I think you are right. I'm not feeling a "wave" from this, although a lot of emotional screaming-at-the-sky types.
They ruined their own movement and options for huge "peaceful protests" when they began redefining what a woman is. Now men can have babies and women can have a penis. What relevance is the issue of abortion (to the Left) when we don't even know who has babies anymore?
For the Lefties who realize what this decision ultimately means, they'll just go to the nearest blue state for their abortions or simply move there. The rest of us can respect and honor the sanctity of life.
Saaaaaame! Looking at natural remedy docs and Osteopaths now, like a kooky person 🤣. I use to travel a lot, too, so I always took international vaccine recommendations seriously. Now, I can't see myself ever getting one again. I deeply regret the ones I got, even though I wasn't seriously harmed (in the short term-- who knows, long term?)
I'm no expert, either, but the vax is no bueno -- absolutely. I consider it a death shot and wouldn't recommend it no matter how high risk a person is.
First: I don't disagree with you.
Second: I think it's potentially misleading to say "the vax is more controlled". I say that because wasn't it proven that the jabs contain billions of spike proteins, an amount far higher than any viral load you'd encounter from the virus itself? I could be mistaken, but this is what I remember reading. If so, "more controlled" just means better aimed to kill you.
I'd suspect c19 spike proteins first and how they damage the body before the Monoclonal Antibodies. MoAbs do have side effects, however. I found a list here. Although one side effect is low blood pressure, none mention the heart specifically.
I've noticed a lot of younger kids (high school aged) who almost never take them off, much like a trendy bracelet or necklace. It's the new "emo" as far as I can tell.
Skulls full of mush, insecurity, or both? Probably both.
Well said, u/numina18!
To be sure, there's a lot of porn or porn-like entertainment in today's world. Outside of the church, I often hear phrases like "porn is fine, everyone watches it" and "masturbation is normal and a very healthy thing to do". I didn't realize how much was tucked into what I was consuming both IRL and online.
It's a complete game-changer (for me at least) to understand that watching porn is like any other sin (you can think of it as a personal obstacle, if that's less "churchy"). Porn isn't special. Think of it like over-eating, over-sleeping, envy, etc. A person addicted to porn has been thrown a hurdle that is pleasurable, entertaining, kind of guilty, and applauded by the mainstream. It's heady! Overcoming it is going to take the personal will to say "No, not today." Everyday, or however often the urge hits you. Some people can stop cold, but for many others this is a process that takes time.
I don't want to minimize the importance of personal will. You truly have to have the will to see the temptation as it engulfs you, acknowledge it (hold it), and rebuke it. There are forces in this world that think you are weak to it; you are not. It's very easy to simply say "Well, I feel like I should just do it. It will make me feel better." Instead, say "Lord, have mercy!" out loud or in your head. Say "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me a sinner." Say it as many times as needed, for as long as the temptation remains.
I encourage anyone working to overcome their sins/obstacles to be kind to themselves. Keep a bible on hand (you don't have to read it; having one near by is a huge help) or a prayer book. Get an icon of a saint whose story speaks to you (there are many on Etsy). Pray often. Find a spiritual confidant. Read faith-based stories.
You are not alone! Godspeed, fren. 🙏
Might seem silly, but the Rush Revere books are a truly great way to get your kids understanding American history (told the correct way). If you homeschool, there are study guides and other materials in the official store, too. I highly recommend, 10/10
You make a good point, and I didn't notice the discrepancy! This is what happens when you skim through... Have you had any luck finding US numbers?
According the the same PDF I referenced above:
The ONS (British Office for National Statistics) lists a total of 128 cases of SADS (all age groups, whether listed as cardiac-related or unknown) in 2016, 77 cases in 2017, 70 in 2018, 107 in 2019 and 139 cases in 2020. <-- This is UK data, of course, but it's probably comparable to US data. 🤷♀️
In addition, according to these guys: "In 2021 and 2022 so far, cardiac disease has not been mentioned. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was mentioned twice, but those two reports were listed in the “not vax related” list. “Enlarged heart” was only mentioned three times, but there was no indication this was a long-term or recent issue (possibly due to vaccine injury). The above shows that in prior years, there were 66 deaths per year, but there have been 87 reported in January 2022, so far." <-- (bold added by me) this metric is related to the US. If true, this is also well above the average from the 2009 study, which should be around 66 SADS deaths per year. If the 87 deaths in January 2022 alone were truly SADS, then the projected number for the whole year is at least 1,000 SADS deaths in the US alone-- but probably more. That's a major increase.
"[...] we will reduce the number of people in the world that cannot afford our medicines by 50%[.]"
Youtube of the interview here, and he says this at about the 2:50 mark.
[EDIT: I didn't watch any further, because I can't stand these people.]
From March 2021- March 2022, there were 769 athletes who "suffered cardiac arrest, collapse, and/or have died on the field, worldwide". That's a single year waaaaay above the <100 per year conclusion from the 2009 study above.
When did the vaccination campaign really pick up in the 1900s? Has SADS always be the go-to excuse for vaxx injury (and death)? "SADS" was first identified in 1977, so I wouldn't doubt it...
It's the anti-betaHCG that causes infertility, not HCG.
There was a conjugate used in order to attach the anti-bHCG to the tetanus vaccine, iirc, which is what you would want to look for with the c19 jabs -- assuming, of course, that they're using the same method.
I'm not in the medical field, so someone please correct me if I'm mistaken!
This should get you started, but I don't have a summary:
The fact that a vaccine's label was covered with a new, fake one in order to hide the manufacturer is astounding.
I shared this short movie when it premiered, but the amount of obfuscation surrounding vaccines, their contents, and their purpose is a huge wake-up call to all and should repeatedly be shared until everyone is aware.
This is bizarre to me, truly! Everything that I've read and heard about the vaxx is that it should be inhibiting pregnancy if not contributing to sterility. This is in the clinical data, too.
I'm skeptical about this news for several reasons. Some that come to mind:
- It's observed data and there's very little to suggest the c19 jabs cause an increase in fertility. So far, there's only a correlation -- if that.
- Different batches of the c19 vaccine mean we can't say what about the jabs contributed to fertility, if they contribute at all.
- There are no long-term studies to show a "vaxx baby's" quality of life. There's a comment here mentioning them being "abnormally large and abnormally strong"; what causal data exists to show this is due to the vaxx? What is used to measure "abnormal" in terms of size and strength?
- We don't know whether these mothers were on other medication, particularly the kind to promote pregnancy, and how that medication might interact with the c19 jabs.
I'm not saying this can't happen, just that it doesn't hold up to data we currently have (that I know of). We know nothing about this.
This is entirely reasonable, and I think most normal people would agree.
The problem is that the Queer agenda doesn't stop at consenting adults. It's built into the foundation of their very theory that "cross generational relationships" (a euphemism for pedophilia) should not be stigmatized. Do not fall for this by taking a back seat as long as it's between consenting adults. They will not stop.
Just so.
I doubt they'll be satisfied with a simple "they've won." They'll keep going until nothing remains.
It's a win...ish.
Nevadans, the ones that pay attention, didn't want Laxalt. We wanted Sam Brown.
Let's hope he doesn't go full RINO and instead stays true to the Trump agenda. 🤞
It's got everything! Bio-engineered dino-critters (plus mind control), CRISPR tech as the hero, beta Asian male with a conscience (in the last minute), and a hint of lesbian. Don't miss out!
(I saw the movie and it's definitely entertaining... But, yeah. Once you are aware of NWO/WEF stuff, you can never unsee it.)
I'm in northern NV, too. Been here about 5 years now, and I would agree.
I've never been huge into chem trail theories, but clouds have definitely been weird lately...
My folks live up there and make a very convincing argument!
Three years ago in Reno, NV, a 2b/2ba apartment averaged about $1400/mo. I thought that was wild at the time. Today, that same apartment costs about $1000 more. It's even rarer to get a place that is updated, with laundry units and pets allowed, under $3000/mo. Also, the homeless are showing up in droves and taking over common areas, making previously-safe walking paths a danger.
I'm at the point where I'm considering buying land and just putting a yurt on it. 🤷♀️
I think it was originally supposed to explain folks who "got covid" but never fully recovered (breathing issues, fatigue, etc). I've always thought it was a term created to explain away the damage done to the folks who survived the hospital protocol (remdesivir + venting).
Now, I suspect it's a term among the many to explain away jab injuries.