Those who are in control aren't "pretending" anything. They are controlling the Minds of Men. The book 1984 wasn't about "One Voice" giving a singular belief system, it was "One Voice" speaking with Many Mouths. That is how the world is run, one voice, many speakers. All beliefs are controlled in opposition.
Microsoft, Intel, AMD, and Apple are all in "opposition" competing for sales. You can find advertisements that suggest that they would like nothing more than to wipe them out of existence, or at least to become the dominant party (AMD v. Intel e.g., or Apple v. Microsoft, etc.). Yet they are restrained in their products by a cartel of silicon and all of them were created by the same entity (specifically seed moneys from Laurence Rockefeller and In-Q-Tel (AKA the CIA)). They are currently intertwined by a shared Board of Directors, ultimately controlled by the same people (not the "CEO"s, they are just the frontmen).
Ultimately, both the CIA and the KGB was created by the Rockefellers. Both MI6 and Mossad were ultimately created and controlled by family Rothschild. But the CIA was also co-created (operationally created) by MI6, aka the Rothschilds.
The Democrats and Republicans (and other parties that have come and gone) are, and always have been, under the thumb of the same source (Rothschild and later Rockefeller).
I shouldn't go there because it is a forbidden topic and body of evidence, but the evidence suggests that both the Christians (post 312 AD), Muslims (from the Quran), and the Jews (not sure when, probably the Babylonian "diaspora" (which is a misnomer)) are controlled by the same entity; a sect of elite Jews, mostly Levites, the ones who wrote the Torah AKA the Law (their Law).
Everything is in opposition to each other, and all sects, all "boxes" are controlled by the same source.
And always have been.
That is how the world is controlled. Many boxes in opposition. That gives the illusion of freedom. You can choose any box you want, but all the boxes were created by and/or later controlled through subversion or hostile takeover by the same entity; the "Cabal".
You can see some of my book on how the economy is controlled by that method. Other claims (like the information Cartel) are in other sections not yet published.
Within reality...left and right aren't in conflict with one another, but imply a balance for ones choice within.
Within fiction...left and right are in conflict with one another, while tempting ones choice to imbalances itself by choosing to hold onto a side.
Few established fiction within the minds of many, who in return ignore reality. This fictitious controlled opposition within the minds of many is called "reason".
I think this talking point is designed to intentionally be a bridge too far for normal people to get behind. I would love this to become the law of the land but I don't think it's feasible both from a public support and realistic perspective.
The goal here appears to make the "con inc" solution too radial to create a divide as the DS usually does. We need to focus on a solution that is feasible because I'd rather get 2/3 of the way there, instead of trying to get the whole way, lose, and get nothing for it.
There were effectively calls for this in Canada, and I think that was a part of the successful push back.
I also have a family friend who is an Iranian woman who fled the fall, and her kids didn't turn into liberal fuckwits like too many Canadian's did. So I have a hard time with any call like this that is trying to be black and white.
You want the best and the brightest and who'll be a good cultural fit, and I'll be honest America isn't going to get that from the majority of the "first world".
Attempts to make complex issues into binary decisions inevitably plays to the racist stereotype liberals love to use against us, and I'll be honest it's because of dipshit statements like these that that claim ends up being successful.
you can want mass remigration and still not want to shut down immigration completely. undo the effects of mass immigration, and get it back to a trickle.
I checked the threads and Walsh was the originator and they call copy pasta on Charlie and Jack. That's fine and dandy to own up to it, but their crime was not saucing it.
You haven't listened to him that much. He goes off the rails sometimes but he's incredibly based and will call out shit like this when no one else will
shifting the blame to third world immigration instead of soros backed riots?
also, shutting down kills the american dream for the whole world. a severe restriction, even one person per year, woud serve a much greater benefit, and get us back to importing the best.
In my opinion, the US should also ban (or heavily restrict) all immigration for a four year period. Many first world countries are littered with third worlders who possess first world passports.
Maybe have some rare exceptions like Poland, Hungary, or Japan
I don't know much about him beyond the fact there was a period of time when he was pushed as being Q. Because of that I don't trust him at all.
I was originally skeptical of Charlie Kirk, but then I watched a bunch of his videos -- I think he is good for America's college-aged kids, a definite net-positive.
Zero immigration for a time would actually be very nice, but the fear is that the enemy will take that stance and run with it as being too radical.
I'm not going to fault them for being too radical on it though, the end result is still a good one.
If we wanted to get tricky we could start asking questions americans don’t know, but should.
What’s the importance of Trial by Jury?
Why is it so hard to get a jury trial right now?
How do you force a jury trial?
What is money?
When you’re told to report your status to the government on some issue where you have not committed a crime, what is a valid response?
Imagine if Americans started being taught their rights by immigrants who’d had to learn them to get in. Luuuuull.
Mexicans do a better job than Americans at avoiding the unconstitutional income tax, for example. Indians do a better job of keeping the family structure intact and in a single house or compound.
How can these people STILL be this dumb? I get maybe the ones posting got their 3am talking points not knowing they are all on the group email cause it was blind carbon copied. But the ones sending those 3am talking points, how are they still doing this lol.
Don't trust talking points in lock step from EITHER side. Smacks of handlers, and though I have no ill will towards any of them, I disregard talking points. Why bother with them? We have better sources and do not need installed opinions
The third world thing bother me because it sounds like some great statement. But the #1 place people come here from is Mexico, a second world country. The #2 place is india, also a second world place. So we will ban people who come here from usual countries but keep most of the immigrants.
This looks like the 4 am talking points the leftist media gets every day.
When you investigate, you find that everyone gets the talking points from the same source. Left, Right, doesn't matter. It's the Matrix baby!
This has been going on for a very long time. Everything is controlled opposition.
Everyone works for Big Daddy, prince of this earth.
Observer: [discussing The Village] This place has been going for a long time.
Number 6: Since the war? Before the war? WHICH... WAR?
Most of Hollywood is designed to show the truth in such a way that no one will believe it.
That seems to be the case.
Those who are in control aren't "pretending" anything. They are controlling the Minds of Men. The book 1984 wasn't about "One Voice" giving a singular belief system, it was "One Voice" speaking with Many Mouths. That is how the world is run, one voice, many speakers. All beliefs are controlled in opposition.
Thats why we need to speak God's Word with one voice.
"That ye all speak the same thing concerning truth"
Microsoft, Intel, AMD, and Apple are all in "opposition" competing for sales. You can find advertisements that suggest that they would like nothing more than to wipe them out of existence, or at least to become the dominant party (AMD v. Intel e.g., or Apple v. Microsoft, etc.). Yet they are restrained in their products by a cartel of silicon and all of them were created by the same entity (specifically seed moneys from Laurence Rockefeller and In-Q-Tel (AKA the CIA)). They are currently intertwined by a shared Board of Directors, ultimately controlled by the same people (not the "CEO"s, they are just the frontmen).
Ultimately, both the CIA and the KGB was created by the Rockefellers. Both MI6 and Mossad were ultimately created and controlled by family Rothschild. But the CIA was also co-created (operationally created) by MI6, aka the Rothschilds.
The Democrats and Republicans (and other parties that have come and gone) are, and always have been, under the thumb of the same source (Rothschild and later Rockefeller).
I shouldn't go there because it is a forbidden topic and body of evidence, but the evidence suggests that both the Christians (post 312 AD), Muslims (from the Quran), and the Jews (not sure when, probably the Babylonian "diaspora" (which is a misnomer)) are controlled by the same entity; a sect of elite Jews, mostly Levites, the ones who wrote the Torah AKA the Law (their Law).
Everything is in opposition to each other, and all sects, all "boxes" are controlled by the same source.
And always have been.
That is how the world is controlled. Many boxes in opposition. That gives the illusion of freedom. You can choose any box you want, but all the boxes were created by and/or later controlled through subversion or hostile takeover by the same entity; the "Cabal".
You can see some of my book on how the economy is controlled by that method. Other claims (like the information Cartel) are in other sections not yet published.
Within reality...left and right aren't in conflict with one another, but imply a balance for ones choice within.
Within fiction...left and right are in conflict with one another, while tempting ones choice to imbalances itself by choosing to hold onto a side.
Few established fiction within the minds of many, who in return ignore reality. This fictitious controlled opposition within the minds of many is called "reason".
Been some heavy shilling going on the last few days. Wonder what’s up.
Conservative Inc.
Pretty interesting how they all went lockstep in this issue at once.
I think this talking point is designed to intentionally be a bridge too far for normal people to get behind. I would love this to become the law of the land but I don't think it's feasible both from a public support and realistic perspective.
The goal here appears to make the "con inc" solution too radial to create a divide as the DS usually does. We need to focus on a solution that is feasible because I'd rather get 2/3 of the way there, instead of trying to get the whole way, lose, and get nothing for it.
There were effectively calls for this in Canada, and I think that was a part of the successful push back.
I also have a family friend who is an Iranian woman who fled the fall, and her kids didn't turn into liberal fuckwits like too many Canadian's did. So I have a hard time with any call like this that is trying to be black and white.
You want the best and the brightest and who'll be a good cultural fit, and I'll be honest America isn't going to get that from the majority of the "first world".
Attempts to make complex issues into binary decisions inevitably plays to the racist stereotype liberals love to use against us, and I'll be honest it's because of dipshit statements like these that that claim ends up being successful.
you can want mass remigration and still not want to shut down immigration completely. undo the effects of mass immigration, and get it back to a trickle.
Absolutely, and especially with regards to immigration from places where the average person there wouldn't contribute well in our society.
I checked the threads and Walsh was the originator and they call copy pasta on Charlie and Jack. That's fine and dandy to own up to it, but their crime was not saucing it.
It looks like Charlie copied Matt's first sentence and then added his take. Then Jack just flat-out copied Charlie altogether.
They want us divided
Where is the lie?
Nick is a clown
He is a clown but I can't say I disagree with everything he says. Obviously a pretty sharp young man.
Everything has become tribal like I've never seen.
You have libtards fighting harder for illegals than they ever did for any Americans.
There's no coming together with these people. They represent everything I'm against.
He's a Clown In America. CIA. Controlled oppo.
You haven't listened to him that much. He goes off the rails sometimes but he's incredibly based and will call out shit like this when no one else will
shifting the blame to third world immigration instead of soros backed riots?
also, shutting down kills the american dream for the whole world. a severe restriction, even one person per year, woud serve a much greater benefit, and get us back to importing the best.
Con inc never talks about election fraud either.
In my opinion, the US should also ban (or heavily restrict) all immigration for a four year period. Many first world countries are littered with third worlders who possess first world passports.
Maybe have some rare exceptions like Poland, Hungary, or Japan
there's a huge difference between heavily restricting and banning.
a heavy restriction makes the US look exclusive. a ban makes it look like north korea.
Well said!
I 100% agree. I have had similar thoughts.
They quoted each other lmao.
If you go to their actual posts, Charlie quote replied Matt Walsh & then Poso quote replied Charlie. That's it.
Fuentes of course didn't post any of that though. It took me all of 1 minute to figure that out. Be careful who you follow.
I agree, I will never be a bleeding heart. I've been through too much tragedy to give a rats ass about non Americans.
That faggot Nick hasn't recovered from that video clip [some time back] of him giving a gay bj. was fun times on /pol/ when those were dropped.
Was that really him?
fk yeah it was. He tried to lay low for a bit after. But pepeFarms likes to remind him. kEk
(((Nick)))
(((gay bj)))
Isn't Nicholas Fuentes a member of Con Inc?
I don't know much about him beyond the fact there was a period of time when he was pushed as being Q. Because of that I don't trust him at all.
I was originally skeptical of Charlie Kirk, but then I watched a bunch of his videos -- I think he is good for America's college-aged kids, a definite net-positive.
Zero immigration for a time would actually be very nice, but the fear is that the enemy will take that stance and run with it as being too radical.
I'm not going to fault them for being too radical on it though, the end result is still a good one.
He’s better than Shapiro, at any rate.
That's rich coming from a CIA plant.
I agree completely. Hordes from othe cultures now feel like nothing but a threat to me.
Conservative Inc.
Fuentes is gay.
So who decides what the third world nations are? And how would South Africa be considered?
Everyone who comes across the border give them an IQ test. Post the results online (anonymized) daily.
We don't need an IQ test lol.
We need simple questions like
Make them answer these questions under a lie detector.
What is the source of rights?
If we wanted to get tricky we could start asking questions americans don’t know, but should.
What’s the importance of Trial by Jury?
Why is it so hard to get a jury trial right now?
How do you force a jury trial?
What is money?
When you’re told to report your status to the government on some issue where you have not committed a crime, what is a valid response?
Imagine if Americans started being taught their rights by immigrants who’d had to learn them to get in. Luuuuull.
Mexicans do a better job than Americans at avoiding the unconstitutional income tax, for example. Indians do a better job of keeping the family structure intact and in a single house or compound.
Every Single Time! They're all taking the same marching orders from the same people. It's disgusting!
How can these people STILL be this dumb? I get maybe the ones posting got their 3am talking points not knowing they are all on the group email cause it was blind carbon copied. But the ones sending those 3am talking points, how are they still doing this lol.
u/#ElonChorus
Don't trust talking points in lock step from EITHER side. Smacks of handlers, and though I have no ill will towards any of them, I disregard talking points. Why bother with them? We have better sources and do not need installed opinions
Imagine drawing attention to a technique that is almost exclusively employed by the commies.
I don’t disagree. Looks like we are taking coms lessons from democrats.
Controlled opposition.
Two guys with similar views on immigration, plus Poso decided to copy and paste one of them as if he wrote it
The third world thing bother me because it sounds like some great statement. But the #1 place people come here from is Mexico, a second world country. The #2 place is india, also a second world place. So we will ban people who come here from usual countries but keep most of the immigrants.
Defeating the Deep State will involve using their same MO! Narrative warfare as per Q! Makes sense, they believe the world they are presented with!
Nice we learned a lefty tactic. To the detriment of the lefties the repetition of truth is more powerful than repetition of a lefty lie.
Funny how Nick Fuentes has to call this out. 4AM talking points... very 'dasting.
I know that is meant to be a harmful to us narrative, but they could get their “wish”. Boomerang.