This is another escalation of the war on men. Actually listen to what Tate says. He's been speaking up about the "deep state" in regards to the culture war against males and how it's being done on purpose. You can't have a strong national defense when the males of your nation have been effeminately broken down into soy-sipping limp dicks.
disheartening to see how many people on GAW are wide asleep. Someone as influential as Top G comes along who is able to wake more people up in a matter of months regarding covid, the clot shot, the war on masculinity, feminism, climate change than us goons on GAW did in years...
is met with hate and vitriol on GAW? where the fuck am I?
I'm not required to like everyone who come out on our side of the political game. In fact, I find some of the celebs who champion our cause to be annoying or otherwise objectionable. Laura Loomer fights the good fight, but is beyond obnoxious. Milo Yiannopolous is flaky and an attention vampire, and many of who I call "paytriots" who get glowing reviews here, I just don't like their style or don't trust their thinking. There are a lot of people with fairly low IQ who either can't see the patterns, see patterns that aren't there, and don't have the logical training to distinguish these.
The point is that I don't have to like everyone who's on our side. I reserve the right to think for myself and not just ride some bandwagon. I've never heard of this Tate guy before, but the Left seem to be losing their ever-loving minds on Reddit over this guy's takedown which is literally the only reason I care at all to know even the slightest bit who he is.
If he's a douche, like I keep hearing, don't expect people to jump on the bandwagon and defend him now that he's accused of sex trafficking which we're all here to oppose (except the FedBois of course)
Why would a man who’s part of a human trafficking operation openly attack companies like Balenciaga and say that women are meant to be protected at all costs?
Think about trying to have cozy relations and sharing wine and song with Fauxcahontas, Grannie Nan, Chuckie and Shifty. Suddenly I very much want to raise a glass and snuggle by the fire with our side folks you name.
Who is Andrew Tate? Here's a 7 minute video with one of the most poignant, concise descriptions of Satanism I've ever heard as he describes the Balenciaga scandal. Decide for yourself.
You write like a politician. That was a pretty lengthy way to basically explain why you're a good person instead of just saying "I'll go read it now" in the first place.
Not sure if that's supposed to be a backhanded compliment or just a personal observation tied to an insult, but in either case, the point I made still stands.
I just read it. Those are some pretty specific allegations. Ill admit I was letting the inner mma fanboy get the better of me without actually knowing what the evidence was.
Of course after.the fake allegations lobbed at Assange, Trump and others it's always hard to tell but this guy is really no Assange...
In 2016, he was booted off the British version of Big Brother after a 2012 video resurfaced of him hitting a woman with a belt, calling her a “whore” and telling her to count her bruises. Tate claims that the actions were consensual, and that the belt was actually made of felt. Either way, the violence and degradation in these videos is clear.
See how fucking hard was that? There she is, multiple times years later having to come out and call it bullshit. Because god forbid the woke sjw feminazis actually listen to a woman rather than using them as pawns.
Picking and editing quotes out of an hour long interview with paperhand portnoy who live recorded himself losing money trading gamestop in its epic run is also not something that screams credibility. Of course whoever wrote this didn't watch the video because they stole it off someone else, because I saw this last time around when he was arrested and released, which again plagiarism just screams credibility.
Yeah, C5 already posted that in another response. And that belt video is what I think really had me smoothing out my brain. I am back on track. Thanks!
It makes you wonder if all this tranny stuff they shove down kids throats (sorry for phrasing lol) isn't a psychological attack by China. Look at many of the places around them that are basically widely known for that stuff (Bangkok, for example). What made so many of the men in those locations do that to themselves in such huge numbers (and young ages)
Don't forget 'someone (probably the FBI or CIA)' tried to frame Julian Assange as a pedophile with child porn on his computer right around the time Seth Rich was murdered.. and if it weren't for Assange's computer skills, it might have stuck.
I would assume nothing about Andrew Tate and would lean more likely that the charges are completely false knowing minimally about him that he is labeled by the left as 'far right' and they attempted to cancel him. I don't really know much about him - but I recommend reserving judgement considering we know the media will happily make up lies with no evidence.. so only the evidence matters.
He sounds like someone with a brain who doesn't want to get tricked or used by the usual outrage machine, so he's trying to do his homework and understand the situation before he makes up his mind. This is what we're supposed to be doing.
This also wouldn’t be his first time that he was arrested. His first time, just so happened that he got swatted.. i’m no fan of the guy and personally thought he was corny but this news doesn’t seem right. Hopefully some clarity in the coming days. More questions than answers.
The whole thing feels like a major distraction / puppet show.
The CIA killed JFK. COVID-19 is a bioweapon. Elections have been stolen. The government is stealing from Americans. The border crisis and the fact that cartels are making billions of dollars. The decline of Western countries.
If the charges are true, and he is trafficking eastern European women, we should be aware and we should want to see justice served. The whole great awakening is about recognizing the sin around us and getting to whose running it all.
Yeah, it's probably intended as a distraction. Too bad for the would-be controllers out there, I can think about more than one thing at a time and I've got a decent memory. I haven't forgotten about the CIA's many abuses, Fauci commissioning bioweapons research with taxpayer money, Biden's corrupt regime and the theft that put it in place, the 5+ million illegals who need to be sent home, the Chinese waging a drug war on the country with fentanyl, Klaus Schwab's war on energy, food, and the global population, the Alphabet mafia institutionalizing debauchery in elementary schools, the bankers war being fought in Ukraine... or any other of countless issues we frequently talk about.
If this guy is a POS who needs to be locked up, then lock him up. If he's being set up, we need evidence and motive.
My guess is that Tate is a black hat asset that is being burned. Any of his supporters instantly look guilty of being pro sex trafficking regardless if the allegations are true. But I think there is quite a few weird comms being sent. Greta says he's got smalldickenergy and the next day Tate makes a video response that is all in all lack luster, while smoking a cigar talking about cars and places a pizza box right in the camera view. The dude gets arrested in Romania because of a pizza box on allegations of sex trafficking. Just very odd.
The whole thing feels like a major distraction / puppet show.
Sooooo, am I the only one here that noticed that bringing sex traffickers to justice was the first Q mission?
It was, wasn't it? I'm pretty sure the whole "stop sex trafficking" was a good percentage of the posts right here in this very lil' ol' forum.
Is the problem here that it's not just underage sex trafficking, specifically? If it was 100% kid sex trafficking, would you still say it was a distraction?
Not sure what rock you've been living under for the sum of your existence, but virtually everytime you have sex trafficking, there are underage kids caught up in it, too.
So, just so we're clear on the matter here, you're saying that now that we've caught a potential sex trafficker (innocent until proven guilty), which (if guilty) most certainly involves underage AKA CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING, well, we're just soooooo busy with all the other stuff going on, well, we just can't be bothered to, you know, even discuss it or anything? Not even a little? Maybe just a teensy tiny little bit?
Why don't you phrase it in your own words, and explain how it's just a distraction, from all the IMPORTANT stuff?
Ugh. I'm going to just go ahead and chalk it up to the general apathy people have about sex trafficking of adult women.
They've got it set up as clear distinctions in their mind where there are "innocents" (whatever they personally deem as "too young") and then everyone else. And fuck everyone else.
Completely oblivious to the fact that many adult sex trafficking victims have been in the system since they were kids.
If the WHs are actually out doing what they're supposed to be doing, this sort of thing will most likely become a common occurrence.
There are going to be people arrested that no one would have ever believed could do stuff this vile.
I'm going to say some stuff now that is going to make some people angry. Shocking, I know! But I think that everyone needs to start getting their heads in a space where finding out someone you liked and admired and identified with are going to show up in posts like this.
There will be some who will be falsely accused. Obviously. But if this is going to turn out as big as it's been portrayed for the past, what, 7-8 years now? It's pretty much guaranteed to get a guilty person that you like.
For the past two years I've been reading posts here going into great detail about how wonderful it's going to be to see sex traffickers strung up, set on fire, beheaded on national TV and so on.
But it was obvious that it never occurred to anyone (that I noticed, anyway) that at some point, someone they valued was going to be up on that chopping block.
If there's one cardinal sin that runs rampant around here, it's the smug, self righteous belief that those who share a couple political ideologies with Q or Trump can do NO wrong. EVER
So, yeah, cognitive dissonance, anyone?
Ok, I think that about wraps up this post. Please don't forget to downdoot this post, go scroll through all my recent comments, downdoot them, and come back here and call me a leftist Shill 3 letter badge so and so whatever.
Oh boy. I was skeptical, but this is put out by a very solid Christian group from what I know of them - Exodus Cry. They formed out of a large prominent faith community I'm Kansas City.
Anyway, I'm inclined to believe there's no way they are making this many facts up for a hit piece article. Yikes.
I haven't read the article you linked yet, but just from the outset it appears to be just like every other inflammatory hit piece ever concocted against the Tates. Whether or not there is any chicanery afoot, when I see articles with slanted, cookie cutter anti-Tate rhetoric like this one I immediately think "propaganda".
Dealing with 6 years of never-Trumping has got my journalistic spider senses tuned into hypersensitivity mode. Now we have ourselves in the 365 days of Never-Tate, which has increased in fervor over the last 6 months or so as he's become more outspoken against the establishment.
Maybe there is something to this story, but as it stands, my skepticism amplifier is cranked to 11.
His video was highlighted on Rumble (figures), and so I watched about 20-30 minutes of it. I didn’t hear or see anything that I felt was abusive to women, but he was exceptionally rude to his brother who was on with him. Definitely a man that likes to make sure betas know their betas. He seems to like to rant in monologues. My honest opinion is that he was the most angry arrogant prick I ever heard speak. No thanks, I prefer Frankie Vale! 🤩
This man is a CIA asset, he has a large following of young boys who pay far too much attention to him. He is solely put out to ruin yet another aspect of the family unit.
I think it’s entirely possible he’s a Judas goat. What’s becoming more and more apparent is that it’s very rare to accrue the level of wealth that he supposedly has without being compromised in some way. If he’s involved in trafficking it’s very unlikely that he’s been independent of established trafficking organization. Maybe he went off the rez with his Covid comments and this is his leash being snapped? Or maybe he’s been set up to follow a script from day 1 for this purpose, to sow division in the movement and to enable the media to focus on him thus tarnishing the movement and also providing a distraction from JP Morgan Chase being sued by BVI for complicity in Epsteins operation? I think it’s very suss that he was so publicly falling for bait from thunberg- if he’s such a supposed alpha why even bother to respond or try to troll her? It seems manufactured to me - I’m going to watch for the 48hr rule to see how it shakes out
“How can your girl leave you if you own all of her accounts? If you have all the login credentials? Forced pimping
FAKE AND GAY: You dont like the way he manages, then make a new account easy as that.
webcam business was profiting off of fraud.
FAKE AND GAY: Yeah it's a scam, anyone who has ever been a succesful salesperson knows that everything is a "scam" you buy low sell high, big deal. He is not ripping anyone off. Customers where satisfied and he spent less and made more.
Fleeing the UK to Find Sanctuary in Romania
SUPER FAKE AND SUPER GAY: So what if he fled a bullshit country because they where after his ass? Did he actually rape anyone? Did Kavanaugh? Did Trump? He isn't as well connected as those two btw. They got Assange that way too.
Andrew Tate dehumanized women by openly labeling his partners as property
what if by setting them up in webcam businesses, he was actually "emancipating" them from traffickers
what if (same) became a "lure" to catch - Snagooroni, #RipadeeDip
If I were his lawyer I'd just point out all those quirks are normal kinks in BDSM and it wouldn't be the first time CNC play bit someone in the ass. He basically sounds like a D heavy on the B, S & M.
Not really a D for the sex stuff, that's just a top. It's the TPE and financial domination stuff that puts him out of just the top category.
It's not an effective article for other reasons as this.
I have no opinion on the person.
In general, if you throw a shoe in a crowd of top influencers you're more likely to hit something spooky than real.
I am not saying that of him, I have no idea.
Bondage, Domination and Sado-Masochism contains something called a "Financial Dominant" and everything in that article can fall into that and other categories without any criminality. It is not degrading or demeaning if done correctly. It is empowering and rewarding for both parties.
I believe he and his brother are being set up, just like the January 6 prisoners. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn the Deep State or a branch of government was involved.
I'm having real trouble reserving judgement on Tate for a few days to see how this shakes out. But, I will state emphatically that anyone who runs women for money won't get any support from me, period...
The SAME people who said Donald Trump had a pee-pee tape, or has small hands, and colluded with Russia are the SAME people who will slander Andrew Tate.
This is not a defense of Andrew Tate. Merely an observation of who the gender-fluid, micro aggression, tranny left goes after.
I personally think he’s funny, and he does shit on the left, but i can’t say explicitly that he supports America, Donald Trump, or anything Q related.
What has stuck out for me is the full court press coverage of this. I kinda have a rule
Of thumb now that if the legacy media are wall to wall coverage then it’s clown shit and to watch and wait. There’s been barely a peep
About Clinton Epstein Wexler Chandler and all
The other shady shit. The media only focused on harry and Meghan orange man bad and Prince Andrew and now Tate. Doubtful this is straightforward so it will be interesting to see how it shakes out
This is another escalation of the war on men. Actually listen to what Tate says. He's been speaking up about the "deep state" in regards to the culture war against males and how it's being done on purpose. You can't have a strong national defense when the males of your nation have been effeminately broken down into soy-sipping limp dicks.
disheartening to see how many people on GAW are wide asleep. Someone as influential as Top G comes along who is able to wake more people up in a matter of months regarding covid, the clot shot, the war on masculinity, feminism, climate change than us goons on GAW did in years...
is met with hate and vitriol on GAW? where the fuck am I?
I'm not required to like everyone who come out on our side of the political game. In fact, I find some of the celebs who champion our cause to be annoying or otherwise objectionable. Laura Loomer fights the good fight, but is beyond obnoxious. Milo Yiannopolous is flaky and an attention vampire, and many of who I call "paytriots" who get glowing reviews here, I just don't like their style or don't trust their thinking. There are a lot of people with fairly low IQ who either can't see the patterns, see patterns that aren't there, and don't have the logical training to distinguish these.
The point is that I don't have to like everyone who's on our side. I reserve the right to think for myself and not just ride some bandwagon. I've never heard of this Tate guy before, but the Left seem to be losing their ever-loving minds on Reddit over this guy's takedown which is literally the only reason I care at all to know even the slightest bit who he is.
If he's a douche, like I keep hearing, don't expect people to jump on the bandwagon and defend him now that he's accused of sex trafficking which we're all here to oppose (except the FedBois of course)
Why would a man who’s part of a human trafficking operation openly attack companies like Balenciaga and say that women are meant to be protected at all costs?
^ many updoots
Trump rubs people the wrong way. So what.
Would Twitter, Facebook ban one of their own? Read about it. It’s not clear on which side he is and what’s true here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Tate
Think about trying to have cozy relations and sharing wine and song with Fauxcahontas, Grannie Nan, Chuckie and Shifty. Suddenly I very much want to raise a glass and snuggle by the fire with our side folks you name.
Good point.
Who is Andrew Tate? Here's a 7 minute video with one of the most poignant, concise descriptions of Satanism I've ever heard as he describes the Balenciaga scandal. Decide for yourself.
https://youtu.be/-95UTrA9_PQ
Great video. After watching it, it makes much more sense why they are attacking him.
I wasn't aware until the Greta Thuneberg thing.
The dude is a dickweed
shills and shills tactics imo
What I said and what the article says are independent of one another.
Objective truths:
There is a war on men
The Tates have been big antagonists against establishment narratives surrounding masculinity
The Tates have largely been successful in helping men of all ages "up their game" even if there are some elements that are not so savory
As I am currently about to start reading the article, I just want to make it clear that these can exist simultaneously.
Now, off to the races as I attempt to alter my perception via investigative writing! Thanks for the nudge, Fren.
You write like a politician. That was a pretty lengthy way to basically explain why you're a good person instead of just saying "I'll go read it now" in the first place.
Not sure if that's supposed to be a backhanded compliment or just a personal observation tied to an insult, but in either case, the point I made still stands.
The point you made stands on the foundation of how you made it. But yes I suppose it does technically stand.
I just read it. Those are some pretty specific allegations. Ill admit I was letting the inner mma fanboy get the better of me without actually knowing what the evidence was.
Of course after.the fake allegations lobbed at Assange, Trump and others it's always hard to tell but this guy is really no Assange...
Why attack him now?
Great point
There's nothing credible in it.
https://youtu.be/nfSCIVAcXOU
See how fucking hard was that? There she is, multiple times years later having to come out and call it bullshit. Because god forbid the woke sjw feminazis actually listen to a woman rather than using them as pawns.
Picking and editing quotes out of an hour long interview with paperhand portnoy who live recorded himself losing money trading gamestop in its epic run is also not something that screams credibility. Of course whoever wrote this didn't watch the video because they stole it off someone else, because I saw this last time around when he was arrested and released, which again plagiarism just screams credibility.
Yeah, C5 already posted that in another response. And that belt video is what I think really had me smoothing out my brain. I am back on track. Thanks!
He has been publicly saying he is not suicidal for a few weeks now. I wonder if he knrw this was coming.
Jake shields hss been questioning this as well.
All things in their extreme become their opposite, and the wolf says 'baa'. ___ Chairman Meow CCCP
It makes you wonder if all this tranny stuff they shove down kids throats (sorry for phrasing lol) isn't a psychological attack by China. Look at many of the places around them that are basically widely known for that stuff (Bangkok, for example). What made so many of the men in those locations do that to themselves in such huge numbers (and young ages)
Don't forget 'someone (probably the FBI or CIA)' tried to frame Julian Assange as a pedophile with child porn on his computer right around the time Seth Rich was murdered.. and if it weren't for Assange's computer skills, it might have stuck.
I would assume nothing about Andrew Tate and would lean more likely that the charges are completely false knowing minimally about him that he is labeled by the left as 'far right' and they attempted to cancel him. I don't really know much about him - but I recommend reserving judgement considering we know the media will happily make up lies with no evidence.. so only the evidence matters.
You sound like a lot like an infiltrator.
He sounds like someone with a brain who doesn't want to get tricked or used by the usual outrage machine, so he's trying to do his homework and understand the situation before he makes up his mind. This is what we're supposed to be doing.
Agreed. It seems to be their goto with men who speak more truth than they’re comfortable with. OP is likely going to hit me with “BuH hAvE YoU ReAd ThE aRtIcLe”, ok but Andrew tate had a recent interview where he literally predicted this: https://twitter.com/kyleforgeard/status/1608599477388181504?s=46&t=I4c_UnZrQpRKl_W5G4QZtA
This also wouldn’t be his first time that he was arrested. His first time, just so happened that he got swatted.. i’m no fan of the guy and personally thought he was corny but this news doesn’t seem right. Hopefully some clarity in the coming days. More questions than answers.
Check out this clip of him interacting with a young lady
Watch this in counter-argument:
https://files.catbox.moe/2bkh6c.mp4
it's easy to get emotional when there's no context and the person you're listening to gets emotional in order to get you to think irrationally.
Ferfuksake! How many uturns does this crazy trip take?!
That speaks volumes...
People need to see that clip.
people need to see THIS clip:
https://rumble.com/v1f0ib5-owen-benjamin-biblical-flat-truths.html
Owen Benjamin.... enough said
https://rumble.com/v1f0ib5-owen-benjamin-biblical-flat-truths.html
Trump had accusations from legacy media. Means nothing. I'm reserving judgement for now
The whole thing feels like a major distraction / puppet show.
The CIA killed JFK. COVID-19 is a bioweapon. Elections have been stolen. The government is stealing from Americans. The border crisis and the fact that cartels are making billions of dollars. The decline of Western countries.
I don't care about Andrew Tate.
If the charges are true, and he is trafficking eastern European women, we should be aware and we should want to see justice served. The whole great awakening is about recognizing the sin around us and getting to whose running it all.
Yeah, it's probably intended as a distraction. Too bad for the would-be controllers out there, I can think about more than one thing at a time and I've got a decent memory. I haven't forgotten about the CIA's many abuses, Fauci commissioning bioweapons research with taxpayer money, Biden's corrupt regime and the theft that put it in place, the 5+ million illegals who need to be sent home, the Chinese waging a drug war on the country with fentanyl, Klaus Schwab's war on energy, food, and the global population, the Alphabet mafia institutionalizing debauchery in elementary schools, the bankers war being fought in Ukraine... or any other of countless issues we frequently talk about.
If this guy is a POS who needs to be locked up, then lock him up. If he's being set up, we need evidence and motive.
He made his money getting women to be cam sluts, mostly eastern european females.
If he isn't a LARP then we will know when he tells us he has changed gender as so many others had to do in order to carry on living.
My guess is that Tate is a black hat asset that is being burned. Any of his supporters instantly look guilty of being pro sex trafficking regardless if the allegations are true. But I think there is quite a few weird comms being sent. Greta says he's got smalldickenergy and the next day Tate makes a video response that is all in all lack luster, while smoking a cigar talking about cars and places a pizza box right in the camera view. The dude gets arrested in Romania because of a pizza box on allegations of sex trafficking. Just very odd.
Makes sense
Innocent until proven fren.. period and non negotiable.
Sooooo, am I the only one here that noticed that bringing sex traffickers to justice was the first Q mission?
It was, wasn't it? I'm pretty sure the whole "stop sex trafficking" was a good percentage of the posts right here in this very lil' ol' forum.
Is the problem here that it's not just underage sex trafficking, specifically? If it was 100% kid sex trafficking, would you still say it was a distraction?
Not sure what rock you've been living under for the sum of your existence, but virtually everytime you have sex trafficking, there are underage kids caught up in it, too.
So, just so we're clear on the matter here, you're saying that now that we've caught a potential sex trafficker (innocent until proven guilty), which (if guilty) most certainly involves underage AKA CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING, well, we're just soooooo busy with all the other stuff going on, well, we just can't be bothered to, you know, even discuss it or anything? Not even a little? Maybe just a teensy tiny little bit?
Why don't you phrase it in your own words, and explain how it's just a distraction, from all the IMPORTANT stuff?
Ugh. I'm going to just go ahead and chalk it up to the general apathy people have about sex trafficking of adult women.
They've got it set up as clear distinctions in their mind where there are "innocents" (whatever they personally deem as "too young") and then everyone else. And fuck everyone else.
Completely oblivious to the fact that many adult sex trafficking victims have been in the system since they were kids.
If the WHs are actually out doing what they're supposed to be doing, this sort of thing will most likely become a common occurrence.
There are going to be people arrested that no one would have ever believed could do stuff this vile.
I'm going to say some stuff now that is going to make some people angry. Shocking, I know! But I think that everyone needs to start getting their heads in a space where finding out someone you liked and admired and identified with are going to show up in posts like this.
There will be some who will be falsely accused. Obviously. But if this is going to turn out as big as it's been portrayed for the past, what, 7-8 years now? It's pretty much guaranteed to get a guilty person that you like.
For the past two years I've been reading posts here going into great detail about how wonderful it's going to be to see sex traffickers strung up, set on fire, beheaded on national TV and so on.
But it was obvious that it never occurred to anyone (that I noticed, anyway) that at some point, someone they valued was going to be up on that chopping block.
If there's one cardinal sin that runs rampant around here, it's the smug, self righteous belief that those who share a couple political ideologies with Q or Trump can do NO wrong. EVER
So, yeah, cognitive dissonance, anyone?
Ok, I think that about wraps up this post. Please don't forget to downdoot this post, go scroll through all my recent comments, downdoot them, and come back here and call me a leftist Shill 3 letter badge so and so whatever.
Night, folks. ✌️
Young men need Jesus as an influence, not Andrew Tate.
the difference is being a good man.
Oh boy. I was skeptical, but this is put out by a very solid Christian group from what I know of them - Exodus Cry. They formed out of a large prominent faith community I'm Kansas City.
Anyway, I'm inclined to believe there's no way they are making this many facts up for a hit piece article. Yikes.
I haven't read the article you linked yet, but just from the outset it appears to be just like every other inflammatory hit piece ever concocted against the Tates. Whether or not there is any chicanery afoot, when I see articles with slanted, cookie cutter anti-Tate rhetoric like this one I immediately think "propaganda".
Dealing with 6 years of never-Trumping has got my journalistic spider senses tuned into hypersensitivity mode. Now we have ourselves in the 365 days of Never-Tate, which has increased in fervor over the last 6 months or so as he's become more outspoken against the establishment.
Maybe there is something to this story, but as it stands, my skepticism amplifier is cranked to 11.
Maybe you should read the article. The guy's a scumbag.
His video was highlighted on Rumble (figures), and so I watched about 20-30 minutes of it. I didn’t hear or see anything that I felt was abusive to women, but he was exceptionally rude to his brother who was on with him. Definitely a man that likes to make sure betas know their betas. He seems to like to rant in monologues. My honest opinion is that he was the most angry arrogant prick I ever heard speak. No thanks, I prefer Frankie Vale! 🤩
This man is a CIA asset, he has a large following of young boys who pay far too much attention to him. He is solely put out to ruin yet another aspect of the family unit.
He is bad, bad news.
Indeed PepeSee.
Another rabbit hole that may be of interest:
Info Wars = Mindwars.
God bless!
He’s Dan Blizeran 2.0 and only betas support him
You can say that again.
He's openly admitted to creating porn by soliciting under aged girls for sex.
Like... why should anyone weep for this piece of shit.
I know the MSM is hyping this as a Greta TRANSberg take down, but even that part is nonsense.
The guy has been on the run for a while, he is shameless is trying to fuck under aged girls for profit... PUT THIS PIECE OF SHIT AWAY!
Fuck that actually... DEATH SQUAD THESE PEOPLE!
I think it’s entirely possible he’s a Judas goat. What’s becoming more and more apparent is that it’s very rare to accrue the level of wealth that he supposedly has without being compromised in some way. If he’s involved in trafficking it’s very unlikely that he’s been independent of established trafficking organization. Maybe he went off the rez with his Covid comments and this is his leash being snapped? Or maybe he’s been set up to follow a script from day 1 for this purpose, to sow division in the movement and to enable the media to focus on him thus tarnishing the movement and also providing a distraction from JP Morgan Chase being sued by BVI for complicity in Epsteins operation? I think it’s very suss that he was so publicly falling for bait from thunberg- if he’s such a supposed alpha why even bother to respond or try to troll her? It seems manufactured to me - I’m going to watch for the 48hr rule to see how it shakes out
Bingo.
He harassed Greta and this is her handlers payback
i think the greta thing is comms. look to the acronym
also, @PapiTrumpo posted vid of "Greta" being "put in the corner" while "The Big T" came up in the elevator
Did he piss on a Russian prostitute as well? Come on man. This is such f-ing garbage.
Andrew Tate most googled man in 2022.
How could the white hats use his popularity to help wake up people?
Perhaps these are bogus charges JUST to get the conversation about human trafficking in the news??
Leftist Friend brought Tate arrest up and I said “wish the media cared about the trafficking going on at the border”
Boom
Claims in the article:
FAKE AND GAY: You dont like the way he manages, then make a new account easy as that.
FAKE AND GAY: Yeah it's a scam, anyone who has ever been a succesful salesperson knows that everything is a "scam" you buy low sell high, big deal. He is not ripping anyone off. Customers where satisfied and he spent less and made more.
SUPER FAKE AND SUPER GAY: So what if he fled a bullshit country because they where after his ass? Did he actually rape anyone? Did Kavanaugh? Did Trump? He isn't as well connected as those two btw. They got Assange that way too.
This woman has ore balls (and brains) than you if you agree with this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygrnf_iD_qw
Women want to be YOURS, men think in this manner by nature ffs
Come at me you low IQ simps, I'm making a post soon
Man, after your balls drop you'll look back on this Tate phase and cringe.
If my balls haven't dropped by now... It's too late for me.
Look at it this way, he is cringe, but he wakes up the normals.
Jordan Peterson is cringe too but the same applies.
They both validate traditional manliness in their own way. And are deeply flawed individuals.
Trump by pushed the vax. St Augustine dealt with the barbarians. We can't deny the bountiful good fruits as much as we are averse to the ugliness.
He is a CIA mossad agent.
Jordan Peterson is also a controlled Asset.
JP I believe so.
Tate? Maybe, got any leads where I can find this out?
what if by setting them up in webcam businesses, he was actually "emancipating" them from traffickers what if (same) became a "lure" to catch - Snagooroni, #RipadeeDip
If I were his lawyer I'd just point out all those quirks are normal kinks in BDSM and it wouldn't be the first time CNC play bit someone in the ass. He basically sounds like a D heavy on the B, S & M. Not really a D for the sex stuff, that's just a top. It's the TPE and financial domination stuff that puts him out of just the top category.
It's not an effective article for other reasons as this.
I have no opinion on the person. In general, if you throw a shoe in a crowd of top influencers you're more likely to hit something spooky than real. I am not saying that of him, I have no idea.
Bondage, Domination and Sado-Masochism contains something called a "Financial Dominant" and everything in that article can fall into that and other categories without any criminality. It is not degrading or demeaning if done correctly. It is empowering and rewarding for both parties.
Understood.
Barring any other evidence that's my defense strategy as his representation. That's all I'm saying.
I believe he and his brother are being set up, just like the January 6 prisoners. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn the Deep State or a branch of government was involved.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKH5bnzJZi0 I'll just leave this here.
That’s because he’s a CIA mossad asset.
Doubt it.
never heard of him but leftist are trying to act like its a victory? okay then.
I'm having real trouble reserving judgement on Tate for a few days to see how this shakes out. But, I will state emphatically that anyone who runs women for money won't get any support from me, period...
I'll just drop this here. https://www.bitchute.com/video/hmEVNB4eZbvT/
The SAME people who said Donald Trump had a pee-pee tape, or has small hands, and colluded with Russia are the SAME people who will slander Andrew Tate.
This is not a defense of Andrew Tate. Merely an observation of who the gender-fluid, micro aggression, tranny left goes after.
I personally think he’s funny, and he does shit on the left, but i can’t say explicitly that he supports America, Donald Trump, or anything Q related.
What has stuck out for me is the full court press coverage of this. I kinda have a rule Of thumb now that if the legacy media are wall to wall coverage then it’s clown shit and to watch and wait. There’s been barely a peep About Clinton Epstein Wexler Chandler and all The other shady shit. The media only focused on harry and Meghan orange man bad and Prince Andrew and now Tate. Doubtful this is straightforward so it will be interesting to see how it shakes out
enter text Interview you won't find easily #Poland