So they admitted to breaking the law on a publicly distributed podcast?

Nah they say it was a programming error and errors like this would have been caught by other recounts or the Cyber Ninjas audit, etc

Yes it's a silly headline, but did you read the article? Inflation is cooling but prices are staying high, do you dispute that?

Sky News was started by Rupert Murdoch, who you should recognize as the owner of Fox News

Is this just a ring-kissing exercise or will it go anywhere?

Is that a comment on how many times he has been married and having children from different mothers?

So is this just an ARG for fun or do people think it has any real relevance?

The head of a New Zealand political party has cited leaked documents

Trying to make it sound like it came from an established politican when it's the head of an ant-vaccine party that was formed this year and got 1.2% of the vote.

Was any of that "digging" time spent on looking at what carbon dating is?

It means that multinational corporations are being targeted to be taxed more and they're going full offense by claiming it has to do with the WEF so that people who don't read the article will be against it

Understand that when people claim to have something you really want, without showing it to you, they probably don't have it? Totally a new one.

Did you look at the evidence? It's from a study of under 40 people that were tested immediately after the vaccine, when they were feverish. Levels returned to normal 145 days later.

This opinion piece is from the Epoch Times fyi

The kraken was a lot more powerful before it was unleashed, no?

And then they ask you for proof

You read that in the article? It only mentioned one document being affected by clearance being revoked

You really feel strongly about this, care to give a detailed reason why it's such a big deal?

I think that's why they chose it

Equal chance to be real and fake? How many bored LARPers are there in the world compared to people with actual Intel that would be willing to risk everything to post it anonymously on 4chan?

There are too many laws that protect banks, I agree with that.

I believe everything except that you got paid. Did you think saying that would give you more credibility?

Unless it was for other accounts, cause this one looks tame.

I guess the only "victim" was the bank taking on more risk than they thought they were. Or receiving less in interest payments.

In your experience, is this something that people faced consequences for?

The value of anything is what someone is willing to pay and someone is willing to sell.

I'm going to hone in on that second part. So if I'm willing to sell my left shoe for a million dollars, is it now worth that much?

Not unless someone is also willing to buy it for that much, right? Well the case here is that Trump evaluated his properties at what people are saying was 10+ times their actual worth, when it was to his advantage. There was no one "willing to pay" that amount.

I hope that clears up your understanding of the case so that you can better explain why you disagree with it.