1
HereComesTrouble 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem with putting garbage like this in jail is that taxpayers have to pay to keep his worthless ass alive. I saw fly him tot he middle of the ocean and feed him to the sharks.

2
HereComesTrouble 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree that mayor is batshit crazy, and that no black female Democrats (or any Democrats) should ever be elected to any office... but it kinda looks like a dude in drag.

2
HereComesTrouble 2 points ago +2 / -0

More fear mongering.

After we had our old, leaky windows replaced, we decided not to get blinds again (the old blinds were hanged on the inside of the window, which isn't possible with vinyl windows). The house looks much better without them, and it's more pleasant inside. It's easier to wash sheers than to take down the blinds and clean them!

1
HereComesTrouble 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. This is a declaration of war. And our government is just letting them waltz in.

4
HereComesTrouble 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think God won't condemn people for protecting themselves against criminal invaders. We have a natural right to protect ourselves, our property, and our families. And stopping these pieces of excrement from entering this country and being set free to attack us all is part of that right, as far as I'm concerned.

1
HereComesTrouble 1 point ago +1 / -0

From an airplane into the ocean. With no parachute and no floating devices.

1
HereComesTrouble 1 point ago +1 / -0

They need to shoot every last fucking one of them. Enough of this shit already.

6
HereComesTrouble 6 points ago +6 / -0

the Democratic party will do exactly what it accused Trump of preparing to do in 2020 - it won't relinquish power.

Honestly, I expected Oblahblah to do this and was surprised he didn't. At this point, I think they are so desperate to hold onto power that they *will *do it.

We've only glimpsed the surface of all the corruption that's gone down in Ukraine.

I think Putin has the goods on all of them, which is one reason they foam at the mouth every time someone says his name. His refusal to play the game with the central banks is pissing them off. I think he has proof of the child trafficking, too. I just wish he'd use it and tear the whole corrupt system to the ground.

BTW this anon does not believe Covid exists. It was a set of symptoms harvested from other diseases, backed by a flaky PCR test.

Considering the flu completely disappeared when the coof came into the picture, I'd say it was just a flu variant. One they used to force the fertility-killing, human-killing vaccines on the morons who actually believed it would help. They also used it to murder a lot of people with the "protocol" and forcing them onto ventilators.

3
HereComesTrouble 3 points ago +3 / -0

They'll pull out suitcases full of ballots for her next. They're going to cheat to make her win, just like they cheated to make the Dementia Patient win in 2020.

8
HereComesTrouble 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is one of those instances where I'd like to have seen the mom pull out a .45 and shoot the fucker right in the head. That would end him trying to abduct any other children.

6
HereComesTrouble 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's why he's doing it. This is revenge for not getting the speakership back. They don't want Johnson as speaker, so they're removing him by handing the majority to the demoncrats.

1
HereComesTrouble 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you keep a minimum at your bank, they'll let you open up another account with no minimum (Truist allows that, at least). Just open up a second account, keep a low amount in it and add to it if needed to buy from the places that require a bank account. And don't provide overdraft protection, so if someone gets hold of it, they can only take what's there.

22
HereComesTrouble 22 points ago +22 / -0

Funny how they want to take this guy down for "disrupting" HRC's lying bullshit, but if a group of people come in threatening conservatives and refusing to let them speak, that's "free speech". The hypocrisy is astounding.

And I really wish someone would slap that smug look off that c***'s face.

1
HereComesTrouble 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends on the laws in that state. In several states, all you need is to be able to pass a background check. Doesn't matter where you live. There are also states where your concealed carry license from one state carries over to that state. I used to have a list somewhere.

2
HereComesTrouble 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why the hell don't people just release the crap they have and be done with it? I'm so sick of this garbage that "it will be released during this and that date!" and it never happens.

If this is real--and I am certain it's just bullshit--then announcing when you're doing something with these criminal psychopaths is a good way to end up suiciding yourself with several bullets to the back of your head. I don't care anymore unless they actually produce the goods.

3
HereComesTrouble 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jailing Trump would intend to: Awaken the masses to corruption Ultimately to demoralize the left and Galvanize his supporters

How would this demoralize he left? My lefty relatives are salivating over the idea of Trump being put in prison and, ultimately, executed for his supposed "crimes". They will never wake up, and giving them Trump's head on a silver platter would cause them to celebrate. If it got reversed, it would just be more of the same "evil Drumpf" bullshit from them.

I think the only thing that could actually demoralize the left is to destroy their gods--Hollywood and the corrupt bastards in DC. And jailing Trump wouldn't even be close to this, even if he got out later. They'd be even more determined to take him down.

Besides, if these sociopaths get him in jail, they'll give him the Epstein treatment. Next thing we hear, he will have shot himself in the back of the head with a 12 gauge while in a locked cell where the video just happened to be messed up during that time. He goes to a jail cell, he's done.

2
HereComesTrouble 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who gives a shit? Our lives would be better without these retards trying to shove their politics down our throats and charging ridiculous amounts of money for their tranny worshiping garbage. They overestimate their value in our lives. Just like the assholes in DC do.

4
HereComesTrouble 4 points ago +4 / -0

I tried to look at it, but all of a sudden I can no longer view any twitter links. It prompts me to log in, then takes me to the login page. I guess twitter has gone the way of instagram.

2
HereComesTrouble 2 points ago +2 / -0

If a woman wants to be a protector, or fight, or whatever, why should she not be allowed to do so?

I agree with this. My one condition for it is that, to be a soldier or firefighter, or any other profession that requires a certain amount of physical strength to do the job properly, women must pass the same tests as a man. There should be no "fudging" of the numbers. There's a reason that men on the frontlines are required to be able to fireman carry a 200 lb comrade, and the same holds true for firemen.

For the former, you need to be able to move one from your group off the battlefield, should they be injured. If you can't do that, you're a detriment to the group and I can see any man refusing to fight with that person by his side.

For the latter--firefighting--if you can't rescue the people you've signed up to save because you lack the upper body strength to do so, you have no business being in that position. People's lives are more important than your ego. I'm 5'2" and damned strong for my size (though a lot of men my size are still stronger than I am because biology!). I can lift 200 lbs, if it's a weight or a small box, but trying to fireman carry a 200 lb man is all but impossible due to the size of my limbs and torso. That's just how it is. Therefore, I have no business being a fireman.

Instead of things working like above, though, everyone wants special considerations. "Well, I'm a woman, so I shouldn't have to do that." No, that's the job. Either you can do it or you can't. If you can't, quit whining and go elsewhere.

As for the MMA fighting... it's a sport. Some women like it. They don't want to play basketball or softball, they want to fight. And there's nothing wrong with that. What's wrong is putting a man in the ring with a woman, just like it's wrong to put a man up against a woman in a weightlifting competition. I don't give a flying fuck if that man claims to be a woman, he's still a man and doesn't belong there, as shown by this asshole in MMA.

What I'd like to see is a decent man come in and, for one match, claim to be a woman, then kick the everloving shit out of this motherfucker. Either that, the friends of the women who had their skulls crushed should catch him somewhere and throw a blanket party for him--hit this prick with a baseball bat enough times and maybe the SOB won't be able to get his rocks off beating up women anymore.

2
HereComesTrouble 2 points ago +2 / -0

I put this further down the board, but saw your question and, since you probably won't notice it below:

https://www.cancelthiscompany.com/Beauty_Companies.html

2
HereComesTrouble 2 points ago +2 / -0

Check the list at the link below. It'll show you which "woke" charities get money from which skincare/makeup companies:

https://www.cancelthiscompany.com/Beauty_Companies.html

Also, this is a good tinted sunscreen:

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1267671772/non-nano-zinc-organic-sunscreen-spf-30?click_key=8a20b409c8a6c7cca67edbd16a96d08737835b7e%3A1267671772&click_sum=91984cd9&ref=shop_home_active_2

From the same seller, I buy the non-tinted (I'm really fair-skinned, so the non-tinted works better for me). You can use it as a moisturizer, too. I have ridiculously sensitive skin and this stuff always calms my skin and gives me a nice glow (and keeps me from turning into a lobster if I have to be outside).

view more: Next ›