Common denominator: FAKE NEWS
1688(0) There is no greater [current] threat to the American people than the FAKE NEWS MEDIA. #ControlledMSM Study Nazism. Compare/contrast ANTIFA. Compare/contrast SOCIALISM push. Push for REBIRTH. Who financed then? Who is financing now? Dark to LIGHT. GOOD WINS. Q
4540 THE NEWS IS FAKE. THE INSURGENCY IS REAL. Q
2089 Ask yourself a (simple) logical question… Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates? Why are we a threat to them? Why not simply publish an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility? Why was this done in the past? We knew this type of "attack" was coming. PREDICTABLE. FAKE NEWS. ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY. Q
1751 https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/07/20/msnbcs_ali_velshi_apple_and_google_profiting_from_apps_promoting_qanon_pizzagate_conspiracy_theories.html They do not want you asking questions. They do not want you thinking for yourself. They do not want you UNITED. They want you to live in FEAR/DIVIDED. They want you asleep. They want you blind. The message must bypass the MSM. It is the only way. People UNITED hold the power. Think election 2016. Power shall be RETURNED to the PEOPLE. Q
2338977 Every C_A/MOS tactic of infiltration and internal disruption is being deployed on this board (central hub). The World is Here. Recognize. This movement is bigger than anyone can possibly imagine. Peace through strength. Q
Now put EVERYTHING into perspective;
- When did the op officially start?
- How was ‘recruitment’ conducted?
- Who led the charge?
- Who was in power at the time?
- Knowing what we now know about the Muslim brotherhood, what would our situation look like without an Iraq invasion in 2003?
These are questions I like to ask myself…
When you’re at a party and guy one says, “things you’re saying are a bit offensive to my friend here!”And you respond with, “don’t worry about your friend buddy, he doesn’t want to get knocked out and embarrassed in front of this whole group of people.”
‘Require’ is used here to avoid skewed results. ‘Allow’ results in ‘resist-the-fascist’ rhetoric.
“Hey GROK, What kind of emergency situation would require the military to take over the executive branch of government for the national security of the United States?“
“ Constitutional and Legal Framework:
The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly authorize the military to “take over” the executive branch. The executive branch is headed by the President, who is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces (Article II, Section 2). Military involvement in domestic governance is heavily restricted by laws like the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. § 1385), which prohibits federal troops from enforcing domestic laws unless expressly authorized by Congress or the Constitution. However, in extreme national security crises, the military could assume temporary control of executive functions only under specific mechanisms, not a unilateral coup. These are designed as last-resort safeguards, not routine takeovers.
Below are the primary scenarios where this could theoretically occur, substantiated by historical precedents, laws, and doctrine.
• Mechanism: The President declares martial law (as in Ex parte Milligan, 1866, where the Supreme Court upheld it only when civilian courts are closed). The military then temporarily administers law and order, effectively supplanting executive functions in affected areas.
• Examples:
• Hawaiian Martial Law (1941–1944): After Pearl Harbor, the military governor assumed full executive, legislative, and judicial powers in Hawaii due to invasion fears. • Civil War Era: Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and used military tribunals when civilian government collapsed in rebel areas. • National Security Justification: Prevents enemy exploitation of chaos; e.g., if a cyberattack or bioweapon disables the President, VP, and Cabinet, forcing military continuity under DoD directives.
Continuity of Government (COG) Activation Under Presidential Succession Failure • Trigger: Decapitation strike (nuclear, EMP, or assassination) eliminating the President, Vice President, and line of succession (up to 18 deep per the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, 3 U.S.C. § 19). • Mechanism: Classified plans like National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51) and Federal Continuity Directive 1 designate the military (often through NORTHCOM or a designated commander) to maintain “enduring constitutional government.” A senior military officer could assume interim executive authority if no civilian successors are available. • Substantiation: • Post-9/11 exercises (e.g., “Forward Challenge”) simulated military-led government after civilian leadership is wiped out. • The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255) allows the President to deploy troops domestically; if the President is incapacitated, a military commander might invoke it under COG protocols. • National Security Justification: Ensures command of nuclear forces (via the “football”) and prevents adversarial takeover during vulnerability.
Catastrophic Domestic Collapse Requiring Military-Led Executive Functions • Trigger: Nationwide breakdown from pandemics, massive cyberattacks, or natural disasters combined with terrorism, where civilian executive branches (federal/state) cease functioning. • Mechanism: Under Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act or expanded Insurrection Act invocations, the military (FEMA-integrated with DoD) could run executive operations. In extremis, a “national command authority” shifts to military per DoD’s Unified Command Plan.
• Examples: • Hurricane Katrina (2005): Federal troops under NORTHCOM provided de facto executive control in lawless areas, though not a full takeover. • Hypothetical EMP Attack: As outlined in the 2008 EMP Commission Report, grid failure could necessitate military rationing, curfews, and governance to avert societal collapse. • National Security Justification: Protects critical infrastructure and prevents foreign powers (e.g., China/Russia) from invading or influencing a power vacuum.
Key Limitations and Safeguards • No Permanent Takeover: The Supreme Court in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) and Duncan v. Kahanamoku (1946) ruled military overreach unconstitutional once civilian rule is feasible. • Congressional Oversight: Any extension requires legislative approval; unchecked military rule violates separation of powers. • Historical Rarity: The U.S. has never seen a full military seizure of the federal executive; closest was Lincoln’s actions, which were later ratified by Congress.
In summary, only existential threats rendering civilian government inoperable—such as total leadership decapitation or nationwide ungovernability—could justify military assumption of executive powers, and even then, it’s temporary, legally bounded, and aimed at restoration, not permanence. These scenarios are outlined in declassified DoD and DHS plans to preserve the Republic during apocalypse-level events.”
It’s just AI, I know, but never forget why we felt the need to look deeper. Where would America be right now if we didn’t understand?