Splice in the Islamic version. Around the time the Treaty of Lisbon was pushed down the throat of the people of Europe, it was alleged that there was a : Judeo-Christian-islamic foundation to the culture of several European peoples.
disgusting as it is .....
Is that a bad thing? At least, the language in use would have been far more logical and original than the bastardized version we call English.
What is it? Crooked Greek? Crooked Latin?
But, on a different note, If it weren't for Poles, we'd be spreaking Turkic, or the Frenchies for that matter, we'd be speaking Arabic.
What kind of an argument is that?
If it weren't for the English, in the US, Japan, and quite frankly, the rest in the world in terms of trade, we'd be speaking Dutch.
It has nothing to do with NATO. NATO is nothing more than a cover for Empire, where US muscle and treasure is expended. To me, that seems a very good reason to at least "re-imagine" NATO; to borrow a phrase from Klaus Schwabs blue book.
Apart from the fact that it is a day, like any other .... truth is: certain days of the year have always been appropriated and assigned a top-down meaning.
- some regard it as liberation from backward ideas
- others as stamping out culture.
Billions of people celebrate the outcome of a certain battle, by fasting during the day, and glutton during the night. I could even point to some heads of state, who host these events in a show of false hospitality. Why? Because that battle is about the destruction of those who do not embrace .... subjection/ submission to a backward fake and ghey political ideology masquerading as religion of peace.
At least those slaughtered have peace.
Anyways. .... Usurping days are the first sign of being on the repressed side.
eh.... really?
My memory may be hazy, but if I am to trust it, I would says that Admiral Dönitz was the one responsible for the order NOT to take any crew of sinking ships on board.
So, the actual language should be: Dönitz was charged without a sentence following.
The reason? Subs are made for a specific size crew. There is no place to hold securely enemy mariners, lest the hole crew is put at danger. One outweighs the other. It is that simple. And besides, the allies has egg on their faces.
Read Carefully!
However, the proclamation of operational zones and the sinking of neutral merchant vessels which enter those zones presents a different question. This practice was employed in the War of 1914-18 by Germany and adopted in retaliation by Great Britain. The Washington conference of 1922, the London Naval Agreement of 1930, and the Protocol of 1936, were entered into with full knowledge that such zones had been employed in the First World War. Yet the Protocol made no exception for operational zones. The order of Doenitz to sink neutral ships without warning when found within these zones was, therefore, in the opinion of the Tribunal, violation of the Protocol.
It is also asserted that the German U-boat arm not only did not carry out the warning and rescue provisions of the Protocol but that Doenitz deliberately ordered the killing of survivors of shipwrecked vessels, whether enemy or neutral. The prosecution has introduced much evidence surrounding two orders of Doenitz, War Order No. 154, issued in 1939, and the so-called " Laconia " Order of 1942. The defence argues that these orders and the evidence supporting them do not show such a policy and introduced much evidence to the contrary. The Tribunal is of the opinion that the evidence does not establish with the certainty required that Doenitz deliberately ordered the killing of shipwrecked survivors. The orders were undoubtedly ambiguous and deserve the strongest censure.
The evidence further shows that the rescue provisions were not carried out and that the defendant ordered that they should not be carried out. The argument of the defence is that the security of the submarine is, as the first rule of the sea, paramount to rescue and that the development of aircraft made rescue impossible. This may be so, but the Protocol is explicit. If the commander cannot rescue, then under its terms he cannot sink a merchant vessel and should allow it to pass harmless before his periscope. The orders, then, prove Doenitz is guilty of a violation of the Protocol.
In view of all the facts proved and in particular of an order of the British Admiralty announced on the 8th May, 1940, according to which all vessels should be sunk at sight in the Skagerrak, and the answers to interrogatories by Admiral Nimitz stating that unrestricted submarine warfare was carried on in the Pacific Ocean by the United States from the first day that nation entered the war, the sentence of Doenitz is not assessed on the ground of his breaches of the international law of submarine warfare.
was ( past tense) possible the US has already had ( present perfect)
Of course, possible and probably are two different things.
But, it would behoove her not to mix up the hoovers
When combined with Thorium, the spent fuel storage can be limited a 100 fold. That should be the next step.
That said: Belgium is poor on yellow cake.
A very accessible analysis. Pretty good! She put logistics center. (IMEC) And the role of proxies. (Houthi, Hamas, Hezbollah -> by extension the others) take financing into account, and the picture becomes quite clear.
If needs be check worldmonitor Check for pipelines.
or go here: https://openinframap.org
Check the pipelines.
The point of revocation of the Canadian membership of the Board of peace, well that is something she still has no good view on.
But, seen through the lens of Empire vs state sovereignty, it all begins to make sense, does it not.
Hamlet: From this to that: (beside that .... Shakespeare's use of words is interesting)
Look here, upon this picture, and on this, The counterfeit presentment of two brothers.
See, what a grace was seated on this brow;
Hyperion's curls; the front of Jove himself;
An eye like Mars, to threaten and command;
A station like the herald Mercury New-lighted on a heaven-kissing hill;
A combination and a form indeed,
Where every god did seem to set his seal, To give the world assurance of a man: This was your husband.
Look you now, what follows:
Here is your husband; like a mildew'd ear, Blasting his wholesome brother.
Have you eyes? Could you on this fair mountain leave to feed, And batten on this moor? Ha! have you eyes?
You cannot call it love; for at your age The hey-day in the blood is tame, it's humble, And waits upon the judgment:
and what judgment Would step from this to this? Sense, sure, you have, Else could you not have motion; but sure, that sense Is apoplex'd; for madness would not err, Nor sense to ecstasy was ne'er so thrall'd
But it reserved some quantity of choice, To serve in such a difference.
What devil was't That thus hath cozen'd you at hoodman-blind?
Eyes without feeling, feeling without sight, Ears without hands or eyes, smelling sans all, Or but a sickly part of one true sense Could not so mope.
O shame! where is thy blush? Rebellious hell, If thou canst mutine in a matron's bones, To flaming youth let virtue be as wax, And melt in her own fire: proclaim no shame When the compulsive ardour gives the charge, Since frost itself as actively doth burn And reason panders will.
Nay, but to live In the rank sweat of an enseamed bed, Stew'd in corruption, honeying and making love Over the nasty sty,--
A murderer and a villain; A slave that is not twentieth part the tithe Of your precedent lord; a vice of kings; A cutpurse of the empire and the rule,
That from a shelf the precious diadem stole, And put it in his pocket!
A king of shreds and patches,--
For comparison:
- The high-speed rail line between Paris and Lyon, known as the LGV Sud-Est, was completed at a cost of approximately €12 billion. Overview of the LGV Sud-Est
- Opening Year: 1981
- Length: 409 km (approximately 254 miles)
-
The cost of constructing the high-speed rail line between Madrid and Barcelona (Spain) was approximately €6 billion. This line, which opened in 2008, spans 621 kilometers.
-
California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) is the United States' first true high-speed rail project — a 800 km (500-mile), 320 km/h (200 mph), fully electrified, grade-separated system connecting San Francisco to Los Angeles — but in early 2026 not a single kilometer of track has been laid despite $18+ billion spent.
Quite the difference, is it not?
Check my flippo collection .... estimated worth 500 years ago: 1 million. Today: landfill won't even have it.
Funny. But , not quite.
I am sure betterment and merriment are lies too, huh? The trap is taking english as leading.
Goto: Latin, not modern french. mentir indeed is to lie, but in essence it relates to the mind i.e. mental construction. This may entail a lie, but not necessarily so. But to govern is by its very nature a mental construct.
Latin: mendax / mendciter
However, the MIND => mens/ mentis. Think: Mens Rea. [intention]
Meaning: the intention or Objective to steer/ pilot. in the word construction, as in government, is functions as the suffix -ing (INGWAZ: runic;) meaning completion of the whole process from begin to end with a result)
It relates to ship, car, personal choices, anything that requires choice and di-rection. (di = 2, rect = to orient on a course/ right; Germanic: richt-ung/ rechten/ richten).
What it has become, the parasitic hierarchical nest, as opposed to what it should have been: free men voluntarily working together with a compact, well, it is the difference between night and day.
Interesting when one studies the notes here: https://www.uscurrency.gov/denominations
Progression.
Compare 100-note with any other. What do you see?
2 sides. But, on the 100 the right side is not underwritten. It is still an enclosed space with two seals ... but the USA seal is not underwritten by the secretary. The Fed seal is underwritten by the Secretary and the treasurer.
The pic Julie shows is Trump's "hand writing" / singa manu is on the right side, below the seal. Interesting. Positional shift?
“Should you ever need to get hold of us, just give us a ring”
O really Charles? Funny that. We gave you a ring but you weren't home. I'm sure it hurts when money is involved, or rather, when money fails to be involved, isn't it Charles?
It is interesting to consider that in 1783, a peace of Paris was negotiated. Of course, mutually, plenipotentiaries have to be recognized in order to get things going.
The sole fact that it worked back then shows that Georgie-Boy had no other choice than to acquiesce ....
Last year: Independence was declared. This year: two royal visits:
- Willem-Alexander (Dutch) (Not Rob Jetten alone)
- Charles (UK) (not Keir Starmer alone or at all)
Such state visits mean: recognition of the new status quo.
@1. It is interesting, when looking at a video of the reception at the south lawn, Willem-Alexanders says:
I brought my Prime Minister with me.
Trump: O?
hahahaha.
This is incredible, but indeed, it is the foundation on which the whole system is build: database integrity.
Is what is being looked at, actually fact or manipulated? It puts the spotlight on the whole building of elections. Especially, in those countries where the idea is that voting happens on paper....
It is interesting to read this article.
https://www.yaacovapelbaum.com/2019/08/16/the-red-green-alliance-and-the-real-devil-of-mogadishu/
(Think: Ilhan Omar)
And since it was written in 2019, 7 years ago, it might give an interesting perspective.
Also think: Tulsi Gabbard speech at TPUSA.
He said:
he not see.
I for did notsee that coming.
;-)
Good idea. I too love me some Rules Based International Order tokens. ....
It does however not relate to the question of Full-spectrum domination whether or not we have a personal preference for this or that. Unless of course, you are directing the fate of money printing states.
Its not the "digital shit" per se. Note what .govs around the world are doing:
- regulate payments and the value of money
- set up gatekeepers by regulations: KYC, ATF, AML, and other acronyms.
- Infuse the system with third parties: custodians and payment processors
- Amend the tax code such that these assets needs to be reported.
create a problem -> serve their solution.
.gov hates digital currencies like BTC, BCH, ZEC, because:
- they do not control it
- it is either private or anonymous.
- it does not need any intermediary.
FED -> FRN -> DEBT SLAVERY,
Exactly what you wrote!
Xi calling Bin Salman with the message:
yo, Sal, it would be nice if the Strait would be open and we can get our oil.
The journalist there says: China [CCP] is exerting pressure. China [CCP} is dependent on the US.
I guess it is worse than that.
- Financial route:
Hongkong and Macau, and some other exotic places, all converge onto London-Amsterdam.
The other part:
- CCP reserves are falling.
=> Marine oil, airplane fuel and of course industry [but that could be supplied by Russia in 2-5 years by a new pipeline.
By the way, during the second world war, Curacao, an small Island belonging to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, provided 40% of the airplane oil .... And Venezuelan oil could no longer be brought to Europe / Germany because of a blockade. Germany had to solve the oil problem in a different way. Just to give an idea:
- OKW calculated that operation Barbarossa would have a duration of 3 months. After that the oil would be gone. and the blitzkrieg would come to a grinding halt.
- It is a but like Patton experienced when his oil requirements were cut due to Operation Market Garden.
In other words: if there is ever a question of : why did they not do this or that? Think of it as an empty gas tank. It is quite a powerful argument.
Such an argument also has a calming effect on runaway panican thinkers who project all kinds of invasion scenarios.
Anyway, CCP gets some oil but much more expensive, and can not leech as much as it used to. Meaning, their entire internal system is destabilizing. And they already have a lot of problems ....
In a sense, this is turning a reframed Hegelian dialectic onto those who preferably use it on weaker parties and their own population. Multiply CCP problems, exacerbate them, then then .... serve them your solution. It's funny, isn't it.
It also has the effect that the goods produced by CCP, increase in price. Meaning, local production begins to become quite interesting. Put on a tariff in the calculation and all of a sudden, local production is alive and kicking. Nice MAGA bonus, right?
It becomes even funnier when we add in, the question: What if Potus is coordinating with China and Russia. I mean, it's not that Trump never said anything. He's been saying it for decades.
We should have kept the oil.
If so, then it becomes even more clear why this move on Iran's oil. And it should become clear that Trump knew, even back in the 80/90-ties, how the system works. How money moves.
And quite frankly: it is the same argument often discussed with Crypto:
- no electricity: no crypto. i.e. the underlying assumption is: abundance of energy. Now think of all the billions pored into this asset-class.
- no silicon. rare earth's, no chips, no mining, no crypto. Now think of all the billions pored into this asset-class.
Energy is the foundation.
The financial system is based on the premise that scarcity increases price. And since Adam Smith it is quite clear that scarcity creates a willingness to depart of high effort gained income to obtain scarce goods. In an economy of scarcity, people become slaves, all chasing the same goods and services.
Make energy abundant, and the reason for fighting becomes ....
Final kicker
Question: And what does the UK/EU do? What do these Rules based international order globalists do? Strangle their own people while burdening their lands with immigrants, windmills and lack of jobs.
I see a bright bright future for the UK/EU.
Ugh ... Where are all the immigrants when you need them ....
But that is I think not the thrust of this article. Its an emo appeal.
Uk has also operations there. .....Its quite an intricate web ....
But it does hang on the naming of those installations as NATO installations to be correct.
If so, it would be interesting to consider what exactly IRGC was hitting .....
Good points.
The EURODOLLAR market is important here. That is the central node.
Liquidity is needed for direct operations. Solvability for other purposes, for instance to enhance the access to liquidity.
BUT ..... here's the kicker. What if a lot of that liquidity is put into brisant bets i.e. derivatives of such a toxic nature and size (500 quadrillion dollars) and is not liquid at all. What if not only the direct liquidity dries up, but also this pesky neck of the woods?
On top, much of it is stashed in silo's called trusts. It's everywhere and no where. So, perhaps, instead of "taking", the force hits from two sides:
- dry up
- decrease in value.
That will produce fireworks.
And, previously, in 1819, when the US bought Liberia for 100.000 dollars and handed it over to freed black people to resettle there ....
It is actually a very rich country. It has: oil, gold, diamonds, uranium, cobalt, copper, iron, lithium, etc, currently grosso modo untapped and green, in addition to fertile lands and seas.
In addition, Liberia was gifted a Constitution akin to that of the US (discarded in 2022 or so) and a flag that is akin to the US flag as well.
Of course, this is also conveniently left out.