4
JessWithTheMess 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, the charges aren’t going anywhere until trial. This motion made Jack find a new panel or jurors on the Grand Jury, not from DC like originally but from Miami

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope so too, however I heard there’s another potential indictment in Arizona

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just because I couldn’t see the actual impact, doesn’t dismiss that I saw the plane flying over my damn head. That’s like saying a car accident could be faked, because I saw the cars but didn’t see them collide down the road.

13
JessWithTheMess 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well this is the first time any president has gotten arrested, so there isn’t really anything else to compare their efforts to. The answer couldn’t be never, because again this is the first time a president arrested. Now if another president has gotten arrested then we could compare the reactions, but that hasn’t happened yet.

20
JessWithTheMess 20 points ago +20 / -0

Just because it’s biblical, doesn’t mean it’s following the story of Jesus. The comparison to Jesus and talking about Trump and “resurrection” in the same sentence, is off putting.

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s the thing - I did not watch it on a screen. Again I’m not believing something I know is not true, because I’ve seen it with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears.

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

The ultimate brainwash is being made to doubt what you see and hear with your own senses.

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn’t see the crash itself, but I was close enough to see and hear the plane before it hit.

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah this is where I disconnect with most anons, cause unlike most anons, I was there that day and saw and heard the plane flying over me before it crashed.

2
JessWithTheMess 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure she’s really an ex considering he’s still with her and was at her concert two days ago.

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

Majority of the time you are correct, mutations are usually at detriment to thrivability, but not all mutations hurt survivability, the few that actually help or give advantage, in turn proliferates amongst it species - essentially this how speciation and evolution works. The few mutations that help survivability - whether it makes them stronger, bigger, easier to camouflage, or other survival mechanism, is how evolution works, as that mutated individuals genes becomes the majority as it outsurvives other members of that species.

If viruses weren’t subject to evolution and selective pressures like every other living organism, then you would be right, that the weaker subspecies may predominate the species population.

5
JessWithTheMess 5 points ago +5 / -0

You and me both bud. I’ve been calling him out since the brain microchips, global warming activist, “I wanna go to hell with everyone else” days, always downvoted

6
JessWithTheMess 6 points ago +6 / -0

You and me both bud. I’ve been calling him out since the brain microchips, global warming activist, I wanna go to hell with everyone else days, always downvoted

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where? And what’s the source on this? This just seems like hopeful wishing.

2
JessWithTheMess 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn’t get ahead of myself.. Until there’s new charges brought against Hunter, he got the charges against him dismissed, the deal was over weeks ago.

4
JessWithTheMess 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can’t have a propaganda platform collapse before election time! Desantis needs the spotlight, seems like Elon has given him plenty of attention and focus.

8
JessWithTheMess 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes. And I told anons this from Day 1. There is a disgusting amount of indicators that Elon is part of cabal. Hes the richest man in the world (can’t be without being down) working on brain implants and mass producing robots, still is dressed up as Satan in his PFP, I actually made a long list months ago. But he has many hook line and sinker, because he says the right things - sometimes. Even has some convinced he’s part of the Q team. I’m sure black hats are taking note on how to manipulate those that already are aware, and see how effective it is. That notoriety and wealth will amass anyone’s support, even those that proclaim they are against exactly that.

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +1 / -0

You temporarily banned someone for a week - not for violating side bar rules, but because they don’t believe a specific ANON theory, and explicitly said they only follow Q posts… Let’s call it for what it is, instead of passive aggressive adhominims about my post history or dressing up a temporary ban and calling it a vacation and assigning homework. You should be concerned that you’re banning anons for other things besides the actual rules, no matter what other people think. It just seems like a power run, banning anyone (whether temporary or permanently) for not agreeing with you - not Q, not Trump, but your own theories.

No one. Emphasis on NOONE, except the Q team, knows the plan. If devolution ends up not being a part of the plan, how will you rectify falsely punishing other anons for not believing a then-disproven theory? Will you “vacation” yourself?

3
JessWithTheMess 3 points ago +3 / -0

Apparently. User just got banned for a week, because he said he doesn’t believe in devolution (an anon theory) and only follows Q drops. I don’t think that even violates any side bar rules, but yet the anon got temporarily banned.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›