Alright, so what's your suggestion for resolving the issue? A major part of the reason that we're in the state that we're currently in as a culture is as a result of the schools and teachers pushing their personal beliefs onto kids from a young age.
I am not saying to watch the kids, I'm saying to give the parents closure and understanding for what their kids are being taught in the first place by giving them access to the lesson material itself, as its being taught, not as the curriculum says that it should be taught.
Of course parents should be more pro-active in the education of their children, but that doesn't work when the parent and teacher are in conflict, and when the parent trusts the teacher to do right by their children in the first place.
Yes Please! Every classroom needs to have a camera that provides a livestream that is accessible to the parents and administrators.
If nothing else, the lesson itself, including a live stream of the board, the teacher's computer, and a microphone at the front of the room should be available to parents and administrators at any time. This, along with pdf files of any worksheet, material, or assignment, along with any powerpoints or similar teaching documentation should be available online as well.
The kids themselves don't need to be recorded directly, but parents should at least be allowed first hand access to what their kids are actually being taught, not second-hand information that comes from kids after the fact, or from a teacher who knowingly misrepresents what they're teaching.
This might be restrictive on the teachers, but only if the teachers are attempting to deviate out of their purview. If they're doing their jobs and following the established curriculum, then it shouldn't be a problem. Teachers who do act out, though, need to be reprimanded and punished as is appropriate.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12j03n3tPr/something-everyone-is-missing-ab/
I'll just leave this here as an argument to consider.
Since when were magnets a major talking point, to the point of distraction or definition? Most people seem to dismiss anti-vaxxers as "they're using the vaccines to insert chips or nanites into us" anyway, and that started long before the magnet thing came about.
Even then, those same people who were mocking us for "being afraid of being controlled remotely, oh no!" already thought that we were stupid for believing in "Qanon", which is already a black sheep among the herd.
Our "credibility" should be backed up with tangible research and evidence anyway, so all things told, you're kind of blowing things out of proportion here, aren't you?
I think that a metaphorical approach makes a lot of sense, as in "they don't see themselves as humans, they see themselves as superior to humans, and they see humans as their prey". This stacks well with the near global mythos of dragons, with many legends that speak of dragons as superior beings who are often associated with great wealth, power, and mystique. I could very easily see these people associating themselves with dragons.
It doesn't hurt that there's a lot of media and fiction that supports dragons as "lords" over humans, in turn sort of reinforcing the association between dragons and power. From Smaug in The Hobbit, to the queen from Sleeping Beauty, who turned into a dragon; there's the fact that dragons are a literal and figurative symbol of power and authority in Game of Thrones, and even in Japanese media, the "Celestial Dragons" pretty much define a low-key version of the Cabal in the world of One Piece. Dragons have a common theme of power and mysticism applied to them in stories from around the world that go back for centuries, at minimum.
The idea makes a lot more sense than the idea that the ruling class is some sort of literal lizard race that can shapeshift or otherwise disguise themselves to fit in with the rest of us.
That's such a blatant sign of someone who has no idea of what they're talking about, and of those who have been programmed by the media. It's so effective that it makes me wonder if the term "Qanon" was planted intentionally.
It's not even just people repeating it, and then being caught spreading something false accidentally. It's newcomers who read the title, take it seriously and then get burned, and opposition, who will use it to paint us as liars.
We're supposed to research things, but if something isn't real, then make sure to note it as such. Don't take any chances, because there are people who specifically do not do any research.
Whether something happened or not, the immediate result is the same if nothing is publicized. That's the issue with datefagging.
Things are definitely happening, that much is clear, but just about the only thing that we can do on our own is to attempt to at least help other people realize it, and to prepare themselves and ourselves as best we can. Building up the expectation that something's going to happen on some date, and then having nothing to show for it is only going to hurt that objective.
Nothing can stop what is coming, but that doesn't mean that we're being provided with definite day-to-day updates as it comes. It's a better strategy to stick with what can be proven from beginning to end.
Same, except with Mountain Dew, and the occasional box of Cheese Its or candy bar, and I've been working myself off of that crap, anyway.
Although, is anything actually "safe", or are these just a few examples? At this point, it seems like just existing within the economy renders any thoughts of avoidance moot, because it all seems to funnel back to someone eventually, unless you're able to live off of your own labor.
You do understand that there are no 2022 and 2024 options as things currently stand, right? That if the 2020 election could actually be stolen from Trump so blatantly, then there will be no uncontrolled elections going forward, correct?
The Tesla Coil was created to use radio waves to produce high voltage, low current loads wirelessly. Tesla had wanted to use them as an answer to electricity distribution, but for various reasons, he never really got off the ground with them. A lot of his work was seized after his death, and it's long been speculated that he had a lot of ideas and inventions that would be revolutionary, but that never saw the light of day.
I went to school for engineering, and I remember hearing a theory of "solar power satellites" that would generate power and use tesla coils to transfer that power to the surface wirelessly. The main issues at the time were the fact that solar panels were very inefficient, and something about existing tesla coil technology not being ready yet. There was a size issue, I think, and a concern about how something like this could be detrimental to society, the environment, and whatnot, although this was years ago, so I don't remember what it was, specifically.
It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if someone gets this working, because the theory and basic technology has been around for years. My main concern just plays into how these transfers would actually affect life on the surface, especially if they could be weaponized.
Amen