He said he would eliminate the Department of Education entirely.
Candace show podcast 1 hour ago (On Rumble I searched “Candace Owens” - you usually have to check off “most recent” after the first search result.)
https://rumble.com/v5onbvq-melanie-tells-jill-biden-to-f-off-candace-ep-101.html
With Judge Brown 22 days ago
https://rumble.com/v5jkus2-judge-joe-brown-x-candace-owens-candace-ep-87.html
Others from a couple of days ago
https://rumble.com/v5nugoh-candace-owens-exposes-obamas-relatability-act.html
https://rumble.com/v5nuoxk-that-is-racist-candace-owens-calls-out-democrat-hypocrisy.html
Joe Rogan - (15 days ago)
From this article: “MSNBC could shift its focus to opinion-based programming”
“Shift”? (Implying it does not do that now?) “Focus”? (Implying it currently is not almost completely “opinion” already?) Is “opinion” a euphemism for “propaganda”?
Perhaps Soros will buy it openly . . .
So that constituents of senators who say they support Thune for Senate majority leader can be made aware and contact the senator, asking them to support Rick Scott instead.
I take issue with use of the term “Department of Justice.” There is no “justice” involved. It is simply a “Legal Department.”
On X a couple of comments say this video came out over a year ago. 🤔
I think by “landslide” they are referring to taking presidency, senate and house, although I don’t think control of the house has been officially declared yet.
I have wondered the same thing. The candidate they picked was one that nobody in their party had voted for to be the presidential nominee. She was pretty universally disliked and not respected. A perfect candidate to put up in an election that they could well lose. If she won, so much the better because she would be a total puppet. But if she lost, it was no great loss to the party. They did not want to chance political damage to their more promising candidate, Gavin Newsom, with a loss i’m so early on instructed him to stay out of the running. And this way they could make a claim that they were the party of diversity, nominating a woman of Indian dissent, showing how open inclusive inclusive they were. And if they did plan to lose, you know that they have something else planned, like an economic disaster, a nuclear war, all out Civil War, an even worse “pandemic,” or something of the like - some catastrophe that will damage a sitting President, that they don’t want happening while a Democrat is an office. It is sounding like increasing inflation is very likely coming, and a major recession. They would want Donald Trump holding the bag for that. However, when all is said and done, I would definitely not want to be on the team that is opposing President Trump.
First thing I did was thank the Lord! (And the second thing I did, and the third, and the fourth . . .)
99 separate posts are not enough! I welcome 1,000!!
Imagine having that book assigned as reading material in schools now . . . Ha Ha
I looked to see if Stelter posted this, and he did. But in the the post just above the one shown here, Stelter reposts the comment by the “anonymous TV Exec” and then says,”This is already true whether Trump loses with 46% of the vote or wins with 49% of the vote.”
https://x.com/brianstelter/status/1851766505026773263?s=61&t=vWfDohqQu5Aj6Bd7QaCqjg
“If . . . they are cheating in Cali” IF????
Watching now - the video was posted 45 minutes ago and already more than 335,000 watching.
Watched until the useful idiot “journalists” took over with propaganda-laced “questions.” Then I turned it off.
I checked on who owns this publication. “The Economist is owned by the Economist Group, which is a British multinational media company. They are primarily owned by the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, Layton, and Agnelli families.“ (However, the website said they rated this publication as the “least biased” even though “ The Economist takes an editorial stance of classical and economic liberalism that supports free trade, globalization, open immigration, and social liberalism. ”)
This post links to a mind-blowing video - 4 hours long - that explains, among other things, how people have become so stupid and irrational.
https://greatawakening.win/p/199OFppFmW/connect-the-dots-of-many-rabbit-/c/
Direct link to video:
So we shouldn’t vote. Then Commie-la wins for sure. But then, that is your objective. 🤔
He has taken stands against soft-on-crime policies and against forced Covid “vaccination.” Therefore he must be vilified with manipulated information, presented in a way calculated to make him look bad.
She’s saying Pres. Trump would “lock people up because they disagree with him.”? Ask Steve Bannon and Steve Navarro about that.
The 31% that still trust them, is that the “you can fool some of the people all of the time”?
You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Depends on the fraud. California democrats are very proficient at fraud.
Trying to figure out what word autocorrect changed to “ember.” 🤔