8
TSearch 8 points ago +8 / -0

Whether we know it or not, whether we accept it or not, we’re all participants in a great, silent war. A war that has been going on for decades. The plandemic was a multi-stage battle to remove President Trump.

Stage 1 - Hope that he ignored the “advice” of “experts” and run up the death count. Pence steps in and invokes the 25th Amendment knowing enough DS or weak people are on the Cabinet to be successful.

Stage 2 - Infect POTUS in the belief, at his age, he will be debilitated to the point the 25th Amendment can be invoked.

u/#q4836

Stage 3 - Create the “necessity” for mail-in ballots and engage 80 million ballots for Biden, among other things.

u/#q4688

We think we can imagine what lengths the DS was willing to take to subjugate the world’s population and eliminate any resistance. But, our imagination quite likely falls far short of their ruthlessness and evil.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s interesting he stirs the pot using Israel when back in 2020 the Jerusalem Post wrote a glowing article about him. Not to mention the IDF made one of his books required reading and had him come speak to IDF leaders.

My opinion is the guy makes his living (and feeds his ego) consulting with Global Leaders. He is going to say things he believes will bring business his way.

https://m.jpost.com/opinion/antisemitism-accusations-against-dr-douglas-macgregor-are-deeply-upsetting-639119

5
TSearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

I get the feeling the members of this Cabinet are receiving training and coaching at fighting back and it’s a joy to watch.

7
TSearch 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hard to believe, but even the left leaning fact check sites ruled this claim as false.

And, as others have pointed out, the livestock industry depends upon fertility, no way they’re treating their animals with a product that causes sterility.

11
TSearch 11 points ago +11 / -0

My opinion is you are absolutely correct, but the list of enemy combatants already exists. The question is when will it be divulged? What are the conditions that have to be met to go public?

I go back to Lindsey Graham’s line of questioning during the Kavanaugh Hearings.

The summary is we are actually operating in a Congressionally declared state of war. People collaborating with our enemies can be declared enemy combatants and tried in the military justice system.

This also brings us back to the media being disturbed about what could potentially be in President Trump’s Presidential Emergency Action Document (PEADs)

President Trump never had to invoke the Insurrection Act because we’re already in a declared state of war. The Congressional Resolution on September 14, 2001 is so broad a President can expand the list of enemies and collaborators without further Congressional approval.

I hope, the timeline in post 3387 is still correct. If it is we are very close to seeing this close out.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MJxG2QM3Y3o

u/#q2523

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here’s my primary source for Musk’s status as a Special Government Employee. He is actually one of many scattered throughout the Administration.

It’s also interesting to note he does not direct the day-to-day activities of DOGE, that is done by the Acting Administrator, Amy Gleason.

Also interesting this class of employee was created in 1962 under JFK.

So, I have no idea why Musk said he would be there a year. But, his status only permits working 130 days per year for the Government.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/musk-special-government-employee-what

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for bringing back that old memory. Unfortunately it seemed like the whole George News experience burned Evespra out and he left shortly after that.

5
TSearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

He has to step back in May because he was appointed as a Special Government Employee which has a statutory limit.

Full disclosure, I didn’t read the article, so maybe they said that.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Zelensky isn’t representing the interests of the Ukrainian people, he’s representing his own interests. He knows when the war is over so is his life. It’s doubtful any level of assurances about his personal safety will convince him to either negotiate or step down.

by TAG55
10
TSearch 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is spot on. It makes me wonder if the whole “release the files” fervor is a DS psyop that has unfortunately been effective.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, crap, that’s two strikes today. You would never know I qualified as a marksman in the military and had the highest score on my base for about a year. But, that seems like it was a hundred years ago now.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s part of my point, we don’t know if there are any planned prosecutions, but don’t you hope there are? What good does it do to release the files if no one is brought to justice?

What we should really be saying is we want the people on Epstein’s “client list” and his accomplices brought to justice. Releasing the files without prosecutions would actually be a travesty of justice for the original reasons I cited, the released files would likely be inadmissible in court.

5
TSearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are two good reasons to not release the Epstein files, there are ongoing Grand Jury investigations, or releasing them would undermine planned prosecutions. It’s not hard to imagine a judge ruling that any material released prior to trial is prejudicial and inadmissible.

What doesn’t make sense is why the President, DOJ, and FBI don’t just admit that if it’s the case.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks. I should have looked more closely, the clip should have been the giveaway.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

First thing, I won’t ever buy anything this company produces.

Second, Congress has recognized through multiple bills that tariffs are integral to the Executive Branch’s ability to conduct foreign policy and protect National Security.

The wild card, as always, is whether the judge assigned to this case follows the law, or decides to legislate from the bench.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11030

7
TSearch 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’m not convinced the woman in the picture is anywhere near 50 years old. I realize there are people who look young for their age, but I would guess she’s mid 30’s at most.

9
TSearch 9 points ago +9 / -0

Came here to say this too.

He appears to be carrying a tactical shotgun and is covering the driver’s side to ensure no one approaches the vehicle.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought the Administration invoked state secrets, but maybe that was in different case? But, if they invoke state secrets in this case, the Judge is effectively powerless.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can’t say it enough. I am beyond pleasantly surprised at how hardcore Rubio is turning out to be. Usually former Senators talk a lot and do very little.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

My reaction to reading DecodingSymbols is almost always the same, it’s almost overwhelming to tie together everything in one of these posts.

I think what I got out of that is we are being intentionally mislead into thinking vaccines are the cause. The MSM’s coverage seems to mock people who believe it is the vaccines, but it is a case of reverse psychology.

All of this is being done to hide the real reason, which wasn’t conclusively identified in the post. Was my decode of the decode correct?

8
TSearch 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have a nagging feeling there are researchers who already know the answer and the answer is being withheld. Their company or institution is hiding it under the legal excuse of protecting intellectual property.

It’s frustrating, but I also get the feeling RFK Jr. has been made aware of the answer and has to go through this process to organically come to the same conclusion. I won’t pretend to understand the legal problems with just divulging the root cause. I do kind of get the sociological-psychological aspect of having to overcome decades of brainwashing.

11
TSearch 11 points ago +11 / -0

Doesn’t it seem like the Trump Administration is executing a set of carefully planned deportations to provoke these court cases?

They grab Khalil at Columbia and the DS rushes to his defense. Then we learn he was an asset for the British at some point, possibly still could be. Plus, the Administration invokes a law that uses foreign policy goals as a standard for determining a person must be deported.

They grab Garcia and the lefties rush to his defense, characterizing him as a “Maryland Man,” who needs to be returned. Then the Trump Administration releases the receipts that he is a known member of MS13. Here, again, the Administration invokes the Alien Enemies Act as the basis for these deportations.

Somewhere during these cases President Trump makes a statement to the effect he has no respect for the lower courts, but he would respect a ruling by the Supreme Court.

This is frustrating, but it seems like another case of having to do things by the book. And, through extensive war gaming, President Trump’s core team believes SCOTUS will have to rule in favor of the Executive Branch. POTUS saying he would respect SCOTUS decisions is a trap of sorts to use against the DS when they try to delegitimize favorable rulings.

What we’re seeing now is the groundwork for mass deportations that can proceed unabated by lower court interference. The Administration is getting the ducks in a row to provoke a SCOTUS ruling that clarifies Immigration Enforcement and the adjudication of immigration status is solely the purview of the Executive Branch.

It’s also interesting the “by the book” post was a delta this week.

u/#q3966

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

It would be more interesting if he announced that he actually invoked the Insurrection Act on January 7, 2021 and released a list of the enemy combatants involved in the insurrection.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the Framer’s intended for Congress to also execute the laws it passes, they would have chosen a Parliamentary System. They didn’t, they established a strong Executive Branch to implement and enforce the law. That includes taxes and tariffs.

9
TSearch 9 points ago +9 / -0

Translation: Total power = restoring the Constitution’s foundational principles.

They don’t honestly believe President Trump will usurp the powers of the Legislative and Judicial Branches. The DS fears he will gain total control over the Executive Branch and negate their decades of defying the President’s Constitutional authority.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›