What is “non-outcome determinative fraud”? What would be the point of committing fraud except to change the outcome of an election? That’s literally the entire point.
And since when has successful completion of a crime been the determining factor in the validity of a crime? If someone robs a bank but they bungle it, they aren’t clear of bank robbery. If a man rapes a woman but doesn’t cum, it’s still rape. We don’t tell her, “But he didn’t successfully complete the rape so stop complaining.”
Does anyone else think Bush Sr., Cheney, and Rumsfeld were the ones plotting 9/11 and they kept W out of the loop? I think they thought he was too dumb to know about it and that he’d perform better as President if he thought it was a terrorist attack. When the aide comes in and tells him while he’s reading that storybook, he looks genuinely surprised and stumped. He doesn’t look like a guy who knew it was coming.
If this is what happened, it might make sense why when the notes came, Jeb turned to W and he had that sheepish look like he flipped.
Originally I think it was meant to be an undeniable Q proof linking Q to Trump, but since Trump has retruthed Q over 600 times, it almost wouldn’t make a difference. The people who refuse to acknowledge the obvious connection between Q and Trump probably won’t change their minds even with Trump posting that exact tweet.
The tweet would still have value as some sort of indicator that there has been a shift, or that Q team is moving into a new phase of the plan.
A famous brand changing its name is really unusual since brand recognition is so important. Coca-Cola won’t even change its font, and it’s been probably one hundred years.
So when Facebook said they were now “Meta” and replaced their logo with that droopy loop, it seemed super odd to me. I started thinking about President Trump’s executive order about confiscating the wealth and assets of any individual or company participating in child sex trafficking. Was Facebook confiscated so Zuckerberg started a new company called Meta to keep the money laundering and child trafficking going?
Then all these other companies started torching their own brands too. Disney. Bud Light. Bed, Bath & Beyond. NFL. FoxNews. It was like they were all intentionally trying to fail. Very strange. Could it be because ownership of the assets had been swapped and the people still working there are now being instructed to bring those companies down to make them worthless as assets?
Now Twitter, a brand Musk paid billions for, is being swapped to X. Again, very strange.
Like what’s next? Ford suddenly decides they want to be known as Dorf? NBC says they are now PeacockTV? Netflix rebrands as MovieSpace?
The worship of Obama and the hatred of Trump seem to be two sides of the same mental disorder.
Remember the video of those kids singing that ode to Obama in 2008? Take those kids and their parents, tack on eight years, and then have Trump come down the escalator. They must have felt insanely threatened.
It’s not about precedent in the legal code but precedent in the eyes of the public.
The theory is that if Trump had tried to arrest the Clinton Family, the Bush Family, the Biden Family, and the Obama Family all on day one of his Presidency, it would have made him look like the Hitleresque tyrant the corporate media had painted him as, and I think most people would have been against it.
So how do you arrest all your political opponents without it looking like it’s sketchy? Perhaps if they do it first, and without reason, they open the public’s mind to the concept - at which point it could be flipped around on them. Much easier to arrest Obama for raping and killing a child after Obama arrested Trump for jaywalking.
People think Joe Biden was stupid for using his son as his bag man, but look at it more from Obama’s perspective. Obama sets up Biden to be his bag man. Biden sets up Hunter to be HIS bag man. And Hunter sets up Archer to be HIS bag man. Obama would probably feel pretty insulated at that point, with three fall guys to protect him. Joe probably figured Hunter was close, but trustworthy, plus the family connection makes laundering the money a little easier, like the $70,000 monthly rent he was charging him.
In his show the other day, Adams took a poke at Q, then proceeded to repeat about three different insights that Q established years ago. He didn’t literally say “only at the precipice will people find the will to change” but that was the point he made, and then he also started talking about how this was all being presented like a movie.
This could start to happen more and more, with more non-Q people starting to merge with Q without them even realizing it.
It does seem odd that these snobbish cabal types would invite this weirdo from Maine to their parties. I’m not sure if King is cabal, or a cabal wannabe, or if he has TDS, or if he is terrified that if he doesn’t publicly push for the cabal, they will cancel him for all his old books. If they could cancel Dr. Seuss and J.K. Rowling, they could easily cancel Stephen King. His book “Rage” was already pulled because they started claiming it was responsible for school shootings.
If HRC is arrested five years to the day that Q said she would be, there are actual Trump supporters who would continue to deny the proof, just as they’ve denied all the others, or the 600 times Trump has retruthed Q.
It’s hard to believe that HRC could actually be arrested and these people would continue to hate Q and say “nothing is happening”. The goalposts would move and they would say, “Well, it might have been five years to the day, but that’s not what Q said, so Q is still wrong and I am still the very smart boy who wrote a lot of words.”
Honestly, the hatred for Q goes beyond logic. It’s irrational in the same way the hatred for Trump is irrational. I’m not sure what would crack it for these people at this point. They’ve invested too much of their ego and identity into hating Q that even if President Trump himself comes to their house and verifies Q to them in person, it won’t be enough.
Look at how they spent the first three years claiming Q was a LARP. Remember how convinced they were of that? And now you don’t even hear the LARP theory anymore. They’ve all switched over to “Q is a CIA psyop”. They don’t even know what the fuck they think which is why they keep swapping arguments, coming up with new excuses, moving goalposts, etc. They think they’re so brilliant, but none of them have read the actual Q posts themselves, so they’re always making their arguments from ignorance, and they know it. The way they reduce 5000+ Q posts to three words - “Trust the Plan” - shows how little research they’ve actually done.
The reason, of course, why Q haters have never read the Q posts is because once you read them, you stop being a Q hater. That’s why they HAVE to stay in ignorance. They know if they read even a few, their ego is going to crash.
2015: “Trump will never win, dummies. He is polling at 1%. You are all so stupid!”
2016: “Fine, Trump won, but Epstein will never be arrested. You guys are dreaming! He’s too powerful!”
2017: “I don’t care how many Supreme Court nominees Trump gets, Roe v. Wade will never be overturned. You guys are delusional. It’s the fucking law of the land, you fucking morons!”
2018: “Fine, Epstein was arrested but Maxwell was the one we achktually wanted, and she’s going to skate, you buffoons.”
2019: “Covid is here forever guys. You’re all kidding yourselves if you think you will be able to resist the WHO through memes and non-compliance. Losers.”
2020: “Trump will never win in 2024. Stop smoking the hopium, idiots. Just quit even voting like me. Nothing ever happens and all my doomium predictions turn out true!”
2021: “You think you’re going to be able to avoid the vaccine, lol. As if! They will chase you down and jab you eventually. Man you guys are pathetic!”
2022: “You dimwits are voting in the midterms? What, you think you’re going to take back the House. OK dipshits, be dumb then. I’m gonna play it smart and stay home and complain and be right about everything as I always am!”
2023: “Trump’s going to jail, losers! You really think he’s going to prove Election Fraud to the courts. Please!”
She actually avoids the fantastical and tries not to make conclusions, only observations. Her presentation is very interesting. The way the towers dustified into nothing doesn’t align with any physics I’m aware of. That is sort of her main point. Also, how areas on the ground look like a bomb went off, only the leaves on the trees are totally unharmed.
One theory is that the cabal has been mixing human meat into the food supply for decades as a big joke on humanity. They themselves are cannibals, and they wanted to make us cannibals against our will too. I’ve even heard that any product that says “natural flavors” on it is cabal code for “human meat”. To me it makes sense because what does “natural flavors” even mean? Why would they even need to write that? If they put strawberries in a drink, they could just say “strawberries”. Why would they need to say that strawberries, or any other ingredient, also has a “natural flavor”? How is “flavor” even an ingredient?
So now from the Q perspective, would you want to stop this practice behind the scenes (possibly by blowing up cabal food factories) and then never reveal what they did, or blow them up and then do a big disclosure that yourself and everyone you know has been eating human meat for years and now can’t do anything about it? And how would people react to that? Would they thank Q or would they turn on Q for revealing something disgusting that they never wanted to know?
That’s the thing about the 60% that Q says must stay classified. Everyone thinks it’s just morbid details about evil things the cabal did, like the specific ways they tortured kids. I think it goes beyond that. I think it’s things that when Q Team found out, they almost regretted learning it, because it’s so horrible, and now they feel they’d rather just stop it quietly behind the scenes without having to put everyone through the disgust they experienced. And again, they also have to negotiate disclosure around what people are willing to accept. What is the point of them revealing it all only to have 90% of people reject it? Wouldn’t it be better to reveal 40% and get public acceptance?
I think their trick would be to admit the Election was fraudulent and then legally install him as President maybe two weeks before the 2024 Election. That would give him about three months and they would say it’s not their fault he only served three months of a four-year term, it was the electors, it was the system, it was all a good faith mistake on the part of the courts. This would all be consistent with their Covid playbook. Even if Trump refused to take office for three months, calling it a bullshit deal, they would probably swear him in by proxy or some other made-up technical lie and use their corporate media mouthpiece to repeat the lie that Trump is President again whether he likes it or not. Anyone who says otherwise is now a Fraud Denier. It would be a total inversion of everyone’s previous position, which we know the cabal loves because it strengthens their grip on the human mind when they are able to fully invert someone’s mental state like this, just like the Democrats went from “I’ve never taking that vaccine” to “Everyone must take that vaccine”.
It seems obvious to me that black people should work as cops in their own neighborhoods so they are able to actually prosecute crime.
If Hollywood actually wanted to help black people (they don’t) then they would make movies and TV shows where the heroes are black cops in black neighborhoods fighting black criminals. You could even still do the whole black gangsta theme that people are now attached to and expect, but just make the black cops the good guys. Teach basic values of right and wrong in the stories. Show black children that they have an actual choice, just as any race does, to be a hero or a villain.
Basically if you keep going down these red-pill rabbit holes, you find out people are more attached to the lies than you realized, and that even truthers have a limit. It’s not all Building 7. The red pills also start to undermine emotional attachments, nostalgia, national identities, history, etc. Many traumas are also lies and hoaxes - that didn’t start with Covid - and people do NOT like having their traumas taken away. It seems counter-intuitive, but then you realize that people define themselves by their traumas, so of course they will cling to them like addicts.
Q told us the military had made the decision to only reveal 40% of the truth to the public because to reveal the other 60% would cause people to reject and revolt. I used to think Q meant they would reject and revolt against the cabal, but actually now I think Q meant they would reject and revolt against the people who brought the cabal down. That people would hate Q Team and say they preferred the illusion the cabal had created, even if it meant being a tax-slave for pedophiles. Basically Cypher in The Matrix.
Originally, Q said only 20% would be revealed and anons were so pissed off, Q said the military had met and agreed to increase disclosure to 40%. Sometimes I think Covid and the Election Fraud are part of that extra 20%, as both revealed layers of corruption no one was fully aware of. Imagine if trying to get Q Team up to 60% or 80% meant more disclosure events like Covid. Could you see how people would start to turn their anger against Q for pulling back the veil and showing (not telling) the world what was going on? Do you think Q could have ever told us everything that Covid showed us.
It’s interesting that Q never once said “Trust Pence”.
If people still think Q was a LARP, then this is almost a Q proof. How would a LARP know not to say “Trust Pence” when from a 2017 - 2020 perspective, trusting Pence would have been one of the safest, most obvious predictions to make.
5000+ Q posts and he never says “Trust Pence”. 5000+ Q posts and the LARP never goes for such an obvious gimme.
The clip of Christopher Miller starting to cry when thanking Pence is still hard to explain. “The most complex military operations in American history.” If Pence is a black hat, then Miller is a black hat too. And why would Trump say Pence “never did anything knowingly wrong”.
I’m also inclined to Pence being Deep State and the Pence-Ryan e-mails do look and feel genuine to me, so there’s that, and Pence’s wife got the note along with the other Cabalists, so there’s that, but then some of these other things don’t fit the Pence black hat theory so well.
Even this new statement. At least of what’s quoted here, it is written vaguely enough that it could be taken two ways.
Could Pence be a RINO who Trump flipped into a white hat who then went undercover as a black hat? Would that theory satisfy all the evidence?
In the middle of an Information War with China, I think it is unwise for any westerner to trust any Chinese talking head when they appear on a TV screen as an expert. I also notice more and more of them slipping into the corporate media. They often speak with strong broken English and they are usually pushing some type of fear or division. With China Joe in The White House, Tik Tok dominating social media, and corporations pushing the CCP’s Social Credit Score System, it’s very suspicious to be seeing more and more of these Chinese experts showing up on America television.
The first time he was asked if he was part of the Q team taking down Satanic pedophiles, he slipped in a “And we are, actually”, but he did it with enough plausible deniability that anyone could believe whatever they personally needed to believe. Which was consistent with the Q proofs. They always had that little bit of plausible deniability that the people who weren’t open to what Q was disclosing could continue to keep their fingers in their ears because “the choice to know will be yours”.