3
QuackQuack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sheesh I should have read your comment first, before spending minutes burrowing through that article. Cheers

3
QuackQuack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some days I feel like about 3% of my words are originals lol.

3
QuackQuack 3 points ago +3 / -0

I had some spaghetti sauce that was expired. I ate it and it tasted fine but it had a different look to it - kind of more glumpy. And yeah, I know that's not a word.

1
QuackQuack 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah I don't think it's common knowledge, but as LongTimeListener pointed out, there have been some "tells" at various stages in the game for those paying close attention. Trump chuckled a bit early during one interpreted conversation, etc etc. I'm 95% sure Chinese and Russian are amongst his languages, along with Korean.

4
QuackQuack 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump speaks 7 or 8 languages, but always uses an interpreter for official stuff. In fact I'm not sure he even lets on in those situations he speaks their language, it's a bit of an ace in the sleeve.

5
QuackQuack 5 points ago +5 / -0

I disagree. I think it would be a great interview, and post big numbers, but I doubt it would be as immediately big as Trump's was.

The left loves to hate Trump, but I don't think they have a grid for Putin beyond "Putin bad"

Same thing with the majority of the right... I think they don't really have much of a grid for him beyond what the MSM has fed them.

That said, I think it would be an incredible tool to help wake up many more people, especially on the right, but I think the numbers would come on the backend through sharing etc not on the front end like Trump's.

Just my 1.5 cents.

2
QuackQuack 2 points ago +2 / -0

On a very basic level, it's purely good marketing.

Vanilla public figures may get a few votes, etc, but they will never amass cult followings or pull the kind of crowds Trump can. To do that, you MUST be polarizing. You create your tribe by making these distinctions - this is what we believe, this is what we don't believe. This is who's IN, and this is who's OUT.

Long before Q came on the scene publicly, or I had any idea what Trump was truly about, I predicted he would win in 2016 simply based on the fact that he was an expert at TV, media, and public image. And he completely owned the politicians at their own game.

But that said, to actually do what Trump is doing (attacking the DS cabal), you simply can't give them half an inch of agreement. He's got a forehead of flint and that makes him incredibly polarizing, which is categorically necessary to wake people up. The vast majority of public figures that people "trust" are in fact compromised, and need to be exposed, even though they often come off as nice people. That's very hard to do unless you are completely laser targeted on your mission and don't deviate for a second.... which is an incredibly polarizing position.

4
QuackQuack 4 points ago +4 / -0

haha that's so true.

15
QuackQuack 15 points ago +15 / -0

If you're legit interested, checkout this fascinating read. It includes a discussion about digits including as related to predictions of Trump's election in 2016. It's related to the whole kek / pepe thing.

https://pepethefrogfaith.wordpress.com/

Well, the digits thing is specific to the board, but in the context of Trump's election, there's actually history there, most famously the post #7777777 in 2016 that simply said "Trump will win"

1
QuackQuack 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it would have been better said "it was meant to be an exercise in humiliation"

LOL Trump is always turning the tables on them. Such an alpha move.

1
QuackQuack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure belief in these things is what's being measured, but perhaps the topics themselves.

1
QuackQuack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Needs one more data point on pure FAKE: 2020 Election Results.

But then, it's pretty hard to be pure fake without also being gay.

2
QuackQuack 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been thinking for a while the first arrest would be Trump, and now he's been arrested, and his (mug)shot is being seen/heard around the world.

I think most common folk - especially internationally - who haven't been paying terribly close attention will be shocked by a former president being arrested... that's just not done.

1
QuackQuack 1 point ago +2 / -1

What, they didn't arrest any lasers from the sky? Dang.... all those pesky arsonists getting in the way of the real culprits here!

😏

2
QuackQuack 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are the chances there is some crazy evidence dump out of the blue today?

Not sure that's feasible - due to needing it in court, but then again, on the flip side, the best way to release stuff would be unannounced before hand. All these stooges saying "I'm gonna do it next week! Yarrr" never happens.

3
QuackQuack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Epoch Times article I read said 7:36 pm local time. Off by 3 mins.

2
QuackQuack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why would they use a pic where his eyelids are half closed? It always comes across as condescending. But then again, it's probably what they're communicating anyhow I guess.

2
QuackQuack 2 points ago +2 / -0

How many times has Hamill been to pedo island or the like?

Those who shout loudest...

by BQnita
8
QuackQuack 8 points ago +8 / -0

it also implies mind control.

7
QuackQuack 7 points ago +7 / -0

*heading straight to the store to clean out the popcorn shelf.

9
QuackQuack 9 points ago +9 / -0

I feel bad for the ordinary folks caught in the cross fire here. It's pretty hard for a regular Joe who's just lost everything to turn down a rich offer for his (currently) useless land. Especially if insurance companies are slow to play ball.

Inquiring minds would love to know if there's a provable link (highly doubtful) between said big money and the sparks that started this mess...

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›