4
WinsAnon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good. That's domestic terrorism. And with a plan to do it in multiple cities, its a RICO violation.

4
WinsAnon 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are 24 federal judges in the DC circuit. The odds of a judge getting a case are roughly 4%. As one of 24 judges, somehow Boasberg flips the numerical odds and assigns himself (and a couple others who are partisan liberals) those cases that will help the liberals and hurt Trump most. This is abuse of power.

1
WinsAnon 1 point ago +2 / -1

The ballistic tests confirmed that the pressure of the round when hitting the front of the skull caused an explosion at the back of the head. I don’t know enough to doubt or confirm that kind of action.

2
WinsAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

He has seen every one of these released documents and interviewed everyone then alive to entertain every possible theory. He has a picture in his office of him with a number of congressmen in Fidel Castro’s office in Havana. They point blank asked Castro if he killed JFK and Castro took a long puff on his cigar and then said, “No. But I know who did.” And he corroborated the wiretap info between Carlos Marcello and Sam Giancana ordering the hit.

22
WinsAnon 22 points ago +22 / -0

REPOSTING THIS HERE FOR MORE EYEBALLS:

My Criminal Law professor was G. Robert Blakey, who was the Chief Counsel on the 1977 US House Committee on Assassinations which reopened the Warren Commission findings and did probably the best work on the JFK assassination conspiracy. I've talked at length with him about his investigation and findings.

Whittled down for brevity:

(1) they had several Army enlisted men try to replicate firing three shots over 7 seconds at that same distance and angle of a target moving away from them. All the very average marksmen easily made the three shots with accuracy. They concluded that Oswald could have made those shots.

(2) they could find compelling evidence for a second gunman, whether on the grassy knoll or elsewhere. He said they began every part of the investigation needing to prove a conspiracy before confirming its existence.

(3) they think Oswald was the sole shooter, and there was no such thing as a magic bullet that changed directions in midair. He hated the Oliver Stone movie.

(4) But he said with certainty that THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY between the New Orleans and Chicago mobs and that the CIA was complicit in it, knew about it, abetted it. The CIA feared JFK because JFK had recently told colleagues that he wanted to dismantle the CIA which had become ineffective and insubordinate to the presidency. The mob wanted revenge because they helped JFK defeat Nixon by cooking the results in Illinois, and then JFK went and appointed RFK as his Attorney General who promptly went hard after the mob (my professor wrote the RICO act for the sole purpose of stopping the mob). My professor has heard the wiretaps where Chicago and New Orleans mobsters decide to have JFK killed.

(5) Jack Ruby was a low level mob flunky who ran a mob bar. He was diagnosed with terminal cancer and he was promised that his wife would get ownership of the bar if he killed Oswald in the police station. He knew it was a suicide mission. It is unknown if Ruby really had cancer or if he was duped by a mob doctor.

I hope all this comes out today after all.

7
WinsAnon 7 points ago +7 / -0

My Criminal Law professor was G. Robert Blakey, who was the Chief Counsel on the 1977 US House Committee on Assassinations which reopened the Warren Commission findings and did probably the best work on the JFK assassination conspiracy. I've talked at length with him about his investigation and findings.

Whittled down for brevity:

(1) they had several Army enlisted men try to replicate firing three shots over 7 seconds at that same distance and angle of a target moving away from them. All the very average marksmen easily made the three shots with accuracy. They concluded that Oswald could have made those shots.

(2) they could find compelling evidence for a second gunman, whether on the grassy knoll or elsewhere. He said they began every part of the investigation needing to prove a conspiracy before confirming its existence.

(3) they think Oswald was the sole shooter, and there was no such thing as a magic bullet that changed directions in midair. He hated the Oliver Stone movie.

(4) But he said with certainty that THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY between the New Orleans and Chicago mobs and that the CIA was complicit in it, knew about it, abetted it. The CIA feared JFK because JFK had recently told colleagues that he wanted to dismantle the CIA which had become ineffective and insubordinate to the presidency. The mob wanted revenge because they helped JFK defeat Nixon by cooking the results in Illinois, and then JFK went and appointed RFK as his Attorney General who promptly went hard after the mob (my professor wrote the RICO act for the sole purpose of stopping the mob). My professor has heard the wiretaps where Chicago and New Orleans mobsters decide to have JFK killed.

(5) Jack Ruby was a low level mob flunky who ran a mob bar. He was diagnosed with terminal cancer and he was promised that his wife would get ownership of the bar if he killed Oswald in the police station. He knew it was a suicide mission. It is unknown if Ruby really had cancer or if he was duped by a mob doctor.

I hope all this comes out today after all.

6
WinsAnon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sorry fren, but I just tried it myself. I saved the file to my hard drive and then searched the pdf for "Eiden." It indeed came up with 832 matches, but when I started looking at them, they were all "Biden" and the pdf search function just found all the true "Biden" references to be "Eiden." It was wrong.

2
WinsAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a contrary thought. Trump uses threats as leverage to get what he wants. If he uses the threat of release to do everything else on his agenda, I think the base will be ecstatic.m with that progress. And I think it’s possible he’ll use the Epstein files and CDC/pharma corruption to force submission and resignations of deep staters to make the rest of his agenda go quicker.

18
WinsAnon 18 points ago +18 / -0

DOJ should have argued that they need time to evaluate fraud, waste and abuse, which has been found to run rampantly through USAID NGOs. They should've come up with a toehold on that argument which would have allowed for more time. You don't have to pay for fraud regardless of a binding contract.

3
WinsAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is just pissing me off. We have proof of some of the most horrific crimes ever committed and that proof is the golden ticket to changing Washington DC. Anyone covering it up needs to be sent to Gitmo.

22
WinsAnon 22 points ago +22 / -0

Zelenskyy has been spoiled rotten by Biden and he is now shocked to have a parent telling him no. Time for us to tell the Ukrainian people what happened.

Zelenskyy has now pissed off both Russia and the USA. What a moron.

4
WinsAnon 4 points ago +6 / -2

Read the entire text of your own "sauce" - this guy is in prison and can't have begun impeachment proceedings. Come on, do better.

16
WinsAnon 16 points ago +18 / -2

Guys, we need to stop this shitposting without sauce. Many here will repeat it to others in their networks and lose credibility. Wait until it really happens. This particular Ukrainian is in prison and couldn't have possibly initiated impeachment proceedings.

48
WinsAnon 48 points ago +48 / -0

Zelensky was disrespectful the moment he stepped out of that car. Wearing a sweatshirt to the White House. I love how Trump immediately called him out for that. He has been unappreciative and disrespectful all this time, largely because Biden made him a spoiled child and as a result Zelensky feels entitled to everything and anything he wants from the US. This meeting today must have been a shock to his system. Way to go JD and DJT.

2
WinsAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

She said a release of some of the info. Flight logs, names.

3
WinsAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let me get this straight, "These people are such good patriots that Trump is an idiot to force them out, so naturally these patriots will turn on their country as a result?"

Yeah, no. That's stupid.

If they are inclined to even think about becoming traitors then they are already traitors.

view more: Next ›