Apparently their excuse is that the date and time is set when they start the draft of the story and not when they post it. Further, they say it is because they were writing another story and then had to switch gears when REAL news comes up and the old story's time sticks.
If any of that were true, at what point does an editor look at the bloody thing!?
They are glorified blog posters at best, and at worse they are just copy and pasting CCP-made stories.
Instead of writing new stories, they attempt to memory hole earlier iterations by editing throughout the day.
This also allows narrative shaping, especially if people aren't archiving each change throughout the day. Their avid readers see one message which sticks with them, and people who see the article in the future aren't even aware that message was sent.
eh it does say "Live Updates" and if you've ever used software like WordPress you can go back and edit a post title and content at any time, there's really no way to tell if this software would update the original publish date with the updated date
Someone with a computer, faster internet than I, could probably use the way back machine and confirm, right? Might try it myself later, if I have time.
They reused this article's page and updated it with the "storm U.S. capitol" story. If you hover the date you can see the page was archived at 15:10 UTC (I'm pretty sure it's UTC at least), which is 10:10 ET. You can also see in the article it says "Trump plans to address the crowd at 11 a.m.", so it's just an earlier version.
You can use wayback on your phone, it doesnt take any computing power to search there... wayback does all the database and searching stuff.
Though I doubt WBM captures things within hours, so may not have archived it until days later
This is not an article. It's a page with live updates that was created at 9:22am. The title most likely read "Trump Rally Planned" but later changed the headline. Poor publishing choice, the Headline should be generic "Live updates of January 6th Events in DC"
I'm with you, but we need to focus on the real conspiracies, not created ones
This is a possible explanation, but whoever designed their website then must be devoid of a brain. More likely, it works like all modern systems, and alters the time to the point of last edit pre-publish. After that, edits get their own time stamp with when they are published.
Storming of the Capitol WAS a staged, false flag event - but this is not evidence of that. MSM often "updates" their posts - changing the information. Archive shows the original: https://archive.is/EcwiV. So, ignore this and let's find the REAL evidence of this set-up.
I mean- the original article is still kind of setting up the false flag
"The concern is that nonviolent Trump supporters at these protests will "get wrapped up in the tactics and violence of the extreme fringes,""
"Proud Boys members typically dress in black and yellow, but are planning to wear all black, to mimic Antifa, a loose affiliation of far-left activists."
Although I believe that this article was not published before the event, I would never use snopes for anything regarding election, political or dems vrs Patriots. Snopes is also run by far left devilcrates!
Because normal reasonably good humans just don’t think about things like pedo cults. In a perfect world we shouldn’t have to. But unfortunately there are creatures outside the scope of normal humanity and they feed on our goodness and take advantage of our ignorance.
All true, but we still should have known. We knew cultures sacrificed 'virgins'. Did we think those were 40 year old virgins? Did we think the practice stopped at some point? It's been in our faces all along.
We thought those were crude Central American cultures sacrificing children, not civilized westerners. And we thought that humanity had evolved from such primitive beliefs. And then our instinct was like, “Why? That would be disgusting. Why would Tom Hanks possibly want to kill a child and drink it’s blood? It would be traumatizing. It would taste terrible. It makes no sense.”
We also thought that pedophilia was a kind of obscure miswiring of the brain. (Not that pedophiles deserve sympathy, because they don’t. Pedophiles should be executed by the state for crimes against children. And even if they claim it’s “not their fault” because “they were born this way”, just tell them it’s also not the rabid dog’s fault it got rabies, but we put it down anyway.) Before, if you said “pedophile”, we thought some weirdo loser in a basement with a pencil thin mustache who spends his afternoons hanging out in the alleyway across from the public school. Nobody realized that pedophilia is actually more of a fetish that can be pushed onto people, or that a Tom Hanks could have started as a normal straight man only to become a pedophile as he hangs out and fraternizes with pedophiles more and more. We also didn’t realize that amongst the elites, pedophilia is how they fast track careers so that pedophiles have been installed in all these key power positions. We also naively believed law enforcement was trying to hunt down and capture these pedophiles, not promote them.
Can anyone confirm that the timestamp isn't a result of appending an earlier article, i.e. originally having it be about the rally but then shifting to the protest afterwards?
I'm asking because I think this would be an excellent red pill if it's exactly what it appears to be.
Oh, I'm not saying I buy that story. It's more so that even the existence of such an explanation renders this useless as a means of red pilling our normie friends & family.
There should be hundred and hundreds of examples of that then, right? It should be so common that we have already heard about this because people had already pointed it out about some other time-related story, like the article that called the Oscar winners before the Oscars aired or the article that called the Super Bowl Winner before the Super Bowl aired.
Even if they were on the wear coast... the time difference still would make no sense. I guess if she’s writing from Hawaii then it might? That’s a stretch
There was a twitter post by someone named silas. His friends were calling him saying then capitol was swarmed, but there wasn't even any breaching of barricades yet. I would like to see that again if someone has it.
Marisa needs to hand in her junior journalist cookiescout badge for a crystal ball. Also she left off “Antifa disguised as”—-a clear decision on her part for CNN browniepoints.
The same kind of "newsgathering" team that reported in detail the collapse of WTC7 half and hour before it fell.
I was just gonna say, wasn't it NPR that reported on Building 7 or was it the BBC?
BBC
Apparently their excuse is that the date and time is set when they start the draft of the story and not when they post it. Further, they say it is because they were writing another story and then had to switch gears when REAL news comes up and the old story's time sticks.
If any of that were true, at what point does an editor look at the bloody thing!?
They are glorified blog posters at best, and at worse they are just copy and pasting CCP-made stories.
That sounds like bullshit. How is the time shown not merely the time the finished story was uploaded to the website?
Many mainstream outlets do this now.
Instead of writing new stories, they attempt to memory hole earlier iterations by editing throughout the day.
This also allows narrative shaping, especially if people aren't archiving each change throughout the day. Their avid readers see one message which sticks with them, and people who see the article in the future aren't even aware that message was sent.
Here's a good example from 1/6 "fixed" version: https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/jan/6/xrvision-firm-claims-antifa-infiltrated-protesters/?__twitter_impression=true
Original: https://web.archive.org/web/20210107013343if_/https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/jan/6/xrvision-firm-claims-antifa-infiltrated-protesters/?__twitter_impression=true
Exactly this, they simply updated an existing post.
eh it does say "Live Updates" and if you've ever used software like WordPress you can go back and edit a post title and content at any time, there's really no way to tell if this software would update the original publish date with the updated date
Someone with a computer, faster internet than I, could probably use the way back machine and confirm, right? Might try it myself later, if I have time.
here you go: https://web.archive.org/web/20210106151035/https://www.npr.org/sections/congress-electoral-college-tally-live-updates/2021/01/06/953616207/diehard-trump-supporters-gather-in-the-nations-capital-to-protest-election-resul
boom thank you, we can do better than this with a little knowledge of how software works...
Did they rig the wayback machine? Only showing updated version, It isn't showing the same page as screenshot
They reused this article's page and updated it with the "storm U.S. capitol" story. If you hover the date you can see the page was archived at 15:10 UTC (I'm pretty sure it's UTC at least), which is 10:10 ET. You can also see in the article it says "Trump plans to address the crowd at 11 a.m.", so it's just an earlier version.
Unfortunately way back will only works for pages that have been crawled and indexed already. This might take hours or days.
You can use wayback on your phone, it doesnt take any computing power to search there... wayback does all the database and searching stuff. Though I doubt WBM captures things within hours, so may not have archived it until days later
This is not an article. It's a page with live updates that was created at 9:22am. The title most likely read "Trump Rally Planned" but later changed the headline. Poor publishing choice, the Headline should be generic "Live updates of January 6th Events in DC"
I'm with you, but we need to focus on the real conspiracies, not created ones
This is a possible explanation, but whoever designed their website then must be devoid of a brain. More likely, it works like all modern systems, and alters the time to the point of last edit pre-publish. After that, edits get their own time stamp with when they are published.
....so they STARTED the draft of this story BEFORE IT HAPPENED?
Either way it makes zero sense.....
Storming of the Capitol WAS a staged, false flag event - but this is not evidence of that. MSM often "updates" their posts - changing the information. Archive shows the original: https://archive.is/EcwiV. So, ignore this and let's find the REAL evidence of this set-up.
Agreed. Also, you can tell it was edited because the original headline is in the URL: https://www.npr.org/sections/congress-electoral-college-tally-live-updates/2021/01/06/953616207/diehard-trump-supporters-gather-in-the-nations-capital-to-protest-election-resul
I mean- the original article is still kind of setting up the false flag
"The concern is that nonviolent Trump supporters at these protests will "get wrapped up in the tactics and violence of the extreme fringes,""
"Proud Boys members typically dress in black and yellow, but are planning to wear all black, to mimic Antifa, a loose affiliation of far-left activists."
Yeah this makes sense.
Collusion. This people are as stupid as they are evil.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/npr-riot-article-before-riot/
Although I believe that this article was not published before the event, I would never use snopes for anything regarding election, political or dems vrs Patriots. Snopes is also run by far left devilcrates!
It was edited, but they should have labelled it appropriately, like "edited" or "updated @ [time]." Unaccountable system otherwise.
We are stupid. How did we not notice a pedo-cult taking over the world?
Because normal reasonably good humans just don’t think about things like pedo cults. In a perfect world we shouldn’t have to. But unfortunately there are creatures outside the scope of normal humanity and they feed on our goodness and take advantage of our ignorance.
All true, but we still should have known. We knew cultures sacrificed 'virgins'. Did we think those were 40 year old virgins? Did we think the practice stopped at some point? It's been in our faces all along.
We thought those were crude Central American cultures sacrificing children, not civilized westerners. And we thought that humanity had evolved from such primitive beliefs. And then our instinct was like, “Why? That would be disgusting. Why would Tom Hanks possibly want to kill a child and drink it’s blood? It would be traumatizing. It would taste terrible. It makes no sense.”
We also thought that pedophilia was a kind of obscure miswiring of the brain. (Not that pedophiles deserve sympathy, because they don’t. Pedophiles should be executed by the state for crimes against children. And even if they claim it’s “not their fault” because “they were born this way”, just tell them it’s also not the rabid dog’s fault it got rabies, but we put it down anyway.) Before, if you said “pedophile”, we thought some weirdo loser in a basement with a pencil thin mustache who spends his afternoons hanging out in the alleyway across from the public school. Nobody realized that pedophilia is actually more of a fetish that can be pushed onto people, or that a Tom Hanks could have started as a normal straight man only to become a pedophile as he hangs out and fraternizes with pedophiles more and more. We also didn’t realize that amongst the elites, pedophilia is how they fast track careers so that pedophiles have been installed in all these key power positions. We also naively believed law enforcement was trying to hunt down and capture these pedophiles, not promote them.
Well said. The only thing I'd add is that Tom Hanks was likely born into the cult, he may even be a Rockefeller.
In Hollywood there are those that were 'born in' and those that are 'adopted in'.
Mass media spell.
Everyone's too busy being a wage slave and consuming entertainment media.
They are DESPERATE, ooops, that was insurrection.
guys, it's pretty easy to check this on the wayback machine...
https://web.archive.org/web/20210106151035/https://www.npr.org/sections/congress-electoral-college-tally-live-updates/2021/01/06/953616207/diehard-trump-supporters-gather-in-the-nations-capital-to-protest-election-resul
The original headline posted at 9:30 was "Diehard Trump Supporters Gather In The Nation's Capital To Protest Election Results."
The way online media works is that headlines can change as events unfold, but the URL of the story stay the same.
Stop making us look dumb.
Can anyone confirm that the timestamp isn't a result of appending an earlier article, i.e. originally having it be about the rally but then shifting to the protest afterwards?
I'm asking because I think this would be an excellent red pill if it's exactly what it appears to be.
Oh, I'm not saying I buy that story. It's more so that even the existence of such an explanation renders this useless as a means of red pilling our normie friends & family.
Do you have the link instead of the screenshot?
There should be hundred and hundreds of examples of that then, right? It should be so common that we have already heard about this because people had already pointed it out about some other time-related story, like the article that called the Oscar winners before the Oscars aired or the article that called the Super Bowl Winner before the Super Bowl aired.
Even if they were on the wear coast... the time difference still would make no sense. I guess if she’s writing from Hawaii then it might? That’s a stretch
Isn't it amazing how God reveals stuff to those who seek truth?
Isn't it amazing how God uses even those who are against him for his work??
Isn't it amazing how God shows the path forward on some things for those wise enough to discern???
You are watching a movie. Nothing in the news or social media is true. Nothing.
these nothingburger "pre-event news articles" doing the rounds again? Careful who you call stupid
Ha! They did same thing with twin towers. ?
They're wrong about that.
possible she was in a west coast time zone? Idk how timestamps work on articles in relation to the reader.
I would love to know the explanation on this !
Different timezone? Edit: NVM saw the ET.
NPR is a leftist rag news organization.
There was a twitter post by someone named silas. His friends were calling him saying then capitol was swarmed, but there wasn't even any breaching of barricades yet. I would like to see that again if someone has it.
Is NPR the same group that want's to "re-educate" our kids at camps? (source Veritas video)
Marisa needs to hand in her junior journalist cookiescout badge for a crystal ball. Also she left off “Antifa disguised as”—-a clear decision on her part for CNN browniepoints.
They don’t even think one thing about what they write and who their audience is
What the hell????? These people appear to know the future.
Fuckin slop pieces of shit.
its the classic 666 again januar (6) inverted 9= 6) 3+3= 6