10
gg102 10 points ago +10 / -0

Interesting thought...

2
gg102 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those engaged in a sting operation could be viewed as complicit also, but the 'greater good' outweighs the 'complicit.' When this is all done, 'complicit' will not be the item of concern. WE and the white hats are fighting to free the entire world.

Is a military soldier complicit in murder?

3
gg102 3 points ago +3 / -0

This case proves that the DS is still deathly afraid of DJT. DJT still must hold some power over them. ALL those previous FF's didn't perform their intended goals. They are/have run out of ammo. This seems to be their last "Hail Mary" bullet. These charges can't possibly hold even if he were to be convicted, it will be overturned on appeal. The DS needs a major distraction to cover for the banking system collapse. This has/is supercharging his campaign. Here we go!

25
gg102 25 points ago +25 / -0

The Mar-a-Lago raid set a never before precedent. Getting his tax returns set a never before precedent. Impeachment for a phone call set a never before precedent. Trump played bait. Don't worry, no charges will stick. His actions allows never before future actions. Think forward....

28
gg102 28 points ago +28 / -0

This should elevated to Class Action for all the people who were banned from any social media.

3
gg102 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are TFRs over San Diego, Los Angeles and Las Vegas for VIP.

5
gg102 5 points ago +5 / -0

Let's see, Genocide for AZT, Genocide for Remdesivir, Violation of UN treaties for Gain of Function and deployment of Bio Weapons, Misappropriation of funds, Perjury, Numerous Rico violations... what more do they need?

5
gg102 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't know if anyone ever noticed this, but if you turn Q-post1440 upside-down, it forms a pistol/hand gun. (You need the spacing, I can't get the formatting correct here.)

10
gg102 10 points ago +10 / -0

Now there's a thought that no-one has brought up. He's known world wide, and his arrest would PANIC a zillion DS people.

2
gg102 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please pardon my ignorance, but can someone please point to the line in the Constitution where the government has the right to modify the terms of a private contract after that contract has been executed? I'll wait.

3
gg102 3 points ago +3 / -0

A mistake is dropping a birthday cake. I can forgive a mistake. Genocide is not a mistake, it’s a crime. One does not accidently commit genocide. It requires deliberate forethought and planning. The perpetrators can have remorse and apologize, but a premeditated crime requires punishment. These officials made an individual choice to commit their part of this crime.

1
gg102 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are going to be seeing a lot more of these in the near future. We are going to have to make personal and moral decisions about how to handle these. This may very well be the hardest moral decision we will have to make in our own lives. Some of the officials are going to be sincere, others are going to be “face saving” and yet some will be an attempt to save their own lives. We are going to have to take a moral position.

For myself, I’m torn between to perspectives: Forgiveness and Guilt/Punishment. I am not any special person, yet early on I knew these jabs were pure evil. They violated almost everything I can think of. They violated the Nuremburg codes, medical ethics, legal standards, the Constitution, Religious beliefs, personal preferences, personal safety, parent/child bonds and security and so much more. Yet, these officials still demanded and required people to get injected, and usually against their will. The officials threatened jobs, family, religion, safety and so much more to push an agenda. Lives were ruined or in many cases, lost. “I was just doing my job” is NOT A DEFENSE. Those are such wise words. Now, it is a FACT that these jabs were intentionally designed to kill millions of people. So, how do we respond to an apology?
The Spirit says to forgive yet “no punishment” is NOT scriptural, fair, nor appropriate. George S. Patton once said, ”May God have mercy on their souls because I sure as hell won’t.” Somehow, that sounds reasonable. Those who pushed the jab made a conscience decision to push something that they themselves did not research. If I was able to research and discover the evil in the jab, they could have done the same, but they chose not to. They chose to “follow orders.” This seems to be where my sympathy ends.
I can’t just ignore the damage that was inflicted on innocent people. Whether doctor, nurse, elected official, employer or whatever, they had a responsibility that innocent people relied on. Responsibility was their job. To me, it is their responsibility to make sure they “Do no Harm.” To me, this is where they failed. I might be wrong, but this position seems reasonable to me.

1
gg102 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not a death sentence. Unless it's debilitating for him, it's only an inconvenience or minor loss of motion. Possibly physical therapy or serious stretching may help. For myself, I also have what are called "trigger finger" occur from time to time. Those are annoying but not a serious issue. I have found that serious stretching can alleviate them, but I'm talking serious stretching. After a day or two they go away.

2
gg102 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not only have I heard of it, I have one. I've had it for over 20 years. For me, there is no progression and no interference with normal operation. I have heard of some nonsurgical options, but I am not specifically familiar with them. Hand surgeries can advance or enhance arthritis later in life. I would be personally uncomfortable with medical tourism but I have heard of people who do it and are completely satisfied.

2
gg102 2 points ago +2 / -0

For myself, I don't like the "won't enforce" solutions. That ILLEGAL law is still on the books, but now subject to someone's discretionary opinion. I don't like that. They could "restart" it any any time. If you want to ignore the law, repeal it. No Trojan horses.

8
gg102 8 points ago +8 / -0

I saw an interview this morning with that lawyer that's doing all this investigative work, and he was asked that question. His response was interesting. He said that locally, it might be hard to find a judge, or DA or police that isn't compromised and that the FBI and DOJ are partially compromised, but in this situation, there are a lot of other agencies like the SEC, Treasury, DEA, IRS and many others who just LOVE to boost their agency by finding fault with other agencies. He was pretty confident that it will be those other agencies that will bring the pressure. Yes, Katie Hobbs probably has local protection, she may not be well protected beyond that.

This drug money thing and bribery goes across many other states also. Prefect for the feds.

IDK, but we can always hope and pray.

4
gg102 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think the rate of people coming forward is going to be increasing. This recent AZ reveal will help.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›