2
The_Watcher 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think someone needs to look into that Moses guy as well. That Red Sea incident is very suspicious.

1
The_Watcher 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't believe they could control the weather back then but experiments in creating rain do date to the end of the 1800s.

3
The_Watcher 3 points ago +3 / -0

Caveat: I am not an expert, but ..

My take is that the amount of precipitation available is controlled naturally but cloud seeding can cause that precipitation to be targetted. Every time I see a big flood in, say, China or elsewhere, I suspect that someone has directed the rain there.

So, weather modification is great for causing serious floods and creating "extreme weather" that the climate scientists can point to but it is not (yet?) able to create more rain in total.

2
The_Watcher 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • 1 Timothy 5:8
  • But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

Charity begins at home.

5
The_Watcher 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here is one example but there are others. In one of Trump's cases the judge wanted to know the witnesses the defence was going to bring and the questions he would be asked. Any witnesses or questions the judge did not like were banned.

Same with the law in the Tina Peters' case. I am not a lawyer so this might not be 100% but I believe there is law that says that people who are investigating election discrepancies are allowed to ignore certain other laws but the jury was not allowed to hear that.

5
The_Watcher 5 points ago +5 / -0

I see what you did there but I was thinking Jezebel ...

However, there is no sign of her sticky end so far.

11
The_Watcher 11 points ago +11 / -0

This trial seems to follow the way the various Trump trials have been conducted. The template is:

  • Democrat judge
  • Democrat jury
  • Democrat prosecutor
  • Judge prevents any exculpatory law from being mentioned
  • Judge prevents or limits all witnesses useful to the defence
  • Judge prevents all exculpatory evidence from being presented
  • Prosecutor chooses timelines to help his cause
  • Somehow we are supposed to think that justice has been served
1
The_Watcher 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at the most famous and/or richest ones.

To get the top jobs they need to be under their control and that is how it is done.

3
The_Watcher 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know weather modification has been a thing since the late 1800s. Every time I see another huge flood in, say, China I suspect that someone is helping it to happen.

What better way to convince people that climate change is real and so we all need to go back to the stone age to prevent it?

3
The_Watcher 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are absolutely right! I have just watched the first hour and it is packed with interesting stuff: Big Tech, Big Pharma, MIC, vaccines, JFK, Jack Ruby's death, cancer, polio, MK Ultra, Mockingbird gets a mention ...

2
The_Watcher 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have you tried the website? project2025.org

Another summary.

Or even: "Trump disavows ‘abysmal’ hard-right ‘Project 2025’ agenda for second term pushed by conservative think tank "

13
The_Watcher 13 points ago +13 / -0

The problem with this particular hydra is that it has been sprouting tentacles all over the world for millennia. The tentacles have been removed many times but they always regrow.

This is the best presentation I have yet seen on the subject. Chapter 2 covers the UK from the 8th century onwards and Chapter 6 covers the Weimar Republic and the rise of the mustachioed man himself.

Caveat: The presenter tends to blame it all on one group of people which is obviously a generalisation. If you replace that group's name with "the money lenders" it still makes sense but in a less controversial way.

2
The_Watcher 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the watches mean "time's up, did the sneakers mean "run away while you still can?"

1
The_Watcher 1 point ago +1 / -0

All that tells me is that you cannot think of any convincing counter argument.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›