Iran's only gambit now is to make Trump destroy them, hoping he'd lose support of American voters and the world in doing so. It's their warped idea of the very long game because the short game is unwinnable.
Trump should call their bluff.
Comey himself said his wife asked why would someone make a home address out of shells and he replied it seems to be a political message. So he admitted that he knew its meaning immediately. There is no way 86 47 could be considered a political message if you don’t understand what both 86 and 47 could mean.
Therefore, prosecutors don’t need any help at all proving that his knowing publishing of a political message that said murder Trump is protected free speech. Comey is, as the long time head of the FBI and an influential political figure, able to cause action and reaction to his posts unlike most anyone in America. And he knows it, as evidenced by his very public explanations for why he didn’t and then did release statements about Hilary’s server. He knows his messaging moves dials and yet he knowingly posted a message saying murder Trump is cool.
Swalwell was a threat to the Dems' control of California. He was unelectable but his 11% of the vote threatened to allow no Dem to make it to the general election. He refused to step aside for the good of the party and they are punishing him for it.
The best case scenario here would be for him to turn his ire against those who are destroying him and rat out the Left's behind the scenes playbook for all to see.
Is it possible (and I'm reaching here) that Wray knew that if he let the Left corrupt January 6 and the aftermath, it would lead to Trump's mandate to clean up the intelligence community?
Probably not, but I'm also trying to reconcile "trust Wray."
A more likely takeaway is that Q wanted Wray to feel comfortable while we were sneaking up behind him.
I've posted this before, but it bears repeating. The money to be lost or gained by the effectiveness/ineffectiveness of Trump's MAGA movement is measured in the tens of trillions of dollars. That's one billion 10,000 times. It's one million 10,000,000 times.
One would have to a total idiot to even begin to doubt that an enterprise with that much at stake would NOT take steps to protect it. And it costs a mere grain of sand in all that wealth to build an extortion case against every single legislator, judge, commentator, and influencer they want. It is unstoppable motivation for them to say, "look, we have you by the balls and we only need to squeeze, or worse we can start with your daughter's best friend and if that doesn't work we can have your daughter picked up after school one day ... OR, you can take this $10 million (insert any number here, nothing is unaffordable) and every now and then you'll do what we want, and everyone in your life is safe."
I have it on first hand knowledge from a now-deceased top FBI guy that this is exactly how it works.
200 years ago, "decimate" meant punishing a military force of mutineers by killing 10% of the men to send a message.
In the last 200 years, it means annihilation of 90% of the enemy.
See below:
In the military of ancient Rome, decimation (from Latin decimatio 'destruction of a tenth'[1]) was a form of military discipline in which every tenth man in a group was executed by members of his cohort. The discipline was used by senior commanders in the Roman army to punish units or large groups guilty of capital offences, such as cowardice, mutiny, desertion, and insubordination, and for pacification of rebellious legions.
The historicity of the punishment during the early and middle republic is questioned, and it may be an ahistorical rhetorical construct of the late republic. Regardless, the first well-attested instance was in 72 BC during the war against Spartacus under the command of Marcus Licinius Crassus. Further instances followed in the next century, mostly occurring during times of civil strife, before falling out of use after AD 69. There is evidence of the punishment's revival in the post-classical world, such as during the Thirty Years' War and World War I.
In modern English, the word is used most commonly not to mean a destruction of a tenth but rather the destruction of 90%, or just annihilation.
That first sentence, the quote, is the Schumer, Schiff, Jeffries, Pelosi, Obama approach to politics. Say an outrageous lie with overwhelming conviction while demeaning the horrible and simple people who “aren’t smart enough/decent enough to grasp this obvious truth.”
It is their entire playbook.
Five of the top 10 economies in the world, including #1, #2, #4 and #5. Russia is #9, but their military is strong and they are an important counter to the EU and Ukraine.
The other 5 top 10 economies are all European and Canada.
Trump is recreating the world order. Reducing the influence of the globalists, Payseurs and Rothchilds.
No one would be stupid enough to even imply that he controls Trump. It is the best way to guarantee that Trump will make it his top priority to destroy that person. Carlson is stirring the pot, but Netanyahu clearly didn't mean Trump is his bitch.
Normies should pay close attention. This is proof that there are indeed people in our government who are willing to intentionally start a pandemic.