Does this imply the crown/ authority were passed from Charles and Camilla/cabal to President Trump and First Lady Melania?
See the ruling crown on President Trump’s head in the video?
Coronation Day is a formal, constitutional, and religious ceremony marking the crowning of a new monarch. It serves to formally inaugurate a new reign, legitimize the ruler, and affirm their duty to the people and church through oaths and anointing. It is also a significant, tradition-filled public celebration, reinforcing the monarchy's enduring role.
Ahem. Well frens, here we are.
Now, after 2+ years, and for the thousandth time...
"And she gave birth to a male child who would come to rule (all) the nations with a rod of iron." ~Revelation 12
Trump is now revealed to be a cousin of the King?
How about that...
As I've been insisting here for the last 2+ years now, Donald John Trump WILL. Be. King.
If it's not 5:5 yet, consider reconsidering.
Kek.
If the above implication catches in your craw, consider searching Q's drops for the word "dogma."
In what context did Q say it over and over and over?
Is this a Q research board? Dogma is the jailer of the minds, and a powerful weapon used by the forces of darkness against of the sons and daughters of God.
"Expand your thinking."
"Biblical times."
"And she gave birth to a male child who would come to rule (all) the nations with a rod of iron." ~Revelation 12
This is about Jesus, NOT DJT. The woman is Israel and the child that WAS caught up to God is Jesus.
DJT is not a King and just because you can pull a scripture out of the Bible and apply to a ridiculous theory is deception and blasphemy. You should repent of using the Word of God so careless.
I interpret a verse in scripture differently than you or your preacher or the Babylonian Roman Catholic Church... so I'm a heretic?
Sorry photobuf, but I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. Don't you find it ironic that even, and especially, the holiest men in the new Testament were all labeled heretics?
Aren't "deception" and "blasphemy" the same words the crowds were shouting every time they murdered another apostle, nay Jesus Christ Himself(!) ...?
You've been on fire lately. I constantly talk about the new republic being a stepping stone to the new Kingdom...
It seems like we're skipping straight to the Kingdom. I've long theorized a reason the accelerationist cabal is so desperate is because Q team neutralized the anti Christ in the future so their "trump" card is gone.
This you've been talking about Trump being a king makes me think the time line from USA to Christ returning is way faster than I assumed
The difference between us is I let the Bible interpret itself. If you read Gen.37 you will understand the Woman is Israel. Joseph's dream and Israel/Jacob interprets the vision.
2Pe_1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
So if/when it happens, will you be quitting The Great Awakening then, and joining the "No KiNgS" resistance?
Do you think Q condemned and warned (so many times) against religious "dogma" for no reason?
Why did he simultaneously emphasize "open-mindedness"?
I can assure you, it was NOT for the openminded, but for the dogmatic among us.
Why?
Logic suggests it's because it's the dogmatic ones that are going to be so sorely disappointed.
Lastly, Is this a "Babylonian board" or a "Q board"?
First off, you put your own interpretation to scripture. Second, I would NEVER support a King over the USA. If you would, may you need a little history on dictatorships since it is the same thing. Third, your logic on this is not sound. Forth, where did you get this is a Babylonian board? Was it because I put up a post about Babylon being rebuilt with the largest port in the world? THAT is Biblical prophesy being fulfilled. Isa.13-14, Jeremiah 50-51 and Revelation 17-18. It is BIBLICAL as Q would have said. I don't believe Q every said Trump would be King. If you don't understand the Bible, don't pull scripture out of context to make one of your points. If you think Trump will become a King, that is your delusion!
Q3038, 3613, 3721, 3858, 3905, 3906, 4535, 4602...
EIGHT separate drops, one of them twice in a row for emphasis... All say this:
"The choice [of information] has always been yours.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma."
Frens, I don't even need to say what the most logical conclusion to be taken from this is.
It speaks for itself.
Throughout most of history after Christ, up until 1885 for KVJ, the Bible had...
1.. The Old Testament.
2.. The New Testament.
3... The Apocrypha.
80 - 88 books.
Now we only have 66.
But you think absolutely zero Fuckery happened?
Completely unmolested? R E A L L Y ? ?
Lastly,
My preacher growing up, your preacher, your grandmother's preacher, etc. etc. very likely went to a Christian seminary school for their seminary degrees.
And over 90% of those schools were started by John D Rockefeller in the 1800 and 1900s.
And now, surprise(!) Most of their funding comes from Israel and other Zionist organizations.
Awake yet?
"And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her (Babylon i.e. the Roman Catholic Church), my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." ~Revelation 17:4
Sin; (v.) "to miss the mark."
The mainstream "big church" has indeed led countless millions to "miss the mark."
No prophesy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. Private in the greek is the greek word idios. You can figure out for yourself the word we get from it.
Nobody needs to agree with these comments, but everybody should consider them.
Especially this:
Don't you find it ironic that even, and especially, the holiest men in the new Testament were all labeled heretics?
This is not to say “he’s right!”, nor taken as an endorsement, because I have NO IDEA if he’s right or not, and don’t know if it’s even possible to know that right now (“future proves past”), but only to point at our need to humble ourselves and be sure we’ve considered things clearly.
God’s children have been very wrong about how they interpreted what was going on many times before. Several of them were recorded in the Bible itself.
Funny. Every time I post that it'd be great to have Eric succeed Donald, and then Don, and then Barron, I get a bunch of knee-jerk reaction comments about how AWWWWFUL a "dynasty" would be. It makes me laugh—if the name can't be used as a reason to MAKE a man president, then his name can't be the reason to DENY him the presidency, either.
if the best available person for the job of president happens to be named Trump, so be it. We would be HONORED as a nation to have a string of President Trumps. Try to imagine how great this country would be.
Deus vult is a Latin phrase meaning "God wills it," famously used as a rallying cry by Christian Crusaders in 1095 during the Council of Clermont, following Pope Urban II's call for the First Crusade. It represents a historic, often militant, expression of religious conviction.
I agree. The "no kings" protests have never made any sense.
However, I still remember an article about President Trump being honored as a ceremonial king, shortly after the attempted assassination in Butler. So from that perspective, President Trump has been a "king" for a while now.
Those nonsensical "no kings" protests caused me to wonder about that earlier king ceremony that quietly flew under the radar. Did it actually mean something?
Now add the recent stuff about bees (royalty), the "two kings" WH posts, and the WH coronation day video... all of which indicate some sort of transfer of royal power from Britain to the US, one king to another...
Been following Melissa since she came on the scene redpilling and teaching how the bible and stars relate to what is habbening. How does she know so much? Wondering if she's more than just an 'ordinary southern church lady'
Oh well, it doesnt matter, she has some interesting info to learn from. Her videos are over an hour long and I struggle with anything over 15 minutes. lol
It is interesting to consider that in 1783, a peace of Paris was negotiated. Of course, mutually, plenipotentiaries have to be recognized in order to get things going.
The sole fact that it worked back then shows that Georgie-Boy had no other choice than to acquiesce ....
Last year: Independence was declared.
This year: two royal visits:
Willem-Alexander (Dutch) (Not Rob Jetten alone)
Charles (UK) (not Keir Starmer alone or at all)
Such state visits mean: recognition of the new status quo.
@1. It is interesting, when looking at a video of the reception at the south lawn, Willem-Alexanders says:
Dutch royalty visit may have been to remove all legacy claims on NYC (previously New Amsterdam) and other former Dutch Royal colonies specifically to prevent reversion to Dutch Royalty control after Crowne (UK) control removed (now). These legacy royals are sneaky bastards putting trap doors into contracts and charters regularly.
Ohhh, this is interesting….“Telling the bees" is an ancient Celtic and European tradition where beekeepers formally inform their hives of significant life events, particularly deaths, marriages, and births, treating bees as family members. They are believed to be messengers between the human and spirit worlds.
Melissa Redpill @MelissaRedpill on X:
DID YOU SEE THIS? 👇💥
It’s CORONATION DAY.🤴👸
Does this imply the crown/ authority were passed from Charles and Camilla/cabal to President Trump and First Lady Melania?
See the ruling crown on President Trump’s head in the video?
Coronation Day is a formal, constitutional, and religious ceremony marking the crowning of a new monarch. It serves to formally inaugurate a new reign, legitimize the ruler, and affirm their duty to the people and church through oaths and anointing. It is also a significant, tradition-filled public celebration, reinforcing the monarchy's enduring role.
BUCKLE UP.
Great OP AlgaeBanquet!!
Ahem. Well frens, here we are.
Now, after 2+ years, and for the thousandth time...
"And she gave birth to a male child who would come to rule (all) the nations with a rod of iron." ~Revelation 12
Trump is now revealed to be a cousin of the King?
How about that...
As I've been insisting here for the last 2+ years now, Donald John Trump WILL. Be. King.
If it's not 5:5 yet, consider reconsidering.
Kek.
If the above implication catches in your craw, consider searching Q's drops for the word "dogma."
In what context did Q say it over and over and over?
Is this a Q research board?
Dogma is the jailer of the minds, and a powerful weapon used by the forces of darkness against of the sons and daughters of God.
"Expand your thinking."
"Biblical times."
"And she gave birth to a male child who would come to rule (all) the nations with a rod of iron." ~Revelation 12
This is about Jesus, NOT DJT. The woman is Israel and the child that WAS caught up to God is Jesus.
DJT is not a King and just because you can pull a scripture out of the Bible and apply to a ridiculous theory is deception and blasphemy. You should repent of using the Word of God so careless.
I interpret a verse in scripture differently than you or your preacher or the Babylonian Roman Catholic Church... so I'm a heretic?
Sorry photobuf, but I'm going to have to respectfully disagree.
Don't you find it ironic that even, and especially, the holiest men in the new Testament were all labeled heretics?
Aren't "deception" and "blasphemy" the same words the crowds were shouting every time they murdered another apostle, nay Jesus Christ Himself(!) ...?
I see you didn't search the Q drops for "dogma".
Just wanted to say fren..
You've been on fire lately. I constantly talk about the new republic being a stepping stone to the new Kingdom...
It seems like we're skipping straight to the Kingdom. I've long theorized a reason the accelerationist cabal is so desperate is because Q team neutralized the anti Christ in the future so their "trump" card is gone.
This you've been talking about Trump being a king makes me think the time line from USA to Christ returning is way faster than I assumed
Thank you for the kind words.
The disagreers here are our brethren, so I respect them and their opinions.
The good news is that it makes no difference whatsoever whether I'm right or not.
However it plays out is the will of God, correct?
All I'm suggesting to them is to be open minded.
"I interpret a verse in scripture "
The difference between us is I let the Bible interpret itself. If you read Gen.37 you will understand the Woman is Israel. Joseph's dream and Israel/Jacob interprets the vision.
2Pe_1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
So if/when it happens, will you be quitting The Great Awakening then, and joining the "No KiNgS" resistance?
Do you think Q condemned and warned (so many times) against religious "dogma" for no reason?
Why did he simultaneously emphasize "open-mindedness"?
I can assure you, it was NOT for the openminded, but for the dogmatic among us.
Why?
Logic suggests it's because it's the dogmatic ones that are going to be so sorely disappointed.
Lastly, Is this a "Babylonian board" or a "Q board"?
First off, you put your own interpretation to scripture. Second, I would NEVER support a King over the USA. If you would, may you need a little history on dictatorships since it is the same thing. Third, your logic on this is not sound. Forth, where did you get this is a Babylonian board? Was it because I put up a post about Babylon being rebuilt with the largest port in the world? THAT is Biblical prophesy being fulfilled. Isa.13-14, Jeremiah 50-51 and Revelation 17-18. It is BIBLICAL as Q would have said. I don't believe Q every said Trump would be King. If you don't understand the Bible, don't pull scripture out of context to make one of your points. If you think Trump will become a King, that is your delusion!
Q3038, 3613, 3721, 3858, 3905, 3906, 4535, 4602...
EIGHT separate drops, one of them twice in a row for emphasis...
All say this:
"The choice [of information] has always been yours.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma."
Frens, I don't even need to say what the most logical conclusion to be taken from this is.
It speaks for itself.
Throughout most of history after Christ, up until 1885 for KVJ, the Bible had...
1.. The Old Testament.
2.. The New Testament.
3... The Apocrypha.
80 - 88 books.
Now we only have 66.
But you think absolutely zero Fuckery happened?
Completely unmolested?
R E A L L Y ? ?
Lastly,
My preacher growing up, your preacher, your grandmother's preacher, etc. etc. very likely went to a Christian seminary school for their seminary degrees.
And over 90% of those schools were started by John D Rockefeller in the 1800 and 1900s.
And now, surprise(!) Most of their funding comes from Israel and other Zionist organizations.
Awake yet?
"And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her (Babylon i.e. the Roman Catholic Church), my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." ~Revelation 17:4
Sin; (v.) "to miss the mark."
The mainstream "big church" has indeed led countless millions to "miss the mark."
photobuf, This is the correct way. Thank you.
No prophesy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. Private in the greek is the greek word idios. You can figure out for yourself the word we get from it.
Amen.
Nobody needs to agree with these comments, but everybody should consider them.
Especially this:
This is not to say “he’s right!”, nor taken as an endorsement, because I have NO IDEA if he’s right or not, and don’t know if it’s even possible to know that right now (“future proves past”), but only to point at our need to humble ourselves and be sure we’ve considered things clearly.
God’s children have been very wrong about how they interpreted what was going on many times before. Several of them were recorded in the Bible itself.
Funny. Every time I post that it'd be great to have Eric succeed Donald, and then Don, and then Barron, I get a bunch of knee-jerk reaction comments about how AWWWWFUL a "dynasty" would be. It makes me laugh—if the name can't be used as a reason to MAKE a man president, then his name can't be the reason to DENY him the presidency, either.
if the best available person for the job of president happens to be named Trump, so be it. We would be HONORED as a nation to have a string of President Trumps. Try to imagine how great this country would be.
The most important question I see in the matter is... what if God wills it?
Deus vult.
Deus vult is a Latin phrase meaning "God wills it," famously used as a rallying cry by Christian Crusaders in 1095 during the Council of Clermont, following Pope Urban II's call for the First Crusade. It represents a historic, often militant, expression of religious conviction.
If God wills it, it happens, period. End of line.
He wont be my King. And I pity the fool who does.
May 17th. Significant. Rededication.
No fren, it's still there.
Trump found out he’s a distant cousin to the king and Charles III gave him a gift of the HMS Trump 1944 🔔 — all very interesting
He may have just gotten the expected promotion from 'King Regent' per "King Trump" breadcrumbs: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFqvVHTL/king-trump-he-appears-to-current/c/
I'm starting to wonder if the 'No Kings' protests were the DS getting ahead of the game as they knew what was happening.
I mean, at present there is zero credibility to argue that Trump is acting like a King, so it would make sense.
I agree. The "no kings" protests have never made any sense.
However, I still remember an article about President Trump being honored as a ceremonial king, shortly after the attempted assassination in Butler. So from that perspective, President Trump has been a "king" for a while now.
Those nonsensical "no kings" protests caused me to wonder about that earlier king ceremony that quietly flew under the radar. Did it actually mean something?
Now add the recent stuff about bees (royalty), the "two kings" WH posts, and the WH coronation day video... all of which indicate some sort of transfer of royal power from Britain to the US, one king to another...
May 17th.
"No Kings" is a dopey straw man.
Exactly.
We're being shown Trump's potential "Royal" bloodline.
Now what about Melania's... ?
Now what about Melania's
Watch the wives
...remember when Putin gave Melania a ' broach '
A Romanov emerald.
It has been speculated that she is of the royal Romanov bloodline.
...4966
and she must not have known it all those years?
Starting to see how two opposing truths can be held by one person ?
Trump can play their King in their game , while at the same time be America's President. Their rigid rules (web) has become their own trap.
God & FREEDOM WINS. Checkmate ?
Been following Melissa since she came on the scene redpilling and teaching how the bible and stars relate to what is habbening. How does she know so much? Wondering if she's more than just an 'ordinary southern church lady'
Oh well, it doesnt matter, she has some interesting info to learn from. Her videos are over an hour long and I struggle with anything over 15 minutes. lol
lol. it is tough to focus for 15 minutes.
In that song I heard "why have a ballroom with no balls?" 🤣
Trump has balls, and shall have his ballroom!
He can still use the other parts of the White House for the rest of his body.
Rofl...the man needs a room big enough for his Yuuuge balls!
And he's "got the BIGGEST BALLS of them all." - Bon
It is interesting to consider that in 1783, a peace of Paris was negotiated. Of course, mutually, plenipotentiaries have to be recognized in order to get things going.
The sole fact that it worked back then shows that Georgie-Boy had no other choice than to acquiesce ....
Last year: Independence was declared. This year: two royal visits:
Such state visits mean: recognition of the new status quo.
@1. It is interesting, when looking at a video of the reception at the south lawn, Willem-Alexanders says:
hahahaha.
Dutch royalty visit may have been to remove all legacy claims on NYC (previously New Amsterdam) and other former Dutch Royal colonies specifically to prevent reversion to Dutch Royalty control after Crowne (UK) control removed (now). These legacy royals are sneaky bastards putting trap doors into contracts and charters regularly.
Great thinking. Makes perfect sense after reading through that Maritime Law thread.
I saw them all looking at the bees. Apparently there’s a bee ceremony? Telling of the Bees.I was unaware, but if true, all the more fascinating.
Ohhh, this is interesting….“Telling the bees" is an ancient Celtic and European tradition where beekeepers formally inform their hives of significant life events, particularly deaths, marriages, and births, treating bees as family members. They are believed to be messengers between the human and spirit worlds.
jUST IN ,ILHAN said Trump is trying to be like KING CHARLES THE ONEHUNDRETH AND ELEVEN ,kek.
Melissa = Bee in Greek.
https://languagedrops.com/word/en/english/greek/translate/bee/
Puts on thinking cap...interesting stuff to think about.
Wow? 🤯
Ok, I'll ask. I can't be the only one. What makes yesterday Coronation Day?
I don't see anything that makes a coronation day constitutional.
A coronation is antithetical to the form of government the US has based on the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.
Is this a test?
Nope, Trump is ascending!
All hail!
It was FORMAL. They announced it and made it OFFICIAL. people were shocked and jaws dropped. Dems were STUNNED. Read all about it!
Can we have a 5 minutes of hate type of thing? Or a great awakening festivus the day before 4th of July. Get all my doomering out one day a year.