I don't trust this writer. We are all for exposing corrupt DNC antics globally as Putin is/has done in Ukraine and elsewhere, but Taiwan is different. It was and is a beacon of anti-Communism and capitalist prosperity which has been a stick in the craw of the Dragon of the CCP for 70+years.
It would be like inviting the Norks into the ROK because the ROK are part of the US's corrupt Military Industrial Complex - as though that solves anything more than giving the Norks what they wanted all along - the whole peninsula
The CCP has always wanted Taiwan back in its sphere of influence. They have been playing the long game. Where high value chip manufacturing and US industry are concerned, those clammoring for the fall of Taiwan to the CCP just to expose Biden's mischief like this Candestine guy does sounds more like he's a Tokyo Rose. He's just trying to get the devolutionists on board with his subversion message as a shadow cheerleader for Xi.
I am all for devolution. I am not at all in favor of a CCP invasion of Taiwan as Clandestine appers to be.
I happen to believe it would also be too destructively costly a card for Bejing to play.
Beware of Clandestine's true motives for writing what he does as he tries to appeal to whose readership he is courting - especially on this board.
The answer to this is disqalification of any cured ballot. Simple.
"I know about cell biology (which is not insubstantial)."
"How exactly did I present myself as such [an authority of some sort]? I presented an argument. That is not speaking from authority, but presenting an argument."
You are a wiki schooled academic-style equivocator who wants to have it both ways. "I know my cell bio, just don't mistake me for speaking authoritatively when I also say, ' I can tell people that I have seen no evidence to support it (despite having done my due diligence), and in my decades of experience, lipids of this nature do not pose a threat.'"
Oh really? And, if true, by what route(s) of administration is this true - or didn't Wikipedia happen to say? And if true, in the presence of what other formulated substances is this true – or don’t you know or want to know, because you let yourself be jabbed with a host of other [undisclosed] substances to keep your job (whose cellular penetration is facilitated and whose activity(s) are possibly co-enhanced in the presence of SM-102) that are percolating through your brain right now. Still an irrelevant consideration?
Your narratives continue to evidence the fact that you have absolutely no accomplishment or understanding of basic pharmaceutical development, hence you are flailing about waving your hands and screaming "irrelevant!" at every point you do not have the intellectual capacity to comprehend. Having identified no relevant experience you persoannly have in either biological or pharmaceutical formulary development you’re clearly out of your league in this discussion in spite of all the verbiage you have thrown at it. Example:
Re: 10% SM-102/90% EtOH: “I can't find that anywhere on her list of things, but even if true (and it could be, because I think ethanol would likely be a viable solvent), pure ethanol, is toxic as fuck..”. Research Grade SM-102 (Cayman Chemicals) https://www.caymanchem.com/news/sm-102-statement Simple enough to look up and verify in 10 seconds – if you know where to look and how to do basic research.
“Do you have a reason to suspect it is other than that "biology is complicated" and "you never know until you do the science"? Because that is all I'm hearing from you.”
That is all I need to say. It is incumbent upon you to justify your safety claims (not just what you’ve read in Wiki and have parroted on the board): it is not incumbent upon me to do the science for you. All substances administered (particularly those administered by injection) must demonstrate their satisfactory safety profile through formulation integrity studies, stability/degradation profiling (according to PubMed there are possibly as many as 75 different related substances for SM-102 alone – which ones does your Moderna jab have in it, in what proportions and how are they limited synthetically?), physiologic/metabolic fates studies, and tissue depositon studies to allow for legitimate consideration for use in pharmaceutical or biologic applications. This was not adequately done for any CV19 jabs.
I do not apologize for the fact that I happen to have 40-years of career achievements and patents in pharmaceutical and biologic therapeutics development, which also happen to include having served at one time as a Review Chemist at the FDA, and having completed with distinction 4 academic undergraduate and graduate degree programs, 3 of which are in the natural sciences of biology, chemistry and biochemistry.
You wrote a clearly butt-hurt soliloquy about when one speaks of experience gained through their academics and their profession, but when you turn around and write, "I know about cell biology (which is not insubstantial),” it quickly becomes painfully obvious to readers that whatever you think you know about cell biology is somewhat less than billed and that you are substantially out of your depth on these topics - particularly with respect to your feigned “expertise” as it pertains to your unmerited certainty regarding presumed safety of SM-102 as co-formulated with undisclosed substances in injectibles.
Based upon the way you reason and write, it would come as no surprise to me to learn that the sum of your "decades of experience" is actually as a part-time Moderna summer intern, driving a pallet mover in the warehouse on 3rd shift.
" A persons [sic.] credentials are completely irrelevant..."
This is a common complaint of those who lack credentials or meaningful accomplishments.
"In fact they are generally used to create fallacies in argument; "pro hominem" or "ad hominem" ..."
No one insulted you. However, if you feel you need some time in a cry corner, I can wait.
"More specifically, none of those areas of knowledge change the fact that SM-102 has no apparent difficulties in it's [sic.] biochemistry of being broken down by the cells...."
The ability of SM-102 to be broken down by cells was not the question. The poster with whom you were communicating was speaking in a context about a concern they had re: chemical safety of formulary components of the jabs. In reply you wrote an apologetic about SM-102, "It is a relatively simple molecule, with no apparent hot spots. That doesn't mean it can't possibly be toxic, but I see no toxicity signals in the molecule itself (as in none)."
If you knew anything about pharma development, you'd know that one does not view the possible toxicity of a formulary component as a stand-alone without also taking into consideration the other components with which it is formulated and the route of delivery of the therapeutic moiety. There are such things as drug-excipient, and excipient-excipient interactions, which may diminish or amplify the activity of formulary components. This often times presents itself as something impactful upon product safety.
“SM-102, as far as I can tell, and as far as all the evidence I have seen, is not a danger in any way”
As far as what “evidence” you say you have seen?
Are you a toxicologist who has run safety studies with SM-102 formulated in the presence of ~280 [unidentified] chemical entities which comprise BioNTech jabs, as delivered IM (which apparently finds itself seeping into general circulation)?
Please comment on what you know for certain from your own research about the safety profile of SM-102, Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol (DMG), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), formulated along with ~280 [unidentified] chemical entities as delivered IM.
Prior to the expediencies of CV19 no lipid nanoparticles (LPNs) were ever used to formulate an injectable product intended for human therapeutic use. In pre-clinical studies, general toxicity of jabs was evident, LPN’s were a suspected culprit. Since you hold yourself out as an authority of some sort, can you tell readers that SM-102 is not implicated in the inherent toxicity of the LPN’s?
LPN’s comprised of SM-102 ferrying a host of other chemical substances through cell walls have been shown to deposit heavily in germ cells and they also penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Can you say with certainty that what may be your own jab induced brain fog is in no way related to the fact that SM-102 is a component of LPN’s?
“In your case, the Pfizer stuff almost sounded like "it's full of pitfalls and fraud, so SM-102 must be too." I'm not saying that was what you were saying."
What you completely missed is the fact that Pfizer has ~ 280 components manufactured in 19 countries whose safety should be placed in doubt because the formulary components have been inadequately characterized, doubtfully inspected adequately (if at all) for cGMP compliance, and this is of particular concern since this is an injectible route of administration of a new, first of its kind gene therapy.
“ I am confused why your response did not address anything I said directly, but was instead a bunch of unrelated things (all of which I agree with, but were completely irrelevant to my post)….
“If you just wanted to talk about completely different things than the context of my post, giving me that information in the beginning of your reply would have alleviated the confusion.”
Now you’re just whining. Safety of formulary components was the respondent’s topic, and you replied glibly and with little to no appreciation for the inherent relevance of safety issues attendant to pharmaceutical development -- much as a low level. inexperienced academic might.
I am starting to get suspicious of this BioClandestine guy:
"They cannot hope to win. China will move in, and given China’s vast militaristic superiority to Taiwan, and the relatively small geographical ground to secure, if and when China moves into Taiwan, I would expect it to move significantly faster than the Russian Special Military Operation in Ukraine."
I smell a Tokyo Rose.
Yes, there may be those labs there, and I applaud Russia for takin gout Ukraine's, but having grown up during the "cold war" Taiwan as a nation has always been the bane of Communist China's existence, and at the forefront of Pacific defense. Bio-boy is being way too much of a cheerleader for the Communists. If he thinks the CCP would not sustain unimaginable damage to themselves for invading China, all he has to do is look at a floods from a vapoporized 3 Gorges Dam, vaporized Shanghai, vaporized Chengdu, and vaporized Bejing - without an economy that can even carry itself now. Phyrric victory at best.
I am a biochemist who has knowledge of and an appreciation for pharmaceutical formulary science. I also know what it typically takes to get new products through FDA review, and their approval for marketing, including necessary inspections of manufacturers and clinical research organiations. I also have significant appreciation for the concept of informed consent. It is apparent to me that there were many corners cut, all of which are impactful on inherenrt product safety.
You write as one who appears to have some familiarity with biomolecules. I could be wrong. The code block came about on its own.
The questions I posed were for anyone to ask themselves, possibly yourself too.
Pfizer Fights to Control Secret of $36 Billion Covid Vaccine Recipe
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-pfizer-secret-to-whats-in-the-covid-vaccine/ (Bloomberg, November 14, 2021)
“The secret formula that Bourla [Pfizer’s CEO] is protecting is much more complicated than a simple recipe. Pfizer’s shot has more than 280 materials made by suppliers in 19 countries, many of which are protected in one form or another. For a manufacturer to produce a vaccine, it would have to negotiate multiple licenses to waive protections on everything from lipids to mRNA strands and trade secrets used in the manufacturing process. The waiver proposal could in theory do that in one go.”
Did your healthcare provider who jabbed you with Pfizer’s CV-19 shot inform you of what all the 280 ingredients were in addition to deleterious, immune-suppressive effects of the genome altering spike protein programming mRNA sequence before you gave your consent to be administered the shot?
Did they discuss the potential toxicity of any one of those 280+ materials with you, including what the body-altering mechanism of the experimental gene therapy is?
Did they tell you this injection was life altering, or was in any way possibly life threatening to you?
They didn’t?
Or did your boss say you’d better get jabbed, or you’d be fired?
Or did you get fired for refusing to be medically raped by the jab?
Or did any establishment, school, or government entity require you or your child to produce a “vackz passport” to enter their premises, or to engage in commerce with them?
If so … you might want to be contacting a smart tort lawyer, real soon.
Start here: Siri/Glimstad (NYC): https://www.sirillp.com/aaron-siri/
Barnes Law (LA): https://www.barneslawllp.com/
O-negative pure blood, baby. $100,000 per unit. Please take a number, sit over there, and wait for your transfusion. I'm only tapped once month so you'd better be next in line!
"If the Democrats had total control of the entire political system, and then the economy crashed, the famine began, and the vaccine die off picked up speed, people would be demanding immediate answers from them, and they would have no solutions to give. :
We are already here. No need to give them 2 more years to destroy infrastructure and military
Warren Buffet was the guy's business mentor. He accused Sidney Powell in a phone call to Lin Wood (which he made available on his telegram for people to hear - and I did hear myself) of coming on to him in a drunken stupor asking for sex. The call was 33 mnutes long. Take what you will from it since Wood doesn't seem to like either Byrne or Powell at the moment, and believes each used him on their own ways for their purposes.
And you are personally doing so much more than Gregg Phillips, are you?
Both my boys are/were enlisted Marines. Each sustained debilitating back injuries in training prior to deployment, but neither saw combat. Each were medically discharged as a result. Are they veterans or are they not in your opinion?
By the time the population sterilization feature of the vackz is discovered long term population sterility has been achieved. Is there any wonder now why Pfizer tried to bottle up for 75 years the data (and lost their case – and they are now being exposed) that FDA relied on to “approve” BioNTech-Pfizer’s jab last August after a review of only 108 days?
What mischief lies in the other 280 ingredients unknown to all who were administered the jab?
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-pfizer-secret-to-whats-in-the-covid-vaccine/ (Bloomberg, November 14, 2021)
“The secret formula that Bourla [Pfizer’s CEO] is protecting is much more complicated than a simple recipe. Pfizer’s shot has more than 280 materials made by suppliers in 19 countries, many of which are protected in one form or another. For a manufacturer to produce a vaccine, it would have to negotiate multiple licenses to waive protections on everything from lipids to mRNA strands and trade secrets used in the manufacturing process. The waiver proposal could in theory do that in one go.”
", and the [US} people who live there consider them second-class people , because they are considered exceptional. If they are exceptional, everyone else is second class.”
Trump is the embodiment of American exceptionalism. Make America GREATEST Again.
Trump doesn't begrudge any country for looking out for its own best interest and considering itself (however, wrongly) to be exceptional in its own class.
All that matters is that the United States is and remains globally exceptional and any other country is in fact second rate compared to US. Not sorry if Putin doesn't like that.
Trump and Putin may be travelling in the same direction regarding de-balling the NWO, but some posters here should temper their admiration of Putin -- same goes for Xi, and Musk.
By the time this population sterilization feature is discovered long term population sterility will have been achieved. Is there any wonder now why Pfizer tried to bottle up for 75 years the data (and lost their case – and they are now being exposed) that FDA relied on to “approve” BioNTech-Pfizer’s jab last August after a review of only 108 days?
What mischief lies in the other 280 ingredients unknown to all who were administered the jab?
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-pfizer-secret-to-whats-in-the-covid-vaccine/ (Bloomberg, November 14, 2021)
“The secret formula that Bourla [Pfizer’s CEO] is protecting is much more complicated than a simple recipe. Pfizer’s shot has more than 280 materials made by suppliers in 19 countries, many of which are protected in one form or another. For a manufacturer to produce a vaccine, it would have to negotiate multiple licenses to waive protections on everything from lipids to mRNA strands and trade secrets used in the manufacturing process. The waiver proposal could in theory do that in one go.”
Golden Sach. You mean Goldman Sachs? Get the mods to change your title. "Brain dead" - appropriate name
We who are over 45 years old should know this stuff pretty well. Those who are under 45 may not have any knowledge of long known teratogenic physiological effects of lead exposure.
You posted your thesis before you thought it all out. Bad move. You grossly mis-spoke and now you are stuck in a dance of backing and filling, correcting and clarifying to the place where you have lost the lead in the narrative. You are straining to regain some semblance of standing on a topic which you started, while more clear-thinking posters repeatedly hand you your head. You should probably figure out a graceful way to exit.
Careless posting diminishes your credibility.
Trust no politician. Apart from flapping her gums what cause has she taken up to right societal ills?
Until there is both outward expression of repentance and contrition, and a bold spoken disavowal of all things that were ever a part of her socialistic Democrat roots she should be considered a snake.
Blue and gold have been the colors of the Swedish flag for centuries, and being Swedish myself, to me it has meant some of the most gorgeous girls ever to have been created on the planet. No need to look for anything suspicious in this context.
Time is not on their side. Add to this the de-ballled admissions by the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna that no one wants the vaxes - hundreds of millions of dosages made and gov't's paid for, but are all set to go to waste. The WEF comes out with the chosen vax passport creator for a vax no one will take. The precedent for the vax falls, and with it the precedence for the pasport, the vax failures continues to mount and the Davos crowd come away from the whole affair even more divided. Your worries about Dialectical Marxism aside, It was actually a good week -- for its stark failures of consensus, and a more awakened global opposition to anything passing itself off as "NWO."
This technology is not new. In fact, it has been around for almost 10 years. I advised the regulatory pathway for FDA's approval of Otsuka's MyCite the line extension for Abilify (aripiprazole) used to treat bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome. MyCite has an ingestible event monitor (IEM) compressed with the tablet which is ingested. As the tablet disintegrates in stomach fluid the IEM comes into contact with the liquid, activating a "battery" which sends a signal to a patch worn on the wrist of the patient. The patch sends a signal to a cloud-based database which is accessible by the patient's physician who can then monitor his patient's compliance with the treatment protocol. Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome patients are notoriously noncompliant with treatment regimens, and this in part overcomes that.
Bourla adapting this tech to his CV-19 tablet for monitoring purposes is something which can be defeated simply by dropping the pill + IEM into water, having the cloud signalling patch close by and letting it send its signal to whatever database collects it. Bourla is just jacking off here.
Putin's invasion of Ukraine is justified. The eastern regions (e.g., Donbass, et. al.) are native Russian speaking and they have been abused by the Ukraine gov't since the time the Obama-sponsored color revolution put Obama and Biden's puppet in there. Fauci's biolabs have been destroyed by Putin and much of the Azov-Nazi human trafficking networks have been broken up. Putin has spoken the language of Trump, and to a certain extent revivalist Christianity. Xi has not spoken the language of Trump, does not have any evidence of Chritian world view, nor has Xi ended human trafficking and jailing of religious opposition to the CCP.
There's your difference.