Nobody knows where the term it came from officially. However it has been pieces to simple "Bongo" drum pot smoking, to the Bongo antelope (from Africa), to the term Mandingo.
The point is that regardless if the term is racist (or not as some claim), the term is charged enough to make us look foolish or racist, and that is the sort of fuel the left needs to demonize us and the movement. We have to be smarter than that.
Besides, we are clever enough to come up with better insults for Obama.
True but still not racist. Too much "racist" bullshit has been thrown around trying to demonize anyone who goes against the narrative of the globalists. That is the bigger picture.
The term is definitely perceived as a racist slur by many, and that is the way I learned the term many years ago. And there are many people like me that only SEE the term as racist.
When you have a term like that is seen that way, using it will automatically taint the movement.
If you want the movement to grow, you need to be aware of how your speech is interpreted. I guarantee you there are tons of unawakened folks that come here only to be turned off by some of the stupid shit people say here with impunity. So regardless of what you believe the term is or isn't, the point is perception. This is how the media and libs have been winning the fucking normie media war against us. If we didn't have memes to wake some folks up, we'd be in interment camps at this point.
The Q movement is about being smart and perceptive. And there is nothing that is further from both of those things than not understanding the origin of language and how it is perceived by everybody around you.
I learned it from people using it as a racist term. That said, how do I know its not racist, nor OP was not using it in that regard when my only knowledge of the word is from a racist standpoint?
And that's point. PERCEPTION. OPTICS.
You are arguing absolutes. Black and whites. Yes there is black in white in the world. There is also a shit ton of gray.
Regardless of what you believe, the bottom line is that it is perceived as racist by some, and you are playing the race baiters game. That word is by definition: GRAY. By defending the term you are automatically:
a) put on the backfoot by defending it against the race baiters
b) automatically dismissed by folks that have already made up their mind
The smart thing is to not use the term at all. You don't give the race baiters ammo, and you don't scare off the folks on the fence. But defending it? That is a hill you are going to die on because you will NEVER win that battle.
But feel free to defend the term, assume my understanding of the term, or assume my knowledge of how OP was using it. It is what the psychopaths do on the left.
LoL ok. I find this rhetoric amusing considering you said this:
"Downvote those that don't groupthink. This place is becoming a shithole like td.w did."
And you are telling me to fuck off because when I am doing the very thing you railed against: accepting group think, and being downvoted because I had another opinion or viewpoint that is valid.
Hey look! Words with multiple syllables. Your parents must be so proud. They must be disappointed you don't know the difference between your and you're though. I mean you could of really showed them with that sentence you just wrote since they both should have been used in it.
They might have been proud enough to claim you, and you could have been introduced to the rest of your family finally. It would have been your day to shine!
Check into the degenerate artist (Kehinde Wiley) that Obama specifically chose to paint it. He puts images of sperm into his paintings....its kinda his thing.
Obamas portrait is no different. Features a 'hidden' sperm going down the rightside of his hairline (pics in the VC link posted below).
Vigilant Citizen did a good write up of the weird artist and painting. The painter was called out as showing “predatory behavior” in the past:
Its funny cause when you see al the other presidential portraits 0bama just looks like the clown he is and when in the years to come people will look at him and laugh as its just such a terrible portrait of a terrible puppet president.
I'd prefer the picture of President Trump hugging the American flag. This picture doesn't even have an American flag in it. Still a nice picture of GEOTUS.
Obongo sure looks like a jackass. It what galaxy does obungo look like art? Classless commie...
u/#trump4eva
It's a tactic for normies who don't genuinely understand art presentations.
He is made with vibrant colors and backgrounds to portray he is more down to earth, and vibrant colors present his supposed personality.
That I agree, but that doesn't mean the methods aren't tried.
I prefer the "presidential" presentations of our presidents, regardless if I am fond of them or not.
Watch the racist shit. I don't like Obama either, but calling him that makes us look as the bad as the left.
There was nothing racist in his post. Name calling may be juvenile but it is not racist.
Nobody knows where the term it came from officially. However it has been pieces to simple "Bongo" drum pot smoking, to the Bongo antelope (from Africa), to the term Mandingo.
The point is that regardless if the term is racist (or not as some claim), the term is charged enough to make us look foolish or racist, and that is the sort of fuel the left needs to demonize us and the movement. We have to be smarter than that.
Besides, we are clever enough to come up with better insults for Obama.
True but still not racist. Too much "racist" bullshit has been thrown around trying to demonize anyone who goes against the narrative of the globalists. That is the bigger picture.
Its about OPTICS.
The term is definitely perceived as a racist slur by many, and that is the way I learned the term many years ago. And there are many people like me that only SEE the term as racist.
When you have a term like that is seen that way, using it will automatically taint the movement.
If you want the movement to grow, you need to be aware of how your speech is interpreted. I guarantee you there are tons of unawakened folks that come here only to be turned off by some of the stupid shit people say here with impunity. So regardless of what you believe the term is or isn't, the point is perception. This is how the media and libs have been winning the fucking normie media war against us. If we didn't have memes to wake some folks up, we'd be in interment camps at this point.
The Q movement is about being smart and perceptive. And there is nothing that is further from both of those things than not understanding the origin of language and how it is perceived by everybody around you.
What is labeled "racist" now is the repetition by race baiters saying that it is so. That does not make it racist. It is all a lie.
There was nothing racist by the OP and you know it.
No I don't know it.
I learned it from people using it as a racist term. That said, how do I know its not racist, nor OP was not using it in that regard when my only knowledge of the word is from a racist standpoint?
And that's point. PERCEPTION. OPTICS.
You are arguing absolutes. Black and whites. Yes there is black in white in the world. There is also a shit ton of gray.
Regardless of what you believe, the bottom line is that it is perceived as racist by some, and you are playing the race baiters game. That word is by definition: GRAY. By defending the term you are automatically:
a) put on the backfoot by defending it against the race baiters b) automatically dismissed by folks that have already made up their mind
The smart thing is to not use the term at all. You don't give the race baiters ammo, and you don't scare off the folks on the fence. But defending it? That is a hill you are going to die on because you will NEVER win that battle.
But feel free to defend the term, assume my understanding of the term, or assume my knowledge of how OP was using it. It is what the psychopaths do on the left.
Bing bing bongo
Nobody here gives a fuck about what they perceive as racist. You can fuck off too.
I won't fuck of. And people do in fact care. Understanding language is how you win debates and win over people.
And so do you. That is why you took the time to respond.
Use your brain and act like an adult instead of trying to dismiss discourse.
Or continue to try to shut down discussion you don't like. Like the psychotic lefties do.
Nah you can fuck right on off. Go have a circle crying session with Obongo.
LoL ok. I find this rhetoric amusing considering you said this:
"Downvote those that don't groupthink. This place is becoming a shithole like td.w did."
And you are telling me to fuck off because when I am doing the very thing you railed against: accepting group think, and being downvoted because I had another opinion or viewpoint that is valid.
I'll go to my circle cry session now hypocrite.
I'm telling you to fuck off because Obongo isn't racist just because you think it is.
If we went by the Leftist definition of racist, everything would be racist and we wouldn't be having a conversation at all.
You're the one trying to get the rest of us to subscribe to this groupthink version of "racism."
Again, fuck off.
Your a dullardly half wit and a credit to your parents lack of both skill and discernment.
Hey look! Words with multiple syllables. Your parents must be so proud. They must be disappointed you don't know the difference between your and you're though. I mean you could of really showed them with that sentence you just wrote since they both should have been used in it.
They might have been proud enough to claim you, and you could have been introduced to the rest of your family finally. It would have been your day to shine!
Obungo. Jungle Obungo.
Obama's portrait is sort of weird looking. Whereas Trump's looks presidential.
If you didn't know who these men were, and had to guess which was a world leader...
Are those shrubs evergreen? Seems like a really strange portrait if it didn't have symbolism
Jokes on Obama then...because his portrait doesn't demean the office of POTUS, it demeans him.
History will show Obama’s portrait was as perfect for him as his code name, Renegade.
It's like that shrub is ready to devour BO.
"Feed me, Seymore!
Check into the degenerate artist (Kehinde Wiley) that Obama specifically chose to paint it. He puts images of sperm into his paintings....its kinda his thing.
Obamas portrait is no different. Features a 'hidden' sperm going down the rightside of his hairline (pics in the VC link posted below).
Vigilant Citizen did a good write up of the weird artist and painting. The painter was called out as showing “predatory behavior” in the past:
https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/strange-facts-obamas-portrait-painter-kehinde-wiley/
Mike Obamas portrait is also terrible. It looks nothing like Mike. The face is completely unrecognizable.
Comparison pics of Mike portrait: Pic 1 and Pic 2
Additionally, feel free to reference this dig by Decoding Symbols - it goes into the political statement of the piece, as well as the 6 fingers.
I would LOVE To acquire this Presidential Portrait of President Donald J Trump
Hope that it will become available for Patriots
WWG1WGA
Yes Obama, you are a joke to us....
Looks like a child did sorotos with crayons.
Obama with a sperm on his head and a huge dick for his left forearm. What a fucking joke of a president.
Are those flags of the military branches behind Trump? As Commander in Chief. Where is the Space Force flag?
Those military flags in the background tho. ?
Only thing missing from the Obama portrait are the Monarch butterflies.
Unless, Obama is the Monarch butterfly.
Anyone ever figure out what the extra finger means? Him and Clinton had it
Obummer looks like a weak traitorous weasel that has to hide in the bushes so he can spy on elected officials. That picture was a give away.
Serious Churchill vibes going on here
Love the warm color palette of GEOTUS. The highlights and shadows are very well done, unlike HUSSEIN'S giant hands, weird angles, and sperm highlights
Obama is such a weak looking person. I'll bet his is about 65.
17 on the flag too
Os legs far apart like he's ready to enjoy himself
Its funny cause when you see al the other presidential portraits 0bama just looks like the clown he is and when in the years to come people will look at him and laugh as its just such a terrible portrait of a terrible puppet president.
Replacing?
Yeah for some reason people think they only have one portrait at a time hanging up in the Smithsonian.
The same troglodytes who don't realize Trump is part of the Deep state too!
Obama been gona 4 years but still giving me migraines.
The fact that the “artist” that did Obama’s portrait used photoshop and made such a poor effort- speaks volumes
He is a laughingstock. My grandkids can do better, and have
One leads The other weeds.
A guy ready to jump up and do something vs. a guy lounging in a slave garden.
I'd prefer the picture of President Trump hugging the American flag. This picture doesn't even have an American flag in it. Still a nice picture of GEOTUS.
Ole spermhead looks idiotic in the bushes.
Obummers portrait looks eerily similar to the Podesta "art".