If you want to know the answer to your question, do the same prompt in Grok and compare.
And so what are the "checks and balances" on the Judicial Branch? Because it appears to be there are none.
Done been buckled up, can't get buckled any further.
"The banned weapons can still be made for military, law enforcement, prison guards, or armored vehicle personnel, but the average citizen will see major hurdles in getting around the law."
All you need to know if you were wondering what the purpose of this law was.
I'm sure the Executive Branch will get right on arresting itself.
NO. Not gonna happen. Even though I want it to. come on people.
Post removed. Reddit is a cesspool.
"Promotes hate" means, promotes content they hate.
Greenland Space Force?
that is also why Ana Palina Luna fiasco last week. Female imperative. They have Solipsim. Once you can wrap your head around that rabbit hole, you'll come out ahead
Took the words out of my mouth, jumped to leave this comment "Woman. Look no further" Woman will do what suits the Female Imperative. That's why the size of government increased consistently from the time they got the right to vote.
Well that won't lead to WW3 with China
I was souding the alarm about chemtrails in 2012. Before it reached conspiracy saturation. Even I was questioning myself then. "surely that isnt' true". But, alas. Happy to see the rest of the class catching up.
But, but, it doesn't exist.
I am not clicking on that.
They have been working diligently to turn Texas blue, and then it really will be all over. It is an infection, spreading like a disease. One that will kill its host.
After the first incident, why is this guy still acting as a liability?
I am not a fan of Presidents using declarations of emergency to garner powers outside the norm when declarations of emergency have become the norm, anyway. However, if it was this easy to rescend said declaration, perhaps that should have been done far more in the past.
As of April 2, 2025, there is no definitive evidence that Canada has formally terminated its military alliance with the United States. Recent news and statements from Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney have sparked confusion and speculation, but the situation appears more nuanced than a complete severance of military ties.
Carney has publicly declared that "the old relationship we had with the United States—based on deepening integration of our economies and tight security and military cooperation—is over." This statement, made in late March 2025, came in response to escalating trade tensions, particularly following U.S. President Donald Trump's imposition of 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, including vehicles and auto parts. Carney’s remarks suggest a significant shift in Canada’s approach to its relationship with the U.S., emphasizing a need to reduce reliance on its southern neighbor and pivot toward other international partners. However, this rhetoric does not explicitly confirm an official end to formal military alliances like NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) or NATO, both of which involve deep U.S.-Canada military cooperation.
Some sources and posts on X have interpreted Carney’s words as Canada "terminating its military alliance" with the U.S., but this appears to be an exaggeration or misreading of the situation. For instance, Canada’s participation in NORAD and NATO remains intact based on available information, and no official government announcement has confirmed a withdrawal from these agreements. Instead, Carney’s statements seem to reflect a broader reevaluation of the bilateral relationship—economically, politically, and strategically—rather than an immediate legal or operational termination of military pacts. The mention of "tight security and military cooperation" being "over" could indicate a desire to restructure or reduce dependency on U.S.-led frameworks, but concrete actions to dissolve alliances have not been documented as of this date.
The context of Trump’s policies, including threats to annex Canada or impose further economic pressure, has undoubtedly strained relations. Canadian leaders have expressed frustration, with Carney noting that the U.S. is "no longer a reliable partner." This has led to discussions about diversifying Canada’s security and trade relationships, potentially with Europe or other allies like France and the UK. However, Canada’s military, which has historically leaned on U.S. support due to its smaller defense budget, would face significant challenges if it fully decoupled from the U.S., a reality that suggests a complete termination is unlikely without a clear alternative in place.
In summary, while Canada has signaled a major shift in its relationship with the U.S., including aspects of military cooperation, there is no conclusive evidence as of April 2, 2025, that it has formally terminated its military alliance. The situation remains fluid, and further developments—such as official policy changes or announcements—would be needed to confirm such a drastic step.
Says Grok
Do something then. Hageman.
Blanket pre-pardons now. They opened that can of worms, now eat it.
lol wondered if anyone would get it. Bravo