VANCE IS DEEP STATE. The connections couldn't be stronger. He would be a political nobody without his globalist funding channels.
https://twitter.com/davidicke/status/1812955631281733967
Let's give this thought a try: Send a message to Trump that he needs to AXE Vance and find someone who is demonstrably able to serve the interests of WE THE PEOPLE and not these globalist goons.
Wrong Choice. Apparently a lot of dark money associated with Vance.
One thing DJT is consistent about; he never appears to have situational awareness about who to surround himself with. I understand the theory that he selects dubious characters to highlight certain corruption associated with them and such, but I'm not convinced that's what he's always doing.
I think there's no way to know, but the more I think about it a second shooter scenario seems unlikely.
-
The kid had not qualified for some rifle association, but then he had some experience with a local gun club.
-
We don't know if he was even aiming for the head. A body shot going for center of mass, from a distance would be the standard approach, the head is just too much movement and margin of error. With the amount of shots popped off, the outcome we saw is possible with the distance and the kid's (limited) experience.
-
Was there some location further back with another shooter who knew his stuff? He still missed because Trump's head movement was too much at that moment. I don't know what's behind that building, so it's hard to say if there was potential for the "second shooter" being out of view but having the exact same line of sight as the kid.
This would also mean the USSS counter snipers NEVER had visual confirmation the kid ever opened fire. So that scenario ends up becoming unreasonably complicated to cover up, if the patsy was actually in view during fire with witnesses he never actually fired.
Perhaps that verse just might be taken out of context. Perhaps we ought to think twice about assuming a political head of state is mandated to bring some kind of spiritual renewal, rather than just restoration of good governance.
Take stock of your emotional responses to events as they are framed for you and presented to you. Try not to get played, you know that constant temptation with citizens of almost every era to put their trust in some Chosen One prince. Unless you really believe he is another Messiah; which means believing they want to eliminate Trump but just can't get it right because of some special spiritual force field, God bending projectile paths. Think this through. Think about what you know about the difference between faith and magic.
How do you differentiate between that set of beliefs, and another option like its a show for the masses where the hero story arc unfolds with all the iconic, visceral images along the way, ready almost in real time? Or the other option that it was incredible luck?
For those who previously accepted the theory that Op Warspeed was an unfortunate necessity by the WHs to stave off a worse plan, should you not have a problem with this being a WH setup for entrapping whoever? Same kind of thing isn't it? That a risk had to be taken to entrap those who would have otherwise done something worse to all of us (?). And so as far as innocent casualties, it's like the same rationale applies to the injured/dead vaxxed MAGA who listened to Trump; "you need to break a few eggs to make an omelette" kind of thing. I reject all those theories, but just pointing out the logic is consistent in each case.
Agreed. The theorizing about her death, with no situational information, is the Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy (after this, therefore because of this) which is easy to fall into because we're all about "there are no coincidences". But I have certainly experienced a number of unfortunate coincidences in my lifetime. It does happen.
That's not the point. When you graphically describe and mime private sexual acts in front of cameras for the viewing pleasure of strangers, we have a name for that its called pornographic material.
What's telling is that, historically since the ascent of porn, its been relegated to specific "smut" media. But this latest meme craze is the most brazen example that there is no longer distinctions b/w smut media and other media, and thus porn culture has successfully captured mainstream imagination like no other time before. It's something to consider when it comes to the quality of social relationships and dialogue, that this kind of stuff is a universal sensation.
Its a handy litmus test for what stage of decline civilization is currently at. Why? How does the general public handle sexual humiliation? At what point is it a valid participant in mass media to require mass attention, conversation, and analysis? As opposed to the other side of the spectrum, simply being too humiliating to even make it to public awareness. Which would have been the case even 10-15 years ago.
The meta kicker is, the behavior itself that's being shared and memed is analogous to the way sexual humiliation was once again vomited all over the public through viral social media marketing. Sexual humiliation is a form of dehumanizing, and of course that all started when hardcore porn chic hit mainstream culture in the early 70s. But even then there was some separation between smut media and other media. Not anymore.
Of course, having said that, most of us are also probably hypocrites for condemning this current "thang", because if we were old enough we laughed our asses off at Star Wars boy in 2003. That was obviously not sexual humiliation, b ut pretty much the very beginning of humiliation rituals, as we obviously knew we were laughing at an unsuspecting incel having privacy displayed for the whole world to mock and feel better about themselves.
Secularism properly defined is intended to protect the freedom of everyone having a relationship with the divine as they freely practice according to their belief system. The word "Secularism" has been weaponized by influencers of the dissident right, apparently as a marketing strategy to harvest outrage, fear and, ultimately, clicks and $.
On point. This flawed framing of the culture war as Christianity vs atheism/secularism/everything else has ALL the characteristics of a psy op movement intended to get enough capture of social media and the dissident right crowd to corner the entire conservative Christian population through association of another Jan 6 style setup. Why? To make it look as if by any means necessary those who take their "Christian faith" seriously want to take America back for Christ the king, whether it be civil war or balkanization or whatever.
This is just another anti-Christianity movement and likely a psy op, mark my words.
Speaking as a deeply concerned Christian believer:
The neo-integralist Christian Nationalists don't understand Secularism. Coming from classical liberalism, Secularism was set out as a protection-of-religion program. It doesn't mean not having a religion, it doesn't mean being Communist, and it certainly doesn't mean being leftist woke. Those are all demonstrable falsehoods your dissident right influencers keep telling you with all the emotions that can muster. Secularism as intended simply serves to protect, on the one hand, the government from acting preferentially towards or enforcing a particular religious belief system; on the other hand it serves to protect the Christian churches, i.e. so that lacking political and governing spheres of power the Christian churches can and ought to focus on the purity of the Gospel message of redemption. Historically, political power has never "improved" the spiritual calling of the Christian church Contentious claim, I know. But In fact, America was in large part founded by individuals fleeing the very non secular, integralist "Christian princes" of Europe. There is a lesson there.
IMHO, by framing this flawed culture war as being between Christianity and Secular atheism, the new Christian-esque dissident right influencers are either using this artificial dichotomy as a successful but unethical marketing campaign to harvest attention and $, or its a flat out psy op intended to get the politically dissident right's energy and time barking up the wrong tree, trying to reclaim a "Christian America" of pure fantasy and dangerous consequences.
It's unfortunate that Jefferson still gets practically sole credit for the Declaration itself. Benjamin Franklin was critical in his guidance and dozens of revisions to Jefferson's draft to make the final document what it is. Franklin's input was the result of already over 20 years of tirelessly fighting for the idea of uniting the colonies, and arguing for the principles underlying a liberty worth dying for.
Not to mention, Franklin was more consistently in alignment with Natural Law as an abolitionist, in contrast to slaveowning Jefferson. Jefferson wanted Locke's ideal of "property" instead of Franklin's higher Leibnizian ideal of "Pursuit of Happiness", since for Jefferson to ultimatize the right to property would safeguard gentleman landowners like himself who enslaved other humans as additional property to maintain their land property. Thank God Franklin won out on that one.
Read this, it will make things a lot more clear. Unlike PragerU its not written from a Zionist revisionist POV.
https://www.amazon.com/Clash-Two-Americas-Unfinished-Symphony-ebook/dp/B09B2RQ9ZX/
High effort well researched post. You should also dig more into Bannon's overall history and his enterprises. 100% Grifter. At one time he was pimping Bio Dome for God's sake.
It should be noted that Bannon has done more than anyone else to convince the MAGA movement we are essentially under attack and being undermined by a foreign state - no not Israel but China. i.e. Red Scare 2.0. i.e. Look Here, Not There. Now look more into who has funded Bannon and his enterprises, their backgrounds etc. That should be necessary homework to form any opinion on him. Not wishful 5D chess thinking.
I spent some time in ES in March, and I think of it as the Philosopher King has broken the witch's spell that was hanging over Salvadoreanos... all that chaos from MS-13 + civil war + bloodshed in the streets were not really homegrown phenomena, it goes against their instincts to be violently tearing each other apart. The whole thing was their version of a military industrial complex, except the corrupt beneficiaries in ES were using the highly lucrative business of anarcho-tyranny of the gang cabals, instead of our version of corporatized geopolitical war policies to feed the beast.
Now that the bad hombres are taken out, the tone of their society is awe inspiring. Energetic, peaceful, productive, and generally ethical (except of course the usual scammers). The reform initiatives with the prisoners (not just the hard work ethic and skills training, but offering spiritual counsel as well through an evangelistic presence in the prison), combined with heavy investment in youth programs to divert the younger generation from going the same path of violence for a quick buck, its all like this comprehensive exorcism.
Read Dr Mary's Monkeys. The weaponization of the SV-40 virus by irradiating it with the LHC in a medical school basement -> to invoke turbo cancers. They wanted to get an infected cigar or scuba suit to Castro to take him out. Never got that far, but they likely did use it to take out Jack Ruby while he was sitting in prison and wanting to talk.
Now also keep in mind that RFK Jr knows this history as laid out in the thread; he has signaled very strongly several times over the years he now knows who was most likely responsible for his father's and uncle's murders.
This is precisely why RFK Jr has the appearance of being the most pro Israel candidate of them all, with his frustrating and outrageous policy statements. It's a survival tactic. Yet he still gets denied proper security as a presidential candidate, despite several requests. He's walking a very thin line. He knows his chances of being elected president are very slim as things stand, but he doesn't want to get taken out in the process of even trying.
If Trump as president saw more details in this backstory to JFK's murder, this may also explain Trump's frustrating Zionist positions. Maybe.
We have a song for that