I think if 2024 is also rigged against Trump, many people will doom and assume there is no plan. I don’t think that immediately triggers a civil war though. One possibility I could imagine is the 2024 Election is an even bigger shitshow than 2020 and it forces the military to somehow step in. Another possibility is they actually put Trump in jail and that triggers them to step in.
But based on how Trump talks, it seems to me that he somehow already knows 2024 will be “unrigged” like 2016 was, and that the Democrats/Uniparty also know this, which is why they are trying their lawfare strategy, which would be unnecessary if they had total control of elections anyway.
What doesn’t make sense to me is why they would use this elaborate Bond villain method of killing humans straight out of Hollywood. I’m surprised they don’t claim they first had to slide down a spike rollercoaster before swimming through an acid vat to get to the chemical showers and ovens.
It’s all so inefficient and expensive in the middle of a two-front war. How would they dissipate the poison gas to go collect the bodies for the ovens? Where were they getting all this gasoline to fuel the ovens? Where were they shipping the ashes? It would be mountains of ash they had to deal with. These are the things you never think of when you’re watching some Hollywood movie where Bond is tied up over some alligator pit. You just think about the danger of the alligators and you cheer for Bond to escape. You don’t think about who’s taking care of the alligators, who’s feeding them, who cleans their water, etc.
When we look at other examples of mass killing in history, how is it done? With elaborate Hollywood-style booby traps? Or do they make people dig their own graves then shoot them? And if they were short on metal for bullets, they could slit their throats. That’s always how it’s done throughout history, aside from this one situation, which also happens to have the Hollywood-style branded name and the lurid James Bond booby traps.
Mr. Reagan? He’s had a YouTube channel for years. I’ve probably watched a dozen or more of his videos and he never seemed sketchy. He never seemed to fit the controlled opposition mold of being irritating to moderates (Shapiro) or going way over the top in his presentation (Jones) or slyly bashing Trump (Crowder).
It’s helpful to think of draining the swamp like defusing a bomb.
Picture a bomb expert defusing a bomb, delicately snipping wires in a specific order, and someone standing over his shoulder yelling, “The timer is still ticking! Idiot! Why is it taking you so long?! Cut them all now! Now! NOW!!!”
It was weird though how Mueller knew so little about his own investigation. Was it possible hiring those Democrat lawyers was itself a sting? Mueller pretends to be their evil Black Hat leader, but also acts like he’s too old for this shit and he’s just giving them the use of his name to give the investigation some legitimacy.
Meanwhile the corporate media is repeating that all the time. “Because it’s Mueller, and Mueller is a registered Republican,” they all repeated, wagging their fingers through the TV screen. “That means you Trump supporters need to accept the results of the Special Counsel because Mueller means legitimacy.”
How would those Democrat lawyers have responded to that? Would they have loved having that cruddy old Republican Mueller out of their hair while they all conspired to “get Trump”?
If their phones and offices and computers and meeting room were all being watched by the military through the NSA, then if Mueller is a White Hat, couldn’t he have set them up to expose all their plans ahead of time while incriminating themselves? They would have likely been violating all sorts of rules and protocols for how a special counsel is meant to be run too, so getting them in a room together to see how they behave could have been validated as an investigative move once they started exposing themselves.
This is all speculation.
Just Human on Badlands Media says that Trump and Rudy worked with Mueller back in I believe the ‘80s and ‘90s to take down the mafia. The way Mueller acted when he testified to Congress was bizarre. The Democrats were so disappointed that day.
Wait, didn’t he get sworn in right in front of the crowd, only he bumbled some of the words? Then a news story was released that for some reason Obama had to officially re-do the swear in for Roberts, and a photo was released of that, apparently, being done?
Are these the same oaths? At the time, they said Obama and Roberts were doing this as a technicality but the oath Obama gave on camera was still, we were told, valid.
I remember it all seeming very weird at the time.
There are things that people believe now that if Trump had said them in March 2020, they would have freaked out and turned on him. Trump tried to end the lockdown by Easter 2020, and the world went mental on him. He tried to offer HCQ as a cure for C19, and the Lancet forged a peer-reviewed study to get it pulled. He took off his mask one time before going into the White House and the world freaked out. He said, “Don’t let Covid dominate your life” and people thought he was crazy. Then these DeSanctimonious voters pretend like he was some kind of Covid fanboy and THEY would have stopped the worldwide agenda. How? Trump told people to leave their homes and they refused. He revealed the cure and they banned it. What would DeSanctus have done differently? Personally drove around to every city and dragged people out of their homes by their arms? Then what? Hold them down in their office chair and make them work for eight hours a day? While the dude flails and flops around and screams and goes limp?
They had used their corporate media to frame the world in such a way that any death of anyone anywhere for any reason could be blamed on Trump, and the Covid hysterians went along with that absurdity because they were still reeling from Mueller saying NO COLLUSION and impeachment failing and needed something - anything - to criticize Trump.
When they say “97% of scientists”, that’s a trick, because it actually refers to 77 people that they hand selected in one particular mail-in study. “97%” makes you picture thousands and thousands of scientists all nodding in agreement. But it’s not even 97 people! It was 77.
I don’t know what the status is of the #WalkAway campaign that Brandon Straka started these days but pretty much any of those video confessionals of former Democrats explaining what caused them to wake up and walk away from the Democrat Party are powerful to someone who just recently saw the coordination and corruption that’s going on. The videos are very emotional and genuine and super interesting. They also make the newly awakened feel less alone.
On a lighter note, I think Flecca’s Talks on YouTube is another good channel for the newly awakened, because he’s so good-natured and lets the radical leftists expose themselves on the street. The Flecca’s Talks podcast also delves into red pills but they keep things positive and motivational and comedic so it’s easy to like them, in comparison to a Crowder or a Shapiro who are so confrontational and shrill.
Although primary attack in chess is the king in as much as you are moving your pieces toward whatever side of the board you suspect he is going to castle right from the start, and Pawns are attacked almost as an afterthought. Right from the jump you are going after your opponent’s king.
Transposing chess onto a war on the cabal, I would think it would make sense for the military to take out whoever the top cabal heads are immediately, secretly, and without announcement. Then work downwards. But public exposure would then be disclosed in reverse, making it appear that the cabal is being folded up from the bottom up. If this is accurate, it would mean that Jan 2017 to potentially August 2017 was the most vulnerable time in the covert war, with Q potentially being introduced once the mission was complete. Like Q says, “It was over before it began.”
Doesn’t it seem strange that there aren’t hundreds of smartphone videos of the “forest fires” taken by the locals and posted online? Shouldn’t there be so many videos that any speculation about what actually happened would be impossible, because people could watch the fires from thousands of different angles?
It reminds me of the the war in Ukraine, where there is also almost no video of anything that looks like an actual war going on coming from people’s smartphones. The TV tells me there is a war, the politicians tell me there is a war, but I don’t feel like I’ve seen any evidence that there actually even is a war.
I remember with the Las Vegas shooting there were all sorts of smartphone videos of the event. Some of those videos claimed it was fake as it was happening - in one video of the huddled crowd, a dude was standing up with his arms outspread yelling at the crowd to stand up because there are no bullets - but I remember people posting videos from all over Las Vegas. Cabbies, tourists, etc. Everyone was filming and uploading.
It all just seems very weird. Some events everyone seems to record and others no one seems to record. How would that be possible? Are videos being blocked/censored at the IP level?
How about the people claiming this is a natural fire show some kind of evidence of past natural fires that burnt in a series of perfect squares and rectangles around the property lines of houses. So far not a single image from Maui has looked like anything I’ve ever seen from previous fires throughout history.
It reminds me of United 93, where the corporate media said a field of grass with a black streak across it was the site of a plane crash, even though it looked nothing like the site of any other plane crash in history. I believe the official story on that now is the plane penetrated the ground and buried itself and then the ground caved in over it with the grass perfectly on top and untouched like it was before. There was never an excavation of the buried plane though, kind of like there was never an investigation into why Notre Dame burned down.
You know how the corporate media is always screeching about how everything they don’t like is a “Constitutional crisis”?
Notice that they haven’t used those words at all with the Biden arrest of his political opponent? One of the few times we actually are heading towards a Constitutional crisis, and crickets.
Hey corporate media, what happened to your favorite phrase? Where’d it go?
Must be sitting next to the “War on Women”, which they retired after HRC and the tranny redefinition of “woman” to mean “twinks with dinks”.
Also, Patriots in Control wouldn’t necessarily have to mean they are directly giving orders to Pelosi and Anderson Cooper and all that. If instead they had infiltrated the 4am talking points, they could do it top down without the pawns knowing. If the person above them tells the CNN CEO this is the new talking point and that gets filtered down to all their minions, how would the minions know to question it? The puppets wouldn’t be coordinated or powerful enough to overthrow the 4am talking points.