Right, but again that's not what we're talking about here. "Mistrial with prejudice" means the prosecutor or judge did something so egregious that a fair trial is impossible. It's debatable whether or not that occurred with the video resolution issue, but the judge decided to proceed with the case.
A hung jury results in a mistrial, but it's not a "mistrial with prejudice." That just means the jury couldn't reach a unanimous decision. It's not some egregious wrongdoing.
If the end result is a hung jury, then the prosecution can try again with a new jury.
Correct, but we're talking about a hung jury (OP said "grid locked jury", but the actual term is "hung jury").
In the event of a hung jury, a mistrial is declared. That allows the prosecution to try the case again with a new jury. A hung jury does not result in "mistrial with prejudice."
The rules went out the window a long time ago
🤡🌎
u/#clownworld