If they get charged with something in which their cell phone usage could be evidence, then yeah it can be used. Is this a big revelation?

So then does it matter that they processes the same ballots multiple times as the article keeps mentioning?

I'm not familiar with how the machines work. Does running the same ballot through it multiple times make it count multiple times?

Does he have to be president to present his evidence?

They sometimes mention how he claimed Hilary had been arrested

But when they were resisting Trump that was different

Some dude has an opinion. Cool

"Vaguely remembered" facts won't do much to convince anyone. Have anything solid that can be shared?

Wait, what? You're saying that if he did assume a second presidency it would be a coincidence, and if not..? Then it's just random words?

Did you believe that it was "just confidence" at the time?

Pallets? Wasn't it just 9 ballots, and "in a ditch" was a metaphor, there wasn't an actual ditch?

How many times has the "coming soon" paid off?

Looking good in that pic for a 63 year old. And yeah, issues with this post have already been pointed out

"his" family? He's not part of that Rothschild clan.

I saw your other recent comments and yeah I thank you for doing this.

It must be frustrating when you actually know something, and internet experts are drawing conclusions based on "common sense".

Do you think those opinions are based on fact? Do you not think it better to help them adjust their opinions with proper information?

So what is your opinion of all the comments above jumping on this as definite proof?

Did people always think it was a 16 year plan? I remember people getting fired up over drops, fresh at the time, that said things like "soon". People getting into it now are less likely to be "Matthew" I suppose

Once he shows some proof?

So you think they're exchanging comms on checks notes NeoGAF?

Oh absolutely, I was honing in on recent legal developments which get hyped by influencers but anyone with legal knowledge will tell you has a snowball's chance in hell.

Edit to add that it really is frustrating that people do this "for the clicks" because it's hard on people's mental health, the rollercoaster of emotions.

Is anyone questioning whether democrats, who were encouraged not to vote in person due to the coronavirus, had more mail in votes?

I think it gave people hope and they set unrealistic expectations. Kinda like the Brunson case.

I don't have a Twitter account, is anyone questioning who the "expert" is? The editor from ABC?