So if I repeat/pass on this quote to others, and I being the personification of the person he is describing? Am I being an original thinker that that endorses a quote from another original thinker who summarized a position I hold myself, in a form useful to instruct others? What do I do...
Please see this link: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-biden-delivers-the-united-states-air-force-academy-commencement-address
On youtube: https://youtu.be/Cu0THJ58yhk?t=2025
Starting at qround 33:45
This video does not have break in it referred to in OP.. The key thing I ask people to pay attention to is that the voice of the person speaking in the full video (on Youtube) is not similar to the voice in the short cut posted to Gateway Pundit and originally by 'Kate Awakening'. Not only is he voice introducing Biden different, but the content of what is said during the introduction is different. This occurs before the break.
I am inclined to throw a flag on this play. Gateway Pundit posted something sourced on twitter by Kate Awakening. Is it reasonable to find out where she sourced this from?
Twitter link: https://twitter.com/kate_awakening/status/1666235121224265729
Please see this link: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-biden-delivers-the-united-states-air-force-academy-commencement-address
On youtube: https://youtu.be/Cu0THJ58yhk?t=2025
Starting at qround 33:45
This video does not have the odd result from original post. The key thing I ask people to pay attention to is that the voice of the person speaking in the full video (on Youtube) is not remotely similar to the voice in the short cut posted to Gateway Pundit and originally by 'Kate Awakening'.
Throwing a flag on this play.
Kate, did you find this or make this?
God Moves in a Mysterious Way: William Cowper
God moves in a mysterious way
His wonders to perform;
He plants His footsteps in the sea
And rides upon the storm.
Deep in unfathomable mines
Of never failing skill
He treasures up His bright designs
And works His sov’reign will.
Ye fearful saints, fresh courage take;
The clouds ye so much dread
Are big with mercy and shall break
In blessings on your head.
Judge not the Lord by feeble sense,
But trust Him for His grace;
Behind a frowning providence
He hides a smiling face.
His purposes will ripen fast,
Unfolding every hour;
The bud may have a bitter taste,
But sweet will be the flow’r.
Blind unbelief is sure to err
And scan His work in vain;
God is His own interpreter,
And He will make it plain.
Begin Speculation:
Acknowledging that the speculation about actions taken by orgs we have no control over and are not informed as to the inner workings of:
-
Moonshot. Regardless of all current appearances, the enforcement of accountability for the short positions does occur (as it must for this to be meaningful). Those organizations/persons in the fraudulent short position are financially destroyed. Their assets liquidated/redistributed by force to cover positions. Companies like this are either totally taken out of existence in the process or greatly reduced.
-
A long term high value of GME (focusing on GME for discussion) as a result of future business activities by GME in the foreseeable future. Using the moonshot analogy, this would mean that a moonshot would be followed by less then lunar orbit but higher orbit (valuation) than now. Just because everyone does not equally benefit from a moonshot, their is a long term value to the stock itself as a source of recurring revenue and/or $ from selling.
End of speculation:
Your response is reasonable; a response that does not change the validity of what I said. The idea of people doing things because they were forced to by someone(s) or some thing that has the authority to force compliance or force penalties. One more aspect that I assume, 'and is willing to do so'. This last part is, I think, the point you are raising. I am assuming that for the MOASS to be meaningful that an authority WILL use force. No force, no accountability. Please note, I never mentioned the SEC.
Thanks Grady