1, E1) | Full Episode | History https://old.bitchute.com/video/eQ04Za7TSPFi/
If you're keen on some eye-opening research, try this:
Breaking Free of Psyops Ep. 11: The Dark Truth of Nikola Tesla - Part 1 (rumble link)
Synopsis
Some eye-opening stuff, to be sure. And, well, researched.
Not casting any shade on John Trump by any means, but it certainly seems that Tesla is not everything he's been made out to be.
Guilt by association, plus the tower was powered down in 1906 and was not capable of transmitting anything. It was shut down as J.P. Morgan found out the power could not be metered, so no profits. I am glad to see you admit it worked.
No, not at all. What posted here is simply the blurb for the issues the research raises. You know, actual research, investigation, with an unbiased mind.
OK. This is the story we are told. But is it true?
The questions are valid.
Well, the snarkiness at least tells me you are triggered. Take that trigger, and invest the energy into research. It's worth doing. Beliefs that cannot be defended are inherently weak.
tbh, prior to listening to this 2-part well researched (aka based on factual information, not narrative) I very much had the exact same impression of Tesla that I'm sure you share. Moreover, I had a personal connection to the Tesla legend, in that a friend/associate of mine is the person who developed and established the Tesla memorial at the New Yorker Hotel, when Tesla lived at the time of his death.
However, listening to this author's research, then cross referencing it with my own checks, leads me to believe that maybe we haven't been told the whole story, or even the real story. I'm still thinking about it, and I don't have any hard and fast conclusions.
But really, if you are willing to convict by association, that's just the inverse of being willing to exonerate by association. Or because of the story you've learned. One we've all been told.
On the other hand, if you're unwilling or unable to question that narrative, with an open mind, and learn some of the factual information, at least, to be able to base your viewpoint on facts, then yeah! Avoid the podcast!
I mean, heck. We've been lied to about everything of the last 120 years, except of course, Tesla, right!!!??
I’ve had times here where I got triggered at something, set off to prove it wrong, and ended up smashing my own biases.
Whoops.
Other times where I found things that lined up with my suspicions but that I’d had no idea about and was stunned at.
It can’t be stressed enough that research is key.
I mean, a willingness to try and be objective or to question what I know, that kinda helps too.
You can't always be right can you? Never mind my presumed snarkiness, It works and you can't deny that.
Uh, ok. You know this, how, exactly?
Hey, its your choice. I'm just providing to the board something I found, and sharing my experience and opinion on the research (so far). If you reject the content out of hand simply because it contradicts a firmly held set of beliefs, hey, that's your choice.
Um, are you trying to make this some sort of argument where one side wins (always right) and the other loses? Because frankly, I'm not interested in that. Am I interested in challenging my understand of various things? Certainly. Including Tesla.
More importantly, I don't have a firm opinion on whether the researchers conclusions are right, or accurate, or on target. Yet. But I'm not going to reject the factual information simply because it contradicts what I think I know.
You would think that if Tesla had been involved with genocidal intentions, the Nazis would have embraced Tesla and held under the Nazi wings. J.S.
Well, one of the weird things is his relationship with George Sylvester Virek. It's well documented. And, Tesla refers to him as his best friend. Who and what George Sylvester Virek also appears to be well documented. (just do a web search on this guy, or ask grok about his relationship with Tesla to get some factoids.)
I don't know that Tesla had 'genocidal intentions', but his statements on Eugenics are pretty clearly recorded, in his words and articles.
This apparently, is one of the more widely quoted statements (published in Liberty magazine (February 1935)):
So, I mean, I never knew this aspect of Tesla. It makes you ponder. It does appear, however, that his view was not quite as racially motivated as the Nazis, who advanced the idea of a superior race. Tesla seems to have simply been more, hey, unfit, mentally ill, criminal inclined... we should get rid of them and not allow anyone connected to them to breed....
The question is, has Tesla been made out to be some sort of humanistic savior of humanity, the inventor who wanted to make energy free to all humanity? Or was he a more complex, and also flawed person.... Hmmm...?
Didn't Nick T have a "Nazi spy" pretending to be an assistant? Almost like some of our "Vice Presidents" turning out to be Deep Staters making sure the President is "monitored" and doesn't get off course (Johnson, Ford, Bush, Pence).
I haven't watched the content yet. But the snip you posted has me calling BS. I say that because this is how we should have known him for all this time if all the information detailed in your snip is true. I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
This isn't the story any of us grew up with. Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
Because that is the response of every single person who claimed that 'if all those baseless conspiracy theories were true, we'd know it.'
Are you convinced that COVID was a verifiable pandemic, that people should have been wearing masks, that all the lockdowns were unfortunate but necessary measures, etc? And that the covid virus thing actually came from bats in a wet market?
Because until the truth emerges, that's what people believe.
Well, obviously. But the argument that "if this was true, I'd know it" is a completely false logic.
What do you understand about the world that you did not understand 10 years ago? Anything? or nothing?
I think its fine to be skeptical, and calling something out as BS is a natural response to information that contradicts something we think we know, but I strongly encourage you to watch or listen to the content before passing judgment. But only if its something that interests you, or you are willing to question what you know.
For me, all this was new information, but listening to the content, well, this certainly got me thinking.
Um, because some one bothered to look?
I for one would like to know if this is conjecture or true. Would explain a lot. But im not sure what secrets he was sending to germany back when thos happened.
I don't know either if he was sending info. I think the facts are, tho, that this was the reason given for shutting it down.
George Sylvester Virek - his "best friend" - was almost certainly a Nazi agent. Lots of information on that. Heaps.
Also, that Aleister Crowley was a full-blown occultist, and a double agent working for both the British intel and the Germans.
The thing is, there seems to be lots of connections that when you join the dots, draw a very different picture of Tesla than the one we've been sold.
I haven't made up my mind yet, but I'm willing to think about it.
The researcher (podcaster) has a podcast focused on breaking free of psyops. That's going to challenge some ideas people think they know.
From what I can gather, Crowley was working for the British in order to draw and force Germany (Prussia) into the first world war. i.e. that Germany had no desire to got to war, but the British Cabal created the situation forcing them in.
For example, the sinking of the RMS Lusitania. According to the researcher, although ostensibly a passenger vessel, it was actually carrying munitions from the USA to the UK. This information was leaked to German intel on purpose to have them attack the ship, thus creating a propaganda victory for the Brits. "Evil Germany sinks civilian population without cause or provocation."
Don't know if this is all true, but the researcher presents an interesting case.
The underlying premise of the podcast (there are two parts, I and II) is that Tesla has been made out to be a sort of 'god-like' figure by the forces that are pursuing a technological utopia, aka the occultist transhumanists, etc.
Curious stuff.
What I do find interesting but not surprising at all is how some people just dismiss any suggestion that Tesla might not be exactly who they think he is, out of hand. The idea of sacred cow comes to mind.
I plan to listen to the series again, and then perhaps report back in a post.
There is a Tesla tower in Texas, one north east of Moscow, how many more have been built?
Wonder what the significance of family photos is?
John was tasked with reviewing Tesla's papers when requestioned at his death.
"Ding-ding-ding-ding"! We have a winner comment on the puzzle!
I was curious about that as well. Trump also made other posts this afternoon specifically referencing his father.
Remember Trump's 2015 campaign video that would get him elected? Tall blonde guy in it 2x iirc that I thot was younger Uncle John. With all the quantum comms now, on top of the drop with POTUS/BO pic ('like you never existed') and Alice/jumproom tech confirmed along with timeline wars...mebbe a timeline convergence is coming up that is a major jump and not just a minor one. Last night POTUS even talked about how quick and easy he could get rid of the commies. Remember he cannot tell us he has to show us... Exhausted thots lol
Free energy lmao how delusional can you be. Why would he care about oil.
transitions are real. {oil is also a good cheap lubricant (once it isn't wasted as the major energy resource )
We are all free energy units lol
Well, if you notice, the MSM and elite instutions will immediatly denounce anyone who evem talks about free energy without bothering to investigate if proposed ideas are accurate. Energy scarcity is how the elite cabal keeps people in chains. They know free energy exists, and they're terrified of it, which is why they work so hard to immediately suppress any inquery into it. They've done such a good job that the US Patent Office won't accept a patent for free energy. Part of fighting back against the cabal is not accepting their version of what is and is not possible. We need to ask the questions that they specifically don't want us to ask. If you think free energy is just a crackpot theory, then I'm sorry to say you have been brainwashed, but now that you're being presented with an opportunity to see that, I hope you are willing to change and challenge your own biases and false assumptions.
He first posted at 4:22pm EDT. Then again at 5:25pm EDT (since deleted). Then he reposted it again at 5:33pm EDT.
Q post 525 is interesting. It mentions power and 7/10 could easily be a date, which is this coming Friday.
You can type u / # q 525 (without spaces) and it'll show up on this page
u/#q525
Thank you! I was trying to figure out how to do something like that. I've been on here for years, but rarely post anything.
Timeline ie Existed, jumped, showed up again? 103 and 8 are differences. The two live drops equal 955. Spitballin.
No, it’s not
sigh
Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Things wear out.
The Mythbusters covered this years ago.
This just makes us look crazy.
Exactly. It's silly nonsense, and it makes us look like gullible fools. This and all the "miracle cancer cures" I see floating around here.
The "miracle cancer cures" have worked for many people. Which would you rather try, chemotherapy with horrible side effects and marginal success rates, or a 'miracle cancer cure" that has great success (although not enumerated), with minimal side effects?
You probably still believe that oil comes from fossilized dinosaurs.
Or that dinosaurs were ever even a real thing!
Alien technology is coming out, including free energy, it is not crazy.
Did Jesus die for them too?
If so, how did they know he did?
Are some aliens Messengers (aliens) while some are Fallen?
Possible, also very difficult for us to discern the answer wrt beings whose skills for millennia are rooted in deception.
We could be playing with some very dangerous fire, here.
Aneutronic fusion. Direct energy conversion.
Whenever you transfer energy, you always lose a little.
Second Law.
Things wear out.
You cannot subvert that. Only God can.
You never lose energy, it is still there. The second law of thermodynamics says that energy/mass cannot be created or destroyed, though honestly I think this is a dumb law and should be changed. Regardless, the energy is still there. Sometimes it comes out as a form we don't find immediately useful, like heat, but it hasn't gone anywhere.
Wrong. That's the FIRST Law.
Yeah, I guess I can see what you're saying there, but for me, the first law is always that we don't talk about fight club
Pretty sure the fallen angel lucifer tje angel of light has an ability there.
Umm...not to be a Debbie Dumbass, but ....
Can you list the things that we already & historically get for free real quick?
I'll check back after I go to this incredible timeshare opportunity meeting...
air? :)
Air and sun and, hopefully, water.
Sunlight is effectively free energy. Our bodies use it to convert cholesterol into vitamin D. You can focus it onto food to cook it with almost-free mirror cardboard/plastic. When it shines on your house, you get free heat. (You might not want it but it's free.) Sunlight dries hay, coffee beans, garlic bulbs, cloves, wet clothing ... all for free.
I think you're confusing "things God gave us for free" with the Cabal saying "what else can we tax??"!
Why would we get free energy? This is just silly.
Why shouldn't we get free energy?
Why should we? The entitlement to think we shohld have free energy is a liberal one.
Energy is a finite resource. There's no magical free energy producer out there. Even if it was, (it's not), it would still have to have people running it, getting it to you, maintaining the system, etc. They wouldn't work for free.
So why would you expect to get it for "free"? Who do you think would cover those bills? The government? Which is why I call it a liberal mindset.
You are thinking of centralised energy production, and its not finite at all. Energy can't be destroyed, it can only be changed into another form of energy. As in electricity heating our home using infra red radiation.
But if we can stop this process and make energy into a closed loop we can harvest this energy forever. It's a scientific mindset which has nothing to do with divisive politics.
Search for Victor Schauberger, and also look at this.
https://upload.disroot.org/r/P0kt03TR#shkAps8shkhLCR0I5HrgAEqlXeYwTzdcnxvnp6jP2EU=
Energy can't be created or destroyed, that's true. But every time you convert it (like electricity to heat), you lose some as unusable waste heat.
That's basic physics (Second Law of Thermodynamics). You can't make a perfect "closed loop" that runs forever without adding new energy.
Schauberger had cool ideas about water and vortices, but none of them created free energy that beats physics. Real progress comes from better batteries, solar, nuclear, etc, not magic loops.
If someone actually builds a working one, it'll change everything. Until then, it's just a fun idea that doesn't work in practice.
And even if they DID actually build one, it would still cost money to produce and transport it. So again, why would you expect to get it for free?
(And sorry, I'm not downloading anything from random, sketchy sites.)
"Energy can't be created or destroyed, that's true."
It's Mass/energy since mass and energy are interchangeable per Einstein's immortal e=mc^2 equation
This presumes that the universe is a closed system.
The MEG.
Laws can be changed, though we need to move quickely while we still have a majority in the house and senate.
No, the Second Law of Thermodynamics can't be changed. It's pretty much a reality of our existance.
It's not something that can be changed by a vote in Congress.
We won't know until we try. Maybe the courts will try to strike it down, but even if that happens, it at least shows us which side these people are on.
The liberal/leftist view is that it should be subsidized by the government.
The view of right/progress is that it can be harnessed so cheaply (from sun/ether) as to essentially become free.
Does that help?
Energy being finite is an artificial construct, created by the elite cabal to control us. They create scarcity, and then ration it out for enormous profits. They have so thoroughly taken over our institutions that anyone bringing up free energy is immediately dismissed and ostracised. Isn't science suppose to be about asking questions and exploring? But for some reason they won't even tolerate dicussion on this topic.
Best credible evidence to support this?
The elites control our instutions and sources of information. There isn't "credible evidence" because they have decided there shouldn't be any. We often see individuals come out with free energy ideas, only for them to quickly be silenced. They're often portrayed as shills for trying to sell their ideas, as if that isn't the basis capitalism. Its rediculous that people think these inventions should be given away for free when they wouldn't expect that anyone else. If you invent a free energy device, why shouldn't you also be able to feed your family?
Asking for evidence is playing the game by the rules of the elite. I and many others like me are taking the bold step to refuse to play by their rules. When we are attuned to truth, our gut instinct is almost always correct. This is like how we know the 2020 election was stolen. I can't prove it, there is no evidence for it, but we know it is true.
Why do you believe so solidly if you acknowlege no credible evidence exists to support it?
I already explained, my gut instinct. I've seen videos (before they were taken down) of people demonstrating free energy devices. Even without the evidence or so called "third party" verification, I can tell if something is genuine or if something is fake. Like with you, I can tell that you're a real person, not a bot or a skinwalker. I don't need you to prove that to me.
Just surprised how many here are scoffing at free energy as if this is the first time they’ve heard about it.
Sometimes I think we all need to step back and look at things from an unemotional/personal standpoint.
Some of the more unrealistic things I've seen spread have been the result of either fear or desperation, or a combination of both.
If you have an instantly deep emotional response to something, I think it's extra deserving of some dispassionate evaluation that isn't based on what we WANT to happen.
A couple of the best examples of this is anything to do with health or money.
This is why I push back so much on things like MedBeds or NESARA/GESARA here.
They have absolutely nothing to do with Q. Q "influencers" just grabbed some random Q drops and twisted them to support ideas like this. But they were never actually presented by Q as being real.
They make us look gullible to normies, and undermine our credibility severly, thus making it harder to red-pill them.
It preys on people who are truly desperate and simply WANT to believe these things are true. We can't simply wish things into reality.
President Trump posted about Medbeds. You can tell how quickly the MSM was to ridicule it that he hit on something sensative there. Medical care is one of the ways the elite control us. They suppressing healing technology and then charge us exorbitant costs for the crude tools and medications they allow us to have. Side effects aren't an accident, they're an intentional part of treatment to create the need for more treatment. The elite cabal can only get away with this if they can continue to supress the truth, which is why President Trump took the bold step of publically calling them out by posting about the medbeds.
He also deleted those posts, I believe.
Do you think something is 100% true because President Trump posted about it?
Sometimes President Trump does delete posts. I think this is because it is sensative information and he only wants those who closely follow him to get this information, which is why I always have my notifications turned on for whenever he posts. And yes, of course. Now, we can't always take what he says at face value, but the underlying message is true, we just have to interpret it. Q has always talked about the value of comms and deception. President Trump has proved himself over and over again. I don't think it is asking much at all to trust him, even when it seems to contradict what we see in reality. If this was easy, then we would already have overthrown the elites and had the Great Awakening.
Did you see my posts earlier about how much of this type of thing is simply wish casting?
You acknowledge that there is no credible evidence to support things you have strong opinions/beliefs about and that we can just interpret anything President Trump says/does to match those wishes.
This isn't us just deciding to what is and isn't true. It is statistically impossible that some many people could reach the same conclusions about so many things. That's the evidence right there. You can see how the time stamps of posts align with the Q clock that this has to be true. For this all to be based on coincidenes or wishful thinking is so statistically unlikely that it isn't even worth considering. The elite cabal has worked hard to shape the way we think, which is why they're so heavily invested in the education system. Q is teaching us a new way to think, a new way to validate information that doesn't depend on third party data which is easily corruptable. When President Trump talks, I often have a feeling that confirms what he is saying is true. For the trickier comms, I often can come up with plausible explanations for the information he is hiding. This isn't some special ability, I just have listened to Q and been able to tune my gut instinct to correclty figure out what is true.
I get where you're coming from, and I respect the dedication to digging deep. But we have to be careful here.
Statistical alignment on timestamps and "gut feelings" confirming what we already want to believe isn't the same as solid evidence.
That's exactly how confirmation bias works, we notice the hits and downplay the misses. The elite cabal angle doesn't magically make physics optional or turn interpretation into proof.
Real red pilling has always been stronger when we stick to things we can verify and show normies without them rolling their eyes. When we lean too hard on "tuned instincts" and comms that need special decoding, it becomes harder to bring people in, not easier.
We should keep questioning everything, including our own interpretations. That's how we actually stay ahead of the narrative, not by trusting the feeling more than the observable reality. Hope isn't the problem, letting hope override scrutiny is.
Especially when it comes to things like hard science, such as the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
Confusing a scientific law with a legal law as you've done repeatedly here, and arguing with or in front of normies that we can change scientific laws with a vote from Congress absolutely undermines our credibility and severely damages our chances of red pilling them.
Julian Assange.
How about cheap energy with no limits?
Nothing is ever free. Getting energy requires some sort of gadget that must be paid for. Moving the energy requires more gadgets that cost. Everything costs some labor, which isn't free.
We used to have cheap energy with no practical limits decades ago. My parents' electric bill used to be only $8 a month. Gasoline used to be less than 50 cents a gallon. As far as the limits, they were invented by the oil companies. Oil doesn't come from dead dinosaurs or ferns. That's a proven fact.
If you factor inflation, the 50-cent a gallon gas of the 60's was actually more expensive than $3/gallon gas of today. 50-cent/gallon gas in 1966 is equivalent to about $5/gallon gas today.
1978 i was only paying 32 cents a gal. 10 years later i remember it going up to 72 cents overnight.
I worked in a store in the late 70s. In late 1974, we were selling gas for 47.9. It quickly went up to 53.9 by that winter or spring of 1975.
Inflation is a construct of the elite cabal. If you took money and went back in time, it would still be worth just as much then, proving that inflation is only true if we collectively believe it to be.
Gas was not 50 cents in the 60s. It passed 47.9 in late 1974, early 1975. I was working then. Minimum wage was $2.00. I could buy four gallons of gas for an hour's pay. Today's minimum wage can buy about two gallons of gas.
I lived back then and know. I also have photos taken at work during that period of time as proof.
It’s free after the gadget.
It depends on how big the "gadget" has to be and who owns the "gadget." For example, hydroelectric power is free, but someone has to build the dam, the generators, and the distribution system.
Nuclear is free, if someone gave you a small, personal nuclear plant and set it up for you.
There are always "ifs" involved.
This would be like a machine that sits outside your house that receives energy like a signal. A one time payment.
It is called a "conspiracy theory" but history would dictate otherwise. During the Tartary empire they extracted energy from the Ether. The Tartarians were a technologically advanced civilization, buried by the Mud floods. Some of their buildings are still standing. It's such an interesting topic, and a fun rabbit hole to delve into.
😐
How much of the Tartary rabbit hole is actual fact, and how much is something that some guy just made up, or cited from someone else who just made it up?
A LOT of those “research documentaries” are REAL light on presenting their sources and verifiable evidence, though it does seem like there was not nothing there at the same time. It’s irritating.
Sources are suppressed by the elite cabal. It has been discussed here enough to know that it is accurate. If you notice, the people who are always clamoring for "facts" and verified sources of information are the same elites from educational institutions. You already have everything you need to verify facts, it is your gut instinct. The elites have control of many sources of information, and have changed the "facts" to fit their agenda. Asking for sources is playing the game by their rules and serves their purposes, which is why I refuse to play along. Like how we know the election was stolen. I can't prove that and I'm mocked by family and friends because of it. Part of the Great Awakening is that we don't need "facts" to pursue what we know as truth. For most of human history, we did fine going by our gut instinct. It is only in the modern age where we find that is no longer sufficient.
That’s the crux, isn’t it.
So we know:
Further:
1 Corinthians 2:2 - For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.
It’s real hard to know anything in this world.
I know a lot of accounts here have made a lot of claims about Tartaria.
I also know that:
That’s about it, really.
True, but going to the opposite pole with no sources and a lot of claims doesn’t work either. If claims can’t be proven and have no obvious practical use, there isn’t much value to them, is there?
Given that uncertainty, how to move forward other than faith?
I do suspect there could easily be something to the whole Tartaria thing, you just won’t catch me running with it as if I know anything about it.
Sure, it can work. If you know your enemy is striving to convince you of something, it is obvious that they are trying to cover up the truth. This is classic Sun Tzu. Once you start asking these questions, it is easy to see what they're trying to hide.
There isn't much uncertainty. Q has proven his (or her) reputation over and over again. We see alignment with post time stamps and the Q clock that would be statistically impossible to happen by chance. Do you think Q would simply give us all these clues and truth and simply leave us to our own devices? Of course not. The white hats have been working behind the scenes to guide our discussions and point of to the truth. Ever notice how we never see anything posted by the top mod of this site? Who do you think user dropgun is?
As for Tartaria, my gut instinct tells me it is true and that there is a even more to discover. I've been honing this instinct and now it is accurate nearly all of the time. I don't have any special abilities, anyone can do this if they focus on truth and develop an awareness of the energy around them. Good energy is attracted to truth, which is why it is so hard to sleep when you have a brilliant idea.
Free energy for the whole world, forever, is already within our reach; powerful people who sell energy don't want it to be known.
We could be enjoying this TODAY if not for the organized crime syndicate that runs the planet
This attempt got dumped 3x so will try again. You already have free energy ie YOU whether spiritual intellectual physical ie energy is defined as using power so if you are praying thinking jumping you are tapping into free energy. The self actualizing person spirals that energy by knowing themselves and their full potential and can spiral that energy like a rocket in their reality. This gift from your Creator is one of the biggest threats to THEM.
The book of all our predictions is so much better than the reality. Hopium eternal. May it all come to pass.
Tesla was able to keep his love of God in his work and saw that religion and science weren't separate but complemented each other. This allowed him to do and learn monumental things.
He was way ahead of his time, and famously posted "The present is theirs; the future, for which I REALLY worked, is MINE."
From what I've seen over the past few years, John G. Trump was able to get Tesla's notes, understand them with his electrical engineering background, and help save the world.
So many other technical people seemed to "have something bad happen to them" when they tried to introduce new technologies like over-unity power and 200mpg carburetors for example.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDMd7flfFVQ
As for free energy just think about POTUS at the sword dance in SA and their hands on the power globe. And remember that just weeks before Nov 22 1963 there was a dustup between JFK and DC agencies re the blueprints of DC BLDGS THAT HAD AETHER INFRASTRUCTURE AND HE HAD BEEN REFUSED AND HE MADE ANOTHER DEMAND WHTH A DEADLINE. It woulda put Koon Kreekers outta business. My money sez POTUS ALREADY HAS WHAT JFK WANTED.
How does this translate to "free" energy.