Jesus said he was the only truth. You wary of him?

Trump does acts of quiet Charity and doesn't tell people he did it.

They are nothing alike. Tate is a testicle.

This isn't an ideological purity test, it's a mark of character. Tate has none.

I assure you I have never in my life kicked on a father who is struggling to take care of their child, and I doubt any other decent humans have either.

We really shouldn't normalize or promote rape, in or out of prison.

Nice ad hominem, very convincing

You sound like every npc 'what color is your Bugatti?'

Oh, so you are a paying Tate fan in the throes of cognitive dissonance and tribal loyalty.

You know it is possible for the deep state to dislike someone and they also be a piece of shit?

If I find his message to be morally repugnant, I can dislike him regardless of what the deep state think.

You appear to be incapable of multi factor analysis and holding more than 1 idea at a time. Stop acting like a normie celeb defender.

You are literally giving the same argument as cabal defenders.

You know it is immoral but don't care and give a pass because it is 'your guy'..

Sometimes the people posting here are every bit as tribal and lacking in introspection as sjw twits I had to put up with in college.

Tate makes his whole brand about worldly success in the most shallow, materialistic, bohemian sense. He has no concept of biblical morality or Christian strength.

He is no role model for anyone but pre-pubescent boys and immature and insecure adults who never had a father figure.

Man, after your balls drop you'll look back on this Tate phase and cringe.

This clown doesn't live true to God, he is absolutely drenched in worldly ideologies and desires.

He's a scam artist who targets preteen boys without male role models.

You can say it all you want, you will still be wrong.

With extreme difficulty

Deport the glowing nazi and move on.

Just say a confessed murderer was approaching you and you feared for your life.

So you're saying in the trials they didn't keep track of how often these side effects happened?

Because that, to me, sounds like a horribly run trial. The entire point of the trials should be to pick up on any and all health outcomes and then compare to the baseline, so if we have no frequency data, what good does that do us?

Does anyone have any graphics or listed frequencies for the side effects?

Trying to share data and people are like 'well these were obviously super rare', so counter to that would be great.

Sue their ass.

Some of us with large noses aren't evil, thank you very much.

No, we shouldn't do it this way because the pedophile should have been executed by the state.

Because you are giving the Dems what they want.

That's like saying 'I won't fight the Nazis because we didn't beat them when they first invaded France.'

You don't give up because the enemy took cheap shots or cheated, you keep forcing them to cheat until they are turned on by even their own supporters.

My issue is that I like my employer and I work with a small company where we all, to some extent, know each other, but they also don't want to jeopardize the company as we are a government sub-contractor, so I am not sure how to do all this without it coming across as aggressively confrontational or hostile.

I feel like the way much of this is written comes across as very 'layman lawyer' and hostile 'gotcha' type language, and so I'm trying to process this situation in a way that shows I also am trying to do what is best for the company and myself at the same time.

It isn't about term limits, it's about voters being smart and invested enough to know who their senators are.

Americans need to hold themselves to higher standards.

Thank you.