It was a multi part strategy and this was part of it for sure.
Another 5D chess move was for Trump to insist on early voting if possible. What this did was flipped the narrative so everywhere was reporting that TRUMP and Republicans were dominating early voting and mail-in returns.
WIth that fact now floating around in everyones mind, that Trump and company were winning the mail-in percentages, then who would believe when a late night ballot dump of 10,000 or more votes get dropped that are all heavy for Kamala when Trump is already trending higher in the numbers.
Those late night dumps would just be even more margin for a Trump victory so the strategy lost credibility. I think MI WI AZ NV were all going to heavy cheat in the middle of the night but when GA/PA got told they can't add votes after election day the whole thing collapsed and I think it got called off.
I remember seeing WI MI AZ NV all floating around 60-70% while everywhere else was calling their winners. It was like once PA/GA went Trump then there was no point to completing their injection because Kamala already didn't have the votes to win.
I think AZ is still fucking around with Kari Lake, I believe she will win when it settles. How can the state go to Trump but Lake not win... they're terrified of her.
But until people like Mitch McConnell and all the RINOs are removed, we're still fighting uphill.
We need Epstein list and JFK files released on day one to clean house of all the bad actors or 1/4 of the "Republicans" are just going to vote with Dems anyway.
I wanted to say something here because this is mis-leading.
The requirement that you need to know English to become a US Citizen gets waived after a legal resident has been here, legally working and paying taxes, for 10 years.
My ex-wifes parents are perfect examples. They are old. They came here in the early 90's legally. They've been working. Their kids know English (my ex) and she passed her citizenship test when she was younger. She signs for everything as far as legal paperwork goes.
Her parents do not speak very much English. I would help them practice for their citizenship test (in English) and after several years of failing the test, when they hit 10 years residency (all legal), they were allowed to have a translator at their citizenship test interview. They still had to pass the test, they were just allowed to answer in Chinese. I support this. Her parents are hard working (now retired) and they completely deserve their citizenship.
The ballots in other languages are for the legal US citizens who naturalized but don't speak the language, typically the older generation of legal immigrants.
They moved here in the 90's when they knew China was going to take over Hong Kong again. They had already fled China to Hong Kong when they wanted to have more children, so when Hong Kong was being passed back to the Chinese they bailed pretty quickly. It was either the US or Canada and at the time Canada required a large cash payment to accept them.
I'm not one for bickering when people are in need but this one is tricky.
Those guys to real dangerous work. If it's "off the clock" and they get hurt there's no workers comp for them to help w/ the injuries.
If they work for the utility company then it's mandatory OT wages as well as their regular pay. So while I can see the guys on staff w/ that utility being covered, all the volunteers coming in would be just that volunteers.
The travesty is that FEMA should be picking up these volunteer guys like private contractors and covering them but they're not.
Just don't put her anywhere near anything really important is all I'm asking.
Put her in charge of the FEMA sector that covers Hawaii for example. Not director level but something regional with authority to call official investigations.
But compartment her access and power so she can't be inticed into doing anything stupid.
Tulsi Gabbard shouldn't be anywhere near the cabinet or high level appointments.
She should go back and focus on fixing Hawaii.
I get it, she says she changed, but it's not worth the risk. I see the resistance against her as staged to give her credibility but I do not see where it's worth the risk having her that close to Trump.
I mean think of the opportunity lost.
A video of Kamala's "doctors" heroically stopping their speech to jump into the crowd to save someone. Instant viral moment.
Instead they have Professor HoneyDew here looking around and pointing to the problem waiting for someone else to address it.
They J6 Sham committee never explained why there were batons being handed to "rioters" inside by the Capital Police themselves or who it was that actually pressed the buttons to open those crazy magnetically sealed doors when the officers waved to the camera.
So by this logic, if I understand the theory here, is that Trump was the bait to illuminate the operation from the inside and get "them" to fully mobilize and expose themselves.
2016-2020 Trumps first term was the bait. (here's what i"m going to do my second term, dun dun dun)
scared shitless, the 2020 election was the "trap" win at all costs. Full mobilization of the MSM machine and all assets.
wait and observe, record, track.
2024 election is the trap springing shut.
Plausible and it fits the "It had to happen this way" tagline.
Meanwhile the patriots were told to "stand down and stand by" to avoid a shooting war that the Left was desperately trying to gaslight folks into which would have ruined "the plan".
As much as I think it's against God, and I personally am against abortion, there's still the need to protect the mother's life in medical emergencies and there's the situations where rape is a factor.
Trump has said he is against it, but is open to exceptions in these 2 cases, rape and medical emergency for the mother. He also supports the states right to choose for themselves how far they go while he personally stated his beliefs
That's a pretty honest position to have imo that takes into account several factors.
It's not black and white. Not voting isn't the same as a vote for Kamala per se, but I suspect the Democrats are going to steal any unused registration to vote on her behalf. At least write in someone but consume the vote so it can't be stolen at the least.
If living in a state that outright bans it, Trump isn't going to reverse that, he'll respect the states right to chose, so hopefully that's not the reason for the low turnout.
I think the low "Christian" turnout might be from predominately black inner city democrat congregations who aren't over their TDS quite yet but do see Kamala as a fraud.
Adding info for context:
In the United States, citizenship can be revoked (denaturalization) or lost (expatriation) under certain circumstances. However, revocation is rare and typically reserved for extreme cases, such as:
So if they break one of these items mentioned above they can potentially have their citizenship revoked. It's not just pointing the deportation cannon at someone brown and zapping them back to their home country which is what the media has programmed the Left to believe.
There could be an argument if there were methods used to fast track someones citizenship without proper due process and procedure, then that citizenship could be at risk for concealment of facts if later it's determined they failed to meet the needed criteria.