I agree that the MSM will spin it in whichever way they see fit. But I think we're well past the point of really caring what the MSM says. I say that because no matter what happens they will always spin it against us. If someone reads about those "crazy Qanons" and still trusts the msm about us then they're still too far off for us to help anyways. Ignorance is a choice, especially nowadays
Ask yourself, what is "harm to the community", why do you care about this concept, and how would it stop the Great Awakening?
Can anything stop what is coming?
If not, then why are we concerned about how other's will portray us NO MATTER WHAT? Is it really all up to us to make good optics for things to play out?
Trying to predict what the media will do to discredit us is going to be like pissing into the wind bro. Besides, them catching us out with a visual effect glitch is still them trying to produce fake news.
Appreciate the sentiment, but people all over the map are saying several aspects of this aint right, from lighting to the booms cliiping with biden's arm (or being out of shot in a wider angled frame, but clearly in shot in the narrower frame). Its like they couldnt get alignment between different production crews.
To me this isnt a post editing fail. This didnt get basic editing.
No, man has never been on the moon. NASA freely admits it does not have the technology to put man on the moon today, because the radiation in space would kill them. They openly admit that we need to develop radiation shielding before we go back. How did all the astronauts make it home safe and live long healthy lives then? Man has never left low earth orbit, unless it was in some secret program that isn't public.
I agree we have a secret space program and who knows what it's accomplished, maybe even more than landing on the moon. The public stories of Apollo, the famous quotes like "one step" and the dangers the crew faced and overcame in Apollo 13; that's all a load of crap.
Look into the Van Allen radiation belt, there is also a video of someone from NASA saying we don't know how to go through it.
Then think about Elon's self landing reusable rockets. Think about all the technology and the processing power of all the computers used on board to control the rockets. Remember a 1st generation iPhone was thousands(or more) times faster than computers from the 70s. Then think about how many times spacex failed, but, miraculously, they did it perfectly on the first try with drastically inferior equipment on the moon.
Why didn't Elon just reverse engineer the technology from the 70s?
Good for you! The moon landing is one of the biggest hoaxes ever done against humanity. It amazes me how many people even in this community believe it to have been real.
The only people who think we went to the moon are those who haven't looked into it.
And let me tell you, the moon is only the beginning of what they're lying to us about.
I actually know someone who thinks the last 4 years were a disaster under Trump. They believe the border crisis is his fault. I involuntarily laughed out loud and walked away. ??
I've run into a few idiots like that who even claim that the border wall was never actually built, uh I don't remember the MSM ever trying to claim that hell they've even shown pictures of the wall and him at it claiming he was misappropriating funds for it.
This is my hope. I think even an idiot has to know how awful that looked. It was like a kid submitting a piece of low effort schoolwork just to get a grade.
I did see this! I still stand firm that the videos I’ve seen today have had errors that cannot be attributed to compression, and something was done in post.
If it was layered over him it would have stayed over him the entire time, not clip through him. This was so blatant that even normies are pointing it out to me.
I believe it is unnecessary to form a centralized consensus. As long as it can be talked about and evidence is prioritized, people can make an educated analysis.
We should always handle with care with claims of surety.
(And probably no one should run anywhere as the town crier within 5 minutes of understanding something themselves)
Yeah I completely agree, that’s exactly how to start a conversation. Telling a theory can be unnecessary. Just “hey this looks pretty weird huh”. I think people can redpill themselves and come up with their own conclusions. Truth is objective so I put faith in that. People gotta just keep seeing evidence.
Yeah. I used to try to convince people. Throw fistfuls of data at them but they'd just dig in their heels and refuse to even think about it. Not effective at all.
But asking questions (and sometimes faking like I just noticed something and am confused myself) works much better.
That's nice. Where's mine? Ready to answer why you pinned a post in that same thread by SpeakEasy which encouraged people to question if I am maybe a shill or maybe a guy just asking question?
Ready to answer why our portion of the discussion specifically within that thread is now missing? I have images kept, just in case any other selective edits happen.
You realise the entire time Jeffersonsghostagain was actually supporting the notion the video is fake, unlike me? You just bit his head off because his theory wasn't the same as yours.
You wanted to make an example of me. Lord knows you haven't taken any ownership of your conduct and interaction with me. So here we are. Why the silence? Why the reluctance to answer me? You were quite vocal when you were confident about the issue.
Nice apology. I thank you for it even after you pinning SpeakEasy's post which really just invited non-discerning people to act like total jackasses, downvote like crazy, and tell me what an idiot I must be after trying to offer reasoned discourse as to why Ghost Biden doesn't exist.
I've been here for months and comment daily and one reasoned counter from me was all it took for fools who wanted to curry favor and idiots who love to play with hype trains to go on the attack.
If I offer a contrarian opinion, it isn't about ego or making you or anyone else look stupid. You roll with this shit wholesale, you won't need any help from me to look that way. GA.win has been great for me since the devolution of TD.win into Patriots.win because it had a better class of people who puzzled things out.
I hope it can see a return to form.
EDIT: Could you also clarify why for some reason that the conversation between you and I specifically seems to be missing from the now deleted thread? I was one of the only contrarians in there, yes?
Who cares what the MSM says about Q, Anons, or the so-called Qanon? We know what they are. I don't get this continued concern about what they think of the movement. The way I see it, the more they say and try to debunk, the more of their hand is shown. Even normies will get tired of the same old story. That shouldn't keep us from discussing and pointing out what's going on. I agree that it was edited and release intentionally. So what? That says more about the MSM IMO. Healthy, vigorous debate scares them. Keep it up.
We all have had those moments. We all need to be careful what we post and what we jump on board with. WE are the chosen one's so we must be extract diligent.
This video reminds me of the blue/black white/gold dress debacle. On my phone screen it looks one way, and on my computer screen it looks totally different. It's very bizarre.
Folks ought to study epistemology more and what constitutes "proof" of an assertion. The immediate interpretation of what your senses perceive? Is that reliable in all, or even many, cases?
I'm not sure as someone else pointed out his shoes disappearing at the end of the 30 second clip. It wasn't just the hands is what I am saying. One way or the other, it's odd for the media to release a video so obviously doctored. They usually go to a little more trouble to frame a narrative whatever that might be.
What gives the whole screen away is the people surrounding him, they are dressed for cold weather. An old potus limo, no Marine standing at Marine one. There is also a small car back by the green fence. Odd it is.
On the one hand, kudos for owning what you perceive to be a mistake like this. This is an example for us all...
But on the other hand... who cares?
The video looks manipulated. Almost everyone agrees.
Whether it is manipulated or an illusion, and whether it was a green screen or a normal correction process done before air, it looks manipulated.
Normies should be given the cue to be aware of these things.
And if it was manipulated, but just as some normal, non-nefarious attempt to clean up the video before distribution and some editor left in a layer unintentionally... even better!
Why? Because most people don't realize news clips go through this kind of editing process before distribution. Be honest, how many people here did prior to recently?
I always figured, sure, you grab the raw video, maybe do some color correction and re-encoding, and then chop around some pieces. But once you start getting into motion-detection cut outs and layering and cleaning up things like microphones, that reaches a level of manipulation I assumed reserved for movies and TV shows, not news clips.
So, even if it's normal and accidental, give the normies an excuse to watch this. To analyze it. To hear just how much these news clips are edited "as a matter of course" for "innocent" things like microphones.
Once people start realizing that these videos are chopped up, layers cropped out, cleaned up and re-composited, even for something like these microphones, then it's just one more opportunity for them to consider these possibilities with every video they see thereafter.
In other words, if ABC or CBS does this regularly on every video anyway, it's no longer a stretch for them to be doing it in ways that paint the picture they want to paint instead of reality.
Does it change anything regarding the narrative whether it was green screen or not? I guess green screen means he’s not at the White House and the other option means he is but that there were not enough journalists? Whatever it is, in any case, it doesn’t look good.
I love that you're being cautious! I'm not saying Biden isn't in the whitehouse. I'm just sharing the clip and saying I don't know what to make of this, how about you? That's what I did with my kids in their 20's. I said watch this clip of Biden and tell me if it looks weird to you. They immediately said....omg that's bad cgi!! And I just said...so are you sure that's what it is?? Because it's on various clips shown on various networks? I wonder why they would do that? You can see their wheels turning in their heads! Lol
We don't need to draw conslusions Or give our theorys....because none of us know WTH is going on. It's best to just point out the strange things....the let people eventually draw their own conclusions.
It's my believe that the video of biden himself is authentic. It's the reporters that appear to be a separate layer.
The quality of the work is exceptionally sloppy, almost as though to get caught.
Going forward I think it would be good to have a cool down period on video and audio evidence in general. There needs to be enough time to have people with some knowledge base weigh in on what's being seen.
It's entirely possible the reporters were there and the video was intentionally cropped so we would react and suddenly more evidence to disprove us materializes. There is clearly layering going on, but that doesn't mean the layers were not a copy/remove/paste to purposefully look sloppy.
The communists are not stupid, they only let out into the open what they want seen.
That's all I ever did think was fake about that video, but isn't that enough? Why fake that? Why add microphones to the video? How could the be so careless as to make it so obviously faked?
I don't exactly care what method they used or what exactly was faked. The fact that they needed to edit it at all tells me enough.
I agree that the MSM will spin it in whichever way they see fit. But I think we're well past the point of really caring what the MSM says. I say that because no matter what happens they will always spin it against us. If someone reads about those "crazy Qanons" and still trusts the msm about us then they're still too far off for us to help anyways. Ignorance is a choice, especially nowadays
Indeed, they shouldn't be editing anything! Supposed to be live, that's what the sheep would expect.
...more precisely you started thinking about the why.
I really respect you posting this. People have been jumping on too many ban wagons and chasing too many shiny lures.
AND THOSE LURES DON'T MATTER.
what if it is green screen, then what? What if it is not green screen, then what?
Bottom line and only focus: do you think POTATUS is legitimate or not? Do you think we are being infiltrated or not.
We ain't convincing anyone in the other side that POTATUS is illegitimate because of no damn green screen. Period.
Ask yourself, what is "harm to the community", why do you care about this concept, and how would it stop the Great Awakening?
Can anything stop what is coming?
If not, then why are we concerned about how other's will portray us NO MATTER WHAT? Is it really all up to us to make good optics for things to play out?
Trying to predict what the media will do to discredit us is going to be like pissing into the wind bro. Besides, them catching us out with a visual effect glitch is still them trying to produce fake news.
Appreciate the sentiment, but people all over the map are saying several aspects of this aint right, from lighting to the booms cliiping with biden's arm (or being out of shot in a wider angled frame, but clearly in shot in the narrower frame). Its like they couldnt get alignment between different production crews.
To me this isnt a post editing fail. This didnt get basic editing.
Rand western is still a dirty dicked shill. Look at post history.
Exactly. This is fucking ridiculous. ABC had shit footage. They bodged it together. They fucked it. End of story.
This is how I feel about the entirety of the last six months.
Well they were doing it long before it was legal anyway; moon landings, mockingbird, etc.
No, man has never been on the moon. NASA freely admits it does not have the technology to put man on the moon today, because the radiation in space would kill them. They openly admit that we need to develop radiation shielding before we go back. How did all the astronauts make it home safe and live long healthy lives then? Man has never left low earth orbit, unless it was in some secret program that isn't public.
http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/
I agree we have a secret space program and who knows what it's accomplished, maybe even more than landing on the moon. The public stories of Apollo, the famous quotes like "one step" and the dangers the crew faced and overcame in Apollo 13; that's all a load of crap.
Look into the Van Allen radiation belt, there is also a video of someone from NASA saying we don't know how to go through it.
Then think about Elon's self landing reusable rockets. Think about all the technology and the processing power of all the computers used on board to control the rockets. Remember a 1st generation iPhone was thousands(or more) times faster than computers from the 70s. Then think about how many times spacex failed, but, miraculously, they did it perfectly on the first try with drastically inferior equipment on the moon.
Why didn't Elon just reverse engineer the technology from the 70s?
Good for you! The moon landing is one of the biggest hoaxes ever done against humanity. It amazes me how many people even in this community believe it to have been real.
The only people who think we went to the moon are those who haven't looked into it.
And let me tell you, the moon is only the beginning of what they're lying to us about.
Mega red pills handed out lately have all started with "are you enjoying the show?"
Normies know a shit show when they see one, even if they don't understand.
I actually know someone who thinks the last 4 years were a disaster under Trump. They believe the border crisis is his fault. I involuntarily laughed out loud and walked away. ??
I've run into a few idiots like that who even claim that the border wall was never actually built, uh I don't remember the MSM ever trying to claim that hell they've even shown pictures of the wall and him at it claiming he was misappropriating funds for it.
Jim Acosta learns that walls work-mark dice
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aoEwI91Cpr4
This is my hope. I think even an idiot has to know how awful that looked. It was like a kid submitting a piece of low effort schoolwork just to get a grade.
Still fraudulent
His hand touches one of the microphones though.
https://streamable.com/ughk4q
What about on the other angle? Doesn't look like it ever gets that close on that one.
Where did you get that video....it looks more doctored than the original.
I did see this! I still stand firm that the videos I’ve seen today have had errors that cannot be attributed to compression, and something was done in post.
Thank you ?
More like his little finger just happened to move a little.
If it was layered over him it would have stayed over him the entire time, not clip through him. This was so blatant that even normies are pointing it out to me.
Exactly. No one can pretend it's not fake. There must be a reason it was done so poorly.
It's obviously green screen. That's not even the debate IMO. The question is why was it so obvious...
The masking argument doesn't work because the hand would have disappeared behind the microphone and the blended area if there was a mask.
https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-green-screen-twitter-white-house-immigration-1576743
lol they are trying to say it's normal
I believe it is unnecessary to form a centralized consensus. As long as it can be talked about and evidence is prioritized, people can make an educated analysis.
We should always handle with care with claims of surety.
(And probably no one should run anywhere as the town crier within 5 minutes of understanding something themselves)
?
As long as it is prompting people to wonder/discuss/research, it is helping bring them closer to a red pill moment.
I just say "Wow, that sure looks weird! What do you think?" and let them run with it.
Yeah I completely agree, that’s exactly how to start a conversation. Telling a theory can be unnecessary. Just “hey this looks pretty weird huh”. I think people can redpill themselves and come up with their own conclusions. Truth is objective so I put faith in that. People gotta just keep seeing evidence.
Yeah. I used to try to convince people. Throw fistfuls of data at them but they'd just dig in their heels and refuse to even think about it. Not effective at all.
But asking questions (and sometimes faking like I just noticed something and am confused myself) works much better.
Haha yeah I do that.
Like “reallyyy I don’t know about that” (questioning msm narrative) “I heard...”
That's nice. Where's mine? Ready to answer why you pinned a post in that same thread by SpeakEasy which encouraged people to question if I am maybe a shill or maybe a guy just asking question?
Ready to answer why our portion of the discussion specifically within that thread is now missing? I have images kept, just in case any other selective edits happen.
You realise the entire time Jeffersonsghostagain was actually supporting the notion the video is fake, unlike me? You just bit his head off because his theory wasn't the same as yours.
You wanted to make an example of me. Lord knows you haven't taken any ownership of your conduct and interaction with me. So here we are. Why the silence? Why the reluctance to answer me? You were quite vocal when you were confident about the issue.
We get it, you say it's real lol.
Yeah, I never got the "green screen" claim.
People just kept saying "green screen", and despite reading these threads, I never saw that.
Thank you for your honesty.
There clearly appears to be gratuitous compositing of the microphones, though. That was the initial oddity called out, and for good reason.
Nice apology. I thank you for it even after you pinning SpeakEasy's post which really just invited non-discerning people to act like total jackasses, downvote like crazy, and tell me what an idiot I must be after trying to offer reasoned discourse as to why Ghost Biden doesn't exist.
I've been here for months and comment daily and one reasoned counter from me was all it took for fools who wanted to curry favor and idiots who love to play with hype trains to go on the attack.
If I offer a contrarian opinion, it isn't about ego or making you or anyone else look stupid. You roll with this shit wholesale, you won't need any help from me to look that way. GA.win has been great for me since the devolution of TD.win into Patriots.win because it had a better class of people who puzzled things out.
I hope it can see a return to form.
EDIT: Could you also clarify why for some reason that the conversation between you and I specifically seems to be missing from the now deleted thread? I was one of the only contrarians in there, yes?
Here's the thread: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkvul39J/-psa--there-are-damage-control-s/
Who cares what the MSM says about Q, Anons, or the so-called Qanon? We know what they are. I don't get this continued concern about what they think of the movement. The way I see it, the more they say and try to debunk, the more of their hand is shown. Even normies will get tired of the same old story. That shouldn't keep us from discussing and pointing out what's going on. I agree that it was edited and release intentionally. So what? That says more about the MSM IMO. Healthy, vigorous debate scares them. Keep it up.
I'm with ya!
We all have had those moments. We all need to be careful what we post and what we jump on board with. WE are the chosen one's so we must be extract diligent.
This video reminds me of the blue/black white/gold dress debacle. On my phone screen it looks one way, and on my computer screen it looks totally different. It's very bizarre.
Post of the day. Thank you
Folks ought to study epistemology more and what constitutes "proof" of an assertion. The immediate interpretation of what your senses perceive? Is that reliable in all, or even many, cases?
The boom mics were definitely fake, no green screen, but still fraudulent. Excellent find.
I'm not sure as someone else pointed out his shoes disappearing at the end of the 30 second clip. It wasn't just the hands is what I am saying. One way or the other, it's odd for the media to release a video so obviously doctored. They usually go to a little more trouble to frame a narrative whatever that might be.
I wish I could sticky my own posts...
What gives the whole screen away is the people surrounding him, they are dressed for cold weather. An old potus limo, no Marine standing at Marine one. There is also a small car back by the green fence. Odd it is.
This is part of the reason I don’t think mods should sticky their own posts. One mod in particular (not you) seems to do it just for attention.
Its hard staying on the track, everyone makes an error and thanks for speaking up when you did. ??✝️
On the one hand, kudos for owning what you perceive to be a mistake like this. This is an example for us all...
But on the other hand... who cares?
The video looks manipulated. Almost everyone agrees.
Whether it is manipulated or an illusion, and whether it was a green screen or a normal correction process done before air, it looks manipulated.
Normies should be given the cue to be aware of these things.
And if it was manipulated, but just as some normal, non-nefarious attempt to clean up the video before distribution and some editor left in a layer unintentionally... even better!
Why? Because most people don't realize news clips go through this kind of editing process before distribution. Be honest, how many people here did prior to recently?
I always figured, sure, you grab the raw video, maybe do some color correction and re-encoding, and then chop around some pieces. But once you start getting into motion-detection cut outs and layering and cleaning up things like microphones, that reaches a level of manipulation I assumed reserved for movies and TV shows, not news clips.
So, even if it's normal and accidental, give the normies an excuse to watch this. To analyze it. To hear just how much these news clips are edited "as a matter of course" for "innocent" things like microphones.
Once people start realizing that these videos are chopped up, layers cropped out, cleaned up and re-composited, even for something like these microphones, then it's just one more opportunity for them to consider these possibilities with every video they see thereafter.
In other words, if ABC or CBS does this regularly on every video anyway, it's no longer a stretch for them to be doing it in ways that paint the picture they want to paint instead of reality.
Well check out the haze around the microphone..that's CGI 100% the edges of his suit are blatant too. Monkey Werx touches on it today too.
https://youtu.be/Qt_hmNGQUYw
Does it change anything regarding the narrative whether it was green screen or not? I guess green screen means he’s not at the White House and the other option means he is but that there were not enough journalists? Whatever it is, in any case, it doesn’t look good.
I love that you're being cautious! I'm not saying Biden isn't in the whitehouse. I'm just sharing the clip and saying I don't know what to make of this, how about you? That's what I did with my kids in their 20's. I said watch this clip of Biden and tell me if it looks weird to you. They immediately said....omg that's bad cgi!! And I just said...so are you sure that's what it is?? Because it's on various clips shown on various networks? I wonder why they would do that? You can see their wheels turning in their heads! Lol We don't need to draw conslusions Or give our theorys....because none of us know WTH is going on. It's best to just point out the strange things....the let people eventually draw their own conclusions.
It's my believe that the video of biden himself is authentic. It's the reporters that appear to be a separate layer.
The quality of the work is exceptionally sloppy, almost as though to get caught.
Going forward I think it would be good to have a cool down period on video and audio evidence in general. There needs to be enough time to have people with some knowledge base weigh in on what's being seen.
It's entirely possible the reporters were there and the video was intentionally cropped so we would react and suddenly more evidence to disprove us materializes. There is clearly layering going on, but that doesn't mean the layers were not a copy/remove/paste to purposefully look sloppy.
The communists are not stupid, they only let out into the open what they want seen.
Respect to anyone who can own up to something!
With that said....... why would they add boom mics in post??
That’s the riddle I’m trying to figure out. WHYYYY
Let's see what affect this video has on the masses!
Thanks for this. I'm still getting shit for my own DEBOOONK I did this morning.
That's all I ever did think was fake about that video, but isn't that enough? Why fake that? Why add microphones to the video? How could the be so careless as to make it so obviously faked?