Officials said evidence of systemic fraud has already started to show
(media.greatawakening.win)
? B O O M ! ?
Comments (104)
sorted by:
Why are they discussing "evidence of systemic fraud" this early?
Because as fraud is discovered and more information leaks out about it... it's very difficult for an Arizona judge to step in and halt the audits. The judge would then be complicit in trying to cover-up the election fraud.
Drip, then flow, then current, then bring the damn dam down.
Now say this five times, fast, and while drunk ;)
pedo joe is a pedo piece of xi.
"Don't throw those away I filled out some of those on my own, come on man!"
-Joe Biden
this, this, this, this.
Watch the water. ;-)
The damn dam is such a good metaphor.
I guess we are about to start the 'flow' stage.
Excellent. Thanks for that explanation. (They had previously stated that no information would be shared prior to the final report after the audit was completed - approximately six weeks out). So, I guess they caught the DS sleeping. I think they call this the rope-a-dope.
Exactly
You are wise. ... If ‘officials’ are saying this, then it’s to trip up the whole audit. Official timeline is 6 weeks for the results to be shared.
We best plan for contingencies anyway. They'll be throwing everything they have at this. No more complacency.
Never forget that they staged AZ in order for the MSM to declare Biden winner, it was the first domino they set up. So it needs to be the first to fall...
Good point. A string of warehouse fires across the country starting soon?
ya and what MSM outlet reported xiden the winner before the ballots were counted ?
Ah, excellent connection.
Gosh dang it, I hope we win
What officials?
Names? Job titles? When did they say it, and to who?
If you have this information, fucking put it our already and stop being like MSNBC or NY Times.
Couldn't agree more! Pulitzer said in an interview that results of the audit would not be released until the audit was over. Beware of unnamed officials and sources.
Two down votes for asking for named sources?
Jesus Fbomb Christ what is this site coming to.
Hey down voters, care to elaborate on how reporting "news" from unnamed sources is a good thing?
Always wonder why people act like two downvotes with 10 upvotes on one reasonable post out of hundreads constitutes a "what is this site coming to".
The site is fine, just a minority of retards being retards.
I know, but I am an old man yelling at clouds sometimes. Just gotta vent.
Fair enough haha.
i didnt down vote but it is probably you're unpleasant tone.
Why? So they can be doxxed and their families threatened? Because then they would be exactly like msm nyt
If they can't site their source, they should not report it as news or facts.
I love OAN, but they should not make claims like this, unless they can tell you how they know, otherwise, its just pandering and click baiting.
I get what you mean. I do. Maybe they shouldn't publish any articles at all on it I would rather have no news than have the audit shut down because people were being threatened.
I remember Jovan saying people on his staff were being shot at a couple months ago. I can't remember which state it was.
https://archive.is/TgI7I
Here is an archived link to the article before they changed it.
Interesting. Looking like Dr. Steve Pieczenik will ultimately be vindicated after all. Seems he was wrong about the timing of the reveal, but right about the watermarks. Good for him. I always generally liked the guy for the most part.
Just in time for the fire
Eyewitnesses say a Tyrannosaurus Rex was spotted trampling the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum last night, reducing the venue to rubble and triggering a tsunami that washed all traces of ballots away.
The surprise attack is the first T-Rex sighting in Arizona in over 150 million years. Experts are unsure of what prompted the attack, but are citing climate change as a contributing factor.
When asked to comment whether other areas of the United States should be concerned, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki mentioned conditions looking similar in New Hampshire and Georgia as other likely locations habitable by the T-Rex, but said she would have to circle back with more details.
Hey... if the libs could do this, they WOULD! LOL
????
Why didn't the dems just destroy the ballots you know like deleting emails and smashing phones because you can get away with that
Because they’re extremely lazy and arrogant. They assume the media will cover for them, while they use their own criminal influence to get judges and lawyers to back off
After 9/11 happened, on all the official online remembrances, the crooks only bothered to fill in identities of 300-400 of the ‘victims.’ Almost all the people who ‘died’ are nothing more than a name and a shitty low quality picture. And nobody ever challenged them on that, so why would they think they’d get challenged on this sort of thing? Normies just repeat the meme “not everyone came from a loving family,” to explain away the fact that no obituaries or remembrances or memories were given for 75% of the ‘victims.’
I guess my point is every criminal endeavor they pull off is riddled with holes that they never bother to go patch up. It’s why it’s all so obvious to anyone who looks with an open mind.
Great points. The bottom line is question everything. The holes are there for anyone that bothers to look.
Who is to say they didn't?
There was a lot of time before the audits began. One of the theories floating around is they destroyed extremely fabricated ballots a long time ago, and use this time to print ballots that were cleaner and would less likely fail a scrutiny test.
That is why the blacklights are being used. I don't know for sure if they are checking for water marks, but they are definitely checking for something, most likely folds or fingerprints.
That is why the testing appears to be extremely thorough, they look like they are photographing every single ballot and tagging results to them.
I originally thought they were looking for fingerprints (as a printed stack would have few or none), but saw the auditors were not wearing gloves.
We don't know for sure what the black lights are testing. But they are looking for "something" when using them.
Noticed that too
I saw a post on Gab that they're using them to look for oils left by human handling.
Black lights can also show differences in the paper. One more simple way to tell a counterfeit ballot from a real one - the paper itself. There should be a record of a legitimate printing company and the type of paper they used for printing ballots. So, unless the counterfeit ballots from China used the exact same paper, oops. The same holds true for inks. These are actually pretty ingenious and low tech ways to verify a real ballot from a counterfeit. The Dems are not that smart. Watermarks would be great, but in the end not necessary.
I think a combination of arrogance (thought they were too smart to get caught) and ignorance (didn't think there was a possibility of a watermark) is why they didn't destroy the ballots. Of course, an alternative theory is that they planned for this audit all along, made sure all traces of fraud were deleted, acted like they were really worried about being audited, only to say after it's all done, "See, there was no fraud!".
Ballots, by law, are supposed to be held for at least 24 months after an election. If they destroyed the ballots a few months after an election, I'm sure that would of sparked some sort of investigation. There wouldn't be any good excuse to justify destroying the ballots.
Well, elections, by law, are supposed to not be rigged :-)
I don't think the DS really cares about the law...
Its over for the deep state. This is it. The military has been in control of the country since Trump left and set the stage for this moment. I think the storm has arrived frens, Time to buckle up. If this don't bear fruit i dont know what will. If this turns out to be a nothing burger...How the hell are you then suppose to red pill the public?? Nah, this is it. We have them.
Trump warned them 6 months or more before the election that the ballots were going to be marked.
He was fighting it back in 2018, got a lot of pushback.thats when he got the Dems to help him write that EO on election fraud.
Are we clear that almost ALL SYSTEMS are controlled by the lunatic LEFT? So it is not surprised we already had a systemic racism.
Until the official results are released, I'm not buying it...especially not from OAN.
That's what I figured. Even with their track record, they're not daft enough to post stuff like that.
https://archive.is/TgI7I
https://archive.is/TgI7I
It’s not manipulated. They changed it after they posted, here is an archived link from before.
Good for OAN to report on the fraud. Too bad they took it down. Glad to be wrong this is some top quality hopium.
Faurk, OAN should be arrested for hopium dealing SRS. I am over dosing right now.
https://archive.is/TgI7I
I wonder, how are MSM going to spin this?
"Recounts say that Biden cheated. Here's why that's okay."
"Recounts are the modern tool of white nationalism. Accountability of agents of social justice might stymie efforts to help victims of racism."
"Votes magically changed by the Trump administration and hacker known as 4chan."
Lmao??
The Schopenhauer Effect • Joining the march of progress in science (in any field) has its dangers. New ‘truths’ and ‘paradigms’, such as ‘heuristics’, are rarely, if ever, immediately accepted. • As the German philosopher Schopenhauer (1788–1860) put it: • “All truth passes through three stages: – First it is ridiculed, – Second it is violently opposed, – Third it is accepted as being self-evident”.
Yes, steal the left's terminology. It's systemic. Take that you commies...
Does anyone know how far away the AZ fire is from where the audit is happening?
THIS IS A FAKE! GO TO OAN'S SITE AND THIS GREEN HIGHLIGHTED SEGMENT IS NOWHERE TO BE FOUND! BE CAREFUL FRENS, THEY WANT US SPREADING FAKE STORIES! https://www.oann.com/
It was stealth-edited later: https://archive.is/TgI7I
Systemic or systematic? There's a difference which is quickly becoming lost.
OMFG this is so lame, they fuckin removed that sentence and changed the title... ugh -_-
And yet they kept the same "Updated at 8:27 AM PT" timestamp. That is deceitful.
Edit: Proof that there was reference to fraud, the URL still works and has the word fraud in it: https://www.oann.com/ariz-audit-underway-officials-finding-signs-of-fraud/
Sigh, you are correct. They removed the "systemic fraud" line.
Proof.
https://files.catbox.moe/txoo3r.jpg
Updated archive https://archive.is/1VQoP
We all know there’s fraud and it will be exposed but I want to keep the hopium pure. Thank you.
Looks like I'm late to the party. I just said the same thing.
I'll delete my reply.
They removed the "systemic fraud" line.
Proof.
https://files.catbox.moe/txoo3r.jpg
Updated archive https://archive.is/1VQoP
I’m sure the audit will reveal fraud. I’m hoping something will be done about it. Hopefully they don’t have to audit every state before they(DS) admit to the fraud.
I'll believe it when something gets done about it.
they know what they are looking for, the deepstate got set up.
Wait, wait. Of COURSE there's systemic fraud! Did you not read the fine print of Biteone's Infrastructure Bill? We're PAYING to have systemic fraud; the finest and most advanced systemic fraud in the WORLD!
AND, there will be systemic racism and systemic corruption and systemic two-tier justice. NOBODY does systemic failure and rot like Joe B and the DEMONcrats (they're gonna be on tour; get your tickets now...)
Careful there, it's starting to get racist.
These people aren't even smart enough to destroy the fake ballots? In 5 months? Weird, it's like they were set up almost.
PlumberFag has it. Bet they will use this as a lame defense when shit hits the fan:
“We were SET UP! (Um, yeah we corrected some “unreadable” ballots), but we didn’t destroy ballots, Your Honor. See, that shows we had no ill intent. WE WERE SET UP! Framed! Trump and THE RUSSIANS did it!!
Oh my so the ballots ARE watermarked?
That's assuming that they actually turn up anything this time. I'm not saying they won't, but until the final results come down it's best to treat this with a grain of salt. By all means hope, but be prepared for the possibility that this could end up being a bust.
As an auditor there are two things you don't do.
Systemic racism? ( No)
Systemic fraud? Hell yes! ?
I hope they have land and air military security.
Might have been posted already, but someone yesterday pointed out that ultra-violet lights would not be used for a watermark check, as normal lights can check for those. Apparently the ultra violet lights check for oil residue, evidence that the ballot has been handled by a human not a machine.
I don't think so. They are not wearing gloves. Possibly looking for creases. If they were watermarked, We don't know the method used. That watermark may only show up under that kind of light.
Ok don't want to be a mood killer - I'm hoping a fellow pede can just explain this... The constitution says that once the states sign off on the election and Congress confirms it (on January 6th), the president is inaugurated on January 20th. There's no caveat or exception outlined in the constitution saying:
So can a fellow pede please explain "objectively* and constitutionally what happens next after sufficient fraud is shown? I haven't seen any legal evidence that shows Trump can just waltz in with evidence of rampant fraud and become president again. Even if the entire thing was fraudulent, the states signed off and Congress confirmed the results, so what else can be done? The only viable path I can even think of is a constitutional amendment which would have to be ratified by 2/3rd of Congress, is that the plan?