It's funny, I just went and did this myself not 10 minutes ago. USA is 1.8%. That includes all the suicides, poisonings, heart attacks, cardiac arrests, every single flu death, etc. And it doesn't include the many fabled asymptomatic carriers, who never knew they had the virus and thus didn't get tested.
The true survival rate is over 99%.
The true survival rate for people younger than 60 is 99.9%
Having looked at the data, and taking out all the cancer, auto accidents, suicides, flu, etc. deaths the real survival rate is > 99.9% across all age groups.
When you also take out vitamin D deficiency (a problem easier and cheaper to solve than masks) I would guess that survival rate probably goes above 99.99% or better across all age groups.
Under 60 (with Vitamin D) its probably better than 99.9999% (one in a million).
The mortality of SARS-cov-2 might be slightly exaggerated.
True, its easy to forget that,
However, Some people might have a hard time putting that into context.
Luckily we already have a baseline of what an acceptable death rate is its called annual flu deaths,
So that should be the benchmark we compare COVID-19 to to see if this is really as bad as its being stated.
And those figures show that covid is NOT a problem.
I was one of those (few) voices who was concerned about our flu death rates, and the fact that the vaccines seemed to make it worse.
I worked in a program for young kids in my church, and I was pretty adamant that if your kid has flu-like symptoms, please keep them home until they recover. It's just not nice to share the flu with everyone, especially when the symptoms are quite dangerous even for young folk.
So with an estimated world population of 7.8 billion people: 127,641,453 people have allegedly contracted the virus and allegedly 2,791,732 people have died from the virus. That equates to a 1.64% of the world catching the virus and 0.0357914% of the population actually dying from the virus.
Those numbers are low enough to piss off even the village idiot. Just imagine how low that they would be sans all the fuckery in the counting of cases and deaths.
Unfortunately I know way too many people eager to jump on the bandwagon, get tested, and be in the cool group. I also know people directly exposed who never got it, and certainly many who refused to be "tested" for the common cold.
What people need to know is the total mortality. IE, what is the chance I die from it?
Total mortality can be estimated by finding the estimated total infected, which can only be obtained by random sampling. You also need to know how many people are likely to get it, which is a more complicated number to calculate.
The fact that NO ONE talks about these numbers but instead focus on the cas fatality tells you everything you need to know.
Hint: total fatality makes COVID less dangerous than the common cold. You could've calculated this in March of 2020, when the first random sampling of populations were done.
And this is using the 20x (at least) inflated numbers of deaths!
The CDC used to have a page where they showed the numbers of covid deaths where the patient also had heart disease, or suicides, etc. I can't find that page anymore as they have changed it up to show scary graphs. Anyone have a link to it?
Mexico had 2,232,910 Covid cases, with 202,633 deaths? A rate of 9.1%?
Every other nation on Earth was in the 0% to 2% range on Covid deaths... but suddenly Mexico had a 9.1% death rate? Even for the entire world of nations... they stick out like a sore thumb, nearly 4 X higher rate than any other nation.
So a Global pandemic originated in China, but China has only had 101,710 people infected. The fucked up thing is the China number is probably accurate. The rest of the world inflated the numbers to keep the scam alive.
Can anyone tell me how the case fatality rate and the survival rate go together? Can you take the case fatality rate and subtract it from 100 to get the survival rate? Does it work like that?
I find India stats fascinating. Considering that much of their population lives in squalor, you'd think their mortality rates would be the highest, not the lowest. Oh, that's right, they widely used hydroxy chloroquine because it wasn't politicized.
FYI: The CDC is NOT a government institution. It's a privately owned inoculation manufacturing company that is run by two Harry Potter Banking Goblin Bolsheviks.
They advise that the only cure is snake-oil and they just happen to sell snake-oil.
It's funny, I just went and did this myself not 10 minutes ago. USA is 1.8%. That includes all the suicides, poisonings, heart attacks, cardiac arrests, every single flu death, etc. And it doesn't include the many fabled asymptomatic carriers, who never knew they had the virus and thus didn't get tested.
The true survival rate is over 99%.
The true survival rate for people younger than 60 is 99.9%
Having looked at the data, and taking out all the cancer, auto accidents, suicides, flu, etc. deaths the real survival rate is > 99.9% across all age groups.
When you also take out vitamin D deficiency (a problem easier and cheaper to solve than masks) I would guess that survival rate probably goes above 99.99% or better across all age groups.
Under 60 (with Vitamin D) its probably better than 99.9999% (one in a million).
The mortality of SARS-cov-2 might be slightly exaggerated.
When you are dealing with rates like 99%, you need to know the number of 9's.
99% = 1/100 die
99.9% = 1/1000 die
99.999% = 1/100,000 die
True, its easy to forget that, However, Some people might have a hard time putting that into context. Luckily we already have a baseline of what an acceptable death rate is its called annual flu deaths, So that should be the benchmark we compare COVID-19 to to see if this is really as bad as its being stated. And those figures show that covid is NOT a problem.
I was one of those (few) voices who was concerned about our flu death rates, and the fact that the vaccines seemed to make it worse.
I worked in a program for young kids in my church, and I was pretty adamant that if your kid has flu-like symptoms, please keep them home until they recover. It's just not nice to share the flu with everyone, especially when the symptoms are quite dangerous even for young folk.
China: 101k total covid cases? RED FLAG!!!!!!
Yes...very strange indeed. BILLIONS of citizens, and the very ground zero of the “epidemic”. This is completely laughable!
Unless it's China that's being open and honest and the rest of the world that's fabricating the numbers?
That would be quite the mindfuck. Lol.
Yep. I was thinking the same.
If we learn that China are the good guys, I'll have to wear adult diapers for a few weeks...
What if China actually "inflated" their numbers at the start, just to put the fear of god into us????
Makes sense. All the propaganda pushed early on showed people literally collapsing in the streets. Fear mongering to push lockdowns.
They exported most of their cases as well. Early on, they sent thousands of people abroad to spread it far and wide.
With stars on it! (Couldn't resist)
So with an estimated world population of 7.8 billion people: 127,641,453 people have allegedly contracted the virus and allegedly 2,791,732 people have died from the virus. That equates to a 1.64% of the world catching the virus and 0.0357914% of the population actually dying from the virus.
Those numbers are low enough to piss off even the village idiot. Just imagine how low that they would be sans all the fuckery in the counting of cases and deaths.
When are people going to wake the eff up?
LoL
Seeing Mexico's numbers, my first thought is 'Let's totally open the southern border!' ?
10% of the US population has been infected according to the CDC. The radio, newspapers and TV tell me that my county was a hotspot in Michigan.
Yet I dont know a single person that had it and I dont know anyone who even knows anyone who has had it.
If their lips are moving they are lying.
Unfortunately I know way too many people eager to jump on the bandwagon, get tested, and be in the cool group. I also know people directly exposed who never got it, and certainly many who refused to be "tested" for the common cold.
PSSST... case mortality is a useless statistic.
What people need to know is the total mortality. IE, what is the chance I die from it?
Total mortality can be estimated by finding the estimated total infected, which can only be obtained by random sampling. You also need to know how many people are likely to get it, which is a more complicated number to calculate.
The fact that NO ONE talks about these numbers but instead focus on the cas fatality tells you everything you need to know.
Hint: total fatality makes COVID less dangerous than the common cold. You could've calculated this in March of 2020, when the first random sampling of populations were done.
And this is using the 20x (at least) inflated numbers of deaths!
Johns Hopkins also stopped doing gender reassignment surgery due to the suicide rate if I recall correctly.
There's no numbers to work with. The truth has been obfuscated to death. 550,000 dead in this country WE KNOW IS BULLSHIT.
Johns Hopkins also ran Event 201 and an "upcoming scenario" about the 2025 outbreak of SPARS.
The CDC used to have a page where they showed the numbers of covid deaths where the patient also had heart disease, or suicides, etc. I can't find that page anymore as they have changed it up to show scary graphs. Anyone have a link to it?
We should call it CDC, Inc., since its a privat corpo
Mexico had 2,232,910 Covid cases, with 202,633 deaths? A rate of 9.1%?
Every other nation on Earth was in the 0% to 2% range on Covid deaths... but suddenly Mexico had a 9.1% death rate? Even for the entire world of nations... they stick out like a sore thumb, nearly 4 X higher rate than any other nation.
Why would Covid be so deadly in Mexico?
So a Global pandemic originated in China, but China has only had 101,710 people infected. The fucked up thing is the China number is probably accurate. The rest of the world inflated the numbers to keep the scam alive.
Thank you!!!!
Can anyone tell me how the case fatality rate and the survival rate go together? Can you take the case fatality rate and subtract it from 100 to get the survival rate? Does it work like that?
Yes.
If you are not dying with it you are surviving it.
I find India stats fascinating. Considering that much of their population lives in squalor, you'd think their mortality rates would be the highest, not the lowest. Oh, that's right, they widely used hydroxy chloroquine because it wasn't politicized.
https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/hydroxychloroquine-has-become-politicised-in-us-but-india-uses-it-widely-white-house-official-110135
FYI: The CDC is NOT a government institution. It's a privately owned inoculation manufacturing company that is run by two Harry Potter Banking Goblin Bolsheviks.
They advise that the only cure is snake-oil and they just happen to sell snake-oil.
just reminded me, I have to run out and buy another box of masks. JK
Yemen has a 21% fatality rate???
It's often smeared onto the parts of improvised explosive devices from Deep State Supply,
so there are complications doctors are heroically trying to determine the extent of.
Case fatality.
A useless and meaningless statistic with no relevance to total mortality.
Looks like Muslim countries are the best. Time to adopt all Muslim values in the west and end liberalism.
They are in hot sunny countries. Lots of vitamin D.
Ahhh...! But they’ve been using masks longer than any of us.....! ?
WWG1WGA
I wouldn't mind adopting the old Muslim practice of the rooftop push for all liberals