366
Comments (58)
sorted by:
37
deleted 37 points ago +37 / -0
13
MAGALogic 13 points ago +13 / -0

Right don't feed the propaganda machine.

2
KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Needed tests to get back to work. Negatives both times.

1
Robert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Needed? Do they also test for HIV and other communicable diseases?

Because this is all illegal as fuck.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, needed. Or I wouldn't be allowed back and lose my job. There are millions like me. They're not requiring a shot at least, for now. Let's see how far that goes.

They were giving out pins to wear proudly for those that got vaxxed, and are considering forcing masks only on those unvaxxed so we shall see what happens.

1
Robert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, my point was it's not "needed" by your company, it's wanted. Because it's literally fucking illegal.

1
What-Me-Worry 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. DO NOT get tested.

Even the Chinese made swabs are suspicious.

1
tracybean76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never been tested... never will!

27
lurkerrr [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

What a brilliant way to hide the fact that the Vaxxed are still getting sick and to be able to blame the unvaccinated for rising case counts/deaths and justify more lockdowns and eventually mandatory vaccinations

3
Gandiva 3 points ago +3 / -0

Precisely!

22
Lonegunman65 22 points ago +22 / -0

Just don’t get tested! I will not get a test even if I have rona symptoms (which in effect are cold/flu symptoms).

26
lurkerrr [S] 26 points ago +26 / -0

I've never been tested, not once, not gonna happen.

1
AngelCole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, just commented yesterday that we never get sick, like in 20 years, and all of a sudden we both have upper respiratory symptoms. Mainly sinus and sore throat. I refuse to call the dr because they'll want us to take a rona test. It seems we came into contact with at the same time or he got it and I got it from him. He's pretty much over it. I still have a little laryngitis and sinus headaches in the morning. We never lost taste and smell so really doubt it's the rona. I've noticed more patients coming in with RSV, enteroviruses, rhinovirus and astrovirus. Was wondering where we picked it up.

12
DrMcCoy 12 points ago +12 / -0

The PCR test run at any cycles is the wrong test to check for Covid.

3
AnonymizeYourSelf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure is.

2
Nomoralcompass89 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can someone give me a quick explanation of what cycles mean in relation to tests. I would google it, but probably will get some propaganda biased answer.

6
6daysandrest 6 points ago +6 / -0

The cycles are the level of refinement of the test. Trouble is at too many cycles the test will give positive results for almost anything. Kari Mullis, inventor of the test and major Fauci critic before COVID, said the PCR test should not be used for diagnosis precisely because too many cycles makes it meaningless.

Mullis died in October 2019.

2
Nomoralcompass89 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for the explanation.

1
Areyoukidding15 1 point ago +1 / -0

PCR is literally used to create copies of genetic material. No matter if you are an animal or a plant, your Genetic material is made up of 4 bases: Adenine, Guanine, Cytosine, and Thymine. They also pair together in only one way. If they don’t they you are being set up for cancer. Adenine ALWAYS pairs with Thymine, Guanine always pairs with Cytosine (A&T together while G&C) together. This tendency is exploited by PCR to be able to back fill any single strand.

This has got to be the dumbest idea on the face of the planet. PCR is literally used for creating material that wasn’t there before. Even in the most controlled environment you can still get stuff in this soup that you don’t want. That’s why you keep the cycles low to keep the noise and unwanted pairs from those contaminants at a minimum. 30+ cycles of exponential growth each cycle? Are you kidding me? This whole thing has been shenanigans from the start.

1
Lonegunman65 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cycles are copies of the particular strand of nucleus acid you are testing. It’s an exponential tests so 1 cycle makes 2 copies of the nucleic acid, 2 cycles makes 4 copies, 3 cycles makes 8 copies, 4 cycles makes 16 copies, etc. At 35 - 40 cycles, you are literally making billions of copies of nucleic acid and you are bound to pick up just about anything including fragments of nucleic acid which will give you a false positive. That’s why Kery Mullis (inventor of the PCR Test) stated it should never be used as a clinical diagnostic tool. Interestingly, he just happened to die in 2019 right before the rona hit the market!

8
Csmall 8 points ago +8 / -0

Refuse to be tested, and refuse the shot.

8
2
racial_maddow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Operation BtJ still in full swing, eh?

0
ThePopcornTape 0 points ago +2 / -2

Good fucking God, you're persistent. This is account number...five, at least?

0
ClassicAbner 0 points ago +3 / -3

No. I'm new here and I'm interested in discussing and sharing Q based research, not entertaining your personal attacks.

1
ThePopcornTape 1 point ago +2 / -1

Guinness_Pepe, you talk exactly like him. Pattern recognition, handshake.

1
ClassicAbner 1 point ago +3 / -2

I don't know who that is, but YOU are down-voting legitimate research and attacking new members of this community.

You have been blocked.

1
ThePopcornTape 1 point ago +2 / -1

See you next account!

0
NanoKhuma 0 points ago +3 / -3

Wonder why all the Jew-faggers have been coming out in droves the last few weeks. Smells like poisoning the proverbial well to me.

4
Graceunderfire 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seeing you all jump on the guy like attack dogs makes me think you're programmed against the info hes spreading.

In which case you must ask yourself why you are programmed this way, and if there is any kernel of truth in the offending information?

7
anotherdream 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why the fuck would they even publish this? - What's their angle? - We already know the PCR test cycles were jacked up to inflate COVID numbers. So now, they're basically holding the sheeps' leashes. Effectively saying "Okay, you'll now have to get tested. It'll be mandatory. If you're not vaccinated, we'll run the test at the original bullshit cycle count; this will make you more likely to be considered infected. If you submit and take the jab, we'll drop the count to 26 cycles. Making it less likely for you to be considered infected. - This won't mean shit though, because you'll probably still be able to contract COVID even if you are vaccinated." -

This is all about submission and compliance. It has nothing to do with public health.

6
DoMagnum 6 points ago +6 / -0

Satanist code of conduct. They have to disclose. Anyone that still lets them get away with their shit is giving their consent. As implausible as it sounds, the planet is full of countless willing victims.

4
Sunnywindows 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most of us in vaxxed will not be getting tests anyway. I do not trust those nasty swabs.

4
BeerMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sauce?

0
Gandiva 0 points ago +2 / -2

Here's the sauce, friend:

off-guardian.org/2021/05/18/how-the-cdc-is-manipulating-data-to-prop-up-vaccine-effectiveness

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html

1
Choo-choo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The source of the OP, not something similar. Source means source

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcY4nkT2/x/c/4JBvq3o9GSn

3
TheSparrow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Source please?

1
Gandiva 1 point ago +2 / -1

Here you are:

off-guardian.org/2021/05/18/how-the-cdc-is-manipulating-data-to-prop-up-vaccine-effectiveness

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html

1
OhhFuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks!

1
Choo-choo 1 point ago +1 / -0

These links are not the source of the information in the OP

For instance, do a Ctrl+F for 'xiamen' on those pages or any of the linked PDF's. No results

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcY4nkT2/x/c/4JBvq3o9GSn

1
TheSparrow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you.

2
thegoldenchild 2 points ago +2 / -0

SOURCE, SOURCE, SOURCE! ...please.

2
Choo-choo 2 points ago +2 / -0

This! Screenshots by themselves are useless. Q would always point to source docs. I wish more posters would be more like Q in this regard

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcY4nkT2/x/c/4JBvq3o9GSn

2
DoMagnum 2 points ago +2 / -0

They want Neg result for Vaxxed to support narrative, Vaxx is safe and effective.

Want case count (false positive) among non-vaxxed to support narrative that you need Vaxx.

Pretty clear and not too difficult to see.

2
LoobintheToobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup

May 21 2021: “Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'd” https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/caught-red-handed-cdc-changes-test-thresholds-virtually-eliminate-new-covid-cases-among “But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.”

As of May 7 2021: Cdc stops reporting Breakthrough cases unless they cause hospitalization or death: https://archive.ph/Wz2hu

Oh as of May 1st now? https://archive.ph/oHhmb

May 2 2021: https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/12iNUs1lju/watch-for-the-term-breakthrough-/

1
Graceunderfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember them talking about this on Darkhorse podcast, 2 evolutionary biologists, dumbfounded at the pure corruption inherent in such a thing.

This not only skews data the wrong way, it COMPLETELY runs the data gathered so we can make zero useful decisions based off of it

It is criminal, period.

1
AnonymizeYourSelf 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is all so openly, so transparently fraudulent.

-1
Gandiva -1 points ago +1 / -2

He he, wait until you make the same realization about the entire theory of viruses.

Read the book Virus Mania (3rd edition). The most important book in the world right now.

1
OhhFuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you provide a link to the original source please?

1
Gandiva 1 point ago +1 / -0

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html

1
p8riot 1 point ago +2 / -1

This could backfire since vax deaths will be less likely attributed to covid.

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

But that's what they want! If people who got the shot, but don't test positive for covid, even if they are re-infected, and then die, they won't blame the death on covid, because that would destroy the "covid shots protect you from dying from covid" lie. (of course, they used to say, "covid shots protect you from covid"; they now have to say they protect from dying :) )

1
polish_snausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

The next step is to change the from "Delta variant" to a entirely 'new' disease... enter Monkey-pox stage left

1
Choo-choo 1 point ago +1 / -0

ACTUAL SOURCE: https://www.scribd.com/document/509292976/AFLD-Motion

Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 1 Filed 05/19/21 Page 1 of 80 FILED
2021 May-20 AM 11:34 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Page 40

1
AussieSpectator 1 point ago +1 / -0

sauce me up bruv...

-1
Gandiva -1 points ago +1 / -2

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html

1
Bedminster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Refuse the test! Realize if you go to the ER and are going to be admitted even for completely non covid related reason say ortho you're going to be tested!! Asymptomatic people are being subjected to a test YOU CAN REFUSE! They can't do anything about it. They will just assign you to a private room.