1
swampwarrior67 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guarantee you she stepped down for some medical procedure that would require her to be unconscious. In another day or two she'll be right back in office.

3
swampwarrior67 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah no way he could have posted it just because he knows we like storms and there was actually a storm over Mar-A-Lago today.

0
swampwarrior67 0 points ago +1 / -1

And now you're older and your blood pressure is higher. Seriously man, get to a doctor and get some blood pressure medication.

1
swampwarrior67 1 point ago +1 / -0

High blood pressure is mostly hereditary. With a blood pressure that high you should definitely be on medication or you're going to kill your organs.

0
swampwarrior67 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sell the house. Prices are sky high right now and you can take that money and invest it somewhere, perhaps a good stock with dividends.

0
swampwarrior67 0 points ago +1 / -1

What the fuck are you getting at the grocery store that costs $500? I can hit Costco and get meal supplies for 2 weeks for under 300 bucks.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
by MAGULQ
0
swampwarrior67 0 points ago +1 / -1

How about you start doing it now rather than waiting for a storm that might never happen?

-3
swampwarrior67 -3 points ago +1 / -4

People need to be a bit more realistic here. If he cancelled the EO, it would tell you he's a bad actor. But somehow him re-upping the EO also means he's a bad actor but white hats are in control?

Any time you think positive and negative outcomes are both proof of some happening, you're wrong.

-3
swampwarrior67 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Do my own research? You mean dig up source links that OP was too lazy to include? Are you saying we shouldn't expect a post about a journal-published article to actually include a link to the journal and the article? I think it's at pretty fucking reasonable to expect posts here to include sources, not just images or links to some random tweets that also doesn't include sources.

The other problem is that this source would not be convincing for anyone who isn't already a fan of AAPS. Their journal has been rejected for indexing and republication by every other major medical journal in the world. The Wikipedia article on them and the journal is scathing, calling them a purveyor of misinformation and bad medical science with numerous examples. It's nearly impossible to find non-AAPS sources that will corroborate anything they publish.

In order to bring this information to normies it would need to be published and accepted by at least one of the mainstream medical journals, and peer reviewed by physicians not associated with AAPS. And to be honest, we need to be skeptical of both sides and integrate information from all sources. AAPS being our single source of information throws every one of these claims into doubt.

In this particular case, it would be trivial to bring up dozens of papers showing that the spike protein breaks down and dissipates very quickly after vaccination. The papers cited here as evidence of ongoing spike proteins are all within hours or a few days after the initial vaccination shot, during which time you would expect to see spike proteins in the body because that's what the vaccine does. I want to see papers showing long-term spike protein contamination of the human body.

I'm not trying to throw a doubt your way just to be a jerk, but we need to do better bringing information to the masses.

0
swampwarrior67 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do you have any idea what they have done in past years? This is super tame in comparison.

2
swampwarrior67 2 points ago +3 / -1

You're wrong. It's being slow-walked because they don't have the votes.

0
swampwarrior67 0 points ago +1 / -1

Except they do the same kind of shit every year for decades. This was just a badly timed hurricane.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›