Holy cow. My mind is blown. Everything from the title, to the director dying 5 days after submitting the final cut, to the location chosen to film the cult party. These links are a long read but a great explanation of the movie.
So many unbelievable things that I've come across in this group are confirmed by this movie. I saw someone mention it in a comment months ago and glad I finally came around to watching it. It was very strange in the beginning, but you have to remember you're not watching a regular movie, you're watching someone trying to show you what's going on without explicitly saying it. After reading the above articles I am just blown away.
Apparently, the released cut has about twenty minutes of footage removed from it. When Kubrick presented the movie, Hollywood wanted all the parts that alluded to child sacrifice/abuse taken out. Kubrick refused, and that's why he was killed. But they forgot to remove the part at the very end where you can see the main couple's daughter being approached and led off by two of the cultists.
They don't care if you think they're wacky occult worshippers, they just didn't want anyone to know they were baby-eaters.
Reminder Kubrick was a /pol/ anon and said moonlandings were faked, by him.
Oh yea got sauce would like to see that! Even screen grabs be fine :)
Yeah, that shit really happened and we are left with the final cut. Never set right with me but I've been digging into shit for over 25 years. NCSWIC is my new motto and has given me life to continue. We are living in biblical times. Remember they have to show and tell, something about free will. These people are sick.
Nicole Kidman said almost as much in an interview at the time, then said she lost jobs for daring to say anything.
She said he plans multiple movies ahead of time, and the next one was going to be specifically about pedos in hollywood - and hinted strongly thats why he was killed.
If I had watched that movie when it was originally released: “What a weird, shitty movie.”
Watching it now after learning pieces of what goes on in the elite circle: “Holy shit.”
They have always told us via movies. Go watch the follow up to The Shining (also Kubrick) called Dr Sleep. Disturbing for sure.
Watch Rosemary's Baby! All the Hollywood stars love Polanski, and that movie is pretty eye opening into their worship of the devil.
For me always the scariest horror movie, because it seemed so real. The way the evil people just blend in and seem normal. The husband's ability to rationalize to get what he wants. Very scary.
Polanski also directed Chinatown - which I can't remember well as it's been decades. But I did just read yesterday that it's essentially about the Chandler family's shady dealings in LA.
Probably ties into This Post by u/sempersupra (haven't read it yet).
Remember when Tom cruise kept going to the rainbow costume shop, and he saw the owners underage daughter with grown men ? What ever she whispered to Tom cruise was the entire point of the movie. At the end of the movie, Tom Cruise's daughter is seen leaving the toy store with two grown men . I swear tom cruise and Nicole Kidman gave their daughter to the cult and became members....the movie is that freaky.
McCanns.
Eesh that's a disturbing thought.
That I have seen
Yes, she was. Apparently if you watch the scene where they are talking while their daughter is taken you'll see a teddy bear in the background behind Tom and Kim. When the camera first shows it there is nothing on it, when the camera shows the bear again there is now a doll in a dress similar to their daughter's sitting on the bear's lap. This was Kubrick's way of subtly telling the truth of their daughter's fate.
He used teddy bears (in the Shining too) as comms for pedos. Teddy bears = pedo in Kubrick movies. Their daughter is now in the lap of the teddy bears.
There was a teddy bear in Full Metal Jacket as well.
There is a ton of Over the Rainbow symbolism in that film. Check out Rob Ager's breakdown of just one weird aspect of it HERE.
Ager is a phenomenal film student and I consider just about everything he does essential. He points out stuff that we, as Q, know has double meanings. He knows it has double meanings as well - his work on The Shining has his most explicit takes. For some reason he shies away from commiting to the "out there" theories he wants to present with EWS (even mentioning in some "I want to preface this..." Etc to let you know he's holding back. Probably doesn't want to be killed.
He also has a site where he sells in-depth extra analysis (his free stuff is AMAZING I assume the pay stuff is jaw dropping), and "funnily enough" most of his extensive EWS material is behind this paywall. Hrmmm. ?
Anyway, the big 3 of The Shining, EWS and 2001 are all about different aspects of EVIL and GOOD, and they all relate to the Cabal. Twin Peaks does as well.
Nicole Kidman was a major red pill if you know what I mean, say no more, nudge nudge wink wink...
Nicole Kidman's father: Dr. Antony Kidman
Dr. Antony Kidman died Friday after fleeing Australia when accused of the sexual abuse and murder of children in an elite Sydney pedophile ring. A month prior Fiona Barnett had filed a complaint with the Australian NSW police and Child Abuse Royal Commission alleging Kidman’s sexual and physical assaults on her throughout childhood. When the Commission opened an investigation the clinical psychologist suddenly left his 43 years with the Sydney University of Technology and Royal North Shore Hospital to stay in Singapore until he died. The family has refused to comment and Singapore police opened an investigation on what they termed as an unnatural death. https://brutalproof.net/2020/11/nicole-kidmans-father-satanist-silenced-by-his-own-ninth-circle-satanic-cult/
There used to be interviews on you tube of Fiona Barnett. She claimed that Nicole actually observed her abuse at one point.
Anyone who thinks Nicole Kidman is anything less than a practicing Satanic witch in naive. That interview is something else!
That explains her playing one in the movie remake of the sitcom, Bewitched.
She also played in a movie called Practical Magic with Sandra Bullock. If you've ever seen The Golden Compass, she plays a woman who is after children and is trying to steal what is basically their soul, but they call the "soul" companion creature a demon. That movie is so metaphorical for what the luciferian cult is actually doing with kids.
Whoa Nelly....
Fiona Barnett remembers seeing Nicole, and Nicole seeing her.
i second that
When I was on twitter I followed Stanley Kubrick's daughter, Vivian. Exchanged a few mssgs with her. (about art...nothing earthshattering).
You may be pleased to know that she is TOTALLY red pilled. Trump/Q supporter. Anti globalist. She left the platform once but returned a few months later. I'll have to go back on to see if she's still there or has been banned by now, lol.
Kubrick hadn’t made a movie in 12 years and anticipation was huge. It was a three year shoot too, which is unprecedented in Hollywood, as Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman basically had to put their careers on hold for this. And for those three years rumours were flying around about what Kubrick was making and what was happening on the set. People also knew that Kubrick hadn’t let the studio see what he was doing for those three years, so by the time he showed his first cut, it was public knowledge that was happening. At that point it was known in the public as an essentially finished film, given how perfectionistic Kubrick was. So even if they kill him off, they can’t shelve the movie because people know he delivered a finished cut that would be presentable.
My theory would be that they offed him for talking about it, as punishment. They don't care that we know, thats why they leave clues/symbols everywhere. They think we're all stupid anyway and I'm sure there's lots of people who think it's just a bad movie.
That would have raised so much more suspicion.
This way, he dies “naturally” and the version the came out is “basically what he wanted it to be” without anyone else to call the studio out on it.
What was left on the cutting room floor had to be so much more damaging.
Completely ghosting the movie and putting it on the shelf would have drawn ire from Kubrick’s massive following.
So when "conspiracy nuts" point out how true this is, the "Mainstream Media" can say they are nuts who got it from a movie. Evil is real.
I wish we could see the version Kubrick wanted us to see
You can if you know what to look for. That's why motion pictures are so powerful - symbolism.
Check out Rob Ager's work on it.
Edit: I get your point though - not trying to be difficult. And I agree.
I work in the industry and have been blessed to be able to have made my own films.
Being a big Kubrick fan I’ve broken down many of his films, especially 2001, clockwork and EWS. He was one of the few directors to have had true sway over his final cuts.
Massive difference between what was put on the cinema screen and what the his true vision was.
If the ~20 min rumor is true, that’s a MASSIVE amount of information that would have been conveyed. Especially with the talent of Kubrick.
Those 20 min must have been DAMNING
Wait until you learn about Room 237.
Kubrick knew some shit, and hid his knowledge in all of his films.
*adds to watchlist
What about Lolita, isn't that about a pedophile?
Yes. Haven't seen it in decades, it's on my rewatch short list though. I figure it's going to be plain as day what it's about - so not super high priority. I would really like to revisit all of his work, especially Strangelove and Barry Lyndon. I've never seen his earliest stuff, so have to remedy that as well. It'll be interesting to see how much of their secrets he gave out during his career.
Fun fact: Kubrick and David Lynch are Crispin Glover's aka "Mr. I want to assfuck Steven Spielberg to death" (his words, not mine!) favorite directors. I don't think it's a coincidence. Search "[HOLLYWOOD]" (with the brackets) on this forum for my post about if interested.
Yea but that doc is rubbish IMHO and even Jay Widner doesn't present his better work in it. I recommend staying away from it until you've exhausted many other resources.
Rob Ager is an interesting source on Kubrick and many other movies.
http://www.collativelearning.com
Old school website - http://www.collativelearning.com/FILMS%20reviews%20BY%20ROB%20AGER.html
This was a great read at the time from 2000.
"I'm sure you are aware of the extremely grave potential for social shock and disorientation caused by this information. We can't release it without proper conditioning" - Heywood Floyd
https://rense.com/general7/alchemkubrick.htm
Was Kubrick a WhiteHat at his core?
He was an artist deeply involved with the filth of Hollywood and probably even higher up (NASA) who probably found them repellent and sent the world messages about it in the best way available to him at the time: deeply symbolic films.
My man!
Rob Ager on YouTube has THE best The Shining takes around. The rest of these theories are essentially child's play in comparison.
Exaggerating, there's a lot of good work out there of course. But if you've watched Room 237, you're the type who'd love Ager. ?
That movie was creepy AF.
If you look at all of Kubricks movies, they are nearly all virtually the same storyline, using the same central character, and plot line/themes, he basically kept making the same movie!
Kubrick wanted to make a lot of money and he was talented in many respects, he was also NY jew so has that wit and humour.
I read once Kubrick repines to "you can't polish a turd"... was "actually you can if you freeze it"
Stanely Kubrick and David Lynch (Twine Peaks, Dale Cooper) used the same technique. The central character actually represent you the viewer, you are the one wandering around the storyline, finding the clues, discovering a very dark and hidden world slowly being revealed to you. It's very clever device.
You get it. Very well said. F5 and read some corroborative info that I've posted here if you feel like it. ?
The uncut version is my fav.
https://independentaustralia.net/life/life-display/trapped-inside-australias-vast-child-abuse-network-part-1,6460
I really have to be in the right kind of mood to watch "Eyes Wide Shut". The first time I saw it, I thought "freaky":. After hopping aboard the Q train, the adjective I use is "horrifying" especially at the end of the movie with the daughter.
Just like the girl in the movie. Tried to brush it off to him just being old I'm sure.
Fun fact: Kubrick had a 4 hour+ work print of EWS.
After Kubrick's death Steven Spielberg was brought in by Warners to "trim up" the film to be presentable to an audience.
There is no doubt Kubrick's true vision of the movie is not the one we are being shown.
Damn. That was a heck of a read.
Several movies that I first watched many years ago that I didn't particularly like that much at the time are now hugely relevant and require a second viewing. V For Vendetta was the first such film and on second viewing I was blown away after watching it, now that the fog has been lifted from my eyes and I can now accept what is not only possible but happening all around us. I will have to give Eyes Wide Shut another viewing as well. If we get to the point where Soylent Green becomes relevant; which if things don't turn around I am sure it will; then I will know it is time for drastic measures!
Soylent Green was a great movie. I've watch it several times. Indeed we could be in that sort of situation soon.
Same experience with V for Vendetta here. Watched it again relatively recently when the plandemic was getting going and I wasn't Q Pilled yet - in retrospect I think it definitely primed me for the Great Awakening.
I couldn't finish that movie. I don't remember how far I got into it - he was in the 'the mansion' seeing all the activities. I had to Pause but I never went back. I won't go back to it for more valiant reasons either, but I'm grateful others will for me.
My wife's like this - she knows but doesn't feel the need to subject herself to everything that proves it. There's certainly something to be said about avoiding things you know will upset you further if you already get the gist of the reason to be upset. God Bless you!
I did not like the way the movie made me feel. To the questions of why would they release the movie if it was exposing them. My answer would be it is just another form of their magic. Casting a spell.
The Shining Forwards and Backwards is interesting. It seems Kubrick was telling multiple stories at the same time. The horror story, a story about faked moon landing and consequences of talking, and a story about pedophilia.
Not familiar with this, thanks! There's a long history of playing music both backwards alone (A. Cr_wley espoused this in Magick) and concurrently (apparently Kubrick? Boards of Canada do this a lot).
Definitely voodoo there. A lot of it used for evil. Sometimes used for good.
I didn't know that about the shining, guess I'll have to look into that more!
For those interested, here is an old school moon landing website link with it's own dedicated post:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJLFXbjq/oldschool-moon-landing-website-h/
This is a good little doc on the movie. https://www.bitchute.com/video/qYe3kTevBI3V/
And her is one about him talking about the moon landing. https://www.bitchute.com/video/TKTImvoMQ092/
I’m adding this movie to my watch list. Can’t believe I’ve never seen it. Thanks for the reco.
Yes that is one unappealing film.
Oh yea and how could you forget (easy if you did not know) - The orgy scenes and masked ball were shot on location in a Rothschild Mansion in Britain.
This movie confused a lot of people at the time, but they had not the insight or symbolic knowledge to understand what they were showing.
The audience were as good as walking around with their eyes wide shut to the secret world right in front of their faces, Kubrick was showing them by opening the eye of the camera on that world.
So you either believe Kubrick was carefully outing as best he could those who run this world like his daughter claims, or he was used for controlled release.
I think he did the deal with the devil to help perfect the filming techniques (done in the UK at the same time 2001 was being shot in pinewood) and regretted it as it almost cost him his soul as such - the shinning plot as originally outlined by Jay Weidner (but he moved all his info online) was on the money here, it's about Kubrick brush with the DS back then around the moon landings... ROOM 237 is a misdirection IMHO do not watch it until you have done lots of other digging.
BTW how do you folk think Kubrick got the super duper low like aperture lenses winged for the black of deep space from NASA to shoot Barry Lyndon scenes by candle light?
A cinematic first! (another film about an outsider allowed into the inner circles)
Original cuts of the 2001 credit NASA and a whole host of other agencies still around today all involved in the Moon program. Later versions the credits are gone.
You need to watch all of Kubrick smokes and the Shinning is not the only one that deals with the Moon Landings.
You all need to watch Clockwork Orange.
Opening scene and early dialogue. Seriously. If you spot the various clues. You will fall over. It's all there.
Oh this is a bit of a spieler too.
The MONOLITH in 2001 is the same ratio as the original 70mm project cinema screen. The original movie had a couple fo minutes at the start of Black.
The Cinema screen was the monolith - Was 2001 was a master work of illumination?
Great post. And yes to all of this.
Funny how the monolith is now the cellphone.
Folks don't forget too, Kubrick was making A.I. at the time he died. So he never got to finish it... yea the one with the Little Boy and his robot Teddy Bear... get it now???
He died, and guess who finished it off?
Spielberg - So he was a great industry director friend of Kubricks, but was Spielberg a kind of handler maybe?
Why did kubrick move to the UK?
A.I. is very Dark but it would have been way darker I think if Kubrick had finished it.
Think about the plot. Men trying to create AI children, oh yea for parents who lose their children? Sure they can have more children right? Procreation.
Who else needs children?
What problem does AI children solve?
Why is there always a Teddy Bear?
I made a post that relates to this here. Search "[HOLLYWOOD]" with brackets. It's about Crispin Glover and directly mentions A.I. in Glover's "essay". Cheers.
I would like to but Tbh the search on this site does not work for me. Anyone know why this might be?
My issue with this analysis is that if the movie was revealing ANYTHING it would have never been made....or released...or streamable and available everywhere.
That's not how these people work. Moloch teaches them to tell everyone what they are doing by hiding in plain sight. That's why their symbolism is everywhere. For a hundred years, no one has done anything about it. Why wouldn't they be overly confident? They were not afraid of us in any way shape or form. At least, not until now. Now, they are afraid.
Well it's not a positive portrayal of them...
Isn't it? At the end of the movie, they win. It demonstrates their power and at the same time allows them to tell any of their real life accusers that they are nuts and just getting their false information from a movie. At the time, we had zero power to stop them. To them, that's a badge of honor.
Maybe you're right. I took it as a warning they were sick and twisted and will destroy your life if you get involved with them...I guess they might like that message if it leads you into being frightened of them.
That's the message in the Shinning right there.
Kubrick the man does not survive but his creative inner child escapes the "hotel California" like deal (to help film the Moon Landing or create and advise the techniques and setups for NASA)
Kubrick took Kings novel and totally inverted it to suit his needs.
King hated the movies. Got it remade for TV. Kubrick had a habit of doing this, in fact Arcthur C Clark and Kubrick co-wrote the novel as the movie was being made. The ending are not the same. You almost think Kubrick picked these projects and re-moulded them to his agenda, which would keep people off the scent, especially those producing/funding it.
There dialogue in the opening scene of the Shinning will blow peoples minds:
Read it here:
https://www.scriptslug.com/assets/uploads/scripts/the-shining-1980.pdf
It's worth watching this scene to see how JACK delivers the final line of the sen in the car as they are diving to the Hotel.
The Shining is a lot of things. A LOT of things. You know this I'm sure, but it's also a study of how Evil reproduces through trauma and sexual abuse. MKULTRA.
Tony the Finger, the boy who lives in the back of Danny's mouth... Well yeah.
Hell now that I'm thinking about it, the fact their name is Torrance could be a way to tie them to Hollywood Pedophilia.
Interesting you focus on Torrence.
Long time ago it was noticed a there was a place name of Torrence, I think ti was in Florida near Cape Canaveral, but I can't find it now. There was definitely a connection on a map.
Maybe someone who knows Florida better can fill us in?
Yes, if you didn't know, they feed off of negative energy. They believe under their "religion" they have to tell us what they are doing and if we don't object then they consider that we have accepted what they do. Even though they "tell" us with their movies which isn't honest about telling us anything, they consider it to informing us.
Even in the release they placed 3D avatars in front of explicit scenes. They are so easy to spot now. A cloaked individuals and naked woman from behind. Dropped in as a composite layer later on and after cutting almost an half hour form the movie.
Is there any edited version?
As another poster pointed out Kubrick made this blind to the studio execs up until the studio screening. They saw it and blew the roof. Supposedly he was outside the screening theatre and smoked a lot of cigarettes seemingly nervous and uncomfortable. A few days later. He was dead. Maybe he was unwell. It's all a bit suspicious.
They were not about to loose money. so they butchered it. Then realised it. Gettin' the last laugh probably in their minds.