https://www.cisa.gov/safecom/NCSWIC This agency is in charge of securing the elections. NCSWIC means National Council of Statewide Interoperability Coordinators. NCSWIC also refers to Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming. The probability that two 6 letters acronyms to be the same is 1/26^6 (26 letters of the alphabet in 6 positions). This is 1/308 915 776. It's still possible this is a coincidence but I would not bet one penny on it. Is it enough to convince you already ?
Comments (44)
sorted by:
'National Council of Statewide Interoperability Coordinators' does sound forced ?
Lol, It doesn't exactly trip off the tongue, does it?
Wait
Are you saying
Nothing can stop what is coming
supports
Stop What Is Coming?!
Stop What Is Coming: Great Reset
Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming: Great Awakening
?
How many coincidences before mathematically impossible?
If you're a 'woke' sleeper, apparently a lot.
I think you're absolutely correct... also, it's not just enough for the letters to appear, but to also appear IN THAT PARTICULAR ORDER. Nice work, thanks.
There are no coincidences https://i.postimg.cc/MpjXx7gr/no-coincidences.png
https://qalerts.app/?n=4951
I think that is what Q was pointing at here
Says it was established in July 2010 according to the fact sheet on the website. https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/NCSWIC%20Fact%20Sheet_FINAL.pdf
But lets get serious ...the op's math makes no sense and the agency was not started by Trump.....and SURELY does not PROVE a sting operation because NCSWIC is a match....dont get mad and downvote me for talking logic...lol
I hate to let real info get in the way of this discussion but......
Established by the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in July 2010, the National Council of Statewide Interoperability Coordinators (NCSWIC) supports Statewide Interoperability Coordinators (SWIC) from the 56 states and territories, by developing products and services to assist them with leveraging their relationships, professional knowledge, and experience with public safety partners involved in interoperable communications at all levels of government.
OK, but "the plan" did not start in Nov 2016 either.
My understanding is the plan started late 1963.
Yes. After Kennedy's assasination.
Based on what I've found, I agree with you. There has definitely been some form of coordinated effort against the deep state ever since then, if not even earlier.
I think Truman realized his mistake in creating the CIA almost immediately and he admitted as much publicly before his death.
it did ...
do you know when did Q first use NCSWIC?
I am not discounting that they could be related,,be cool if they were, mainly I was commenting about the OP's logic and questionable math used as PROOF of sting.
Post 2494 November 2018
Before the agency was established.
I must have read that wrong and lumped it in with all the other big changes Trump.was doing last summer.
You're right, my bad, just corrected it.
It's n factorial:
The number of ways of arranging n unlike objects in a line is n! (pronounced ‘n factorial’). n! = n × (n – 1) × (n – 2) ×…× 3 × 2 × 1
That would be correct with cards for instance, because if you place a queen of heart, you cannot do it twice, but letters are differents. You could repeat the letter C three times, so I still think my calculations are correct. But now that I think about it the probability that these letters would be in that order, I think, would be (1/(26626526426326226*1)), which would amount to 1/ 222 419 358 720. Tell me if I am wrong.
You’re right that it’s not factorial.
Also in calculating probability we could (just toying around with this statistics problem now) include the chance of two acronyms having identical lengths. Most of these would be length 3 to 6, so that’s a factor four you could include. One in 26^6 x 4 = 1.2 billion.
The real question is, when Chris Kerbs said "This is the most secure election in the history", was it really true? We are seeing that it is indeed turning out to be true, but did he mean it that way? Was he a white hat pretending to be a black hat? So many questions.
Never thought about it that way. With all eyes on it, you could claim it was the most secure election.
1776
There are no coincidences.
Uh, q team literally wrote the acronym, as part of the phrase, then linked their website. So there's no coincidence here. This was specifically called out
You would probably have to weight the probability of each letter to match the probability of being the first in common English words. X and (ironically) Q being somewhat unlikely for example... but yeah.. the basic argument holds.
“Shall we play a game?”
Odds it's not a coincidence is too high.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=ncswis&ia=web
KEK
KEK
I believe you may be off on the odds there as acronyms are not random. For example the number of acronyms beginning with X or Z would be minimal.
You maybe be right but this is going too far for my skills. I invite you to do it if you want the real answer. But this is not the point, which is, this is VERY VERY VERY unlikely that this is a coincidence.